Abstract
Purpose
This study proposes a method based on the analysis of trade networks over time for modelling the marginal supply of products in consequential life cycle assessment (LCA). It aims at increasing the geographical granularity of markets, accuracy of transport distances and modes and material losses during transit by creating country-specific markets, instead of region-based supply-origin markets as currently proposed by ecoinvent. It leads to a better consideration of the environmental weight of trade following a change in demand on a local market and may serve as an inspirational basis for future releases of consequential life cycle inventory (LCI) databases.
Methods
The method uses ecoinvent v.3.3 as a support LCI database and two distinct traded products: bananas and grey Portland cement. Each country involved in the trade of a said product has a corresponding market created in the LCI database. The behavior of market to a marginal change in internal demand is modelled after its marginal trading preferences: it can either affect local production, imports, exports or a mix of the first two. Markets are linked to one another based on the linear regression analysis of their historical trade relations. The inventories that follow an increase in demand of 1000 kg of bananas and grey Portland cement are calculated for each market involved in their trade and are environmentally characterized and compared to the generic region-based market datasets provided by ecoinvent to assess the gains in accuracy through a higher geographical granularity. Furthermore, the characterized inventories of the markets for bananas are compared to a parallel scenario where transport distances are kept to a minimum using the shortest path method. It isolates the environmental burden associated to the utility maximization of the demand.
Results and discussion
When comparing the characterized impacts of country-specific markets with the generic ecoinvent market datasets, disparities in results appear. They highlight the importance of transport induced by demand displacement and losses of material during transport, both being the consequences of the extent a given market decides to be supplied directly from producing markets at the margin. These are aspects that may go unaccounted for when using generic regional markets. Second, optimizing transport distances for each market decreases the environmental impacts for most categories by more than 70%.
Conclusions
This study shows there is a need for modelling and understanding market relations to more accurately define the role of trade, supply chain efficiency and import policies in LCA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
More information at https://ocelot.space/
References
Armington PS (1969) A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production (Une théorie de la demande de produits différenciés d’après leur origine)(Una teoría de la demanda de productos distinguiéndolos según el lugar de producción). Staff Papers-International Monetary Fund 16(1):159–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/3866403
Bento A, Klotz R (2014) Climate policy decisions require policy-based lifecycle analysis. Environ Sci Technol 48(10):5379–5387. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405164g
Chalmers N, Brander M, Revoredo-Giha C (2015) The implications of empirical and 1:1 substitution ratios for consequential LCA: using a 1% tax on whole milk as an illustrative example. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(9):1268–1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0939-y
Chen I-C, Fukushima Y, Kikuchi Y, Hirao M (2012) A graphical representation for consequential life cycle assessment of future technologies. Part 1: methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(2):119–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0356-9
Cooper J, Noon M, Jones C, Kahn E, Arbuckle P (2013) Big data in life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 17(6):796–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12069
Corrado S, Ardente F, Sala S, Saouter E (2017) Modelling of food loss within life cycle assessment: from current practice towards a systematisation. J Clean Prod 140:847–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.050
Earles M, Halog A (2011) Consequential life cycle assessment: a review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(5):445–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0275-9
Earles M, Halog A, Ince P, Skog K (2013) Integrated economic equilibrium and life cycle assessment modeling for policy-based consequential LCA. J Ind Ecol 17(3):375–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00540.x
Ekvall T, Andrae A (2005) Attributional and consequential environmental assessment of the shift to lead-free solders (10 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:344–353
FAOSTAT (2016) FAOSTAT Statistics Database. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/. Accessed 11 Jan 2016
Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U et al (2011) Global food losses and food waste. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
Hagberg A, Swart PJ, Schult DA (2008) Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. Proceedings of the 7th python in science conference (SciPy2008), pp 11–15
Hunter J (2007) Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng 9(3):90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
Igos E, Rugani B, Rege S, Benetto E, Drouet L, Zachary DS (2015) Combination of equilibrium models and hybrid life cycle—input–output analysis to predict the environmental impacts of energy policy scenarios. Appl Energ 145:234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.007
Jensen JD, Andersen M (2003) Marginale producenter af udvalgte landbrugsprodukter
Kapuscinski C, Warr P (1999) Estimation of Armington elasticities: an application to the Philippines. Econ Model 16(2):257–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-9993(98)00042-X
Kløverpris J, Wenzel H, Nielsen PH (2008) Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:13–21
Lund H, Mathiesen B, Christensen P, Schmidt J (2010) Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(3):260–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0164-7
Mathiesen B, Münster M, Fruergaard T (2009) Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments. J Clean Prod 17(15):1331–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.009
Mayer T, and Zignago S (2011) Notes on CEPII’s Distances Measures: The GeoDist Database. CEPII Working Paper No. 2011-25. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1994531 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1994531
Pizzol M, Scotti M (2017) Identifying marginal supplying countries of wood products via trade network analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(7):1146–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1222-6
Rajagopal D (2014) Consequential life cycle assessment of policy vulnerability to price effects. J Ind Ecol 18(2):164–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12058
Sacchi R (2017) Example – heat recovery and system expansion
Schmidt J (2008) System delimitation in agricultural consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):350–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0016-x
Schmidt J, Weidema B (2007) Shift in the marginal supply of vegetable oil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:235
United Nations (2016) UN ComTrade Database. http://comtrade.un.org/. Accessed 11 Jan 2016
U.S. Geological Survey (2016) Cement Statistics and Information. https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/cement/. Accessed 11 Jan 2017
van Meijl H, van Rheenen T, Tabeau A, Eickhout B (2006) The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe. sciencedirect
Vieira P, Horvath A (2008) Assessing the end-of-life impacts of buildings. Environ Sci Technol 42(13):4663–4669. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071345l
Vázquez-Rowe I, Rege S, Marvuglia A, Thénie J, Haurie A, Benetto E (2013) Application of three independent consequential LCA approaches to the agricultural sector in Luxembourg. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(8):1593–1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0604-2
Weidema BP, Ekvall T, Heijungs R (2009) Guidelines for applications of deepened and broadened LCA. Co-ordination Action for innovation in Life-Cycle Analysis for Sustainability
Weidema BP, Frees N, Nielsen A-M (1999) Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4(1):48–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979395
Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G (2013) Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Ecoinvent Report 1(v3). St. Gallen, The ecoinvent Centre
Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(9):1218–1230
Williams J (2013) Agricultural supply chains and the challenge of price risk. Taylor and Francis
Zepeda L (2001) Agricultural Investment, Production Capacity and Productivity. FAO Economic and Social Development Paper, Rome
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Massimo Pizzol who provided insightful comments and time that greatly assisted the development, improvement and review of this work. The author also thanks the valued inputs of the three reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Yi Yang
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 876 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sacchi, R. A trade-based method for modelling supply markets in consequential LCA exemplified with Portland cement and bananas. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 1966–1980 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1423-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1423-7