The distinctive recognition of culture within LCSA: realising the quadruple bottom line
- 479 Downloads
Cultural indicators, although present in S-LCA subcategories, are fairly limited and are not compulsory; performing an S-LCA does not guarantee the inclusion of cultural values. This paper explores the potential to distinctly represent and include cultural aspects within Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) (alongside economic, social and environmental aspects). As such, it demonstrates LCSA’s capability to communicate results along a quadruple bottom line.
A participatory LCSA case study was undertaken using a mixed methods approach. Research was carried out working in close collaboration with three key members of an indigenous community in New Zealand—the Māori tribe of Ngāti Porou. A series of semi-structured interviews with the three participants was undertaken in order to investigate alternative forestry options for Ngāti Porou land. The research involved (1) understanding the decision-making process of Ngāti Porou, (2) recognising Ngāti Porou aspirations and goals, (3) determining a range of forestry land use and product options to be reviewed within the LCSA case study, (4) selection of meaningful (to Ngāti Porou) economic, social and environmental indicators, (5) developing a bespoke cultural indicator and (6) collaboratively reviewing and discussing the results.
Results and discussion
The results of the participatory LCSA represented culture in two ways. Firstly, a bespoke cultural indicator (Cultural Indicator Matrix) was created to distinctly represent culture in LCSA. The indicator subjectively measures the perceived impact that a forestry process or product has upon a range of Ngāti Porou aspirations, and the results can be viewed alongside other LCSA indicators. Secondly, the participatory research approach made the LCSA process more culturally-inclusive. Overall, the results of the culturally-inclusive LCSA gave the participants ‘validation’ and ‘direction’ and justified their desire to pursue alternative forestry options for their land.
This first use of the Cultural Indicator Matrix was experienced by the participants as an effective mechanism for gathering community-based impressions of how forestry life cycle processes affect their cultural aspirations. They felt the participatory aspect was important, and considered that the ongoing communication between themselves and the LCSA practitioner provided them with more control, access to information and understanding of the LCSA process and led to higher acceptance of the final results. Thus, this research suggests that there is a place for culture in LCSA, and that distinctive representation of culture (separately from S-LCA) may be beneficial, particularly if the end-users have explicit cultural needs or concerns.
KeywordsCulture LCSA Quadruple bottom line
This research has been carried out with the financial support of Scion, Massey University, and the New Zealand Life Cycle Management Centre.
The authors are grateful and appreciative for the guidance provided by Dr. Tim Payn and Dr. Jeff Seadon. In addition, the comments and suggestions from the reviewers have been invaluable.
Compliance with ethical standards
This research involved engagement with three Māori (Ngāti Porou) participants. A full human ethics application was submitted to and approved by the Massey University Human Ethics Committee (Southern B application, 13-58).
- Anderson K, Gale F (1992) Introduction. In: Anderson K, Gale F (eds) Inventing places: studies in cultural geography. Longman Cheshire, Melbourne, pp. 1–14Google Scholar
- Baumann H, Cowell SJ (1999) An evaluative framework for conceptual and analytical approaches used in environmental management. Green Manage Int 26:109–122Google Scholar
- Bryson JM (2004) What to do when stakeholders matter: stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public. Manag Rev 6(1):21–53Google Scholar
- Ciroth A, Finkbeiner M, Hildenbrand J, Klöpffer W, Mazijn B, Prakash S, Vickery-Niederman G (2011) Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products. Retrieved from Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
- Clift R (2014) Social life cycle assessment: What are we trying to do? Paper presented at the International Seminar in Social LCA, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
- Creswell JW (2009) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- Department of Internal Affairs (2002) Local Government Act 2002. (No 84). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand GovernmentGoogle Scholar
- Dessein J, Soini K, Fairclough G, Horlings L (eds) (2015) Culture in, for and as sustainable development. Conclusions from the COST action IS1007 investigating cultural sustainability. University of Jyväskylä, JyväskyläGoogle Scholar
- Duncker PH, Spiecker H, Tojic K (2007) Definition of forest management alternatives. Retrieved from Frieburg, Germany: http://220.127.116.11/eforwood/Results/ResultArchive/tabid/222/Default.aspx
- EFORWOOD (2007) EFORWOOD: Sustainability impact assessment of the forestry-wood chain. Retrieved from http://www.innovawood.com/eforwood/Home/tabid/36/Default.aspx
- Guinée JB (2016) Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: What Is It and What Are Its Challenges? In R. Clift & A. Druckman (Eds.), Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology, Springer, pp 45–68Google Scholar
- Harmsworth G (2011) Mäori perspectives on the science and innovation system. New Zeal Sci Rev 68(1):45–48Google Scholar
- Harmsworth G, Warmenhoven TA, Pohatu P, Page M (2002) Waiapu catchment report: Maori community goals for enhancing ecosystem health (Landcare Research Report No.: LC 0102/100). Retrieved from Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- Hawkes J (2001) The fourth pillar of sustainability: culture's essential role in public planning. Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd., VictoriaGoogle Scholar
- Hodges W (1994) Maori conservation ethic: a Ngati Kahungunu perspective. Retrieved from WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- Khan R (2012) A mauri-model analysis of remediation methods of industrial waste from the Tasman pulp and paper mill in Kawerau, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. University of Auckland. Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://frontiersabroad.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Risalat-Khan.pdf
- Llobera JR (2003) An invitation to anthropology: the structure, evolution and cultural identity of human societies. Berghahn Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Marsden M (2003) In: Charles TA (ed) The woven universe: selected writings of rev. Māori Marsden. Estate of Rev. Māori Marsden, OtakiGoogle Scholar
- Marsden M, Henare TA (1992) Kaitiakitanga: a definitive introduction to the holistic world view of the Maori. Ministry for the Environment, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- McGavock ZC, Moewaka-Barnes H, McCreanor T (2012) Maori and pain: a literature review. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Scholarship 8(2):164–175Google Scholar
- Morgan KB (2004) A Tangata Whenua Perspective on Sustainability using the Mauri Model: towards decision making balance with regard to our social, economic, environmental and cultural well-being. Paper presented at the International Conference on Sustainability Engineering and Science, Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- Morgan TKKB, Sardelic DN, Waretini AF (2012) The three gorges project: how sustainable? J Hydrol 460–461:1–12Google Scholar
- New Zealand Conservation Authority (1997) Maori customary use of native birds, plants and other traditional materials. Retrieved from Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- New Zealand Government (1991) Resource management act. (no 69). Ministry for the Environment, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- Patterson J (2006) Maori environmental virtues. In: Koggel CM (ed) Moral issues in global perspective, vol 3, 2nd edn. Broadview Press, Ontario, pp. 283–292Google Scholar
- Peacock BC (2011). A GIS-Based Habitat Restoration and Preservation Prioritization Tool Geospatially Integrating Hydrological, Ecological, Pollution, Economic, Social and Cultural Considerations. Paper presented at the The National Conference On Undergraduate Research (NCUR), Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Pizzirani S (2016) A culturally-focussed life cycle sustainability assessment: Analysis of forestry value chain options with Māori land owners (submitted). (PhD), Massey University, Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- Platia O (2012) Using the Mauri Model to Assess the Impact of the Rena Grounding on the Mauri of the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. Civil and Environmental Engineering. Lafayette College. Easton, PA, United States. Retrieved from http://frontiersabroad.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/OliviaPlatia.pdf
- Scion (2012) Waiapu river catchment study - final report. Retrieved from Rotorua, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- Simon KH (2003) Searching for synergy: Maori/indigenous and scientific conservatory values—the affinity proposition. He Puna korero. Journal of Maori and Pacific Development 4(1):44–58Google Scholar
- Stake RE (1995) The art of case study research. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- Statistics New Zealand (2013) Census QuickStats about Māori. Retrieved from Wellington, New Zealand: www.stats.govt.nz
- UNEP & SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. Retrieved from Belgium: http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1164xPA-guidelines_sLCA.pdf
- UNEP and SETAC (2010) Methodological sheets of sub-categories of impact for a social LCA (S-LCA). Retrieved from Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
- UNESCO (2000) World Culture Report 2000: Cultural diversity, conflict and pluralism. Retrieved from Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
- UNESCO Sector for Culture (2001) Culture throughout the project cycle. In: Matarosso F (ed) Recognising culture: a series of briefing papers on culture and development. Comedia, the Department of Canadian Heritage and UNESCO, London, pp. 77–87Google Scholar
- Walker R (1990) Ka whawhai tonu matou: struggle without end. Penguin Books, AucklandGoogle Scholar
- Walker S (2015) Designing sustainability: making radical changes in a material world. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Warmenhoven TA, Barnard T, Pohatu P, Garrett L, Porou T, Fitzgerald G, Ruru W (2014) Climate change and community resilience in the waiapu catchment. Retrieved from Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- Weaver P, Jansen L, van Grootveld G, van Spiegel E, Vergragt P (2000) Sustainable technology development. Greenleaf Publishing Limited, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
- Welsh E (2002). Dealing with Data: Using NVivo in the Qualitative Data Analysis Process. 3(2). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/865/1880
- Wrisberg N, Udo de Haes HA, Triebswetter U, Eder P, Clift R (eds) (2002) Analytical tools for environmental design and management in a systems perspective: the combined use of analytical tools, vol 10. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar