Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Life cycle assessment of European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) landed by purse seine vessels in northern Spain

  • CHALLENGES AND BEST PRACTICE IN LCAS OF SEAFOOD AND OTHER AQUATIC PRODUCTS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The main purpose of this article is to assess the environmental impacts associated with the fishing operations related to European anchovy fishing in Cantabria (northern Spain) under a life cycle approach.

Methods

The life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was applied for this case study including construction, maintenance, use, and end of life of the vessels. The functional unit used was 1 kg of landed round anchovy at port. Inventory data were collected for the main inputs and outputs of 32 vessels, representing a majority of vessels in the fleet.

Results and discussion

Results indicated, in a similar line to what is reported in the literature, that the production, transportation, and use of diesel were the main environmental hot spots in conventional impact categories. Moreover, in this case, the production and transportation of seine nets was also relevant. Impacts linked to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions suggest that emissions were in the upper range for fishing species captured with seine nets and the value of global warming potential (GWP) was 1.44 kg CO2 eq per functional unit. The ecotoxicity impacts were mainly due to the emissions of antifouling substances to the ocean. Regarding fishery-specific categories, many were discarded given the lack of detailed stock assessments for this fishery. Hence, only the biotic resource use category was computed, demonstrating that the ecosystems’ effort to sustain the fishery is relatively low.

Conclusions

The use of the LCA methodology allowed identifying the main environmental hot spots of the purse seining fleet targeting European anchovy in Cantabria. Individualized results per port or per vessel suggested that there are significant differences in GHG emissions between groups. In addition, fuel use is high when compared to similar fisheries. Therefore, research needs to be undertaken to identify why fuel use is so high, particularly if it is related to biomass and fisheries management or if skipper decisions could play a role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Notes

  1. It should be noted that the region imports substantial amounts of European anchovy from other Spanish regions, France or Morocco, and other anchovy species from Peru (Engraulis ringens) and Argentine (Engraulis anchoita) to nourish the canning industry.

  2. A standard error of 0.00 was computed for Engraulis anchoita, according to the data provided by FishBase (2016). This value is probably linked to the lack of multiple data points measuring the trophic level of this species.

References

  • Almeida C, Vaz S, Cabral H, Ziegler F (2014) Environmental assessment of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) purse seine fishery in Portugal with LCA methodology including biological impact categories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:297–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avadí A, Fréon P (2015) A set of sustainability performance indicators for seafood: direct human consumption products from Peruvian anchoveta fisheries and freshwater aquaculture. Ecol Indic 48:518–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avadí A, Fréon P, Quispe I (2014a) Environmental assessment of Peruvian anchoveta food products: is less refined better? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(6):1276–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avadí A, Vázquez-Rowe I, Fréon P (2014b) Eco-efficiency assessment of the Peruvian anchoveta steel and wooden fleets using the LCA+DEA framework. J Clean Prod 70:118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayer N, Tyedmers P, Pelletier N, Sonesson U, Scholz A (2007) Co-product allocation in life cycle assessment of seafood production systems: review of problems and strategies. Int J of Life Cycle Assess 12(7):480–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bala A, Raugei M, Fullana i Palmer P (2014) Introducing a new method for calculating the environmental credits of end-of-life material recovery in attributional LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(5):645–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Basurko OC, Gabiña G, Uriondo Z (2013) Energy performance of fishing vessels and potential savings. J Clean Prod 54:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulay AM, Bare J, De Camillis C, Döll P, Gassert F, Gerten D, Humbert S, Inaba A, Itsubo N, Lemoine Y, Margni M, Motoshita M, Núñez M, Pastor AV, Ridoutt B, Schencker U, Shirakawa N, Vionnet S, Worbe S, Yoshikawa S, Pfister S (2015) Consensus building on the development of a stress-based indicator for LCA-based impact assessment of water consumption: outcome of the expert workshops. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(5):577–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J, Macfadyen G (2007) Ghost fishing in European waters: impacts and management responses. Mar Policy 31(4):488–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashion T, Tyedmers P, Parker R (2016) What we feed matters: differences in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and primary productivity requirements to sustain provision of fish meals and oils. LCA of Foods 2016, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi J, Kelley D, Murphy S, Thangamani D (2016) Economic and environmental perspectives of end-of-life ship management. Resour Conserv Recy 107:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll M, Palomera I, Tudela S, Sardà F, (2006) Trophic flows, ecosystem structure and fishing impacts in the South Catalan Sea, Northwestern Mediterranean. J Marine Syst 59:63–96

  • Ecoembes (2015) Available at https://www.ecoembes.com/es/ciudadanos/envases-y-proceso-reciclaje/reciclaje-en-datos/barometro

