Abstract
Purpose
A review of LCA process datasets is an important element of quality assurance for databases and for other systems to provide LCA datasets. Somewhat surprisingly, a broadly accepted and applicable set of criteria for a review of LCA process datasets was lacking so far. Different LCA databases and frameworks are proposing and using different criteria for reviewing datasets. To close this gap, a set of criteria for reviewing LCA dataset has been developed within the Life Cycle Initiative.
Methods
Previous contributions to LCA dataset review have been analysed for a start, from ISO and various LCA databases. To avoid somewhat arbitrary review criteria, four basic rules are proposed which are to be fulfilled by any dataset. Further, concepts for assessing representativeness and relevance are introduced into the criteria set from established practices in statistics and materiality. To better structure the criteria and to ease their application, they are grouped into clusters. A first version of the developed review criteria was presented in two workshops with database providers and users on different levels of experience, and draft versions of the criteria were shared within the initiative. The current version of the criteria reflects feedback received from various stakeholders and has been applied and tested in a review for newly developed datasets in Brazil, Malaysia and Thailand.
Results and discussion
Overall, 14 criteria are proposed, which are organised in clusters. The clusters are goal, model, value, relevance and procedure. For several criteria, a more science-based definition and evaluation is proposed in comparison to ‘traditional’ LCA. While most of the criteria depend on the goal and scope of dataset development, a core set of criteria are seen as essential and independent from specific LCA modelling. For all the criteria, value scales are developed, typically using an ordinal scale, following the pedigree approach.
Conclusions
Review criteria for LCI datasets are now defined based on a stringent approach. They aim to be globally acceptable, considering also database interoperability and database management aspects, as well as feedback received from various stakeholders, and thus close an important gap in LCA dataset quality assurance. The criteria take many elements of already existing criteria but are the first to fully reflect the implications of the ISO data quality definition, and add new concepts for representativeness and relevance with the idea to better reflect scientific practice outside of the LCA domain. A first application in a review showed to be feasible, with a level of effort similar to applying other review criteria. Aspects not addressed yet are the review procedure and the mutual recognition of dataset reviews, and their application for a very high number of datasets.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
‘Definition of the goal and scope is the first step in developing a unit process dataset. It basically describes what kind of process the dataset intends to represent. Developers are required to define the goal and scope in a similar way as LCI and LCA studies do, to guide the steps needed to develop the dataset and to provide corresponding information for users when they choose datasets for their own LCI or LCA studies.’ (UNEP/SETAC 2011, p. 54)
‘Data quality goals specify in general terms the desirable characteristics of the data needed for the study.’ (Weidema and Wesnæs 1996, p. 168)
Up to the point of a trivial case study which consists of one single, aggregated dataset.
https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/LCDN/developerILCDDataFormat.xhtml: ‘A new SDK zip will be released when the Extended ILCD (eILCD) format will be released’, accessed June 11, 2019. An implementation is publicly accessible here: https://github.com/GreenDelta/olca-modules/blob/master/doc/eilcd.md
‘In science and human affairs alike we lack the resources to study more than a fragment of the phenomena that might advance our knowledge’ (Cochran 1977, p. 1)
Who continue: ‘When the determination of the [items] included in a sample involves personal judgement, one cannot have an objective measure of the reliability of the sample results, because the various [items] may have differing and unknown chances of being drawn.’ (Hansen et al. 1953, vol. I p 9)
See e.g. Huijbregts (1998): Variability expresses inherent variations in the real world, e.g. temperature change from day to night; uncertainty and thus imprecision covers all other reasons of why values are not reproducible.
References
Brown KF, Corbera E (2002) A multi-criteria assessment framework for carbon-mitigation projects : Putting
Ciroth A, Srocka M (2008) How to obtain a precise and representative estimate for parameters in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:265–277
Ciroth A, Hildenbrand J, Zamagni A, Foster C, Vigon B (2015a) Annex A: Review Criteria for LCI Datasets Annex A: life cycle inventory dataset review criteria Llorenc Mila i Canals Fayçal Boureima Annex A: Review Criteria for LCI Datasets 2 Content
Ciroth A, Vigon B, Sonnemann G (2015b) UNEP Shonan Guidance Principles put into practice [WWW Document]
Cochran, WG (1977) Sampling Techniques. 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Dodge Y (2008) The concise encyclopedia of statistics. Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin
Edelen A, Ingwersen W (2016) Guidance on Data Quality Assessment for Life Cycle Inventory Data, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-16/096, 2016
Elkasabi MA, Heeringa SG, Lepkowski JM (2015) Joint calibration estimator for dual frame surveys, Statistics in Transition. New Series. GUS
European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and, Sustainability (2012) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Data Network - Compliance rules and entry-level requirements. Version 1.1. https://doi.org/10.2788/80302
Hansen MH, Hurwitz WG, Madow WN (1953) Sample survey methods and theory. Vol. I-Methods and Applications; Vol. II-Theory. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800010416
Henn L (2015) A multi-dimensional financing appraisal framework for public infrastructure 272
Huijbregts MAJ (1998) Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA. Int. J Life Cycle Assess 3:273–280
International Accounting Standard Board (2010) Conceptual framework for financial reporting 2010. https://doi.org/ISBN: 978-1-907026-69-0 Copyright
Investopedia (2016) Independent Auditor [WWW Document]. URL https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/independentauditor.asp. Accessed 7.26.19
ISO (2002) ISO/TS 14048:2002 - Environmental management -- life cycle assessment -- data documentation format
ISO (2006a) ISO 14040: Life cycle assessment — principles and framework. Environ Manag 3:28. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr
ISO (2006b) ISO 14044: Life Cycle Assessment — requirements and guidelines. Environ Manag 3:54
ISO (2014) ISO/TS 14071:2014 - Environmental management -- life cycle assessment -- critical review processes and reviewer competencies: additional requirements and guidelines to ISO 14044:2006 11
Kuczenski B (2019) Disclosure of product system models in life cycle assessment: achieving transparency and privacy. J Ind Ecol 23:574–586
Offensive gegen Schadstoffe [WWW Document] (2016) VDI Nachrichten. URL https://www.vdi-nachrichten.com/Technik-Wirtschaft/Offensive-Schadstoffe. Accessed 7.27.19
PE International (2018) GaBi database & modelling principles
UNEP/SETAC (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases - “Shonan Guidance Principles.” UNEP/SETAC
Waterworth AM, Benz J, Northwest P (2018) Criteria for Comparative Evaluations of Treaty 999
Weidema BP, Wesnæs MS (1996) Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators. J Clean Prod 4:167–174
Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G (2013) Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. St. Gallen
Yodkhum S, Sampattagul S, Gheewala SH (2018) Energy and environmental impact analysis of rice cultivation and straw management in northern Thailand. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:17654–17664
Zhai J (2013) Calibration estimation via a smoothing newton method. WSEAS Trans Math 12:329–340
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Yi Yang
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ciroth, A., Foster, C., Hildenbrand, J. et al. Life cycle inventory dataset review criteria—a new proposal. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25, 483–494 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01712-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01712-9