Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of the study is to quantify the environmental performance of Smart City Solutions at urban system level and thus evaluate their contribution to develop environmentally sustainable urban systems. Further, the study illustrates how this quantification is conducted.
Methods
The case city chosen in our modeling is Copenhagen, where seven Smart City Solutions are introduced: Green Roofs, Smart Windows, Pneumatic Waste Collection, Sensorized Waste Collection, Smart Water Meters, Greywater Recycling, and Smart Energy Grid. The assessment is conducted using a fused urban metabolism (UM)-life cycle assessment (LCA) approach, referred to as UM-LCA. The UM-LCA uses metabolic flows across an urban system as inputs and outputs in an LCA. All life cycle stages of the metabolic flows can be accounted for by using this approach and burden shifting from one stage to another is made quantifiable and hence transparent. The impact assessment is conducted using the ReCiPe method.
Results and discussion
The results obtained for the midpoint indicator, global warming potential (GWP), show reduced environmental performance effect at 75% relative to a business as usual reference scenario by introducing Smart Windows. Furthermore, the GWP indicator shows an environmental improvement of 10% for a Smart Energy Grid solution. Introduction of Pneumatic Waste Collection or Greywater Recycling reveals a minor negative performance effect of 0.76 and 0.70%, respectively, for GWP. The performance changes in terms of GWP for the remaining solutions are so small that these are expected to be within the uncertainty of the calculations. To obtain endpoint indicators (damages), the entire palette of ReCiPe indicators is included. The results of the endpoint indicator assessment yield a tendency similar to the one observed for climate change.
Conclusions
It is found that the implementation of Smart City Solutions generally has a negative influence on the environmental sustainability performance of an urban system. The limited positive influence from the Smart City Solutions is due to burden shifting from the direct impacts of the urban system to embedded impacts which are out of sight for most policy makers. The influence of the Solutions on Copenhagen is generally small, due to a focus on reducing in areas that are not a large environmental burden in Copenhagen. The results are not sufficient to discard the idea of using Smart City Solutions to reduce environmental impacts, but highlight the importance of choosing solutions with the right focus and optimizing the design to best fit the intensions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Baetens R, Jelle BP, Gustavsen A (2010) Properties, requirements and possibilities of smart windows for dynamic daylight and solar energy control in buildings: a state-of-the-art review. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 94:87–105
Bakιcι T, Almirall E, Wareham J (2012) A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. J Knowl Econ 4:135–148
Bianchini F, Hewage K (2012) How “green” are the green roofs? Lifecycle analysis of green roof materials. Build Environ 48:57–65
Britton TC, Stewart RA, O’Halloran KR (2013) Smart metering: enabler for rapid and effective post meter leakage identification and water loss management. J Clean Prod 54:166–176
Chou J-S, Ngo N-T (2016) Smart grid data analytics framework for increasing energy savings in residential buildings. Autom Constr 72:247–257
Cocchia A (2014) Smart and digital city: a systematic literature review. In: Dameri RP, Rosenthal-Sabroux C (eds) Smart city. Springer, Switzerland, pp 13–43
Danmarks statistik (2013) Folketal den 1. i kvartalet efter køn, alder, civilstand, område of tid. Danmarks statistik http://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/selectvarval/saveselections.asp. Accessed 30 November 2016
Danmarks statistik (2016) Areal efter område og tid. Danmarks statistik http://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/selectvarval/saveselections.asp. Accessed 30 November 2016
Dansk skraldesug ApS (2016) Minimax. Dansk skraldesug ApS. http://www.danskskraldesug.dk/Webnodes/da/Web/Dansk+Skraldesug/Affaldssystemer/Minimax++%28fuldt+nedgravet%29. Accessed 30 November 2016