  • Ecoinvent (2016). Available at http://www.ecoinvent.org/

  • Emanuelsson A, Ziegler F, Pihl L, Sköld M, Sonesson U (2014) Accounting for overfishing in life cycle assessment: new impact categories for biotic resource use. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(5):1156–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EMEP/EEA (2013) Air pollutant emission inventory guidebook. Available at http://www.eea.europa.eu//publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2013

    Google Scholar 

  • EMEP-Corinair (2006) Emissions inventory guidebook. Available at http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/EMEPCORINAIR4

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurofish (2012) Overview of the world’s anchovy sector and trade possibilities for Georgian anchovy products. Eurofish International Organization

  • European Commission (2011) Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Off J Eur Union, L 174/88

  • European Commission (2012) Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Off J Eur Union, L 197/38

  • FAO (2016) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fishery/area/Area27/en

  • FishBase (2016) Available at http://www.fishbase.org/search.php

  • Fréon P, Cury P, Shannon L, Roy C (2005) Sustainable exploitation of small pelagic fish stocks challenged by environmental and ecosystem changes: a review. B Mar Sci 76(2):385–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Fréon P, Avadí A, Soto WM, Negrón R (2014a) Environmentally extended comparison table of large- versus small- and medium-scale fisheries: the case of the Peruvian anchoveta fleet. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 71(10):1459–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fréon P, Avadí A, Vinatea-Chavez RA, Iriarte F (2014b) Life cycle assessment of the Peruvian industrial anchoveta fleet: boundary setting in life cycle inventory analyses of complex and plural means of production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1068–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fréon P, Sueiro JC, Iriarte F, Miro Evar OF, Landa Y, Mittaine JF, Bouchon M (2014c) Harvesting for food versus feed: a review of Peruvian fisheries in a global context. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 24(1):381–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner D, Pagavino M, Marcano J (1999) Influence of fisheries’ behavior on the catchability of surface tuna schools in the Venezuelan purse-seiner fishery in the Caribbean Sea. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:394–406

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Cobo PL (1998) La importancia del sector conservero en la economía de Santoña y Cantabria. Asociación de Fabricantes de Conservas de Pescado de Cantabria, pp 95–99

  • Gilbert P, Wilson P, Walsh C, Hodgson P (2016) The role of material efficiency to reduce CO2 emissions during ship manufacture: a life cycle approach. Mar Policy 75:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Schryver A, Struijis J, Van Zelm R (2009) ReCIPE 2008. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonized category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint

  • Goedkoop M, Oele M, Leijting J, Ponsioen T, Meijer E (2016) Introduction to LCA with SimaPro 8. PRé Consultants, Amersfoort

    Google Scholar 

  • González-García S, Villanueva-Rey P, Belo S, Vázquez-Rowe I, Moreira M. T, Feijoo G, Arroja L (2015) Cross-vessel eco-efficiency analysis. A case study for purse seining fishing from North Portugal targeting European pilchard. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1019–1032

  • Guascor (2016) Guascor marine diesel engines and systems. Available at http://www.dresser-rand.com/products-solutions/guascor-gas-diesel-engines/

  • Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Wegener A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA (2001) Life cycle assessment. An operational guide to the ISO Standards. Centre of Environmental Science, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild MZ, Goedkoop M, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Margni M, De Schryver A, Humbert S, Laurent A, Sala S, Pant R (2013) Identifying best existing practice for characterization modelling in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(3):683–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hornborg S, Nilsson P, Valentisson D, Ziegler F (2012) Integrated environmental assessment of fisheries management: Swedish Nephrops trawl fisheries evaluated using a life cycle approach. Mar Policy 36(6):1193–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hospido A, Tyedmers P (2005) Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries. Fish Res 76:174–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICES (2014) ICES advice December 2014 for European anchovy. Available at http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Advice/2014/Special%20Requests/EU_Bay_of_Biscay_anchovy_TAC.pdf

  • ILCD (2011) Recommendations for life cycle assessment in the European context—based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors. Joint Research Centre. ISBN: 978-92-79-17451-3

  • IPCC (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Available at http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/spanish/

  • IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013. The physical science basis. Working group I contribution to the 5th assessment report of the IPCC. Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change Available at: http://www.climatechange2013.org (Last accessed: June 30th 2016)

  • ISO (2006a) ISO 14040: environmental management-life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Standards Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006b) ISO 14044: environmental management-life cycle assessment—requirements and management. International Standards Organization., Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafarzadeh S, Ellingsen H, Aanond-Aanondsen S (2016) Energy efficiency of Norwegian fisheries from 2003 to 2012. J Clean Prod 112:3616–3630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahhat R, Kim J, Xu M, Allenby B, Williams E, Zhang P (2008) Exploring e-waste management systems in the United States. Resour Conserv Recy 52:955–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko N, Gantner J (2016) Local added value and environmental impacts of ship scrapping in the context of a ship’s cycle. Ocean Eng 122:317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois J, Fréon P, Delgenes JP, Steyer JP, Hélias A (2014) New methods for impact assessment of biotic-resource depletion in life cycle assessment of fisheries: theory and application. J Clean Prod 73:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois J, Fréon P, Delgenes JP, Steyer JP, Hélias A (2015) Sea use impact category in life cycle assessment: characterization factors for life support functions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:970–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laso J, Margallo M, Celaya J, Fullana P, Bala A, Gazulla C, Irabien A, Aldaco R (2016a) Waste management under a life cycle approach as a tool for a circular economy in the canned anchovy industry. Waste Manage Res 34(8):724–733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laso J, Margallo M, Fullana P, Bala A, Gazulla C, Irabien A, Aldaco R (2016b) Introducing life cycle thinking to define best available techniques for products: application to the anchovy canning industry. J Clean Prod doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.040

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo-Toja Y, Vázquez-Rowe I, Chenel S, Marín-Navarro D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2015) Eco-efficiency analysis of Spanish WWTPs using the LCA+DEA method. Water Res 68:651–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lovarelli D, Bacenetti J, Fiala M (2016) Water footprint of crop productions: a review. Sci Total Environ 548-549:236–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magrama (2013) Informe sobre el Estudio de Mercado de la Anchoa (Engraulis encrasicolus). Secretaría General de Pesca

  • Margallo M, Aldaco R, Irabien A, Carrillo V, Fischer M, Bala A, Fullana P (2014) Life cycle assessment modelling of waste-to-energy incineration in Spain and Portugal. Waste Manage Res 32(6):492–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment (2015) Dossier Autonómico de la Comunidad Autónoma de Cantabria. Análisis y Prospectiva-serie Territorial, Gobierno de España

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson P, Ziegler F (2007) Spatial distribution of fishing effort in relation to seafloor habitats in the Kattegat, a GIS analysis. Aquat Conserv 17:421–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu R, Wang Z, Song Q, Li J (2012) LCA of scrap CRT display at various scenarios of treatment. Procedia Environmental Sciences 16:576–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker R (2011) Measuring and characterizing the ecological foot-print and life cycle environmental cost of Antartic Krill (Euphasia superb) products. MSc thesis. Dalhousie University, Canada

  • Parker R, Tyedmers P (2012) Life cycle environmental impacts of three products derived from wild-caught Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba). Environ Sci Technol 46(9):4958–4965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker R, Tyedmers P (2015) Fuel consumption of global fishing fleets: current understanding and knowledge gaps. Fish Fisheries 16:684–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker RW, Hartmann K, Green BS, Gardner C, Watson RA (2015a) Environmental and economic dimensions of fuel use in Australian fisheries. J Clean Prod 87:78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker R, Vázquez-Rowe I, Tyedmers P (2015b) Fuel performance and carbon footprint of the global purse seine fleet. J Clean Prod 103:517–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PAS 2050-2 (2012) Assessment of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions. Supplementary requirements for the application of PAS 2050:2011 to seafood and other aquatic food products

  • Pauly D, Christensen V (1995) Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374(6519):255–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier N, Tyedmers P (2011) An ecological economic critique of the use of market information in life cycle assessment research. J Ind Ecol 15(3):342–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier N, Ayer N, Tyedmers P, Kruse S, Flysjo A, Robillard G, Ziegler F, Scholz A, Sonesson U (2007) Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production systems: review and prospectus. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(6):414–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plan de Residuos de Cantabria (2016) Plan de Residuos de la Comunidad Autónoma de Cantabria (2016–2022). Gobierno de Cantabria

  • Pontes LM, Ambrosio L, García M (2015) Cantabrian Sea purse seine anchovy fishery. Bureau Veritas Certification France, pp:1–174

  • Ramos S, Vázquez-Rowe I, Artetxe I, Moreira MT, Feijoo G, Zufía J (2011) Environmental assessment of the Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) season in the Basque Country. Increasing the timeline delimitation in fishery LCA studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):599–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni MD, McKone TE, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:532–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell SD, Alexander RT (1996) The skipper effect debate: views from a Philippine fishery. J Anthropol Res 52(4):433–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan L, Tyedmers P (2007) Skippers, spotters and seiners: analysis of the “skipper effect” in US menhaden (Brevoortia spp.) purse-seine fisheries. Fish Res 83:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Q, Wang Z, Li J, Zeng X (2012) Life cycle assessment of TV sets in China: a case study of the impacts of CRT monitors. Waste Manag 32:1926–1936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sthiannopkao S, Wong MH (2013) Handling e-waste in developed and developing countries: initiatives, practices, and consequences. Sci Total Environ 463-464:1147–1153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SUPERPROP (2012) Superior lifetime operation economy of ship propellers Available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/transport/projects/items/superprop_en.htm

  • Tyedmers P (2001) Energy consumed by North Atlantic fisheries. In: Zeller D, Watson R, Pauly D (eds) Fisheries impacts on North Atlantic ecosystems: catch, effort, and national/regional datasets, vol 9. Fisheries Centre Research Reports, pp 12–34

  • Tyedmers P, Watson R, Pauly D (2005) Fueling global fishing fleets. Ambio 34:635–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Tyedmers P (2013) Identify the importance of the “skipper effect” within sources of measured inefficiency in fisheries through data envelopment analysis (DEA). Mar Policy 38:387–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2010) Life cycle assessment of horse mackerel fisheries in Galicia (NW Spain): comparative analysis of two major fishing methods. Fish Res 106(3):517–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2011a) Life cycle assessment of fresh hake fillets captured by the Galician fleet in the Northern Stock. Fish Res 1110:128–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2011b) Estimating global discards and their potential reduction for the Galician fishing fleet (NW Spain). Mar Policy 35:140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012a) Inclusion of discard assessment indicators in fisheries life cycle assessment studies. Expanding the use of fishery-specific impact categories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:535–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012b) Environmental assessment of frozen common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) captured by Spanish fishing vessels in the Mauritanian EEZ. Mar Policy 36(1):180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012c) Best practices in life cycle assessment implementation in fisheries. Improving and broadening environmental assessment for seafood production systems. Trends Food Sci Tech 28:116–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Villanueva-Rey P, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2014a) Edible protein energy return on investment ratio (ep-EROI) for Spanish seafood products. Ambio 43(3):381–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Villanueva-Rey P, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2014b) Life cycle assessment of European pilchard (Sardina pilchardus) consumption. A case study for Galicia (NW Spain). Sci Total Environ 475:48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Reyna J, García-Torres S, Kahhat R (2015) Is climate change-centrism an optimal policy making strategy to set national electricity mixes? Appl Energ 159:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Kahhat R, Quispe I, Bentín M (2016) Environmental profile of green asparagus production in a hyper-arid zone in coastal Peru. J Clean Prod 112(4):2505–2517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villamor B, Abaunza P (2009) La anchoa del golfo de Vizcaya: un recurso pesquero en crisis. Perspectivas científicas Anuario de la Naturaleza de Cantabria 6:10–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods JS, Veltman K, Huijbregts MA, Verones F, Hertwich EG (2016) Towards a meaningful assessment of marine ecological impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA). Environ Int 89:48–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WULCA (2016) Consensual method development. Available at: http://www.Wulca-waterlca.Org/project.Html. Last accessed 17th Oct 2016

  • Xunta de Galicia (2016) Pesca de Galicia. http://www.pescadegalicia.gal/. Last accessed: June 2016

  • Ziegler F, Hornborg S (2014) Stock size matters more than vessel size: the fuel efficiency of Swedish demersal trawl fisheries 2002–2010. Mar Policy 44:72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler F, Valentinsson D (2008) Environmental life cycle assessment of Norway lobster (Nephrops novegicus) caught along the Swedish west coast by creels and conventional trawls—LCA methodology with case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:487–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler F, Winther U, Hognes E, Emanuelsson A, Sund V, Ellingsen H (2013) The carbon footprint of Norwegian seafood products on the global seafood markets. J Ind Ecol 17(1):103–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler F, Hornborg S, Green BS, Eigaard OR, Farmery AK, Hammar L, Hartmann K, Molander S, Parker RWR, Hognes ES, Vázquez-Rowe I, Smith ADM (2016) Expanding the concept of sustainable seafood using life cycle assessment. Fish Fish 17:1073–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlatanos S, Laskaridis K (2007) Seasonal variation in the fatty acid composition of three Mediterranean fish—sardine (Sardina pilchardus), anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) and picarel (Spicara smaris). Food Chem 103:725–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zlatanos S, Sagredos AN (1993) The fatty acids composition of some important Mediterranean fish species. Eur J Lipid Sci Tech 95(2):66–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Spanish Government for their financial support via the project GeSAC-Conserva: Sustainable Management of the Cantabrian Anchovies (CTM2013-43539-R) and to Pedro Villanueva-Rey for valuable scientific exchange. Jara Laso thanks the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spanish Government for their financial support via the research fellowship BES-2014-069368 and to the Ministry of Rural Environment, Fisheries and Food of Cantabria for the data support. Dr. Ian Vázquez-Rowe thanks the Peruvian LCA Network for operational support. Reviewers are also thanked for the valuable and detailed suggestions. The work of Dr. Rosa M. Crujeiras has been funded by MTM2016-76969P (AEI/FEDER, UE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jara Laso.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Patrik John Gustav Henriksson

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 183 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laso, J., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Margallo, M. et al. Life cycle assessment of European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) landed by purse seine vessels in northern Spain. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 1107–1125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1318-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1318-7

Keywords