Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Including metal atmospheric fate and speciation in soils for terrestrial ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment

  • LCIA OF IMPACTS ON HUMAN HEALTH AND ECOSYSTEMS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study is to calculate regionalized characterization factors for the atmospheric emissions of metals transferred to soil for zinc, copper, and nickel taking into account the atmospheric fate and speciation.

Methods

In order to calculate characterization factors for all possible atmospheric emission locations around the world, the link between atmospheric deposition with regionalized soil fate factors and bioavailability factors accounting for the metal’s speciation was established. The methodology to develop the regionalized fate factors and characterization factors is threefold. First, the emitted metal fraction that is deposited on soils is calculated from atmospheric source-receptor matrices providing for each emission location the fraction of an emission that is deposited on each worldwide receiving cell (2° × 2.5° resolution). Second, the fraction of metal deposited in different soil types is determined by overlapping the deposition map with a soil map, based on the 4513 different soil types from the Harmonized World Soil Database. Third, bioavailability factors are calculated for each soil type, which allows determining the bioavailable fraction of the deposited metal depending on the soil properties. Combining these steps with the effect factors results in a series of terrestrial ecotoxicological characterization factors. These characterization factors are then applied in an illustrative example and compared to results obtained with generic characterization factors. The case study focuses on the electricity production process in Québec, whose ecosystem impacts are currently dominated by metal ecotoxicity impacts. The uncertainty due to the spatial variability of the impact is quantified.

Results and discussion

Our results show that regionalized characterization factors are over three orders of magnitude lower than generic characterization factors. They are presented on maps and their spatial variability was evaluated at different regional scales (region, country, world). The use of regionalized characterization factors with their spatial variability at different geographic resolution scales in the case study gives a result more or less precise depending on the level of resolution of the characterization factor applied (country or global-default). The impact scores of the three metals in the case study are three orders of magnitude lower when compared to the scores obtained with generic characterization factors.

Conclusions

The development of those regionalized characterization factors improves the terrestrial ecotoxicity assessment in life cycle impact assessment by taking into account the atmospheric fate and the speciation of the metal for new 3 metals for the different soil types in the world and by documenting their spatial variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bulle C et al (2017) IMPACT World+: a globally regionalized life cycle impact assessment method. Int J Life Cycle Assess (submitted)

  • Diamond M et al (2010) The clearwater consensus: the estimation of metal hazard in fresh water. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):143–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0140-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Gandhi N, Hauschild MZ (2014) Development of comparative toxicity potentials of 14 cationic metals in freshwater. Chemosphere 112:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrother A, Wenstel R, Sappington K, Wood W (2007) Framework for metals risk assessment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 68(2):145–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.03.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi N, Diamond M, van de Meent D, Huijbregts MAJ, Peijnenburg WJGM, Guinée J (2010) New method for calculating comparative toxicity potential of cationic metals in freshwater: application to copper, nickel, and zinc. Environ Sci Technol 44(13):5195–5201. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903317a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi N, Diamond ML, Huijbregts MAJ, Guinée JB, Peijnenburg WJGM, van de Meent D (2011a) Implications of considering metal bioavailability in estimates of freshwater ecotoxicity: examination of two case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(8):774–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0317-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi N, Huijbregts MAJ, van de Meent D, Peijnenburg WJGM, Guinée J, Diamond ML (2011b) Implications of geographic variability on comparative toxicity potentials of Cu, Ni and Zn in freshwaters of Canadian ecoregions. Chemosphere 8:268–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenenberg JE, Dijkstra JJ, Bonten LTC, de Vries W, Comans RNJ (2012) Evaluation of the performance and limitations of empirical partition-relations and process based multisurface models to predict trace element solubility in soils. Environ Pollut 166:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2012.03.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2) (2012) Accessed 21–08-2016

  • Hauschild M (2007) International consensus model for comparative assessment of chemiclas. SETAC Europe Annual Meeting 2007

  • Hauschild MZ, McKone TE, van de Meent D, Huijbregts M, Margni M, Rosenbaum RK, Jolliet O (2010) USEtox™ 1.01 - UNEP/SETAC model for the comparative assessment of chemicals released to air, water and soil and their toxic effects on the human population and ecosystems. UNEP/SETAC

  • Haye S, Slaveykova IV, Payet J (2007) Terrestrial ecotoxicity and effect factors of metals in life cycle assessment. Chemosphere 68(8):1489–1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson AD, Hauschild MZ, van de Meent D, Huijbregts MAJ, Larsen HF, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Rosenbaum RK, Jolliet O (2011) USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(8):701–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0294-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts M, Hauschild M, Jolliet O, Margni M, McKone T, Rosenbaum RK, van de Meent D (2010) USEtox™ User manual. USEtox™ Team

  • INRP (2014) Inventaire national des rejets de polluants. http://ec.gc.ca/inrp-npri/donnees-data/index.cfm?do=query&lang=fr. Accessed 02 Jan 2017

  • ISO (2006) Management environnemental —— Analyse du cycle de vie —— Principes et cadre

  • Jolliet O, Saadé M, Crettaz P (2005) Analyse du cycle de vie - Comprendre et réaliser un écobilan vol 23. Gérer l'Environnement, 1st edn. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabata-Pendias A, Mukherjee AB (2007) Trace elements from soil to human. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32714-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Mauzerall DL, Horowitz LW (2008) Source-receptor relationships between East Asian sulfur dioxide emissions and northern hemisphere sulfate concentrations. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 8(2):5537–5561. https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-8-5537-2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan AL, Zhang H, McLaughlin MJ (2005) Prediction of zinc, cadmium, lead, and copper availability to wheat in contaminated soils using chemical speciation, diffusive gradients in thin films, extraction, and isotopic dilution techniques. J Environ Qual 34(2):496–507. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owsianiak M, Rosenbaum RK, Huijbregts MAJ, Hauschild MZ (2013) Addressing geographic variability in the comparative toxicity potential of copper and nickel in soils. Environ Sci Technol 47(7):3241–3250. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3037324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patouillard L, Bulle C, Margni M (2016) Ready-to-use and advanced methodologies to prioritise the regionalisation effort in LCA. Mater Tech 104(1):105. https://doi.org/10.1051/mattech/2016002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payet J (2004) Assessing Toxic Impacts on Aquatic Ecosystems in Life Cycle Assessment. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

  • Pizzol M, Bulle C, Thomsen M (2012) Indirect human exposure assessment of airborne lead deposited on soil via a simplified fate and speciation modelling approach. Sci Total Environ 421–422:203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plouffe G, Bulle C, Deschênes L (2015a) Assessing the variability of the bioavailable fraction of zinc at the global scale using geochemical modeling and soil archetypes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plouffe G, Bulle C, Deschênes L (2015b) Case study: taking zinc speciation into account in terrestrial ecotoxicity considerably impacts life cycle assessment results. J Clean Prod 108(Part A):1002–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plouffe G, Bulle C, Deschênes L (2016) Characterization factors for zinc terrestrial ecotoxicity including speciation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(4):523–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1037-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox-the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(7):532–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0038-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy P-O, Deschênes L, Cécile B (2016) Global scale atmospheric modeling of black carbon for estimating metal source-receptor relationships for life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess (submitted)

  • Sanderson M et al (2008) A multi-model study of the hemispheric transport and deposition of oxidised nitrogen. Geophys Res Lett 35. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035389

  • Strandesen M, Birkved M, Holm PE, Hauschild MZ (2007) Fate and distribution modelling of metals in life cycle impact assessment. Ecol Model 203(3-4):327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tromson C, Bulle C, Deschênes L (2017) Including the spatial variability of metal speciation in the effect factor in life cycle impact assessment : limits of the equilibrium partitioning method. Sci Total Environ 581-582:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(9):1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yantosca B, Sager PL, Carouge C (2015) GEOS-Chem v10-01 online user’s guide. http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/geos/doc/man/index.html. Accessed 18–08 2016

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Pierre-Olivier Roy for his share of expertise and Pablo Tirado-Seco, Amir Yadghar, Hassana El-Zein, Clara Tromson, Geneviève Plouffe and Ivan Viveros Santos for their appreciated contribution. The International Life Cycle Chair (a research unit of the CIRAIG) would like to thank its industrial partners for their financial support: Arcelor Mittal, Bombardier, Mouvement des caisses Desjardins, Hydro-Québec, LVMH, 477 Michelin, Nestlé, RECYC-QUÉBEC, RONA, SAQ, Solvay, Total, Umicore, and Veolia Environment. The research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Environmental Sciences, CIRAIG, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888, succ. Centre ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada

    Lycia Aziz

  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, CIRAIG, Polytechnique Montréal, C.P. 6079, succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3A7, Canada

    Louise Deschênes, Rifat-Ara Karim & Laure Patouillard

  3. Department of Strategy and Corporate Social Responsibility, CIRAIG, ESG UQAM, C.P. 8888, succ. Centre ville, Montréal, C.P. 8888, succ. Centre ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada

    Cécile Bulle

Authors
  1. Lycia Aziz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Louise Deschênes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rifat-Ara Karim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laure Patouillard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cécile Bulle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cécile Bulle.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Miguel Brandão

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 6697 kb).

ESM 2

(XLSX 3207 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aziz, L., Deschênes, L., Karim, RA. et al. Including metal atmospheric fate and speciation in soils for terrestrial ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 2178–2188 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1438-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1438-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation