Abstract
Purpose
To assess the effect of intensification of feeding strategies on the environmental impacts of different animal-handling scenarios of buffalo milk production.
Methods
Seven scenarios suitable for buffalo milk production were considered—baseline system (BS), S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6—differing from one another in the management system, diet used, and productivity. An attributional cradle-to-farm gate life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed in a buffalo milk farm with a herd of 691 animals. The functional unit was 1 kg of fat (4%) and protein (3.3%) corrected milk (FPCM). The product system comprised four unit processes: mineral salt production, homeopathic medicine production, animal breeding, and milking and milk cooling. The impact assessment considered six categories from the ReCiPe 2016 midpoint method using the software SimaPro® as a supporting tool for the modeling and impact assessment of scenarios.
Results and discussion
The BS was the most impactful among the other scenarios in the categories “climate change (CC),” “land use (LU),” and “water consumption (WC).” S5 and S6 were the most impactful in the categories “terrestrial acidification (TA),” “freshwater eutrophication (FE),” and “fossil resource scarcity (FRS).”
Conclusions
This study can help in choosing feed resources and the handling system and analyzing the consequences on the categories considering their impacts. However, the intensification of production should be achieved by improving both the quality of animal feeding and the management of cropping practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakken AK, Daugstad K, Johansen A, Hjelkrem AGR, Fystro G, Strømman AH, Korsaeth A (2017) Environmental impacts along intensity gradients in Norwegian dairy production as evaluated by life cycle assessments. Agric Syst 158:50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.09.001
Bartl K, Gómez CA, Nemecek T (2011) Life cycle assessment of milk produced in two smallholder dairy systems in the highlands and the coast of Peru. J Clean Prod 19(13):1494–1505
Bernardes O (2007) Bubalinocultura no Brasil: situação e importância econômica. Rev Bras Reprod Anim 31(3):293–298
Bylund G (2003) Whey Processing. In: Dairy processing handbook. Tetra Pak Processing Systems AB. http://dairyprocessinghandbook.com/chapter/whey-processing. Accessed 28 Jan 2018
David FM, Collao-Saenz EA, Pérez JRO, Castro ALA, Resende HRA, Landim AV (2010) Efeito da adição de soro de leite sobre a digestibilidade aparente e os parâmetros sanguíneos de vacas secas. Arq Bras Med Vet 62(5):1183–1190
De Vries JW, Groenestein CM, De Boer IJM (2012) Environmental consequences of processing manure to produce mineral fertilizer and bio-energy. J Environ Manag 102:173–183
FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities, Roma
Flysjo A, Thrane M, Hermansen JE (2014) Method to assess the carbon footprint at product level in the dairy industry. Int Dairy J 34(1):86–92
Garg M, Phondba B, Sherasia P, Makkar H (2016) Carbon footprint of milk production under smallholder dairying in Anand district of Western India: a cradle-to-farm gate life cycle assessment. Anim Prod Sci 56(1):423–436
Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008 - A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. First edition. Report I: Charaterisation
Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira MDM, Hollander A, Zijp M, van Zelm R (2016) ReCiPe 2016 - A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Report I: Characterization. RIVM Report 2016–0104
IDF - International Dairy Federation (2009) Environmental / ecological impact of the dairy sector: literature review on dairy products for an inventory of key issues - List of environmental initiatives and influences on the dairy sector. Bull Int Dairy Fed 436/2009, 60pp
IDF - International Dairy Federation (2015) A common carbon footprint approach for the dairy sector – The IDF guide to standard life cycle assessment methodology. Bull Int Dairy Fed 479/2015, 60pp
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2006a) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Chapter 10: Emissions from Livestock and Manure Management, Japan
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2006b) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Chapter 11: N2O Emissions from Managed soils, and CO2 Emissions from Lime and Urea Application, Japan
ISO - International Organization for Standardization (2006a) ISO 14040: Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework, Geneva
ISO - International Organization for Standardization (2006b) ISO 14044: Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and guidelines, Geneva
Léis CM, Cherubini E, Ruviaro CF, Da Silva VP, Lampert VN, Spies A, Soares SR (2015) Carbon footprint of milk production in Brazil: a comparative case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(1):46–60
Mollea C, Marmo L, Bosco F (2013) Valorisation of cheese whey, a by-product from the dairy industry. In: I Muzzalupo (ed) Food food industry. InTech. ISBN: 978–953–51-0911-2
OECD-FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015) OECD - FAO agricultural outlook 2015–2024 Brazilian agriculture: prospects and challenges. OECD Publishing, Paris
Palmieri N, Forleo MB, Salimei E (2016) Environmental impacts of dairy cheese chain including whey feeding: an Italian case study. J Clean Prod 124(1):1–28
Pirlo G, Carè S, Fantin V, Falconi F, Buttol P, Terzano G, Mason P (2012) Life cycle assessment of Mediterranean buffalo milk. 8th Int. Conference on LCA in the Agri-Food Sector, LCA Food
Pirlo G, Carè S, Fantin V, Falconi F, Buttol P, Terzano GM, Masoni P, Pacelli C (2014a) Factors affecting life cycle assessment of milk produced on 6 Mediterranean buffalo farms. J Dairy Sci 97(10):6583–6593
Pirlo G, Terzano G, Pacelli C, Abeni F, Carè S (2014b) Carbon footprint of milk produced at Italian buffalo farms. Livest Sci 161(1):76–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.12.007
Popa D, Popa R, Vidu L, Nicolae C (2016) Emission of methane from enteric fermentation of cattle and buffaloes in Romania between 1989-2014. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 10(1):289–298
Prazeres AR, Carvalho MFN, Rivas J (2012) Cheese whey management: a review. J Environ Manag 110:48–68
Sabia E, Napolitano F, Claps S, De Rosa G, Barile VL, Braghieri A, Pacelli C (2018) Environmental impact of dairy buffalo heifers kept on pasture or in confinement. Agric Syst 159:42–49
Santos CLR, Santos Júnior JB, Cunha MC, Nunes SRF, Bezerra DC, Torres Júnior JRS, Chaves NP (2016) Nível tecnológico e organizacional da cadeia produtiva da bubalinocultura de corte no estado do Maranhão. Arq Inst Biol 83:1–8
Santos HCM, Maranduba HL, de Almeida Neto JA, Rodrigues LB (2017) Life cycle assessment of cheese production process in a small-sized dairy industry in Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(4):3470–3482
Seó HLS, Machado Filho LCP, Ruviaro CF, Léis CMD (2017) Life cycle assessment in dairy cattle and opportunities to Brazil. Eng Sanit Ambient 22(2):221–237
Soteriades AD, Stott AW, Moreau S, Charroin T, Blanchard M, Liu J, Faverdin P (2016) The relationship of dairy farm eco-efficiency with intensification and self-sufficiency. Evidence from the French dairy sector using life cycle analysis, data envelopment analysis and partial least squares structural equation modelling. PLoS One 11(11):e0166445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166445
TDSoftware (2018) Supercrac. https://www.agropecuaria.inf.br/produtos/supercrac. Accessed 27 Jan 2018
Willers CD, Maranduba HL, de Almeida Neto JA, Rodrigues LB (2017) Environmental impact assessment of a semi-intensive beef cattle production in Brazil’s northeast. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(4):516–524
Woldegebriel D, Udo H, Viets T, van der Harst E, Potting J (2017) Environmental impact of milk production across an intensification gradient in Ethiopia. Livest Sci 206:28–36
Funding
This study was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (476725/2012-7; 313293/2014-7; 424824/2016-7; 167546/2017-1; 406850/2017-8), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (Fapesb) (APP0056/2011; PAM0017/2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Mary Ann Curran
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 38 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soares, B.B., Alves, E.C., Maranduba, H.L. et al. Effect of handling and feeding strategies in the environmental performance of buffalo milk in Northeastern Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24, 1129–1138 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1547-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1547-4