Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An agile approach for evaluating the environmental-economic performance of cropping systems at experimental stage: the case of Brazilian mango

  • REGIONAL TOPICS FROM LATIN AMERICA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The lack of approaches to consider the economic-life cycle environmental performance of cropping systems at experimental stage and the absence of evaluations regarding alternative mango systems are issues addressed in this paper. In this study, an approach for assessing the environmental-economic performance of alternative crop systems, at the experimental stage, is proposed and applied to the mango experiment in Brazil. This approach may be used in other assessments of cropping systems at experimental stage.

Methods

The proposed approach encompasses three consecutive evaluations: agronomic and environmental-economic. Initially, the agronomic evaluation statistically compares the yield of alternative cropping systems (treatments in the experiment). Next, a treatment is selected among those with significant better yield and compared to the treatment representing the conventional system, considering environmental and economic criteria. The environmental criteria are the carbon and water footprints of the selected treatments, according to ISO 14067 and 14,046, while the economic is profitability (revenue minus costs with labor and inputs). This approach was applied to evaluate an 8-year mango experiment in the Sao Francisco Valley, Brazil, which intercropped mango trees with two types of plant mixtures (cover crops with different plant mixes), applying two soil management systems (tillage and no-tillage).

Results and discussion

The agronomic assessment that statistically compared yields showed that four treatments (T1, T2, T4, and T5) obtained higher yields than those representing the conventional system (T3 and T6). Treatment T4 was selected among the ones with higher yields, and compared with T6 (conventional system), considering the economic and environmental criteria. The economic analysis showed that in 30 years (expected orchard life time), T4 generates a profit that is 44% higher than T6. Regarding the environmental analysis, T4 presents a 16% lower carbon footprint and from 16 to 435% lower water footprint than T6, according to the impact category considered. The scenario where land use changed from an annual crop (melon) to mango orchard further reduced both carbon and water footprints of mangoes produced in T4.

Conclusions

The application of the proposed approach to the mango experiment resulted in the reduction of time and data requirements when evaluating the economic-environmental performance of mango alternative cropping systems, allowing the selection of best performing treatment. The assessment of economic-environmental performance showed that treatments with plant mixtures used as cover crops between lines of mango trees, independently of the type of mix used or the soil management applied, enhance the overall performance of mango production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barão L, Alaoui A, Ferreira C, Basch G, Schwilch G, Geissen V, Sukkel W, Lemesle J, Garcia-Orenes F, Morugán-Coronado A, Mataix-Solera J, Kosmas C, Glavan M, Pintar M, Tóth B, Hermann T, Vizitiu OP, Lipiec J, Reintam E, Xu M, Di J, Fan H, Wang F (2019) Assessment of promising agricultural management practices. Sci Total Environ 649:610–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Basset-Mens C, Vannière H, Grasselly D, Heitz H, Braun A, Payen S, Koch P, Biard Y (2016) Environmental impacts of imported and locally grown fruits for the French market: a cradle-to-farm-gate LCA study. Fruits 71(2):93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulay AM, Bare J, Benini L, Berger M, Lathuillière MJ, Manzardo A, Margni M, Motoshita M, Núñez M, Pastor AV, Ridoutt B, Oki T, Worbe S, Pfister S (2018) The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(2):368–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandão SS, Salviano AM, Olszevski N, Giongo V (2017a) Green manure contributing for nutrients cycling in irrigated environments of the Brazilian semi-arid. Journal of Environmental Analysis and Progress 2(4):519–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandão SS, Giongo V, Olszevski N, Salviano AM (2017b) Plant mix and soil management systems changing soil quality and mango productivity. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física 10(4):1079–1089

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro JM, Dias AF, Barros VS, Giongo V, Matsuura MISF, Figueirêdo MCB (2019) Carbon and water footprints of Brazilian mango produced in the semi-arid region. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24(4):735–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti AK, Beccaro GL, Bruun S, Bosco S, Donno D, Notarnicola B, Bounous G (2014) LCA application in the fruit sector: state of the art and recommendations for environmental declarations of fruit products. J Clean Prod 73:125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzivagiannis MA, São José AR, Bomfim MP, Oliveira Junior MX, Rebouças TNH (2014) Flowering and yield of the mango fruits ‘bourbon’, ‘palmer’ and ‘rosa’ with use of paclobutrazol. Rev Iber Tecnología Postcosecha 15(1):41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Deytieux D, Munier-Jolain N, Caneill J (2016) Assessing the sustainability of cropping systems in single-and multi-site studies: a review of methods. Eur J Agron 72:107–126

    Google Scholar 

  • EPD International AB (2019) Fruits and Nuts: Product Category Classification: UN CPC 013. Version 1.01. https://www.environdec.com/PCR/Detail/?Pcr=14175

  • Falcone G, Stillitano T, Montemurro F, De Luca AI, Gulisano G, Strano A (2019) Environmental and economic assessment of sustainability in Mediterranean wheat production. Agron Res 17(1):60–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria CMB, Soares JM, Leão PCS (2004) Adubação verde com leguminosas em videira no Submédio São Francisco. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 28(4):641–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria CMB, Costa ND, Faria AF (2007) Atributos químicos de um Argissolo e rendimento de melão mediante o uso de adubos verdes, calagem e adubação. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 31:299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Filgueiras HAC, Menezes JB, Amorim TBF, Alves RE, Castro EB (2000) Características da fruta para exportação [Caracteristics for fruits exported]. In: Filgueiras HCA (ed) Manga pós-colheita [Mango post-harvesting]. Embrapa Comunicação para Tranferência de Tecnologia, Brasília, pp 14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2009) Global agriculture towards 2050. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2017) Faostat: crop production. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Accessed 01 June 2019

  • Garcia-Franco N, Hobley E, Hübner R, Wiesmeier R (2018) Climate-smart soil management in semiarid regions. In: Munoz M, Zornoza R (eds) Soil management and climate change: effects on organic carbon, nitrogen dynamics, and greenhouse gas emissions. Academic, Cambridge, pp 349–368

    Google Scholar 

  • García-González I, Hontoria C, Gabriel JL, Alonso-Ayuso M, Quemada M (2018) Cover crops to mitigate soil degradation and enhance soil functionality in irrigated land. Geoderma 322:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Giongo V, Salviano A, Santana M, Costa ND, Yuri JE (2016) Soil management systems for sustainable melon cropping in the sub-median of the São Francisco Valley. Revista Caatinga 29:537–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, Oele M, Vieira M, Leijting J, Ponsioen T, Meijer E (2014) SimaPro tutorial. PRé-Consultants, Amersfoort

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes TCA, Silva JAM, Soares BEM, Silva MSL (2004) Decomposition and nutrient release patterns of the green manure phytomass in irrigated mango orchard. Acta Hortic 645:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006a) ISO 14040:2006—environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006b) ISO 14044:2006—environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2013) ISO 14067:2013—greenhouse gases—carbon footprint of products—requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2014) ISO 14046:2014—environmental management–water footprint principles— requirements and guidelines. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) Fifth assessment report. IPCC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • JRC (Joint Research Centre of the European Commission), IES (Institute for Environment and Sustainability) (2011) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook: Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European context. First edition November 2011. EUR 24571 EN. Luxemburg. Publications Office of the European Union

  • Lampurlanés J, Plaza-Bonilla D, Álvaro-Fuentes J, Cantero-Martínez C (2016) Long-term analysis of soil water conservation and crop yield under different tillage systems in Mediterranean rainfed conditions. Field Crop Res 189:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis DG (1995) Análise de variância. Editora Harbra, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • MAPA (Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply) (2020) Agrostat database. http://indicadores.agricultura.gov.br/agrostat/index.htm. Accessed 21 Feb 2020

  • Marras S, Masia S, Duce P, Spano D, Sirca C (2015) Carbon footprint assessment on a mature vineyard. Agric For Meteorol 214(15):350–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Matejovic I (1997) Determination of carbon and nitrogen in samples of various soils by the dry combustion. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 28(17–18):1499–1511

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MCTI (Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation) (2010) Inventário Brasileiro de Emissões Antrópicas por Fontes e Remoções por Sumidouros de Gases de Efeito Estufa não Controlados pelo Protocolo de Montreal. MCTI, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier MS, Stoessel F, Jungbluth N, Juraske R, Schader C, Stolze M (2015) Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products: are the differences captured by life cycle assessment? J Environ Manag 149:193–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JP, Shrestha A, Mathesius K, Scow KM, Southard RJ, Haney RL, Schmidt R, Munk DS, Horwath WR (2017) Cover cropping and no-tillage improve soil health in an arid irrigated cropping system in California’s San Joaquin Valley, USA. Soil Tillage Res 165:325–335

    Google Scholar 

  • National Mango Board (NMB) (2010) Sustainability assessment: base-line assessment findings & recommendations. Available from: <http://www.mango.org/Mangos/media/Media/Documents/Research%20And%20Resources/Research/Industry/Post-Harvest/Sustainability_Final_Report_Engpdf?ext=pdf>. Accessed: 15 Oct 2017

  • Nemecek T, Dubois D, Huguenin-Elie O, Gaillard G (2011a) Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: I. integrated and organic farming. Agric Syst 104:217–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Huguenin-Elie O, Dubois D, Gaillard G, Schaller B, Chervet A (2011b) Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: II. Extensive and intensive production. Agric Syst 104:233–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Bengoa X, Lansche J, Mouron P, Riedener E, Rossi V, Humbert S (2015) Methodological Guidelines for the Life Cycle Inventory of Agricultural Products. Version 3.0, July 2015, World Food LCA Database (WFLDB), Quantis and Agroscope, Lausanne and Zurich, Switzerland

  • Nicki G (2016) The environmental pressures of eating a mango: a pre-liminary life cycle assessment of mango production in Taiwan. A&WMA ’ s 109th Annual Conference & Exhibition. New Orleans, Louisiana

  • Pereira Filho A, Teixeira Filho J, Giongo V (2016) Nutrients dynamics in soil solution at the outset of no-till implementation with the use of plant cocktails in Brazilian semi-arid. Afr J Agric Res 11(4):234–246

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poeplau C, Don A (2015) Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops – a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 200:33–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 03 June 2019

  • Ridoutt BG, Juliano P, Sanguansri P, Sellahewa J (2010) The water foot-print of food waste: case study of fresh mango in Australia. J Clean Prod 18:1714–1721

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santos TL, Nunes ABA, Giongo V, Barros VS, Figueirêdo MCB (2018) Cleaner fruit production with green manure: the case of Brazilian melons. J Clean Prod 181:260–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva MSL, Gomes TCA (2004). Manejo do solo [Soil management]. In Mouco MAC (ed) Cultivo da mangueira [Mango production]. Available at: http://www.cpatsa.embrapa.br:8080/sistema_producao/spmanga/socioeconomia.htm. Accesses 01 Apr 2019

  • Smith P, I H, Bustamante M, Sobocká J, Harper R, Pan G, West PC, Clark JM, Adhya T, Rumpel C, Paustian K, Kuikman P, Cotrufo MF, Elliott JA, McDowell R, Griffiths RI, Asakawa S, Bondeau A, Jain AK, Meersmans J, Pugh TA (2015a) Global change pressures on soils from land use and management. Glob Chang Biol 22:1008–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith F, Cotrufo C, Rumpel K, Paustian K, Kuikman PJ, Elliott JA, McDowell R, Griffiths RI, Asakawa S, Bustamante M, House JI, Sobocká J, Harper R, Pan G, West PC, Gerber JS, Clark JM, Adhya T, Scholes RJ, Scholes MC (2015b) Biogeochemical cycles and biodiversity as key drivers of ecosystem services provided by soils. Soil 2:537–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza Filho HD, Frigere T, Moreira A, Godoy R (2007) Produção de sementes de Guandu. Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, São Carlos

    Google Scholar 

  • Statsoft INC (2007) Statistic (data analysis software system), version 7

  • Tait PR, Saunders C, Guenther M (2015) Valuing preferences for environmental sustainability in fruit production by United Kingdom and Japanese consumers. J Food Res 4(3):46–55

    Google Scholar 

  • The Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) (2020) Municipal agriculture production. https://ww2.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/pam/2016/default.shtm. Accessed 21 Feb 2020

  • Valentini L, Oliveira LAA, Ferreira JM (2009) Produção de sementes de milho variedade para uso próprio em propriedades de microbacias hidrográficas. Programa Rio Rural-Manual Técnico, 15. Niterói- RJ

  • Vinyes E, Asin L, Alegre S, Asin L, Alegrec S, Pere M, Boschmonart J, Gasol CM (2017) Life cycle assessment of apple and peach production, distribution and consumption in Mediterranean fruit sector. J Clean Prod 149:313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens K, Vandecasteele B, Buchan D, Neve S (2014) Soil quality is positively affected by reduced tillage and compost in an intensive vegetable cropping system. Appl Soil Ecol 82:61–71

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Brazilian Agriculture Research Corporation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Campus do Itaperi, Fortaleza, CE, 60714-903, Brazil

    Amanda Ferreira Dias & Viviane da Silva Barros

  2. Embrapa Semiárido, Rodovia BR-428, Km 152, s/n - Zona Rural, Petrolina, PE, 56302-970, Brazil

    Vanderlise Giongo

  3. Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical, Rua Dra Sara Mesquita 2270, Pici, Fortaleza, CE, 60511-110, Brazil

    Jade Müller Carneiro & Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo

Authors
  1. Amanda Ferreira Dias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vanderlise Giongo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Viviane da Silva Barros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jade Müller Carneiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Nydia Suppen-Reynaga

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 112 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dias, A.F., Giongo, V., da Silva Barros, V. et al. An agile approach for evaluating the environmental-economic performance of cropping systems at experimental stage: the case of Brazilian mango. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25, 1588–1604 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01772-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01772-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation