Environmental analyses to inform transitions to sustainable diets in developing countries: case studies for Vietnam and Kenya
Sustainable diets are an environmental, economic, and public health imperative, but identifying clear intervention points is challenging. Decision-making will require descriptive analyses from a variety of perspectives, even under the inevitable uncertainty introduced by limited data. This study uses existing data to provide a diet-level perspective on environmental impact from food production in the case study countries of Vietnam and Kenya.
FAO food supply data at decadal time steps were used as a proxy for national average diets in Vietnam and Kenya. We combined these data with estimates of the greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) and water use impact associated with producing food commodities. Generic GHGE factors were derived from a survey of the life cycle assessment literature. Country- and commodity-specific blue water use estimates were used, reflecting country-of-origin for import-dominated commodities. The AWARE characterization model was used to offer a diet-associated water scarcity footprint. Trends in diet-associated environmental impacts were interpreted in light of diet shifts, economic development trends, and other factors.
Results and discussion
Increasing per capita food supply in Vietnam, and in particular increases in meat, have led to rising diet-associated per capita GHGE. While supply of beef remains 5.2 times smaller than pork—the dominant meat—increases in beef demand in the past decade have resulted in it becoming second only to rice in contribution to diet GHGE. The water use and water scarcity footprint in Vietnam follow an increasing trend comparable to food supply. On the other hand, historically consistent levels of dairy and beef in Kenya dominate diet-level GHGE. Water use associated with the Kenyan diet shows marked increases between the 1990s and 2000s due to imports of wheat and rice from water-stressed regions. Environmental performance data for characteristic food production systems in these and other developing countries are needed to improve the representativeness and reliability of such assessments.
Despite data limitations, the methods and results presented here may offer a fresh perspective in sustainable development policy deliberations, as they offer an entry point to linking environmental impact and consumption behaviors and can elucidate otherwise obscure or unexpected outcomes. A clear need emerges for further environmental analysis of dominant production systems within both Vietnam and Kenya.
KeywordsDecision-making Diet Greenhouse gas emissions Low- and middle-income countries Sustainable development goals Water use
This work is funded through a grant from the Graham Sustainability Institute at the University of Michigan.
- Asia Beef Network (2018) Vietnam country profile: cattle production systems. http://www.asiabeefnetwork.com/country-profiles/viet-nam/cattle-production-systems/. Accessed Jan 2019
- Benny L, Duc LT, Hang NTT (2017) Growth and nutrition: preliminary findings from the round 5 survey in Vietnam. Young Lives. https://younglives.org.uk/content/growth-and-nutrition-preliminary-findings-round-5-survey-vietnam. Accessed 15 Jan 2019
- Bong BB (2000) Bridging the rice yield gap in Vietnam. FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/x6905e/x6905e0e.htm
- Boulay A-M, Bare J, Benini L, Berger M, Lathuillière MJ, Manzardo A, Margni M, Motoshita M, Núñez M, Pastor AV, Ridoutt B, Oki T, Worbe S, Pfister S (2018) The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:368–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- FAO (2018a) FAOSTAT food balance sheets. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS. Accessed 8 June 2018
- FAO (2018b) Kenya cattle and poultry sectors: livestock and livelihoods spotlight. I8978EN. http://www.fao.org/3/I8978EN/i8978en.pdf
- FAO (2018c) Kenya cattle and poultry sectors: livestock production systems spotlight. i8270en. http://www.fao.org/3/i8270en/I8270EN.pdf
- Green RF, Joy EJM, Harris F, Agrawal S, Aleksandrowicz L, Hillier J, Macdiarmid JI, Milner J, Vetter SH, Smith P, Haines A, Dangour AD (2018) Greenhouse gas emissions and water footprints of typical dietary patterns in India. Sci Total Environ 643:1411–1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the fourth assessment. International Panel on Climate Change, International Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- ISO (2014) Environmental management - water footprint - principles, requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization ISO 14046:2014Google Scholar
- Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, AlMazroa MA, Amann M, Anderson HR, Andrews KG, Aryee M, Atkinson C, Bacchus LJ, Bahalim AN, Balakrishnan K, Balmes J, Barker-Collo S, Baxter A, Bell ML, Blore JD, Blyth F, Bonner C, Borges G, Bourne R, Boussinesq M, Brauer M, Brooks P, Bruce NG, Brunekreef B, Bryan-Hancock C, Bucello C, Buchbinder R, Bull F, Burnett RT, Byers TE, Calabria B, Carapetis J, Carnahan E, Chafe Z, Charlson F, Chen H, Chen JS, Cheng ATA, Child JC, Cohen A, Colson KE, Cowie BC, Darby S, Darling S, Davis A, Degenhardt L, Dentener F, Des Jarlais DC, Devries K, Dherani M, Ding EL, Dorsey ER, Driscoll T, Edmond K, Ali SE, Engell RE, Erwin PJ, Fahimi S, Falder G, Farzadfar F, Ferrari A, Finucane MM, Flaxman S, Fowkes FGR, Freedman G, Freeman MK, Gakidou E, Ghosh S, Giovannucci E, Gmel G, Graham K, Grainger R, Grant B, Gunnell D, Gutierrez HR, Hall W, Hoek HW, Hogan A, Hosgood HD III, Hoy D, Hu H, Hubbell BJ, Hutchings SJ, Ibeanusi SE, Jacklyn GL, Jasrasaria R, Jonas JB, Kan H, Kanis JA, Kassebaum N, Kawakami N, Khang YH, Khatibzadeh S, Khoo JP, Kok C, Laden F, Lalloo R, Lan Q, Lathlean T, Leasher JL, Leigh J, Li Y, Lin JK, Lipshultz SE, London S, Lozano R, Lu Y, Mak J, Malekzadeh R, Mallinger L, Marcenes W, March L, Marks R, Martin R, McGale P, McGrath J, Mehta S, Memish ZA, Mensah GA, Merriman TR, Micha R, Michaud C, Mishra V, Hanafiah KM, Mokdad AA, Morawska L, Mozaffarian D, Murphy T, Naghavi M, Neal B, Nelson PK, Nolla JM, Norman R, Olives C, Omer SB, Orchard J, Osborne R, Ostro B, Page A, Pandey KD, Parry CDH, Passmore E, Patra J, Pearce N, Pelizzari PM, Petzold M, Phillips MR, Pope D, Pope CA III, Powles J, Rao M, Razavi H, Rehfuess EA, Rehm JT, Ritz B, Rivara FP, Roberts T, Robinson C, Rodriguez-Portales JA, Romieu I, Room R, Rosenfeld LC, Roy A, Rushton L, Salomon JA, Sampson U, Sanchez-Riera L, Sanman E, Sapkota A, Seedat S, Shi P, Shield K, Shivakoti R, Singh GM, Sleet DA, Smith E, Smith KR, Stapelberg NJC, Steenland K, Stöckl H, Stovner LJ, Straif K, Straney L, Thurston GD, Tran JH, van Dingenen R, van Donkelaar A, Veerman JL, Vijayakumar L, Weintraub R, Weissman MM, White RA, Whiteford H, Wiersma ST, Wilkinson JD, Williams HC, Williams W, Wilson N, Woolf AD, Yip P, Zielinski JM, Lopez AD, Murray CJL, Ezzati M (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:2224–2260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacRae R, Langer J, Cuddeford V (2012) Lessons from 20 years of CSO advocacy to advance sustainable pest management in Canada. In: MacRae R, Abergel E (eds) Health and sustainability in the Canadian food system: advocacy and opportunity for civil society. UBC Press, Vancouver, pp 127–152Google Scholar
- Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2010a) The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands. No. 47Google Scholar
- Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2010b) The green, blue and grey water footprint of farm animals and animal products. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands. No. 48Google Scholar
- Nguyen T, Roehrig F, Grosjean G, Tran D, Vu T (2017) Climate smart agriculture in Vietnam. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Hanoi, Vietnam. http://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/155807/retrieve
- Springmann M, Wiebe K, Mason-D'Croz D, Sulser TB, Rayner M, Scarborough P (2018) Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environmental impacts: a global modelling analysis with country-level detail. Lancet Planetary Health 2:e451–e461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- The World Bank (2018) GDP per capita (current US$). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD. Accessed Sept 7 2018
- Torbick N, Salas W, Chowdhury D, Ingraham P, Trinh M (2017) Mapping rice greenhouse gas emissions in the Red River Delta, Vietnam. Carbon Management 8:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2016.1275816
- Trung ND, Anh LH, Thang NT, Sebastian LS (2017) The challenges in implementing Vietnam’s nationally-determined contribution (NDC) in the agriculture sector under the current supporting laws, regulations, and policies. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Wageningen, the Netherlands. CCAFS Working Paper No. 217. www.ccafs.cgiar.org
- UN FAO (2018) FAOSTAT Data portal. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data . Accessed Jan 2019
- USAID (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions in Vietnam. https://www.climatelinks.org/resources/greenhouse-gas-emissions-factsheet-vietnam
- USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (2017) Vietnam retail foods - sector report 2016Google Scholar
- World Bank: CIAT (2015) Climate-smart agriculture in Kenya. The World Bank Group, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- WRI (2017) CAIT climate data explorer. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. https://cait.wri.org
- WULCA (2016) AWARE factors: sub-watershed and country level. http://www.wulca-waterlca.org/aware.html. Accessed Feb 2018
- Yamaguchi T, Tuan LM, Minamikawa K, Yokoyama S (2019) Assessment of the relationship between adoption of a knowledge-intensive water-saving technique and irrigation conditions in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Agric Water Manag 212:162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.08.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar