Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect factors of terrestrial acidification in Brazil for use in Life Cycle Impact Assessment

  • LCIA OF IMPACTS ON HUMAN HEALTH AND ECOSYSTEMS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In Life Cycle Impact Assessment, atmospheric fate factors, soil exposure factors, and effect factors are combined to characterize potential impacts of acidifying substances in terrestrial environments. Due to the low availability of global data sets, effect factors (EFs) have been reported as the major contributors to statistical uncertainties of characterization factors and they are the focus of this study. We aim to develop spatially differentiated EFs taking Brazil as case and explore new methodological ways to derive them.

Methods

EFs are calculated based on a comprehensive database reporting observations of approximately 30,000 plant species at biome and ecoregion levels. Species richness distributions as function of soil pH are developed and translated into potentially not occurring fraction (PNOF) of species, which can be equated to the more commonly used potentially disappeared fraction of species, to assess effects of changes in soil hydrogen ion concentration on terrestrial plant species. Potentially extinct fraction (PXF) of species is proposed as a complementary metric for LCIA models based on distributions of range-restricted species (species only occurring in one ecoregion of Brazil). Different approaches for determining EFs from the species richness distributions are evaluated. Area-weighted EFs are explored to determine potential effects when considering both acid and alkaline sides of species richness curves, thus integrating potentially positive effects of acidification on biodiversity.

Results and discussion

Spatially differentiated EFs are provided for 6 biomes and 45 ecoregions composing Brazil. Comparisons with previous EFs demonstrate that data availability might significantly influence regression analyses, and the use of more representative data can lead to more consistent EFs. Moreover, consideration of the entire species richness curves yields positive and negative EFs. Adding acidifying substances onto specific soils in Brazilian ecoregions may therefore be associated with increased species richness if the pH approaches the optimum pH from the alkaline side of the curve. The meaningfulness of species richness as indicator of acidification stress is discussed based on this finding, as is the inclusion of the metric PXF, highlighting species whose loss could cause irreversible damages to the environment.

Conclusions

We recommend the calculation of area-weighted EFs to be integrated into characterization models for terrestrial acidification, and we therefore advocate that similar work be done for other regions in the world than Brazil to enhance the consistency of the EFs and reduce their uncertainties. We additionally recommend that LCIA method developers further explore the application of PXF for other impact categories than acidification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azevedo LB, van Zelm R, Hendriks AJ, Bobbink R, Huijbregts MA (2013) Global assessment of the effects of terrestrial acidification on plant species richness. Environ Pollut 174:10–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo-Mendes N, Laurent A, Bruun HH, Hauschild MZ (2019) Relationships between plant species richness and soil pH at the level of biome and ecoregion in Brazil. Ecol Indic 98:266–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Baan L, Mutel CL, Curran M, Hellweg S, Koellner T (2013) Land use in life cycle assessment: global characterization factors based on regional and global potential species extinction. Environ Sci Technol 47(16):9281–9290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EC-JRC—European Commission-Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook—framework and requirements for life cycle impact assessment models and indicators, 1st edn. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • EC-JRC—European Commission-Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2011) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook—recommendations for life cycle impact assessment in the European context, 1st edn. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg

  • Forzza RC, Baumgratz JFA, Bicudo CEM, Canhos DAL, Carvalho AA, Coelho MAN, Zappi DC (2012) New Brazilian floristic list highlights conservation challenges. BioScience 62(1):39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GBIF: The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (2017) What is GBIF? Available via http://www.gbif.org/what-is-gbif. Accessed 8 Dec 2017

  • Goedkoop M, Huijbregts MAJ, Heijungs R, De Schryver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008: a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM), Amersfoort

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JBE, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, De Koning A, Van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, De Bruijn JA, Van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Series. Eco-efficiency in industry and science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild M, Wenzel H (1998) Environmental assessment of products. Vol 2: scientific background. Chapman & Hall, London ISBN 0-412-80810-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi K, Okazaki M, Itsubo N, Inaba A (2004) Development of damage function of acidification for terrestrial ecosystems based on the effect of aluminium toxicity on net primary production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:13–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R, Guinee JB, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, Van Duin R, De Goede HP (1992) Environmental life cycle assessment of products: guide and backgrounds. Centre of Environmental Science, University, Leiden, Leiden

  • Hengl T, de Jesus JM, MacMillan RA, Batjes NH, Heuvelink GBM, Ribeiro E, Gonzalez MR (2014) SoilGrids1km—global soil information based on automated mapping. PLoS One 9(8):e105992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira M, Zjip M, Hollander A, van Zelm R (2017) ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMPACT World+ (2018) Available via http://www.impactworldplus.org/en/index.php. Accessed 5 Jan 2018

  • Kemna R, Van Elburg M, Li W, Van Holsteijn R (2005) MEEuP methodology report, final. VHK for European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen HF, Hauschild MZ (2007) Evaluation of ecotoxicity effect indicators for use in LCIA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:24–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • LC-Impact: a spatially differentiated life cycle impact assessment method (2018) Available via http://www.lc-impact.eu/. Accessed 5 Jan 2018

  • Norris GA (2003) Impact characterization in the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts; methods for acidification, eutrophication and ozone formation. J Ind Ecol 6(3–4):79–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D’Amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51(11):933–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington DW, Payet J, Hauschild MZ (2004) Aquatic ecotoxicological indicators in life-cycle assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1796–1807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potting J, Schöpp W, Blok K, Hauschild M (1998) Site-dependent life-cycle impact assessment of acidification. J Ind Ecol 2(2):63–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy PO, Huijbregts M, Deschênes L, Margni M (2012a) Spatially-differentiated atmospheric source-receptor relationships for nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides and ammonia emissions at the global scale for life cycle impact assessment. Atmos Environ 62:74–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy PO, Deschenes L, Margni M (2012b) Life cycle impact assessment of terrestrial acidification: modeling spatially explicit soil sensitivity at the global scale. Environ Sci Technol 46(15):8270–8278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy PO, Azevedo LB, Margni M, van Zelm R, Deschênes L, Huijbregts MAJ (2014) Characterization factors for terrestrial acidification at the global scale: a systematic analysis of spatial variability and uncertainty. Sci Total Environ 500:270–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer L, Pfister S (2016) Global water footprint assessment of hydropower. Renew Energy 99:711–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppälä J, Posch M, Johansson M, Hettelingh JP (2006) Country-dependent characterization factors for acidification and terrestrial eutrophication based on accumulated exceedance as an impact category indicator. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):403–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steen B (1999) A systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in product development (EPS). Version 2000—models and data of the default method. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop MJ, Hauschild M, Hertwich E, Hofstetter P, Jolliet O, Klöpfer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Müller-Wenk R, Olsen SI, Pennington DW, Potting J, Steen B (2002) Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice. SETAC Press, Pensacola

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zelm R, Huijbregts MAJ, Van Jaarsveld JA, Reinds GJ, De Zwart D, Struijs J, Van de Meent D (2007) Time horizon dependent characterization factors for acidification in life-cycle assessment based on forest plant species occurrence in Europe. Environ Sci Technol 41:922–927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zelm R, Roy PO, Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts MAJ (2015) Acidification. In: Hauschild M, Huijbregts M (eds) Life cycle impact assessment. LCA compendium—the complete world of life cycle assessment. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Verones F, Saner D, Pfister S, Baisero D, Rondinini C, Hellweg S (2013) Effects of consumptive water use on biodiversity in wetlands of international importance. Environ Sci Technol 47(21):12248–12257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verones F, Huijbregts MAJ, Chaudhary A, de Baan L, Koellner T, Hellweg S (2015) Harmonizing the assessment of biodiversity effects from land and water use within LCA. Environ Sci Technol 49(6):3584–3592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel H, Hauschild M, Alting L (1997) Environmental assessment of products vol 1: methodology, tools and case studies in product development. Chapman & Hall, London ISBN 0 412 80800

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Process number 9365/13-3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment (QSA), Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

    Natalia Crespo-Mendes, Alexis Laurent & Michael Zwicky Hauschild

Authors
  1. Natalia Crespo-Mendes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexis Laurent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Zwicky Hauschild
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Crespo-Mendes.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Mark Huijbregts

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 334 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crespo-Mendes, N., Laurent, A. & Hauschild, M.Z. Effect factors of terrestrial acidification in Brazil for use in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24, 1105–1117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1560-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1560-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation