Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

At the intersection of life cycle assessment and indirect greenhouse gas emissions accounting

  • CARBON FOOTPRINTING
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to review the current landscape of the link between life cycle assessment and greenhouse gas accounting. This paper summarizes this link and the findings of a data source review conducted by an American Center for Life Cycle Assessment-Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry working group.

Methods

In this paper, we review the working group’s current research on the use of LCA for indirect emissions reporting, including a literature review covering guidelines and standards, datasets, and databases applicable for North American GHG accounting using life cycle approaches. We document key attributes of each reviewed source. We also developed surveys for ACLCA-SETAC members to provide information on how each uses LCA-based techniques for GHG accounting.

Results

We summarize our findings including recommendations for using LCA data for indirect GHG emissions accounting, discussion of current data gaps and next steps to support streamlined and consistent reporting. We also provide an analysis of how LCA resources are used in different climate-based programs such as science-based targets. Lastly, we summarize the findings of survey results, such as the most common type of LCA data source used for GHG accounting and the GHG accounting categories where LCA is most applicable.

Conclusions

The study demonstrates the importance of using LCA for GHG accounting. The paper summarizes the outcomes of each objective identified by the working group and identifies the remaining data gaps and challenges when linking LCA and GHG accounting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed a rule that would require all publicly traded US companies to tell investors about their greenhouse gas emissions and how they manage risks related to climate change and future climate regulations.

  2. Emission factors are results that are already characterized by global warming potential (e.g., kg CO2 eq. per kg material). Global warming potential is defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) according to different time horizons.

  3. Survey form available to view at: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScHiNw_FBQB5t1OdGwLQSNyoMDc29kVRirdrY13WuZC8-jiEw/viewform.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Cashman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no known conflicts of interest. The work was part of a collaborative ACLCA-SETAC WG, and no funding was received to complete the work.

Additional information

Communicated by Enrico Benetto.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 89.8 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 111 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agyei Boakye, A.A., Boguski, T., Cashman, S. et al. At the intersection of life cycle assessment and indirect greenhouse gas emissions accounting. Int J Life Cycle Assess 28, 321–335 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02137-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02137-1

Keywords

Navigation