An Italian tomato “Cuore di Bue” case study: challenges and benefits using subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment
- 313 Downloads
The main purpose of this study is to present an implementation of the subcategory assessment method (SAM) to the life cycle of an Italian variety of tomato called “Cuore di Bue” produced by an Italian cooperative. The case study was used to use the methodology proposed in compliance with the guidelines of social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) in order to highlight issues for the improvement of SAM. A summary of strengths and weaknesses of the methodology as well as the social performance of the considered Italian tomato is an important result of this case study.
The methodology used is based on SAM. The UNEP/SETAC guidelines of S-LCA and the complementary methodological sheets were used as main references to carry out SAM, and it was used to assess the social performances of Cuore di Bue. The focus was on the assessment of the following three out of five stakeholder groups presented in the guidelines: workers, local community and consumers. Specific questionnaires have been developed to collect the inventory data related to each stakeholder group and along the product life cycle.
Results and discussion
SAM of Cuore di Bue showed a range of values, between 2 and 3 (C-B) for consumer stakeholder group and mainly 3 (B) for the local community and worker stakeholders. Because the best performance (A) is related to a numerical value of 4, better performances were not identified, owing to no propagation of actions in the value chain. The collective bargaining, transparency, feedback mechanism and privacy are the subcategories with the worst performance, but at the same time with more potential for improvements.
The implementation of SAM on Cuore di Bue allowed us to demonstrate how SAM transforms qualitative data into semi-quantitative information through a score scale that can help a decision maker achieve a product overview. SAM has been implemented on Cuore di Bue; the product assessment, the strengths and weaknesses of the methodology are identified and discussed as well. It has been possible to present the best and worst performances in product life cycle, by identifying the phase or the subcategories with good or bad performance. However, in this case study, as the same company owns most of the product life cycle taken into account, the majority of social performances are identical, and this may represent a limit of the methodology or that more organisations along the life cycle must be taken into account (for example, energy, distribution).
KeywordsSubcategory assessment method Social life cycle assessment Social impact assessment Stakeholders Characterisation model Case study
- Benoît-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2011–05-31, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, ISSN: 0948–3349, pag. 1–9, May 2011Google Scholar
- Benoît-Norris C, Traverso M, Valdivia S, Vickery-Niederman G, Franze J, Azuero L, Ciroth A, Mazijn B, Aulisio D (2013) The methodological sheets for social life cycle assessment—a practical support to implement S-LCA of product. Oral Presentation and proceedings of SETAC Europe 19th LCA Case Study Symposium in Rome, Italy, 11–13 November 2013. ISSNGoogle Scholar
- Ciusa, W (1979) Trattato di Merceologia, UTET Consumer Protection Act (1987)Google Scholar
- Corbetta, P (2003) La ricerca sociale: metodologia e tecniche. IV L’analisi dei dati. Collana “Itinerari”. pp 288, 978–88–15-09477-3Google Scholar
- Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2010) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA Part 1: development of indicators for labour rights. 15:247–259Google Scholar
- Federazione lavoratori dell’agroindustria (FLAI) (2008) Contratto collettivo nazionale di lavoro per i quadri e gli impiegati agricoli. Roma. Acessed: 11/05/2015 Available: https://www.google.com.br/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazio.cgil.it%2Fflai%2Ffilelist_download.asp%3Fid%3D32&ei=qPxQVbzsDoz1gwT6qIDQBQ&usg=AFQjCNEl6kdo5wkUlLbs4wXY0WI3RAjNJQ&sig2=Q_Qt8ybBlSrB-R6g0rOTbg
- ISO (UNI EN) 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework (ISO 14040); ISO: Genova, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Parti sociali (2010) 30 luglio 2010, Contratto provinciale di lavoro degli operai agricoli e florovivaisti della provincia di CuneoGoogle Scholar
- Petti L, Ugaya CML, Di Cesare S (2014) Systematic review of social-life cycle assessment (S-LCA) case studies impact assessment method. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Pre-proceedings of the 4th international seminar in social LCA. FruiTrop Thema, pp. 34–41Google Scholar
- Privacy International (2007) Privacy International https://www.privacyinternationalorg/survey/rankings2007/phrcomp_sort.pdf. Accessed 18 November 2011
- Sanchez Ramirez PKS, Petti L, Ugaya CM L (20120 Subcategory assessment method (SAM) for S-LCA: stakeholder “worker” and “consumer”. In: Barberio G, Rigamonti L, Zamagni A (ed) What is sustainable technology? The role of life cycle-based methods in addressing the challenges of sustainability assessment of technologies, Proceedings of the 2nd DIRE Working Group Meeting, September 27, 2012 Rome (Italy). ENEA, Rome (Italy)Google Scholar
- Ugaya C, Brones F, Corrêa S (2011) S-LCA: Preliminary results of Natura’s Cocoa soap bar”, Proceedings of Life Cycle Mangement Conference 2011, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Program, Paris SETAC Life Cycle Initiative United Nations Environment ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
- UNEP/SETAC (2013) The methodological sheets for subcategories in social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). United Nations Environment Program, Paris SETAC Life Cycle Initiative United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
- Vicoli, R (2012) La metodologia della social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). Applicazioni preliminari della metodologia al “pomodoro “Cuore di Bue” dell’azienda Ortogranda, Master’s Thesis, Fac. Economia, CLEAM, “G. d’Annunzio” Univ. Pescara, ItalyGoogle Scholar