Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mineral resources depletion, dissipation and accessibility in LCA: a critical analysis

  • LCI METHODOLOGY AND DATABASES
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The depletion-based ADP method has been extensively used for more than 20 years in LCA. A discussion on the core concepts and assumptions it is grounded on is however still needed. Several methods were recently developed to address reduction of resources accessibility and dissipation in LCA; namely, EDP, ADR/LPST, ARP, and JRC-LCI, complemented by price-based JRC to capture value loss. This article aims at critically analyzing these methods.

Methods

It first describes the methods, in terms of concept, target, resource flows in scope, midpoint and/or endpoint impact mechanism, and temporal scope. It then performs an in-depth analysis of these methods, in order (i) to discuss assumptions and modelling choices from a user perspective (LCA practitioners and decision-makers) and (ii) to highlight and discuss the scientific-evidence and scenarios on which they build.

Results and discussion

This article gives an overview of the methods’ relevance to the safeguard subject, model robustness, data quality and completeness, and operability. The ADPUltimate Reserves, EDP, and ARP methods rely on several assumptions, at the same time core in the modelling and scientifically questionable for some aspects. ADPUltimate Reserves and EDP methods both do not address the loss of value of mineral resources, while the JRC-LCI (and potentially ARP) methods combined with JRC price-based, and the ADR/LPST endpoint, do (considering economic value). Overall two schools of thought are identified, regarding recent methods that strive addressing mineral resources use in LCA: a first one building on currently available LCI databases, implementing assumptions and proxies (ADR/LPST, EDP, ARP), and a second one pledging for new LCIs to be developed (JRC-LCI method).

Conclusions

This article highlights and challenges some of the key underlying choices and assumptions on which the reviewed methods are based. Intentionally, it does not provide any recommendation on which methods shall be implemented. Yet we encourage authoritative initiatives in the LCA domain (e.g., UNEP GLAM or PEF) and LCA practitioners to cautiously and critically select LCIA methods. We moreover highlight that the approach undertaken by the “first school” is certainly easier to operationalize in the short-term, though it necessarily requires proxies to overcome unfit-for-purposes existing LCI datasets. On the contrary, the effort initiated by the “second school” calls for a deep change of paradigm on modelling mineral resources in LCIs, which certainly requires a longer timeframe for implementation. The latter however looks very promising for LCAs to be truly supportive of more resource-efficient products and systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed in this study.

References

  • Ardente F, Beylot A, Zampori L (2023) A price-based life cycle impact assessment method to quantify the reduced accessibility to mineral resources value. Int J Life Cycle Assess 28:95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02102-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger M, Sonderegger T, Alvarenga R, Bach V, Cimprich A, Dewulf J, Frischknecht R, Guinée J, Helbig C, Huppertz T, Jolliet O, Motoshita M, Northey S, Peña CA, Rugani B, Sahnoune A, Schrijvers D, Schulze R, Sonnemann G, Valero A, Weidema BP, Young SB (2020) Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment: part II– recommendations on application-dependent use of existing methods and on future method development needs. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:798–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01737-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beylot A, Ardente F, De Sousa P, Marques A, Mathieux F, Pant R, Sala S, Zampori L (2020a) Abiotic and biotic resources impact categories in LCA: development of new approaches, EUR 30126 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2020, ISBN 978-92-76-17227-7. https://doi.org/10.2760/232839, JRC120170. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC120170

  • Beylot A, Ardente F, Sala S, Zampori L (2020b) Accounting for the dissipation of abiotic resources in LCA: status, key challenges and potential way forward. Resour Conserv Recycl 157:104748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beylot A, Ardente F, Sala S, Zampori L (2021) Mineral resource dissipation in life cycle inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26:497–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01875-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beylot A, Bodénan F, Guezennec A-G, Muller S (2022) LCA as a support to more sustainable tailings management: critical review, lessons learnt and potential way forward. Resour Conserv Recycl 183:106347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blengini GA, Mathieux F, Mancini L, Nyberg M, Viegas HM (Editors); Salminen J, Garbarino E, Orveillon G, Saveyn H, Mateos Aquilino V, Llorens González T, García Polonio F, Horckmans L, D’Hugues P, Balomenos E, Dino G, de la Feld M, Mádai F, Földessy J, Mucsi G, Gombkötő I, Calleja I (2019) Recovery of critical and other raw materials from mining waste and landfills: State of play on existing practices, EUR 29744 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, ISBN 978–92–76–08568–3

  • Charpentier-Poncelet A, Helbig C, Loubet P, Beylot A, Muller S, Villeneuve J, Laratte B, Thorenz A, Tuma A, Sonnemann G (2021) Life cycle impact assessment methods for estimating the impacts of dissipative flows of metals. J Ind Ecol 25:1177–1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13136

