Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Applying soil quality indicators in the context of life cycle assessment in a Finnish case study

  • LAND USE IN LCA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In this paper, we present a case study of soil quality assessments for Finnish arable crop production. The aim was to assess the applicability of three soil quality indicators by testing available assessment models and data in the context of a life cycle assessment (LCA). The indicators were erosion, soil organic matter (SOM) and compaction, which are crucial effects of soil cultivation in Finland, strongly affecting the cultivation fitness of soil especially in the long run.

Methods

In this case study, we assessed the effects of four Finnish arable crop rotations. The functional unit was 1 metric ton of cereal or turnip rape seed on the farm. The model used for assessing SOM was Yasso07, VIHMA for erosion and COMPSOIL for compaction. We used data from two conventional and two organic farms, collected from 4-year-long crop rotations that included turnip rape, cereals and green manure ley. Farm data were supplemented with geographic information and data from the literature.

Results and discussion

The data needed for the assessment of soil erosion and soil carbon decline was in the main readily available at farm level in the Finnish agricultural database, the Finnish Meteorological Institute, and from geographic information systems. However, more data would have been needed in the cultivation history of the field parcels for an accurate assessment of soil carbon decline. With regard to soil compaction, we had difficulties in finding suitable data especially on machinery use, which is not available in public data sources. Moreover, the reliability of the compaction model COMPSOIL was questioned, as its performance has not been validated in Finnish conditions.

Conclusions

The erosion and SOM models were found to be suitable for use in LCAs. However, the model for the assessment of compaction was considered too difficult to use. Furthermore, the compaction model results need to be validated with field measurements to be considered reliable in Finnish conditions. This study provides a starting point for developing soil quality assessment in Finnish agricultural production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achten WMJ, Mathijs E, Muys B (2009) Proposing a life cycle land use impact calculation methodology. In: Nemecek T, Gaillard G (eds) Proceedings of the 6th international conference on LCA in the agri-food sector—towards a sustainable management of the food chain. Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, Zürich, pp. 22–33

  • Al Majou H, Bruand A, Duval O, Le Bas C, Vautier A (2008) Prediction of soil water retention properties after stratification by combining texture, bulk density and the type of horizon. Soil Use Man 24:383–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alakukku L (2000) Response of annual crops to subsoil compaction in a field experiment on clay soil lasting 17 years. Adv Geoecol 32:205–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Alakukku L, Elonen P (1994) Finnish experiments on subsoil compaction by vehicles with high axle load. Soil Till Res 29:151–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alakukku L, Weisskopf P, Chamen WCT, Tijink FGJ, van der Linden JP, Pires S, Sommer C, Spoor G (2003) Prevention strategies for field traffic-induced subsoil compaction: a review. Part 1. Machine/soil interactions. Soil Till Res 73:145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome

  • Ball BC (2013) Soil structure and greenhouse gas emissions: a synthesis of 20 years of experimentation. Eur J Soil Sci 64:357–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck T, Bos U, Wittstock B, Baitz M, Fischer M, Sedlbauer K (2010) Land use indicator value calculation in life cycle assessment—method report. Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics Department Life Cycle Engineering. Echterdingen

  • Berglund K, Berglund Ö, Bjuréus A (2002) Markstrukturindex- ett sätt att bedöma jordarnas fysikaliska status och odlingssystemets inverkan på markstrukturen. Avdelningsmeddelande 02:4. Sveriges Landbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för markvetenskap, Uppsala

  • Bolinder MA, Janzen HH, Gregorich EG, Angers DA, VandenBygaart AJ (2007) An approach for estimating net primary productivity and annual carbon inputs to soil for common agricultural crops in Canada. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandão M, Milà i Canals LM (2013) Global characterisation factors to assess land use impacts on biotic production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1243–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandão M, Milà i Canals L, Clift R (2011) Soil organic carbon changes in the cultivation of energy crops: implications for GHG balances and soil quality for use in LCA. Biomass Bioenerg 35:2323–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney K, Swift RS (1984) The influence of organic matter on aggregate stability in some British soils. J Soil Sci 35:223–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman K, Jenkinson DS, Crocker GJ, Grace PR, Klír J, Körschens M, Poulton PR, Richter DD (1997) Simulating trends in soil organic carbon in long-term experiments using RothC-26.3. Geoderma 81:29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell SJ, Clift R (2000) A methodology for assessing soil quantity and quality in life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 8:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW (2002) Soil health and global sustainability: translating science into practice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 88:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2002) Towards a thematic strategy for soil protection. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels

  • EC (2006) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels

  • Eurofins Viljavuuspalvelu (2010) Finnish soil fertility measurement statistics. http://www.tuloslaari.fi/index.php?id=41 (in Finnish). Accessed 26 Aug 2016

  • FAO, IIASA, ISRIC, ISSCAS, JRC (2012) Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2). FAO, Rome, Italy and IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria

  • Finke P, Hartwich R, Dudal R, Ibanez J, Jamagne M, King D, Montanarella L, Yassoglou N (2001) Georeferenced soil database for Europe. Manual of procedures, version 1.1. European Soil Bureau Scientific Committee

  • Finnish Meteorological Institute (2013a) Normal period 1981-2010. http://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/normal-period-1981-2010. Accessed 3 Dec 2013

  • Finnish Meteorological Institute (2013b) Open data sets. http://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/open-data-sets-available. Accessed 10 Sept 2013

  • Finnish Meteorological Institute (2013c) Personal communication, 11.10.2013

  • Fullen MA (1985) Compaction, hydrological processes and soil erosion on loamy sands in east Shropshire, England. Soil Till Res 6:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrigues E, Corson MS, Angers DA, van der Werf HMG, Walter C (2012a) Soil quality in life cycle assessment: towards development of an indicator. Ecol Indic 18:434–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garrigues E, Corson MS, Walter C, Angers DA, Van der Werf HMG (2012b) Soil-quality indicators in LCA: method presentation with a case study. In: Corson MS, van der Werf HMG (ed) Proceedings of the 8th international conference on life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector, Saint Malo, pp. 347–352

  • Garrigues E, Corson MS, Angers DA, van der Werf HMG, Walter C (2013) Development of a soil compaction indicator in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1316–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen J, Ketoja E, Nuutinen V, Regina K (2013) Declining trend of carbon in Finnish cropland soils in 1974-2009. Global Change Biol 19:1456–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildén M, Lehtonen H, Bärlund I, Hakala K, Kaukoranta T, Tattari S (2005) The practice and process of adaptation in Finnish agriculture. FINADAPT Working Paper 5, Finnish Environment Institute Mimeographs 335, Helsinki

  • Jensen ES (1987) Seasonal patterns of growth and nitrogen fixation in field-grown pea. Plant Soil 101:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JRC (2011) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook—recommendations for life cycle impact assessment in the European context. First edition, November 2011. EUR 24571 EN. Luxemburg. Publications Office of the European Union. European Commission-Joint Research Centre-Institute for Environment and Sustainability

  • Karhu K, Gärdenäs AI, Heikkinen J, Vanhala P, Tuomi M, Liski J (2012) Impacts of organic amendments on carbon stocks of an agricultural soil—comparison of model-simulations to measurements. Geoderma 189:606–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW, Cline RG, Harris RF, Schuman GE (1997) Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:4–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koellner T, De Baan L, Beck T, Brandão M, Civit B, Margni M, Milà i Canals L, Saad R, de Souza DM, Müller-Wenk R (2013a) UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1188–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koellner T, de Baan L, Beck T, Brandão M, Civit B, Goedkoop M, Margni M, Milà i Canals L, Müller-Wenk R, Weidema B, Wittstock B (2013b) Principles for life cycle inventories of land use on a global scale. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1203–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukkonen S, Alakukku L, Myllys M, Palojärvi A (2004) Maan laadun arviointi tiloilla – kirjallisuuskatsaus (Soil quality on-farm assessment—a review). Maa- ja Elintarviketalous 63. MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen

  • Lilja H, Turtola E, Hyväluoma J, Hakala O, Puustinen M, Uusi-Kämppä J (2014) Suomen peltojen karttapohjainen eroosioluokitus: karttojen kattavuus ja käyttömahdollisuudet (Map-based classification of soil erosion risk in Finnish agricultural fields). MTT Raportti 133. MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen

  • Lindeijer E (2000) Biodiversity and life support impacts of land use in LCA. J Clean Prod 8(2000):313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila T, Helin T, Antikainen R, Soimakallio S, Pingoud K, Wessman H (2011) Land use in life cycle assessment. The Finnish Environment 24

  • Mattila T, Helin T, Antikainen R (2012) Land use indicators in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:277–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson B, Cederberg C, Blix L (2000) Agricultural land use in life cycle assessment (LCA): case studies of three vegetable oil crops. J Clean Prod 8:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milà i Canals L, Bauer C, Depestele J, Dubreuil A, Freiermuth Knuchel R, Gaillard G, Michelsen O, Müller-Wenk R, Rydgren B (2007a) Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milà i Canals L, Romanyà J, Cowell SJ (2007b) Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of ‘fertile land’ in life cycle assessment (LCA). J Clean Prod 15:1426–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milà i Canals L, Rigarlsford G, Sim S (2013) Land use impact assessment of margarine. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1265–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MTT Vakola (2004) Maatalous - ja metsäkoneiden myynti 2000–2002 (Sales of agricultural and forestry machines 2000-2002). http://jukuri.mtt.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/441066/TILASTOKOKO.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 4 Oct 2013

  • Muys B, García Quijano J (2002) A new method for land use impact assessment in LCA based on the ecosystem exergy concept. Laboratory for Forest, Nature and Landscape Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

  • Myllys M, Palojärvi A, Alakukku L (2011) Internet-based soil quality test for Finnish farmers. In: Hultgren J, Persson P, Nadeau, E, Fogelberg F (eds) Food, feed, fuel and fun. Nordic light on future land use and rural development, book of abstracts, p. 228

  • Nokian Heavy Tyres Technical manual/Agricultural tyres (2010) http://www.nokianraskaatrenkaat.fi/files/nht/technical_manual/NokianHeavyTyres_Technical_manual_04_Agricultural_20082013.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2013

  • Nunez M, Anton A, Munoz P, Rieradevall J (2013) Inclusion of soil erosion impacts in life cycle assessment on a global scale: application to energy crops in Spain. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:755–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan MF, Henshall JK, Dickson JW (1999) A simplified method for estimating soil compaction. Soil Till Res 49:325–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberholzer H, Freiermuth Knuchel R, Weisskopf P, Gaillard G (2012) A novel method for soil quality in life cycle assessment using several soil indicators. Agron Sust Devel 32:639–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013) Sustainable agriculture. Theme: soil quality. http://www.oecd.org/tad/sustainable-agriculture/themesoilquality.htm. Accessed 10 Dec 2013

  • Pahkala K, Hakala K, Kontturi M, Niemeläinen O (2009) Peltobiomassat globaalina energianlähteenä. Maa- ja Elintarviketalous 137. MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen

  • Pietola L, Alakukku L (2005) Root growth dynamics and biomass input by Nordic annual field crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puustinen M, Koskiaho J, Peltonen K (2005) Influence of cultivation methods on suspended solids and phosphorus concentrations in surface runoff on clayey sloped fields in boreal climate. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:565–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puustinen M, Tattari S, Koskiaho J, Linjama J (2007) Influence of seasonal and annual hydrological variations on erosion and phosphorus transport from arable areas in Finland. Soil Till Res 93:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puustinen M, Turtola E, Kukkonen M, Koskiaho J, Linjama J, Niinioja R, Tattari S (2010) VIHMA—a tool for allocation of measures to control erosion and nutrient loading from Finnish agricultural catchments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 138:306–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen K, Nousiainen R, Kurppa S, Autio S, Junnila S, Tiilikkala K, Kaseva J, Laitinen P (2013) How to measure the environmental risks from uses of plant protection products for achieving the IPM requirements and risk communication. MTT Report 105, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen

  • Renard KG, Ferreira VA (1993) RUSLE model description and database sensitivity. J Environ Qual 22:458–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riesinger P (2010) Agronomic challenges for organic crop husbandry. Dissertation, University of Helsinki

  • Riesinger P, Herzon I (2008) Variability of herbage production in mixed leys as related to ley age and environmental factors: a farm survey. Agricult Food Sci 17:394–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riipinen T (2010) Miten traktorin vetokyky muodostuu? Koneviesti 7:12–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbergts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox-the UNEp-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:532–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryhmäesittely, kaksoisaurat (Group presentation of double ploughs for sale) (2007a) Koneviesti 6:75–77

  • Ryhmäesittely, kasvinsuojeluruiskut (Group presentation of field sprayers for sale) (2007b) Koneviesti 17:57–59

  • Ryhmäesittely, kevättyökoneet (Group presentation of field machinery for sale) (2007c) Koneviesti 14:62–65

  • Ryhmäesittely, leikkuupuimurit (Group presentation of combine harvesters for sale) (2007d) Koneviesti 16:24–28

  • Ryhmäesittely, niittokoneet (Group presentation of mowers for sale) (2008) Koneviesti 12:62

  • Ryhmäesittely, s-piikkiäkeet ja kultivaattorit (Group presentation of s-tine harrows and cultivators for sale) (2007e) Koneviesti 1:35–36

  • Ryhmäesittely, traktoritaulukko (Group presentation of tractors for sale) (2007f) Koneviesti 4:78–103

  • Saad R, Margni M, Koellner T, Wittstock B, Deschenes L (2011) Assessment of land use impacts on soil ecological functions: development of spatially differentiated characterization factors within a Canadian context. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:198–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saad R, Koellner T, Margni M (2013) Land use impacts on freshwater regulation, erosion regulation and water purification: a spatial approach for a global scale level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1253–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi M, Thum T, Järvinen H, Fronzek S, Berg B, Harmon M, Trofymow JA, Sevanto S, Liski J (2009) Leaf litter decomposition—estimates of global variability based on Yasso07 model. Ecol Model 220:3362–3371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uusitalo R, Ekholm P, Turtola E, Pitkänen H, Lehtonen H, Granlund K, Bäck S, Puustinen M, Räike A, Lehtoranta J, Rekolainen S, Walls M, Kauppila P (2007) Maatalous Itämeren rehevöittäjänä. Maa- ja Elintarviketalous 96, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen

  • Yli-Halla M, Mokma DL, Peltovuori T, Sippola J (2000) Agricultural soil profiles in Finland and their classification. Publications of Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Serie A 78. Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Jokioinen

  • Yli-Viikari A, Risku-Norja H, Nuutinen V, Heinonen E, Hietala-Koivu R, Huusela-Veistola E, Hyvönen T, Kantanen J, Raussi S, Rikkonen P, Seppälä A, Vehmasto E (2002) Agri-environmental and rural development indicators: a proposal. Agrifood Research Reports 5. MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Riikka Nousiainen for the calculation of the slope steepness of the field parcels for the erosion assessment and Jaakko Heikkinen for the guidance and comments on the soil C stock assessment. The following experts in soil science also offered their viewpoints in the selection of indicators and the assessment methods: Visa Nuutinen, Merja Myllys, Pentti Seuri, Laura Alakukku, Helinä Hartikainen and Markku Yli-Halla. The study was a part of the project “Towards a sustainable food choices: consumer information about health and environmental effects of food in the context of sustainability (SustFoodChoice)”. The project was funded by the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, as well as the seven participating food companies (Valio, HKScan, Raisio, Kankaisten Öljykasvit, Samsara, Juvan Luomu and Bioferme).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Natural Resources Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland

    Katri Joensuu & Merja Saarinen

Authors
  1. Katri Joensuu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Merja Saarinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merja Saarinen.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Llorenc Milà i Canals

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joensuu, K., Saarinen, M. Applying soil quality indicators in the context of life cycle assessment in a Finnish case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22, 1339–1353 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1247-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1247-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation