Skip to main content

Clarify the nexus between life cycle assessment and circularity indicators: a SETAC/ACLCA interest group

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment volume 27, pages 916–925 (2022)Cite this article

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Bisoni CP, Brondi C, Rosso C, Cutaia L (2020) Towards a Global Framework to Measure and Assess Circular Economy. Symphonya Emerg Issue Manag 1:88–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boldoczki S, Thorenz A, Tuma A (2021) Does increased circularity lead to environmental sustainability?: The case of washing machine reuse in Germany. J Ind Ecol 25(4):864–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charter M, Tischner U (2001) Sustainable Solutions: Developing Products and Services for the Future (1st ed.). Routledge.

  • Corona B, Shen L, Reike D, Rosales-Carreon J, Worrel E (2019) Towards sustainable development through the circular economy- A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics. Resour Conserv Recycl 151:104498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013) Towards the Circular Economy: An economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/towards-the-circular-economy-vol-1-an-economic-and-business-rationale-for-an. Accessed 15 December 2021.

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015) Circularity Indicators: An Approach to Measuring Circularity. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/material-circularity-indicator. Accessed 15 December 2021.

  • Gai L, Varbanov PS, Fan YV, Klemeš JJ, Romanenko SV (2021) Trade-offs between the recovery, exergy demand and economy in the recycling of multiple resources. Resour Conserv Recycl 167:105428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haupt M, Hellweg S (2019) Measuring the environmental sustainability of a circular economy. Environ Dev Sustain 1–2:100005

    Google Scholar 

  • Haupt M, Zschokke M (2017) How can LCA support the circular economy?—63rd discussion forum on life cycle assessment, Zurich, Switzerland, November 30 2016. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(5):832–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiska M (2019) Assessing environmental impacts of a tool rental service from Husqvarna using life cycle assessment. Degree Project in Environmental Engineering, Second Cycle, Kth Royal Institute of Technology.

  • International Organization for Standardization (2006) ISO 14040: 2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. In: ISO 14000 International Standards Compendium. Genève, Switzerland.

  • Kirchherr J, Reike D, Hekkert M (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour Conserv Recycl 127:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessard JM, Habert G, Tagnit-Hamou A, Amor B (2021) Tracking the Environmental Consequences of Circular Economy over Space and Time: The Case of Close-and Open-Loop Recovery of Postconsumer Glass. Environ Sci Technol 55(17):11521–11532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lonca G, Muggeo R, Imbeault-Tetreault H, Bernard S, Margni M (2018) Does material circularity rhyme with environmental efficiency? Case studies on used tires. J Clean Prod 183:424–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordelöf A, Poulikidou S, Chordia M, Bitencourt de Oliveira F, Tivander J, Arvidsson R (2019) Methodological Approaches to End-Of-Life Modelling in Life Cycle Assessments of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Batteries 5(3):51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panchal R, Singh A, Diwan H (2021) Does circular economy performance lead to sustainable development?–A systematic literature review. J Environ Manage 293:112811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña C, Civit B, Gallego-Schmid A, Druckman A, Pires AC et al (2021) Using life cycle assessment to achieve a circular economy. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26(2):215–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos Lindgreen E, Mondello G, Salomone R (2021) Exploring the effectiveness of grey literature indicators and life cycle assessment in assessing circular economy at the micro level: a comparative analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26:2171–2219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidani M, Kim H, Cluzel F, Leroy Y, Yannou B (2020) Product circularity indicators: what contributions in designing for a circular economy? Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, DESIGN2020, 1, 2129–2138, Oct. 2020, Dubrovnik, Croatia.

  • Saidani M, Kravchenko M, Cluzel F, Pigosso D, Leroy Y, Kim H (2021) Comparing life cycle impact assessment, circularity and sustainability indicators for sustainable design: results from a hands-on project with 87 engineering students. International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 21, Aug. 2021, Gothenburg, Sweden.

  • Saidani M, Yannou B, Leroy Y, Cluzel F, Kendall A (2019) A taxonomy of circular economy indicators. J Clean Prod 207:542–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stucki M, Jattke M, Berr M, Desing H, Green A et al (2021) How life cycle–based science and practice support the transition towards a sustainable economy. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26(5):1062–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations-UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2019) The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019. 2019th ed. United Nations.

  • Valdivia S, Backes JG, Traverso M, Sonnemann G, Cucurachi S, Guinée JB, Schaubroeck T, Finkbeiner M, Leroy-Parmentier N, Ugaya C, Peña C (2021) Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26(9):1900–1905

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Velenturf APM, Purnell P (2021) Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustain Prod Consum 27:1437–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisthoff A, Ferrero V, Huynh T, DuPont B (2016) Quantifying the impact of sustainable product design decisions in the early design phase through machine learning. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 50145, p. V004T05A043). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development-WBSCD (2020). https://www.wbcsd.org/Programs/Circular-Economy/Factor-10/Metrics-Measurement/Circular-transition-indicators. Accessed 15 December 2021.

  • Zore Ž, Čuček L, Kravanja Z (2018) Synthesis of sustainable production systems using an upgraded concept of sustainability profit and circularity. J Clean Prod 201:1138–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign IL, Chicago, 61820, USA

    Michael Saidani

  2. Ramboll US Consulting, Denver, CO, 80202, USA

    Ashley Kreuder

  3. Little Venice Manufacturing, LLC, Goldsboro, NC, 27534, USA

    Guillermo Babilonia

  4. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, USA

    Pahola Thathiana Benavides

  5. Institute of Chemical and Electrochemical Process Engineering, Clausthal University of Technology, 38678, Clausthal, Germany

    Nick Blume

  6. The Sherwin-Williams Company, Cleveland, OH, 44115, USA

    Seth Jackson

  7. Sphera Solutions Inc, 170 Milk St, Boston, MA, 02109, USA

    Christoph Koffler

  8. Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India

    Manish Kumar

  9. Department of Electric Energy Storage Systems, Leibniz University Hannover, 30167, Hannover, Germany

    Christine Minke

  10. MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA, 22102, USA

    Jennifer Richkus

  11. Owens Corning, Granville, OH, 43023, USA

    Cheryl Smith

  12. Cotton Incorporated, Cary, NC, 27513, USA

    Michele Wallace

Authors
  1. Michael Saidani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashley Kreuder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guillermo Babilonia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pahola Thathiana Benavides
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nick Blume
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Seth Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christoph Koffler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Manish Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Christine Minke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jennifer Richkus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Cheryl Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Michele Wallace
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Saidani.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by Guido W. Sonnemann.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saidani, M., Kreuder, A., Babilonia, G. et al. Clarify the nexus between life cycle assessment and circularity indicators: a SETAC/ACLCA interest group. Int J Life Cycle Assess 27, 916–925 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02061-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02061-w