Advertisement

Positive impacts in social life cycle assessment: state of the art and the way forward

  • Silvia Di Cesare
  • Federica Silveri
  • Serenella Sala
  • