Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Costructal law, exergy analysis and life cycle energy sustainability assessment: an expanded framework applied to a boiler

  • LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) is one of the most relevant tools delving in sustainability science, based currently on the triple bottom line idea that is defined as the contemporary implementation of the three tools of life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC) and social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). The methodology is currently being applied to a wide set of products and systems. However, as per in the large interest towards energy-related products, the sustainability assessment of energy systems—in particular those where fluid streams are used—could be more effective if some further stages could be included in the analysis, i.e. a process level analysis with regard to energy quality and exergy, and a more thorough energy analysis of the fluid flows available to achieve an optimal design of the system.

Methods

This paper proposes an extended framework for LCSA introducing two additional stages to the methodology: Constructal law (CL) inspired analysis of the energy design of the system and exergy analysis (EA) of the system and its life cycle. A fully developed case study (a biomass boiler) is proposed, described the extended life cycle energy and sustainability assessment (LCESA: LCA, LCC, S-LCA, CL, EA), highlighting both the quantitative results related to each section together with the strengths and limits of the methodology, while stressing the potential applications as, e.g., decision support tool and support to the design of energy system.

Results

The results highlight different and optimized designs for the boiler through a constructal law–based analysis and several hot-spots throughout different stages of the life cycle, ranging from the production stage of steel for most environmental indicators in LCA to the cooking stage for the exergy analysis. Relevant positive impacts are traced also in the S-LCA point of view during both the use and production step.

Conclusions

The methodology could represent a potential advancement towards the LCSA application to energy technologies as it highlights some limits and proposes specific advancements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ardente F, Beccali G, Cellura M (2003) Eco-sustainable energy and environmental strategies in design for recycling: the software “ENDLESS”. Ecol Model 163(1–2):101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardente F, Beccali M, Cellura M (2004) F.A.L.C.A.D.E.: afuzzy software for the energy and environmental balances of products. Ecol Model 176(3–4):359–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Author (n.d.-a) https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan .2017

  • Author (n.d.-b) https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC99101/lbna27624enn.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2018

  • Author (n.d.-c) Sonia Valdivia and Guido Sonnermann - Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment, making informed choices on products – UNEP ISBN: 978–92–807-3175-0

  • Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M (2007) Environmental effects of energy policy in Sicily: the role of renewable energy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11(2):282–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.02.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beccali M, Cellura M, Longo S, Guarino F (2016) Solar heating and cooling systems versus conventional systems assisted by photovoltaic: application of a simplified LCA tool. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 156:92–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bejan A, Lorente S (2008) Design with constructal theory. Wiley, Hoboken, p 2008

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco JM, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social life cycle assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bösch ME, Hellweg S, Huijbregts MAJ, Frischknecht R (2007) Applying cumulative exergy demand (CExD) indicators to the ecoinvent database. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catrini P, Cellura M, Guarino F, Panno D, Piacentino A (2018) An integrated approach based on life cycle assessment and thermoeconomics: application to a water-cooled chiller for an air conditioning plant. Energy 160:72–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cellura M, Guarino F, Longo S, Mistretta M (2017) Modeling the energy and environmental life cycle of buildings: a co-simulation approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 80:733–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekoninck EA, Domingo L, O’Hare JA, Pigosso DCA, Reyes T, Troussier N (2016) Defining the challenges for ecodesign implementation in companies: development and consolidation of a framework. J Clean Prod 135:410–425 ISSN 0959–6526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products

  • EN 15804 (2012) Sustainability of construction works, environmental product declarations, core rules for the product category of construction products

  • European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre e Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2008) European Life Cycle Data Network

  • European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre e Institute for Environment and Sustainability, 2012 Characterization factors of the ILCD recommended life cycle impact assessment methods. Database and Supporting Information, first ed. Luxembourg Publications Office of the European Union. EUR 25167

  • European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability 2011 ILCD handbook e recommendations for life cycle impact assessment in the European context e based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors. Available on: http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/

  • Fernandes de Magalhães R, de Moura Ferreira Danilevicz A, Palazzo J (2019) Managing trade-offs in complex scenarios: a decision-making tool for sustainability projects. J Clean Prod 212:447–460 ISSN 0959-6526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2(10):3309–3322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2103309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finocchiaro P, Beccali M, Cellura M, Guarino F, Longo S (2016) Life cycle assessment of a compact desiccant evaporative cooling system: the case study of the “Freescoo”. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 156:83–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fontes J (2016) Handbook for Product Social Impact Assessment, p 153. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23821.74720

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guarino F, Traverso M, Cellura M, Finkbeiner M The use phase in social life cycle assessment: a case study of a biomass boiler. Proceedings of 1st Latin American SDEWES Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 28–31 2018

  • Gulotta TM, Guarino F, Cellura M, Lorenzini G (2017) Constructal law optimization of a boiler. Int J Heat Technol 35(2):297–305. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.350210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulotta TM, Guarino F, Cellura M, Lorenzini G (2018) A constructal law optimization of a boiler inspired by life cycle thinking. Thermal Sci Eng Progress 6:380–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inabez Forés V, Bovea MD, Perez-Belis V (2014) A holistic review of applied methodologies for assessing and selecting the optimal technological alternative from a sustainability perspective. J Clean Prod 70:259–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Incropera FP, DeWitt D, and Bergman T “Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer,” J. W. SONS, Ed., seventh ed, (2011), pp. 468–476;517–593

  • ISO 14040 2006 Environmental management e life cycle assessment e principles and framework. European Committee for Standardization

  • ISO 14044 2006 Environmental management e life cycle assessment e requirements and guidelines. European Committee for Standardization

  • ISO 21930 (2007) Sustainability in building construction—environmental declaration of building products

  • Kates RW et al (2001) Environment and development: sustainability science. Science 292:64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepffer W (2007) Life cycle based sustainability assessment as part of LCM. IN proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management, Zurich, Switzerland, 27–29

  • Kloepffer W (2008a) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepffer W (2008b) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products (with comments by Helias A. Udo de HAes p95). Int J LCA 13(2):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamé G, Leroy Y, Yannou B (2017) Ecodesign tools in the construction sector: analyzing usage inadequacies with designers’ needs. J Clean Prod 148:60–72 ISSN 0959–6526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo S, Antonucci V, Cellura M, Ferraro M (2014) Life cycle assessment of storage systems: the case study of a sodium/nickel chloride battery. J Clean Prod 85:337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzini G, Moretti S (2009) A Bejan’s constructal theory approach to the overall optimization of heat exchanging finned modules with air in forced convection and laminar flow condition. J Heat Transf 131(8):2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzini G, Moretti S, Conti A (2011) Fin shape optimization using Bejan’s constructal theory. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Francisco

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ness B et al (2007) Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ

  • Nzila C, Dewulf J, Spanjers H, Tuigong D, Kiriamiti H, Van Langenhove H (2012) Multi criteria sustainability assessment of biogas production in Kenya. Appl Energ 93:496–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osorio LAR, Lobato MA, Del Castillo XA (2009) An epistemology for sustainability science: a proposal for the study of the health disease phenomenon. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 16(1):46–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500902760571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2017 setting a framework for energy labelling and repealing Directive 2010/30/EU (Text with EEA relevance)

  • Rocha LAO, Lorente S, Bejan A (2012) Constructal law and the unifying principle of design. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi M, Germani M, Zamagni A (2016) Review of ecodesign methods and tools. Barriers and strategies for an effective implementation in industrial companies. J Clean Prod 129:361–373 ISSN 0959-6526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala S, Farioli F, Zamagni A (2013a) Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: part 1. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1653–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala S, Farioli F, Zamagni A (2013b) Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1686–1697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santoyo-Castelazo E, Azapagic A (2014) Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects (2014). J Clean Prod 80:119–138, ISSN 0959-6526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic 15:281–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Social Hotspot Database Project https://socialhotspot.org/, last accessed 05/01/2018

  • Spriensma R (2004) SimaPro database manual e the Buwal 250 library. PRé Consultants, the Netherlands Available from: https://www.pre-sustainability.com

  • Stefanova M, Tripepi C, Zamagni A, Masoni P (2014) Goal and scope in life cycle sustainability analysis: the case of hydrogen production from biomass. Sustainability 6:5463–5475. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6085463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swarr TE, Hunkeler D, Klöpffer W, Pesonen HL, Ciroth A, Brent CA, Pagan R (2011) Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice. Int J LCA 16:389–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen A, Schneider L (2012a) Life cycle sustainability dashboard. J Ind Ecol

  • Traverso M, Asdrubali F, Francia A, Finkbeiner M (2012b) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to photovoltaic modules. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:1068–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0433-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Traverso M, Bell L, Saling P, Fontes J (2018) Towards social life cycle assessment: a quantitative product social impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:597–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1168-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. Environ. Program

  • USGS Home, commodity statistics and information. https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/, last accessed 05/01/2018

  • WCED – World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford

  • Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni A, Amerighi O, Buttol P (2011) Strenghts or bias in social LCA? Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):596–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università di Palermo Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 9, 90128, Palermo, Italy

    Francesco Guarino & Maurizio Cellura

  2. Institute of Sustainability in Civil Engineering, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Aachen Mies-van-der-Rohe-Str. 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany

    Marzia Traverso

Authors
  1. Francesco Guarino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maurizio Cellura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marzia Traverso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Guarino.

Additional information

Communicated by Christopher J Koroneos

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guarino, F., Cellura, M. & Traverso, M. Costructal law, exergy analysis and life cycle energy sustainability assessment: an expanded framework applied to a boiler. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25, 2063–2085 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01779-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01779-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation