Skip to main content

A parametric environmental life cycle assessment of newspaper making in Spain

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment volume 23, pages 1240–1260 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Most LCAs estimate environmental impacts for a specific situation (industry, sector or location) in a generic way, without considering the specific characteristics of the product or service being evaluated. This paper outlines the relevance of the use of parameters and scenarios in environmental assessment for a daily newspaper considering multiple factors. The results of the different environmental impacts were compared with a baseline reference scenario.

Methods

Different product specifications, sources of raw materials, manufacturing technologies, energy mix, locations of the printing plant, and distribution possibilities of the newspaper have been taken into account. The unit processes and the amounts allocated for each resource may vary depending on the scenarios. Inventory data were obtained directly from measured data for consumption in the printing plant located in Gran Canaria (Spain) and internal inventories and indirectly from information of existing processes and products. As functional units, both 1 kg of printed newspaper and 1 unit of printed newspaper have been used. The environmental impact assessment methodology ReCiPe has been applied in this study. Also endpoint indicators are shown as score (Pt) for different areas of protection.

Results and discussion

For variations in the number of printed copies, the results show that environmental impacts are very high for small runs. For large runs, the impacts decrease between −14 and −16% with respect to the baseline scenario. The environmental impact of paper in the final product depends on several variables including the use of recycled fiber, the papermaking technology and the energy used in the paper plant. For airlifted daily newspapers, this means an increase of over 98% in the Climate Change impact if it is not printed in the same place of distribution. The electricity mix also depends on the geographical location and significantly affects the impacts, especially in the case of an isolated territory with increments of over 12% compared to interconnected systems.

Conclusions

An impact assessment should take into account the suppliers and the characteristics of the raw materials the equipment, the technology, the energy mix, and all the variables that may affect the product. From the analysis of the scenarios, it is obtained that the low runs as well as the high pages and weights produce the greatest impacts. The use of recyclable paper, the shorter distance to the printing plant from the raw materials factories as well as the use of renewable energy sources considerably reduce the impacts generated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  • AGA (2011) Declaración Medioambiental 2010. Artes Gráficas del Atlántico

  • AGA (2012) Declaración Medioambiental 2011. Artes Gráficas del Atlántico

  • AGFA (2004) Polaris XTV-S & XCV-S. Specifications

  • AGFA (2007a) Polaris XCV(S)-XTV(S) XEV with GENII Optics. Service Guide

  • AGFA (2007b) Plate processor VXP85. Service manual

  • AGFA (2008) Material safety data sheet. PL10RI Photopolymer Replenisher. SUBID:000000012726

  • AGFA (2010a) Plate specifications N91V & N91. High performance photopolymer plate technology

  • AGFA (2010b) Agfa-Gevaert. Sustainability report 2009

  • AGFA (2010c) Material safety data sheet. PL10 Photopolymer Developer. SUBID:000000011962

  • AGFA (2010d) Material safety data sheet. Unifin. Offset plate finisher solution. SUBID:000000009031

  • AGFA (2010e) Material safety data sheet. Wash gum solution. SUBID:000001007793

  • Berger M, Finkbeiner M (2011) Correlation analysis of life cycle impact assessment indicators measuring resource use. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(1):74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börjeson L, Höjer M, Dreborg K, Ekvall T, Finnveden G (2006) Scenario types and techniques: towards a user’s guide. Futures 38(7):723–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bousquin J, Gambeta E, Esterman M, Rothenberg S (2012) Life cycle assessment in the print industry. J Ind Ecol 16(s1):S195–S205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clément É, Van Durme G, Charron-Doucet F (2011) Environmental life cycle assessment of paperback book printing alternatives in the usa. Report. Hewlett Packard Company

  • Cluzel F, Yannou B, Millet D, Leroy Y (2014) Exploitation scenarios in industrial system LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(1):231–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlbo H, Laukka J, Myllymaa T, Koskela S, Tenhunen J, Seppälä J, Jouttijärvi T, Melanen M (2005) Waste management options for discarded newspaper in the Helsinki metropolitan area: life cycle assessment report. Helsinki, Finnish environment institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlbo H, Koskela S, Pihkola H, Nors M, Federley M, Seppälä J (2012) Comparison of different normalised LCIA results and their feasibility in communication. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(4):850–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlheim R, Axelsson U (1997) Life-cycle analysis for printed products. Advances in printing science and technology

  • Ecoinvent (2012) Swiss centre for life cycle inventories. Available via Ecoinvent V2.2. www.ecoinvent.org

  • ELCD (2014) European reference life cycle database. In: http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ Accessed 7/12 2016

  • Endesa (2012) Declaración Ambiental 2009. Central Térmica Barranco de Tirajana

  • European Commission (2013) The EU ecolabel for printed paper products best practice guide. a useful tool for competent bodies

  • Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudreault C, Samson R, Stuart P (2009) Implications of choices and interpretation in LCA for multi-criteria process design: de-inked pulp capacity and cogeneration at a paper mill case study. J Clean Prod 17(17):1535–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GDI, Green Design Institute (2014) Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA). In: http://www.eiolca.net/. Accessed 07/12 2016

  • Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Report I: characterisation. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level

  • Goleman D (2009) Ecological intelligence: how knowing the hidden impacts of what we buy can change everything. Random House LLC

  • Hischier R (2007) Life cycle inventories of packagings and graphical papers. Part III paper and board. Ecoinvent report No. 20

  • Hischier R, Reichart I (2003) Multifunctional electronic media-traditional media. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(4):201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohenthal C, Moberg Å, Arushanyan Y, Ovaskainen M, Nors M, Koskimäki A (2013) Environmental performance of Alma Media’s online and print products. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

  • Holmen Paper (2011) Standard Newsprint Madrid Mill. In: http://www.holmen.com/Products/Printing-paper/Environment/Paper-Profile/ Accessed 07/12/2016

  • ILCD (2012) International reference life cycle data system (ilcd) handbook. In: http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/JRC-Reference-Report-ILCD-Handbook-Towards-more-sustainable-production-and-consumption-for-a-resource-efficient-Europe.pdf. Accessed 7/12/2016

  • Infras (1998) LCA graphic paper and print products. A life cycle assessment of the production of a daily newspaper and a weekly magazine

  • Jolliet O, Müller-Wenk R, Bare J, Brent A, Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Itsubo N, Peña C, Pennington D, Potting J (2004) The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(6):394–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juntunen S, Lindqvist U (2007). Modelling the eco-balance of printed communications. Advances in printing science and technology

  • Kipphan H (2001) Handbook of print media: technologies and production methods. Springer

  • Larsen HF, Hauschild M, Hansen MS (2006) Ecolabelling of printed matter part II- Life cycle assessment of model sheet fed offset printed matter. Working Report. Technical University of Denmark

  • Lesage P, Schoonenberg C (2010) Comparative life cycle assessment of marketing collateral printing. report. Hewlett Packard Company

  • Man Roland (2007) Manual del proyecto COLORMAN - AGA. Gran Canaria

  • Moberg Å, Johansson M, Finnveden G, Jonsson A (2007) Screening environmental life cycle assessment of printed, internet-based and tablet e-paper newspaper. KTH Centre for Sustainable Communications

  • Moberg Å, Borggren C, Finnveden G (2011) Books from an environmental perspective—part 2: e-books as an alternative to paper books. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(3):238–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nela (2010) Nela VCPm. Multivariable, fully automatic register punching and bending device with video-control positioning

  • Nors M, Pajula T, Pihkola H (2009) Calculating the carbon footprints of a Finnish newspaper and magazine from cradle to grave. Life cycle assessment of products and technologies. LCA Symposium—VTT

  • Pihkola H, Nors M, Kujanpää M, Helin T, Kariniemi M, Pajula T, Dahlbo H, Koskela S (2010a) Carbon footprint and environmental impacts of print products from cradle to grave. Results from the LEADER project (part 1).VTT tutkimus [viitattu 1.6.2011].Saatavissa: http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2010/T2560.pdf. Accesed 7/12/2016

  • Pihkola H, Federley M, Nors M, Dahlbo H, Koskela S, Jouttijärvi T (2010b) Communicating environmental impacts of print products. Results from the LEADER project (Part 2)

  • PRé Consultants (2012). Simapro Sofware version 7.3.3, http://www.pre-sustainability.com/simapro Accessed 7/12/2016

  • Rack M, Valdivia S, Sonnemann G (2013) Life cycle impact assessment—where we are, trends, and next steps: a late report from a UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative workshop and a few updates from recent developments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(7):1413–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafenberg C, Eric M (1998) Life cycle analysis of the newspaper le monde. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3(3):131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008a) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 1: goal and scope and inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008b) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 2: impact assessment and interpretation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(5):374–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R, Hunkeler D, Norris G, Rydberg T, Schmidt W, Suh S, Weidema BP, Pennington DW (2004) Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 30(5):701–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • REE (2011) Red Eléctrica de España y el Cambio Climático 2011

  • REE (2012) Reunión del comité Técnico de Seguimiento de la Operación del Sistema Eléctrico Canario enero-diciembre 2011

  • Roberts BH (2004) The application of industrial ecology principles and planning guidelines for the development of eco-industrial parks: an Australian case study. J Clean Prod 12(8):997–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JH, Holm P, Merrild A, Christensen P (2007) Life cycle assessment of the waste hierarchy-A Danish case study on waste paper. Waste Manag 27(11):1519–1530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann M, Scholz R, Tietje O, Haan P (2005) Scenario modelling in prospective LCA of transport systems. Application of formative scenario analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(5):325–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stora Enso (2007) Hilte Mills. EMAS Environmental Statement 2006

  • Stora Enso (2011a) NewsPress Langerbrugge Mill

  • Stora Enso (2011b) Standard Newsprint Hylte Mill

  • Suh S (2009) Handbook on Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology. Springer

  • Suh S, Huppes G (2005) Methods for life cycle inventory of a product. J Clean Prod 13(7):687–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases: a basis for greener processes and products. Publication of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative

  • Vercalsteren A, Van Hoof V (2010) Carbon footprint (CFP) analysis of different Agfa plate systems

  • Weidema B, Ekvall T, Pesonen H, Rebitzer G, Sonnemann G, Spielmann M (2004) Scenarios in LCA. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Brussels/Pensacola

  • Westren-Doll J, Innanen J, Väisänen T (1997). Teollisuuden Energiatehokkuusindeksi: Graafinen Teollisuus (the Energy Efficiency Index of the Industry: Printing Industry). Motivan Julkaisuja

  • Zarwan J (2009) The environmental impact of the printing plate. J Zarwan Partners: http://www.johnzarwan.com/pubs/environmentplate.pdf Accessed 7/12/2016

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Edificio de Ingenierías - Campus Tafira, 35017, Las Palmas, Spain

    Alexis Lozano-Medina

  2. Department of Process Engineering, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Edificio de Ingenierías - Campus Tafira, 35017, Las Palmas, Spain

    Sebastián Ovidio Pérez-Báez & Ana María Blanco-Marigorta

  3. Department of Mathematics, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus Tafira, 35017, Las Palmas, Spain

    Antonio Luis Alamo

Authors
  1. Alexis Lozano-Medina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sebastián Ovidio Pérez-Báez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio Luis Alamo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ana María Blanco-Marigorta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexis Lozano-Medina.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Yi Yang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lozano-Medina, A., Pérez-Báez, S.O., Alamo, A.L. et al. A parametric environmental life cycle assessment of newspaper making in Spain. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 1240–1260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1366-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1366-z

Keywords

  • Ecolabel
  • Endpoint
  • Environmental impact
  • Newspaper
  • Parameter
  • Printing
  • Scenario