  • Charpentier-Poncelet A, Beylot A, Loubet P, Laratte B, Muller S, Villeneuve J, Sonnemann G (2022a) Linkage of impact pathways to cultural perspectives to account for multiple aspects of mineral resource use in life cycle assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 176:105912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105912

  • Charpentier-Poncelet A, Helbig C, Loubet P, Beylot A, Muller S, Villeneuve J, Laratte B, Thorenz A, Tuma A, Sonnemann G (2022b) Losses and lifetimes of metals in the economy. Nat Sustain 5:717–726. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00895-8

  • Charpentier-Poncelet A, Loubet P, Helbig C, Beylot A, Muller S, Villeneuve J, Laratte B, Thorenz A, Tuma A, Sonnemann G (2022c) Midpoint and endpoint characterization factors for mineral resource dissipation: methods and application to 6000 data sets. Int J Life Cycle Assess 27:1180–1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02093-2

  • CSIRO (2018) Space: A Roadmap for unlocking future growth opportunities for Australia. 2018. Available at: https://www.csiro.au/-/media/Do-Business/Files/Futures/18-00349_SER-FUT_SpaceRoadmap_WEB_180904.pdf

  • Dewulf J, Hellweg S, Pfister S, León MFG, Sonderegger T, de Matos CT, Blengini GA, Mathieux F (2021) Towards sustainable resource management: identification and quantification of human actions that compromise the accessibility of metal resources. Resour Conserv Recycl 167:105403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drielsma JA, Russell-Vaccari AJ, Drnek T et al (2016) Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment—defining the path forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:85–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0991-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2021) Commission recommendation of 16.12.2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations. Brussels 16.12.2021 C(2021) 9332 final

  • Graedel TE, Miatto A (2022) Alloy profusion, spice metals, and resource loss by design. Sustainability 2022(14):7535. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greffe T, Margni M, Bulle C (2023) An instrumental value-based framework for assessing the damages of abiotic resources use in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 28:53–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02107-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB, Gorée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA et al (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p p2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein JR, Mizell K, Koschinsky A, Conrad TA (2013) Deep-ocean mineral deposits as a source of critical metals for high- and green-technology applications: comparison with land-based resources. Ore Geol Rev 51:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2012.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai F, Beylot A (2023) Loss of mineral resource value in LCA: application of the JRC-LCI method to multiple case studies combined with inaccessibility and value-based impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 28:38–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02110-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Licht C, Peiró LT, Villalba G (2015) Global substance flow analysis of gallium, germanium, and indium: quantification of extraction, uses, and dissipative losses within their anthropogenic cycles. J Ind Ecol 19:890–903. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore KR, Segura-Salazar J, Bridges L, Diallo P, Doyle K, Johnson C, Foster P, Pollard N, Whyte N, Wright O (2022) The out-of-this-world hype cycle: Progression towards sustainable terrestrial resource production. Resour Conserv Recycl 186:106519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassar NT, Lederer GW, Brainard JL, Padilla AJ, Lessard JD (2022) Rock-to-metal ratio: a foundational metric for understanding mine wastes. Environ Sci Technol 56:6710–6721. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c07875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owsianiak M, van Oers L, Drielsma J, Laurent A, Hauschild MZ (2022) Identification of dissipative emissions for improved assessment of metal resources in life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 26:406–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Popp J, Oláh J, Farkas Fekete M, Lakner Z, Máté D (2018) The relationship between prices of various metals, oil and scarcity. Energies 2018(11):2392. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch JN, Pacyna JM (2009) Earth’s global Ag, Al, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, and Zn cycles. Global Biogeochem Cycles 23:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudnick R, Gao S (2014) Composition of the continental crust. In: Holland H, Turekian K (eds) Treatise on geochemistry, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker SK, Haque N, Bhuiyan M et al (2022) Recovery of strategically important critical minerals from mine tailings. J Environ Chem Eng 10:107622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider L, Berger M, Finkbeiner M (2015) Abiotic resource depletion in LCA—background and update of the anthropogenic stock extended abiotic depletion potential (AADP) model. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:709–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0864-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Wellmer FW (2021) Endangering the integrity of science by misusing unvalidated models and untested assumptions as facts: General considerations and the mineral and phosphorus scarcity fallacy. Sustain Sci 16:2069–2086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01006-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze R, Guinée J, van Oers L, Alvarenga R, Dewulf J, Drielsma J (2020a) Abiotic resource use in life cycle impact assessment—Part I- towards a common perspective. Resour Conserv Recycl 154:104596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze R, Guinée J, van Oers L, Alvarenga R, Dewulf J, Drielsma J (2020b) Abiotic resource use in life cycle impact assessment—Part II – Linking perspectives and modelling concepts. Resour Conserv Recycl 155:104595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonderegger T, Berger M, Alvarenga R, Bach V, Cimprich A, Dewulf J, Frischknecht R, Guinée J, Helbig C, Huppertz T, Jolliet O, Motoshita M, Northey S, Rugani B, Schrijvers D, Schulze R, Sonnemann G, Valero A, Weidema BP, Young SB (2020) Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment—part I: a critical review of existing methods. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:784–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01736-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart M, Weidema B (2005) A consistent framework for assessing the impacts from resource use. A focus on resource functionality. Int J Life Cycle Ass 10(4):240–247. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.10.184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilton JE, Crowson PCF, DeYoung JH, Eggert RG, Ericsson M, Guzmán JI, Humphreys D, Lagos G, Maxwell P, Radetzki M, Singer DA, Wellmer F-W (2018) Public policy and future mineral supplies. Resources Policy 57, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.01.006

  • UNEP (2011) Recycling rates of metals – a status report. A report of the working group on the global metal flows to the international resource panel. Graedel, T.E.; Allwood, J.; Birat, J.-P.; Reck, B.K.; Sibley, S.F.; Sonnemann, G.; Buchert, M.; Hagelücken, C.

  • UNFC (2019) The United Nations Framework Classification for Resources. Update 2019. UNECE. Geneva. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/energy/se/pdfs/UNFC/publ/UNFC_ES61_Update_2019.pdf

  • USGS (2014) Mineral Commodity Summary 2014. US Geol Surv

  • van Oers L, Guinée JB, Heijungs R (2020a) Abiotic resource depletion potentials (ADPs) for elements revisited—updating ultimate reserve estimates and introducing time series for production data. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:294–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01683-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers L, de Koning A, Guinée JB, Huppes G (2002) Abiotic resource depletion in LCA. Road and Hydraulic Engineering Institute, Ministry of Transport and Water, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oers L, Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Schulze R, Alvarenga RAF, Dewulf J, Drielsma J, Sanjuan-Delmás D, Kampmann TC, Bark G, Uriarte AG, Menger P, Lindblom M, Alcon L, Ramos MS, Torres JME (2020b) Top-down characterization of resource use in LCA: from problem definition of resource use to operational characterization factors for dissipation of elements to the environment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:2255–2273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01819-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson BJ, Eggert RG (2021) Understanding relative metal prices and availability: Combining physical and economic perspectives. J Ind Ecol 2021(25):890–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West J (2020) Extractable global resources and the future availability of metal stocks: “Known Unknowns” for the foreseeable future. Resour Policy 65:101574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampori L, Pant R (2019) Suggestions for updating the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method, EUR 29682 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/424613

  • Zampori L, Sala S (2017) Feasibility study to implement resource dissipation in LCA, EUR 28994 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/869503

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A. Beylot and S. Muller acknowledge the financial support of ADEME in the context of the ERAMIN 2020 project PROPER (Contract n°2002C0079), and of SCORE LCA in the context of the study « Méthodes innovantes de comptabilisation des ressources en ACV » (Contract n°2020-05). J. Dewulf acknowledges support of FWO (FWO.SAB.2023.0003.01). T. Greffe acknowledges the financial support of the industrial partners of the Consortium on Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Transition (a research unit of the CIRAIG): Arcelor-Mittal, Hydro-Québec, L’ORÉAL, LVMH, Ministère de l'Économie, de l'Innovation et de l'Énergie du Québec, Michelin, OCP, Optel, Richemont, Syensqo, TotalEnergies. The authors remain solely responsible for the content of this study. G.A. Blengini acknowledges support of Horizon Europe projects METALLICO (GA 101091682) and mine.io (GA 101091885).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. BRGM, F-45060, Orléans, France

    Antoine Beylot, Jo Dewulf & Stéphanie Muller

  2. Research Group Sustainable Systems Engineering (STEN), Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Jo Dewulf

  3. CIRAIG, Institute of Environmental Sciences , UQAM, Montreal, QC, H2X 3Y7, Canada

    Titouan Greffe

  4. Politecnico Di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10125, Torino, Italy

    Gian-Andrea Blengini

Authors
  1. Antoine Beylot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jo Dewulf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Titouan Greffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stéphanie Muller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gian-Andrea Blengini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine Beylot.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Vanessa Bach

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supporting information document

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 34 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beylot, A., Dewulf, J., Greffe, T. et al. Mineral resources depletion, dissipation and accessibility in LCA: a critical analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 29, 890–908 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02278-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02278-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation