Carbon footprints of grain-, forage-, and energy-based cropping systems in the North China plain
Low carbon footprint agriculture has received increasing attention in the effect of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating climate change. However, little is known about how crop diversification may affect the system productivity and the carbon footprint.
In this study, we analyzed the carbon footprints of four cropping systems: winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–summer maize (Zea mays L.) (WM, grain crop pattern, 1-year cycle); ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)–sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) (RS, forage crop pattern, 1-year cycle); ryegrass–sweet sorghum → winter wheat–summer maize (RSWM, grain plus forage crop pattern, 2-year cycle); and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) perennial cropping (SG, energy crop pattern) that have been evaluated in a long-term (2009–2015) field experiment in the North China Plain (NCP). Carbon footprints were expressed using three metrics: CFa (per unit area), CFb (per kg of biomass), and CFe (per unit of economic output).
Results and discussion
The results showed that switchgrass as a perennial herbaceous crop with one cut per year had the lowest annual carbon footprint at three metrics. The WM cropping system had the highest annual CFa, CFb, and CFe values which were 1.73, 2.23, and 1.78 times higher, respectively, than those of the RSWM cropping system. The RS cropping system had the lower annual CFa, CFb, and CFe values, which accounted for 20.9, 3.4, and 2.9%, respectively, of the WM cropping system. The four cropping systems had annual carbon footprints at per unit area, per kilogram of biomass and per unit of economic output ranked from lowest to highest of SG < RS < RSWM < WM.
We conclude that appropriately designed, diversified cropping systems that include grain, forage, and bioenergy crops can effectively reduce the carbon footprint while maintaining or even increasing the systems productivity in the North China Plain.
KeywordsCarbon footprint Cropping system Energy crop Forage crop Grain crop Soil organic carbon
carbon footprint per unit area
carbon footprint per kg of biomass
carbon footprint per unit of economic output
- CO2 eq
carbon dioxide equivalents
greenhouse gas emissions
North China Plain
ryegrass–sweet sorghum → winter wheat–summer maize
switchgrass perennial cropping
Soil organic carbon
winter wheat–summer maize
This work was jointly financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31601267) and National Key Project of Scientific and Technical Supporting Programs (No. 2016YFD0300203; No. 2016YFD0300105) and the Chinese Universities Scientific Fund (2017NX003).
- BSI (2008) PAS 2050:2008 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services (British Standards Institution, London)Google Scholar
- BSI (2011) PAS 2050:2011 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services (British Standards Institution, London)Google Scholar
- Cougnon M, Baert J, Van Waes C, Reheul D (2013) Performance and quality of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and mixtures of both species grown with or without white clover (Trifolium repens L.) under cutting management. Grass Forage Sci 69(4):666–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fan XF, Hou XC, Zuo HT, Wu JY, Duan LS (2010) Biomass yield and quality of three kinds of bioenergy grasses in Beijing of China. Scientia Agricultural Sinica 43(16):3316–3322 (in Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar
- Gan YT Hamel C, O Donovan JT, Cutforth H, Zentner RP, Campbell CA, Niu YN, Poppy L (2015) Diversifying crop rotations with pulses enhances system productivity. Sci Rep 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14625
- IPCC (2006) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Agriculture, Forestry and other Land Use, vol. 4. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, p 104. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_full_report.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2017
- ISO 13065:2015 (2015) Sustainability criteria for bioenergy. International Organisation for Standardisation (Geneve)Google Scholar
- Li CX, Feng HS (2013) A study on the adaptability of sweet sorghum planted in different altitudinal areas of the Qinghai plateau. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 22(3):51–59 (In Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Liang L (2009) Environmental impact assessment of circular agriculture based on life cycle assessment: methods and case studies. (PhD thesis), Beijing, China: China Agricultural University, College of Agronomy and BiotechnologyGoogle Scholar
- Miller PR, Gan YT, McConkey BG, McDonald CL (2003) Pulse crops in the northern Great Plains. I Grain productivity and residual effects on soil water and nitrogen Agron J 95(4):972–979Google Scholar
- Perlack RD et al (2011) US billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. http://works.bepress.com/douglas_karlen/47/
- SAS I.I (2011) SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 9.3. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
- Seda, M., Assumpeió, A., Muñoz, P., (2010) Analysing the influence of functional unit in agricultural LCA. LCA FOOD 2010. VII international conference on life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector. In: Notarnicola B, Settanni E, Tassielli G, Giungato P (eds) Proceedings of LCA Food 2010. Bari 22–24 September 2010Google Scholar
- Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Tian SZ, Ning TY, Zhao HX, Wang BW, Li N, Han HF, Li ZJ, Chi SY (2012) Response of CH4 and N2O emissions and wheat yields to tillage method changes in the North China plain. PLoS One 7(12):1–10Google Scholar
- Wackernagel M (1994) Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: a tool for planning toward sustainability. (PhD thesis), the University of British Columbia, School of Community and Regional Planning, VancouverGoogle Scholar
- Wiedmann T, Minx J (2008) A definition of “carbon footprint”. In: Pertsova CC (ed) Ecological economics research trends: chapter 1, NY, USA, pp 1–11Google Scholar
- Wu CW, Chen XB, Wei CB, Xu HL, Zhang LB, Liu SJ, Zhang PN, Bi YB (2014) Marginal land resources development and biomass energy research in Yellow River Delta. J Agr Sci Technol 16(4):109–119 (in Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar
- Zhang YM, Chen DL, Zhang JB, Edis R, Hu CS, Zhu AN (2004) Ammonia volatilization and denitrification losses from an irrigated maize-wheat rotation field in the North China plain. Pedosphere 14(4):533–540Google Scholar
- Zhao B, Dong ST, Zhang JW, Liu P (2013b) Effects of controlled-release fertilizer on nitrogen use efficiency in summer maize. PLoS One 8(8):1–8Google Scholar
- Zhao CQ, Fan XF, Hou XC, Zhu Y, Yue YS, Hu YG, Wu JY (2016) Research on the differences in biomass and its allocation of 14 switchgrass in Beijing. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 17(2):280–287 (in Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar