LCA and decision making: when and how to use consequential LCA; 62nd LCA forum, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, 9 September 2016

  • Rolf Frischknecht
  • Enrico Benetto
  • Thomas Dandres
  • Reinout Heijungs
  • Charlotte Roux
  • Dieuwertje Schrijvers
  • Gregor Wernet
  • Yi Yang
  • Annika Messmer
  • Laura Tschuemperlin
CONFERENCE REPORT: 62ND DISCUSSION FORUM ON LCA

Abstract

The 62nd life cycle assessment (LCA) forum was held on 9 September 2016 to discuss the state of research and application with regard to consequential life cycle assessment. This conference report presents the highlights of the LCA forum. The state of the art of consequential LCA was presented from different viewpoints. It was pointed out that consequential LCA is more than marginal mixes and avoided burdens and involves causal modelling. It was also said that social responsibility calls for consequential LCA. Currently, different models are used to support decision making. It was suggested to make use of the variety of models to check the conclusiveness of their results and thus the reliability of the LCAs. Current and future implementations of consequential LCI models in background databases and linking algorithms were presented. Several speakers presented consequential LCA case studies covering the sectors energy, transport, housing and mining. Some of the LCA models used in the case studies are complemented with general and partial computable equilibrium models and agent-based models and use environmentally extended input-output data or process-based LCA data. Some of the presentations focused on elements such as constrained production, marginal market mixes and technologies or recycling and system expansion. In three parallel workshops, the needs, contents and methodology, and implementation of consequential LCA approaches were discussed. The participants seemed to generally agree on the basic goal that LCA should be able to reflect the consequences of decisions. The inquiry among the participants showed that the demand for consequential LCA studies is hardly existent. The appropriate implementation of consequential modelling in LCA databases and on the appropriate model to be used in consequential LCA case studies was debated. It revealed a need for further and extensive discussions to be able to reach (minimum) consensus.

References

  1. Augustin M (1997) Lebenserwartung. Neue Zürcher Zeitung NZZ, Samstag/Sonntag 7/8, p. 80Google Scholar
  2. Binnemans K, Jones PT, Blanpain B, Van Gerven T, Yang Y, Walton A, Buchert M (2013) Recycling of rare earths: a critical review. J Clean Prod 51:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dandres T, Gaudreault C, Seco PT, Samson R (2014) Uncertainty management in a macro life cycle assessment of a 2005–2025 European bioenergy policy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 36(0):52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dandres T, Gaudreault C, Tirado-Seco P, Samson R (2011) Assessing non-marginal variations with consequential LCA: application to European energy sector. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(6):3121–3132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dandres T, Gaudreault C, Tirado-Seco P, Samson R (2012) Macroanalysis of the economic and environmental impacts of a 2005-2025 European Union bioenergy policy using the GTAP model and life cycle assessment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(2):1180–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heijungs R (1998) Towards eco-efficiency with LCA’s prevention principle. An epistemological foundation of LCA using axioms. In: Klostermann JEM, Tukker A (eds) Product innovation and eco-efficiency. Twenty-three industry efforts to reach the factor 4. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 175–185Google Scholar
  7. Heijungs R, Guinée J (2015) Some fundamentals on ALCA and CLCA. In: Blanc I (ed) EcoSD annual workshop: consequential LCA. Presses des Mines, Paris, pp. 41–48Google Scholar
  8. Igos E, Rugani B, Rege S, Benetto E, Drouet L, Zachary D (2015) Combination of equilibrium models and hybrid life cycle-input-output analysis to predict the environmental impacts of energy policy scenarios. Appl Energ 145:234–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Manski CF (2013) Public policy in an uncertain world: analysis and decisions. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Querini F, Benetto E (2015) Combining agent-based modeling and life cycle assessment for the evaluation of mobility policies. Environ Sci Technol 49:1744–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Roux C, Schalbart P, Assoumou E, Peuportier B (2016) Integrating climate change and energy mix scenarios in LCA of buildings and districts. Appl Energ 184:619–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vázquez-Rowe I, Rege S, Marvuglia A, Thénie J, Haurie A, Benetto E (2013) Application of three independent consequential LCA approaches to the agricultural sector in Luxembourg. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(8):1593–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1218–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yang Y (2016) Two sides of the same coin: consequential life cycle assessment based on the attributional framework. J Clean Prod 127:274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yang Y, Heijungs R (2016) Comparative review of linear models and non-linear optimization models for consequential life cycle assessment: a path forward. J Clean Prod, under reviewGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rolf Frischknecht
    • 1
  • Enrico Benetto
    • 2
  • Thomas Dandres
    • 3
  • Reinout Heijungs
    • 4
  • Charlotte Roux
    • 5
  • Dieuwertje Schrijvers
    • 6
  • Gregor Wernet
    • 7
  • Yi Yang
    • 8
  • Annika Messmer
    • 1
  • Laura Tschuemperlin
    • 1
  1. 1.treeze Ltd.UsterSwitzerland
  2. 2.Luxembourg Institute of Science and TechnologyEsch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg
  3. 3.Department of Environmental EngineeringCiraig University, Université de Montréal - École Polytechnique de MontréalMontréalCanada
  4. 4.Department of Econometrics and Operations Research, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Mines Paris Tech, CES - Centre Efficacité Énergétique des SystèmesParisFrance
  6. 6.Analyse du Cycle de Vie et Chimie Durable (CyVi), Institut des Sciences MoléculairesUniversité de BordeauxTalenceFrance
  7. 7.ecoinventZurichSwitzerland
  8. 8.CSRA Inc.Falls ChurchUSA

Personalised recommendations