Abstract
Purpose
The electricity and heat sectors are reported to contribute approximately 40% of total CO2 emissions from the energy sector in Indonesia. Nonetheless, Indonesia is composed of several interconnected electricity-grid networks with different characteristics. This study was conducted to identify the life cycle inventories (LCIs) and perform a life cycle assessment (LCA) to determine the potential environmental impacts of electricity distributed in the Jamali grid network, contributing to 72% of the total electricity produced in Indonesia.
Methods
An LCA was conducted with a functional unit of 1 kWh of electricity generated and transmitted in the distribution line in the Jamali grid network in 2018. The system boundary used in this study was cradle-to-gate, covering fuel production and transportation, electricity generation, and electricity distribution. The LCIs were gathered for each power plant’s technology connected to the grid, which includes fuel consumption, fuel-related wastes, infrastructure, land use, water use, and air emissions. The following impact categories were assessed: global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), photochemical oxidation potential (POX), abiotic depletion potential (ADP), abiotic depletion potential–fossil fuels (ADF), and water scarcity footprint (WSF). Methods used to calculate those categories include IPCC GWP 100a, CML-IA (Baseline and Non-baseline), ReCiPe, and AWARE.
Results and discussion
LCI analysis showed that the subcritical coal-fired power plants contributed to the highest electricity generation (58.80%), energy consumption (89.39%), and CO2 production (70.52%) among other technologies connected to the grid. Subsequently, for every 1 kWh of electricity distributed in the grid, the power plants’ operation produced the largest GWP, AP, and POX. Each category produced a total of 1.06 kg CO2 eq., 5.89 × 10−03 kg SO2 eq, and 4.08 × 10−03 kg NMVOC, respectively. The EP and ADF produced were 2.62 × 10−03 kg PO4 eq. and 1.58 × 101 MJ, respectively, mainly resulting from coal mining. ADP produced was 2.30 × 10−05 kg Sb eq. and WSF produced was 3.8 × 10−02 m3, both majorly contributed by the production of transmission and distribution grid materials.
Conclusions
LCA performed to determine the potential environmental impacts from the electricity distributed in the Jamali grid showed that the electricity produced from subcritical coal-fired power plants dominated the electricity mix in 2018. Subsequently, it contributed significantly to multiple impact categories, namely GWP, AP, and POX. Reducing the use of subcritical coal-fired power plants is thus essential to reduce the environmental impacts, which is aligned with the Indonesian government’s plan to reach net-zero emissions by 2060.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors declare that some data supporting the findings of this study are available as stated within this published article (and its Supplementary information file). Complete datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Asian Development Bank (2016) Indonesia country water assessment. In Country Sector and Thematic Assessments: Asian Development Bank.
Barros MV, Piekarski CM, De Francisco AC (2018) Carbon footprint of electricity generation in Brazil: an analysis of the 2016–2026 Period. Energies, 11(6), 1412. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1412
Burchart-Korol D, Pustejovska P, Blaut A, Jursova S, Korol J (2018) Comparative life cycle assessment of current and future electricity generation systems in the Czech Republic and Poland. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(11):2165–2177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1450-z
Directorate General of Electricity (2018a) Pedoman Penghitungan dan Pelaporan Inventarisasi Gas Rumah Kaca. Available online at https://www.gatrik.esdm.go.id/assets/uploads/download_index/files/56959-buku-pedoman-igrk-pembangkit-2018.pdf (in Indonesian)
Directorate General of Electricity (2018b) Statistik Ketenagalistrikan Tahun 2018. Available online at https://gatrik.esdm.go.id/assets/uploads/download_index/files/92999-statistik-2018.pdf (in Indonesian)
Directorate General of Mineral and Coal (2018) Laporan Kinerja Tahun 2018. Available online at https://www.minerba.esdm.go.id/pdf/95-Lakin%202018 (in Indonesian)
Environdec (2021) Environmental performance indicators: impact indicators. Retrieved from https://www.environdec.com/resources/indicators
EPD International AB (2020) Electricity, steam, and hot water generation and distribution. In Product Category Classification: UN CPC 171, 173. Sweden: EPD International AB
European Commission (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance. First edition March 2010. EUR 24708 EN. Luxembourg. Publications Office of the European Union
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Rebitzer G (2005) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework (7 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(1):3–9
Gaete-Morales C, Gallego-Schmid A, Stamford L, Azapagic A (2018) Assessing the environmental sustainability of electricity generation in Chile. Sci Total Environ 636:1155–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.346
Garcia R, Marques P, Freire F (2014) Life-cycle assessment of electricity in Portugal. Appl Energy 134:563–572
Hondo H (2005) Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case. Energy 30(11):2042–2056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.07.020
IEA (2018) World Energy Balance 2018. Available online at https://www.iea.org/countries/indonesia
Indonesian Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (2012) Rencana Induk Jaringan Transmisi dan Distribusi Gas Bumi Nasional Tahun 2012–2025. (2700/K/11/MEM/2012). Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (in Indonesian)
Indonesian Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (2018) Penetapan dan Pemanfaatan Gas Bumi untuk Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik oleh PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (Persero). (1790 K/20/MEM/2018). Jakarta: Indonesian Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (in Indonesian)
Indonesian Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (2021) ESDM One Map: Ketenagalistrikan. Retrieved from https://geoportal.esdm.go.id/ketenagalistrikan/
IRU (2021) Strengthening the Policy Synergy to Promote Recovery and Maintaining Macroeconomic Stability. Jakarta
ISO (2006) ISO 14044: Environmental management - life cycle assessment - requirements and guidelines. In: International Standard Organization
ISO (2009) ISO 14025: Environmental labels and declarations–type III environmental declarations–principles and procedures. Standard. In: International Standard Organisation Geneva
Kabayo J, Marques P, Garcia R, Freire F (2019) Life-cycle sustainability assessment of key electricity generation systems in Portugal. Energy 176:131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.166
Kadiyala A, Kommalapati R, Huque Z (2016) Evaluation of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from hydroelectricity generation systems. Sustainability 8(6):539. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/6/539
Lee JS, Lee MH, Chun Y-Y, Lee KM (2018) Uncertainty analysis of the water scarcity footprint based on the AWARE model considering temporal variations. Water 10(3):341
Lelek L, Kulczycka J, Lewandowska A, Zarebska J (2016) Life cycle assessment of energy generation in Poland. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0979-3
Mallia E, Lewis G (2013) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of electricity generation in the province of Ontario, Canada. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(2):377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0501-0
MEMR (2018) Laporan Kinerja Ditjen Minerba 2018
Mokhatab S, Mak JY, Valappil J, Wood DA (2013) Handbook of liquefied natural gas: Gulf Professional Publishing
PT. Cirebon Power (2018) Sustainability Report 2018. Available online at https://www.cirebonpower.co.id/wp-content/uploads/doc/2.%20SR_CP_2018_%20lores%20ENG_2020.02.06.pdf
PT. Indonesia Power (2018) Sustainability Report 2018. Available online at https://www.indonesiapower.co.id/id/komunikasi-berkelanjutan/Reports/Sustainability%20Report%20PT%20Indonesia%20Power%202018.pdf
PT. Pertamina RU VI (2017) Sustainability Report 2017. Available at https://www.pertamina.com/Media/Upload/Files/Sustainability_Report_Refinery_Unit_VI_2017.pdf
PT. PJB (2018a) Statistik Perusahaan (Corporate Statistics) 2014–2018. Available online at https://www.ptpjb.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Statistik-2014-2018-PJB.pdf
PT. PJB (2018b) Sustainability Report 2018. Available online at https://www.ptpjb.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/SR-2018_PT-PJB_21Agustus-2.pdf
Turconi R, Tonini D, Nielsen CFB, Simonsen CG, Astrup T (2014) Environmental impacts of future low-carbon electricity systems: detailed life cycle assessment of a Danish case study. Appl Energy 132:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.078
US-EPA (1995) AP-42: compilation of air emissions factors. In: US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park NC
Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(9):1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
Widiyanto A, Kato S, Maruyama N (2003) Environmental impact analysis of Indonesian electric generation systems (development of a life cycle inventory of Indonesian electricity). JSME Int J Ser B 46(4):650–659
Funding
The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the financial supports from a collaborative research project between the Sustainable Energy System and Policy Universitas Indonesia (SESP-UI), TCO2 Co. Ltd., and PT. Life Cycle Indonesia on “National Inventory Database for Energy Sector Development".
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Shabbir Gheewala
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nugroho, R., Hanafi, J., Shobatake, K. et al. Life cycle inventories and life cycle assessment for an electricity grid network: case study of the Jamali grid, Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 27, 1081–1091 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02082-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02082-5