EcoGrid EU (2016) EcoGrid EU—a prototype for European smart grids. Deliverable D6.7 overall evaluation and conclusion. EcoGrid EU. http://www.eu-ecogrid.net. Accessed 30 November 2016
Enevo (2016) Products. Enevo. http://www.enevo.com/products/. Accessed 30 November 2016
Envac ab (2009) Vakuumteknologi. Envac. http://www.envac.dk/produkter-ydelser/vores-teknik/teknologien-bag-affaldssug. Accessed 30 November 2016
European Commission (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook—general guide for life cycle assessment—detailed guidance. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pdf-directory/ILCD-Handbook-General-guide-for-LCA-DETAIL- online-12March2010.pdf
Frederiksberg kommune (2011) Analyse for potentialet for grønne tage, solceller og tagvindmøller. Frederiksberg kommune. https://www.frederiksberg.dk/sites/default/files/meetings-appendices/E58F7213-982F-483D-93C5-9C2EBA08C2DE/2251635-2329574-1.PDF. Accessed 30 November 2016
Free ES, Selkowitz SE, Clear RD, DiBarolomeo DL, Klems JH, Fernandes LL, Ward GJ, Inkarojrit V, Yazdanian M (2006) A design guide for early-market electrochromic windows. Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3mm8j7q1%0ACopyright. Accessed 30 November 2016
Goldstein B, Birkved M, Quitzau M-B, Hauschild M (2013) Quantification of urban metabolism through coupling with the life cycle assessment framework: concept development and case study. Environ Res Lett 8(35024)
Goldstein B, Hauschild M, Fernández J, Birkved M (2016) Testing the environmental performance of urban agriculture as food supply in northern climates. J Clean Prod 135:984–994
Gutierrez JM, Jensen M, Henius M, Riaz T (2015) Smart waste collection system based on location intelligence. Procedia Comput Sci 61:120–127
City Hall (2009) Carbon neutral by 2025—Copenhagen climate plan. City of Copenhagen, The Technical and Environmental Administration, City Hall. https://www.energycommunity.org/documents/copenhagen.pdf
Hauber-Davidson G, Idris E (2006) Smart water metering. Water 33(3):38–41
Hu Z, Li C, Cao Y, Fang B, He L, Zhang M (2014) How smart grid contributes to energy sustainability. Energy Procedia 61:858–861
ISO (2006a) ISO 14040:2006—environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Standards Organization, Switzerland
ISO (2006b) ISO 14044:2006—environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Standards Organization, Switzerland
ITU (International Telecommunication Union) (2014) Smart water management in cities. International Telecommunication Union. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/ssc/Documents/Approved_Deliverables/TR-SWM-cities.docx Accessed 30 November 2016
Jefferson B, Laine a PS, Stephenson T, Judd S (2000) Technologies for domestic wastewater recycling. Urban Water 1:285–292
Joss S, Molella A (2013) The eco-city as urban technology: perspectives on Caofeidian international eco-city (China). J Urban Technol 20:115–137
Kalbar P, Birkved M, Nygaard S, Hauschild M (2017) Weighting and aggregation in life cycle assessment: do present aggregated single scores provide correct decision support? J Ind Ecol 21:1591–1600
Kamstrup (2015) Data sheet Siemens MAG 8000 with READy Gateway. Kamstrup. http://products.kamstrup.com/. Accessed 30 November 2016
Kamstrup (2016a) Non-revenue water—understanding and working proactively with non-revenue water. Kamstrup. https://www.kamstrup.com/en-en/business-areas/water-metering/non-revenue-water. Accessed 30 November 2016
Kamstrup (2016b) The digital water utility—white paper on the potential of smart metering. Kamstrup. https://www.kamstrup.com/en-uk/business-areas/water-metering/the-digital-water-utility. Accessed 30 November 2016
Kennedy C, Pincetl S, Bunje P (2011) The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environ Pollut 167:184–185
Larsen H, Petersen L (2011) Risø energy report 10: energy for smart cities in an urbanised world. Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, Risø Nationallaboratoriet for Bæredygtig Energi. http://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/risoe-energy-report-10--energy-for-smart-cities-in-an-urbanised-world(4e125ec3-2089-483b-a1bf-4840807be6b1).html. Accessed 30 November 2016
Lazarova V, Hills S, Birks R (2003) Using recycled water for non-potable, urban uses: a review with particular reference to toilet flushing. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply 3:69–77
Malik AS, Bouzguenda M (2013) Effects of smart grid technologies on capacity and energy savings—a case study of Oman. Energy 54:365–371
Mamun MAA, Hannan MA, Hussain A, Basri H (2014) Real time bin status monitoring for solid waste collection route optimization. Eng Technonogy doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2014.1077
Memon FA, Zheng Z, Butler D, Shirley-Smith C, Lui S, Makropoulos C, Avery L (2007) Life cycle impact assessment of greywater recycling technologies for new developments. Environ Monit Assess 129:27–35
Nam T, Pardo TA (2011) Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proc 12th Annu Int Digit Gov Res Conf Digit Gov Innov Challenging Times. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602
Neirotti P, De Marco A, Cagliano AC, Mangano G, Scorrano F (2014) Current trends in smart city initiatives: some stylised facts. Cities 38:25–36
Niachou A, Papakonstantinou K, Santamouris M, Tsangrassoulis A, Mihalakakou G (2001) Analysis of the green roof thermal properties and investigation of its energy performance. Energy Build 33:719–729
Opti (2014) Advanced green roof retrofit SAP North America Newtown Square, Pennsylvania. OptiRTC, Inc. https://d1qmdf3vop2l07.cloudfront.net/turquoise-tomato1.cloudvent.net/compressed/d6a9811ccafc0f498b7ac09ea692dc5d.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2016
Optigreen (2011) Technical brochure green roofs. Optigrün. https://www.optigruen.de/fileadmin/contents/sprache_englisch_uk/Blaetterkatalog/index.html. Accessed 30 November 2016
Pincetl S, Bunje P, Holmes T (2012) An expanded urban metabolism method: toward a systems approach for assessing urban energy processes and causes. Landsc Urban Plan 107:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.006
Punkkinen H, Merta E, Teerioja N, Moliis K, Kuvaja E (2012) Environmental sustainability comparison of a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system and a door-to-door system. Waste Manag 32:1775–1781
Rovetta A, Xiumin F, Vicentini F, Minghua Z, Giusti A, Qichang H (2009) Early detection and evaluation of waste through sensorized containers for a collection monitoring application. Waste Manag 29:39–49
Teerioja N, Moliis K, Kuvaja E, Ollikainen M, Punkkinen H, Merta E (2012) Pneumatic vs. door-to-door waste collection systems in existing urban areas: a comparison of economic performance. Waste Manag 32:1782–1791
Townsend A (2013) SMART CITIES—big data, civic hackers and the quest for a new utopia. W. W. Norton, New York
VanWoert ND, Rowe DB, Andresen JA, Rugh CL, Xiao L (2005) Green roof stormwater retention: effects of roof surface, slope and media depth. J Environ Qual 40:659–664
View Dynamic Glass (2010) Energy benefits of view dynamic glass in workplaces. View. https://viewglass.com/assets/pdfs/workplace-white-paper.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2016
View Dynamic Glass (2017) Product Guide. View. https://viewglass.com/assets/pdfs/product-guide.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2016
Villareal E, Dixon A (2005) Analysis of a rainwater collection system for domestic water supply in Ringdansen, Norrköping, Sweden. Build Environ 40:1174–1184
Yang J, Yu Q, Gong P (2008) Quantifying air pollution removal by green roofs in Chicago. Atmos Environ 42:7266–7273
Zadeh SM, Hunt DVL, Lombardi DR, Rogers CDF (2013) Shared urban greywater recycling systems: water resource savings and economic investment. Sustain 5:2887–2912
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Giuseppe Ioppolo
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 2811 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ipsen, K.L., Zimmermann, R.K., Nielsen, P.S. et al. Environmental assessment of Smart City Solutions using a coupled urban metabolism—life cycle impact assessment approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24, 1239–1253 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1453-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1453-9