Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysing industrial symbiosis implementation in European cement industry: an applied life cycle assessment perspective

  • LCA FOR MANUFACTURING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In the last 20 years, the implementation of industrial symbiosis (IS) has gained notoriety in the international context since it can create positive environmental, economic and social impacts. The literature suggests that the primary, extraction and conversion sectors are those with the highest potential for IS implementation. Among them, the cement industry has been recognized as an important sector due to its high potential to incorporate alternative resources in its production process. Nevertheless, this industrial sector is also characterised by its significant environmental impact; for this reason, it is necessary to evaluate the influence that circular business models, such as IS, can bring to this sector.

Method

This study defined a set of scenarios for the implementation of IS in European industry based on literature review and expert consultation. A life cycle assessment–based analytical framework is developed to evaluate the impact of those measures in this sector. Lastly, a viability study dedicated to these scenarios was performed.

Results

Results showed that IS implementation managed to produce a net positive impact, with a 6 to 12% GHG emission reduction being observed. Depending on the approach to biogenic carbon, industrial targets for 2030 can produce a reduction of either 80 kg or 39 kg of CO2 per tonne of cement.

Conclusion

IS implementation effectively reduces GHG emissions, albeit at a relatively smaller scale when compared with the overall emissions from cement manufacturing. The approach to biogenic carbon emissions poses a challenge, as the use (or omission) of these emissions affect the results substantially. Depending on the approach to biogenic carbon, 2030 objectives are either overachieved or underachieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All the data used was obtained from publicly available datasets.

References

  • 3drivers - Engenharia Inovação e Ambiente; AVE - Gestão Ambiental e Valorização Energética SA (2018) 13 Anos De Coprocessamento Em Portugal

  • Aalborg Portland (2015) Annual Environmental Report 2015. Environment and Health & Safety

  • Adamides ED, Mouzakitis Y (2009) Industrial ecosystems as technological niches. J Clean Prod 17:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.003

  • Albino V, Fraccascia L (2015) The industrial symbiosis approach: a classification of business models. Procedia Environ Sci Eng Manag

  • Ali AAMM, Negm AM, Bady MF et al (2016) Environmental impact assessment of the Egyptian cement industry based on a life-cycle assessment approach: a comparative study between Egyptian and Swiss plants. Clean Technol Environ Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1096-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammenberg J, Baas L, Eklund M et al (2015) Improving the CO2 performance of cement, part III: the relevance of industrial symbiosis and how to measure its impact. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew RM (2018) Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth Syst Sci Data. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-195-2018

  • ATIC - Associação Técnica da Indústria do Cimento (2021) Roteiro para a Neutralidade Carbónica 2050

  • ATIC - Associação Técnica da Indústria do Cimento (2019) Sobre ATIC - Associação Cimento

  • Baas L, Boons F (2007) The introduction and dissemination of the industrial symbiosis projects in the Rotterdam Harbour and Industry Complex. Int J Environ Technol Manag

  • Baldassarre B, Schepers M, Bocken N et al (2019) Industrial symbiosis: towards a design process for eco-industrial clusters by integrating circular economy and industrial ecology perspectives. J Clean Prod 216:446–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blengini GA (2006) Life cycle assessment tools for sustainable development: case studies for the mining and construction industries in Italy and Portugal. Instituto Superior Técnico

  • Boix M, Montastruc L, Ramos M et al (2017) Benefits analysis of optimal design of eco-industrial parks through life cycle indicators. Comput Aided Chem Eng 40:1951–1956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantini A, Leoni L, De Carlo F et al (2021) Technological energy efficiency improvements in cement industries. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEMBUREAU (2013) The role of cement in the 2050 low carbon economy

  • CEMBUREAU (2020) Cementing the European Green Deal, reaching climate neutrality along the cement and concrete value chain by 2050. Eur Cem Assoc Brussels 1–38

  • Climate Technology Center Network (CTCN) (2011) Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI). CO2 and energy accounting and reporting standard for the cement industry. May 2011. In: The cement CO2 and energy protocol

  • WBCSD Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI) (2014) List of constants and default CO2 emission factors. In: Cement CO2 and energy protocol

  • Chertow MR (2000) Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:313–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chertow MR (2007) “Uncovering” industrial symbiosis. J Ind Ecol 11:11–30. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2007.1110

  • CIMPOR (2018) Declaração Ambiental 2018 - Alhandra

  • Cruz Juarez RI, Finnegan S (2021) The environmental impact of cement production in Europe: a holistic review of existing EPDs. Clean Environ Syst 3:100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100053

  • Daddi T, Nucci B, Iraldo F (2017) Using life cycle assessment (LCA) to measure the environmental benefits of industrial symbiosis in an industrial cluster of SMEs. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande S (2015) Development patterns and factors influencing the growth of industrial symbiosis

  • Deutz P, Lyons DI (2008) Editorial: Industrial symbiosis - an environmental perspective on regional development. Reg Stud

  • ecoinvent (2020) Ecoinvent database v3

  • European Commission (2019) The European Green Deal. Eur Comm. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Comission (2021) Environmental Footprint v3

  • European Commission (2013) Best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the production of cement, lime and magnesium oxide

  • European Environment Agency (2021) Greenhouse gas emission intensity of electricity generation in Europe

  • Feiz R, Ammenberg J, Baas L et al (2015) Improving the CO2 performance of cement, part I: utilizing life-cycle assessment and key performance indicators to assess development within the cement industry. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Gusano D, Herrera I, Garraín D et al (2015) Life cycle assessment of the Spanish cement industry: implementation of environmental-friendly solutions. Clean Technol Environ Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0757-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geocycle (2018) The geocycle circular economy approach. https://www.geocycle.com/poland?address=Poland. Accessed 6 May 2020

  • Gesch MS (2015) Einsatz alternativer Rohstoffe im Zementherstellungsprozess - Hinter-grundwissen, technische Möglichkeiten und Handlungsempfehlungen

  • Gibbs D (2008) Industrial symbiosis and eco-industrial development: an introduction. Geogr Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00123.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Sprinz D, Bonazountas M et al (2012) Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Energy Policy 45:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haq H, Välisuo P, Niemi S (2021) Modelling sustainable industrial symbiosis. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14041172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris S (2004) Drivers and barriers to industrial ecology in the UK

  • Hashimoto S, Fujita T, Geng Y, Nagasawa E (2010) Realizing CO2 emission reduction through industrial symbiosis: a cement production case study for Kawasaki. Resour Conserv Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques J, Ferrão P, Castro R, Azevedo J (2021) Industrial symbiosis: a sectoral analysis on enablers and barriers. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institut Cerdà (2017) Reciclado y valorización de residuos en la industria cementera en España

  • Ismail Y (2020) Potential benefit of industrial symbiosis using life cycle assessment. J Phys Conf Ser

  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2004) Environmental management — life cycle assessment — principles and framework (ISO 14040:2006). Environ Manag Syst Requir 44

  • Jacobsen NB (2006) Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: a quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. J Ind Ecol 10:239–255. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafarge Holcim Austria (2015) LafargeHolcim Austria: thinking circular about construction and demolition waste. https://www.lafargeholcim.com/austria-construction-waste-recycling. Accessed 6 May 2020

  • Liu Q, Jiang P, Zhao J et al (2011) Life cycle assessment of an industrial symbiosis based on energy recovery from dried sludge and used oil. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi DR, Laybourn P (2012) Redefining industrial symbiosis. J Ind Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00444.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin M, Harris S (2018) Prospecting the sustainability implications of an emerging industrial symbiosis network. Resour Conserv Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales ME, Diemer A (2019) Industrial symbiosis dynamics, a strategy to accomplish complex analysis: the Dunkirk case study. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti L, Caro S (2017) Critical analysis of the life cycle assessment of the Italian cement industry. J Clean Prod 152:198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notarnicola B, Tassielli G, Renzulli PA (2016) Industrial symbiosis in the Taranto industrial district: current level, constraints and potential new synergies. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRMCA (2008) Concrete CO2 fact sheet. National Ready Mixed Concrete Association

  • O.C.O Technology (2010) M-LS by O.C.O Technology: a carbon-negative limestone aggregate created with residues from waste to energy residue

  • Patrício J, Costa I, Niza S (2015) Urban material cycle closing - assessment of industrial waste management in Lisbon region. J Clean Prod

  • Quintana J (2019) Scaler Deliverable 3.4: synergies socio-economic impact assessment

  • Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R et al (2004) Life cycle assessment. Part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 30:701–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • REN (2019) Diagrama de Carga 2018

  • SECIL (2018) Declaração Ambiental 2018. SECIL-OUTÃO 2018

  • Short SW, Bocken NMP, Barlow CY, Chertow MR (2014a) From refining sugar to growing tomatoes: industrial ecology and business model evolution. J Ind Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short SW, Bocken NMP, Barlow CY, Chertow MR (2014b) From refining sugar to growing tomatoes. J Ind Ecol 18:603–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soyez K, Graßl H (2008) Climate change and technological options: basic facts, evaluation and practical solutions

  • Stéphane O, Jean-Baptiste Q, Charles-Xavier S et al (2019) A cross-sectorial synergies identification methodology for industrial symbiosis. In: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Springer Singapore, pp 229–240

  • Technical Committee CEN/TC 350 (2013) EN 15804:2012+A2 - sustainability of construction works - environmental product declarations - core rules for the product category of construction products

  • Valderrama C, Granados R, Cortina JL et al (2012) Implementation of best available techniques in cement manufacturing: a life-cycle assessment study. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vladimirova D, Miller K, Evans S (2018) Scaler Deliverable 2.1: lessons learn and best practices for enhancing industrial symbiosis in the process industry

  • Wiloso EI, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Fang K (2016) Effect of biogenic carbon inventory on the life cycle assessment of bioenergy: challenges to the neutrality assumption J. Clean Prod 125:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.096

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu F, Han F, Cui Z (2015) Assessment of life cycle environmental benefits of an industrial symbiosis cluster in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3712-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zheng H, Chen B, Yang N (2013) Social network analysis and network connectedness analysis for industrial symbiotic systems: model development and case study. Front Earth Sci 7:169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-012-0349-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was partially funded by the c5Lab, Sustainable Construction Materials Association, through the POR Centro and POR Lisboa (CENTRO-04–3559-FSE-000096 and LISBOA-05-3559-FSE-000008, respectively).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Capucha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Yi Yang.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 241 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capucha, F., Henriques, J., Ferrão, P. et al. Analysing industrial symbiosis implementation in European cement industry: an applied life cycle assessment perspective. Int J Life Cycle Assess 28, 516–535 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02159-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02159-9

Keywords

Navigation