Skip to main content

Launch of a new report: “Road testing organizational life cycle assessment around the world: applications, experiences and lessons learned”



Organizational life cycle assessment (O-LCA) is still a rather young proposal, but moving towards becoming more broadly accepted as a scientifically mature and practical method. The UNEP/SETAC flagship project “LCA of organizations” concluded its “road-testing” phase and is glad to announce the publication of the final report “Road testing organizational life cycle assessment around the world: applications, experiences and lessons learned.” The full report can be accessed at This article shortly summarizes the flagship project phases and main outcomes, particularly the report recently launched, and pinpoints future actions.


In 2015, the “Guidance on Organizational Life Cycle Assessment” was published. During the following 2 years, the flagship project accompanied 12 organizations in the road testing of that O-LCA Guidance. They represent four world regions, different sectors and sizes. The road testers’ case studies and their feedback are the basis of the Road-testing Report.

Results and discussion

The Road-testing Report aims to complement the O-LCA Guidance through the road testers’ experience, thus delivering advice for future practitioners and inspiration to method developers. It includes executive summaries of the O-LCA road testers’ case studies and the main results of a comprehensive survey through which the road testers share their experience, feedback, and lessons learned. The road testing confirmed the application potential of the O-LCA method and the positive outcomes of the road testing have shown that no immediate updates to the O-LCA Guidance are needed, but some priority actions were identified in order to further ease the application of O-LCA.


Three main tasks for the coming years are identified by the authors: firstly, the challenges highlighted during the road testing should be addressed in the future by the LCA community; specific methodological difficulties of certain kinds of organizations, like the service sector, should be targeted; and finally, the potential revealed by the organizational perspective can be deployed in adjacent LCA fields. The flagship project team hopes that this second publication, together with the great acceptance of the O-LCA Guidance and the contribution of third parties, will pave the way to make O-LCA a mainstream tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. 1.


  1. European Commission (2013) Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF) Guide

  2. ISO (2014) ISO/TS 14072 environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines for organizational life cycle assessment. Geneva, Switzerland

  3. Jungbluth N, Keller R, König A (2016) ONE TWO WE—life cycle management in canteens together with suppliers, customers and guests. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:646–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira VG, Torregrosa-López JI, Capuz-Rizo SF (2016) Use of life cycle assessment methodology in the analysis of ecological footprint assessment results to evaluate the environmental performance of universities. J Clean Prod 133:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Manzardo A, Loss A, Mazzi A, Scipioni A (2016) Organization life-cycle assessment (OLCA): methodological issues and case studies in the beverage-packaging sector. Springer, Singapore, pp 47–73

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martínez-Blanco J, Inaba A, Finkbeiner M (2015a) Scoping organizational LCA—challenges and solutions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(6):829–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Martínez-Blanco J, Inaba A, Quiros A et al (2015b) Organizational LCA: the new member of the LCA family—introducing the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative guidance document. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1045–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Chang Y-J, Finkbeiner M (2015c) Social organizational LCA (SOLCA)—a new approach for implementing social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1586–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martínez-Blanco J, Inaba A, Finkbeiner M (2016) Life cycle assessment of organizations. In: Finkbeiner M (ed) Special types of life cycle assessment. Springer, Netherlands, pp 333–394

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Neppach S, Nunes KRA, Schebek L (2017) Organizational environmental footprint in German construction companies. J Clean Prod 142(Part 1):78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Resta B, Gaiardelli P, Pinto R, Dotti S (2016) Enhancing environmental management in the textile sector: an organisational-life cycle assessment approach. J Clean Prod 135:620–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. UN Environment (2017) Road testing organizational life cycle assessment around the world: applications, experiences and lessons learned. United Nations Environment Programme, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  13. UNEP (2015) Guidance on organizational life cycle assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to particularly thank all the road testers for their commitment and dedication during the pilot phase and their valuable contribution to the Road-testing Report. We would like to also acknowledge Prof. Atsushi Inaba and the feedback stakeholders for their precious comments. Finally, we thank the sponsors and the secretariat of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative for their support.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Martínez-Blanco.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Mary Ann Curran

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martínez-Blanco, J., Forin, S. & Finkbeiner, M. Launch of a new report: “Road testing organizational life cycle assessment around the world: applications, experiences and lessons learned”. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 159–163 (2018).

Download citation


  • O-LCA
  • Sustainable supply chain management
  • Survey
  • Case studies
  • Footprinting
  • Environmental management