Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Benchmarking environmental performance of electric insulator supply chain in India using life cycle assessment

  • LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims at finding the environmental impacts generated by an electric disk insulator supply chain, used for the distribution of electricity by an open wire system, through a case study. This study also aims at benchmarking the environmental impacts of an electric insulator manufacturing process by taking ideal condition of zero waste as reference.

Methods

Cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) has been carried out by following the guidelines provided in ISO 14040 series standards and using Umberto NXT software. ReCiPe endpoint and ReCiPe midpoint impact assessment methodologies have been used to calculate environmental impacts under various categories. The primary data has been collected from a medium-scale manufacturer of electric disk insulators located at Bikaner in north-west India. The secondary data has been taken from ecoinvent 3.0 database and literature. The environmental impacts using endpoint assessment (ecosystem quality, human health, and resources) and midpoint assessment (climate change, fossil depletion, human toxicity, metal depletion, ozone depletion, terrestrial acidification, and water depletion) categories have been computed. Finally, the results are compared and benchmarked against the ideal zero waste condition using three different production scenarios. The limitation of this study is that the data has been collected only from one manufacturer and its supply chain.

Results and discussion

It has been found that the use of steel, electricity, and fuel; transportation of product; and disposal of water generate high environmental impacts in the supply chain. It has also been found that in the electric disk insulator supply chain, the raw material extraction phase has the highest environmental impacts followed by manufacturing, disposal, transportation, and installation phases. This study has also found that benchmark scenario “B” (zero waste condition) is environmentally more efficient in comparison to scenario “A” (actual recycling condition) and scenario “C” (maximum waste condition).

Conclusions

This study has identified that raw materials, resources, and processes in the supply chain of an electric disk insulator manufacturing unit are responsible for the environmental damage. The various manufacturing processes and installation of the electric disk insulators are similar for all manufacturers except the machinery efficiency and the generated waste. This study provides environmental impacts associated with an electric disk insulator manufacturing process under zero waste or ideal conditions (scenario B). These results are used as a benchmark to compare environmental performance of electric disk insulator supply chain operating under actual conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ifu hamburg (2017) Umberto NXT Universal

  • Bhakar V, Agur A, Digalwar AK, Sangwan KS (2015) Life cycle assessment of CRT, LCD and LED monitors. Procedia CIRP 29:432–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhamu J, Sangwan KS (2015) Reduction of post-kiln rejections for improving sustainability in ceramic industry: a case study. Procedia CIRP 26:618–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birol F, Gould T (2015) India energy outlook. France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Callister WD, Rethwisch DG (1997) Materials science and engineering: an introduction, 4th edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong YH, Ng ST (2014) Comparing the midpoint and endpoint approaches based on ReCiPe—a study of commercial buildings in Hong Kong. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1409–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatima E, Jhamb A, Kumar R (2013) Ceramic dust as construction material in rigid pavement. Am J Civ Eng Archit 1:112–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF et al (2016) ReCiPe 2016 a harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level report I: characterization. Bilthoven

  • ISO 14040 International Standard (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. Switzerland, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14044 International Standard (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. Switzerland, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari DP, Nagrath IJ (2007) Power system engineering, 2nd edition. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, India

  • Power insight magazine (2013) Power insight magazine 2013. In: deccan. http://www.deccan.in/images/media/pdf/power-insight-magazine-2013.pdf,. Accessed 23 Sep 2015

  • Raval AD, Patel IN, Pitroda J (2013) Eco-efficient concretes: use of ceramic powder as a partial replacement of cement. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng 3:2278–3075

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R et al (2004) Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 30:701–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sangwan KS, Bhakar V, Naik S, Andrat SN (2014) Life cycle assessment of incandescent, fluorescent, compact fluorescent and light emitting diode lamps in an Indian scenario. Procedia CIRP 15:467–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senthamarai RM, Devadas Manoharan P (2005) Concrete with ceramic waste aggregate. Cem Concr Compos 27:910–913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwani AF, Usmani JA, Varun (2010) Life cycle assessment of solar PV based electricity generation systems: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:540–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soni, M. L., Gupta P. V., Bhatnagar V. S. and CA (2015) A text book on power system engineering. Dhanpat Rai & Co., 1998, New Delhi, India

  • Stoppato A (2008) Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation. Energy 33:224–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • TERI (2012) Widening the coverage of PAT scheme sectoral manual-ceramic industry, New Delhi, India

  • Turconi R, Boldrin A, Astrup T (2013) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: overview, comparability and limitations. Renew Sust Energ Rev 28:555–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1218–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuldip Singh Sangwan.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Sonia Valdivia

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sangwan, K.S., Choudhary, K. Benchmarking environmental performance of electric insulator supply chain in India using life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24, 518–529 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1455-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1455-7

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Kuldip Singh Sangwan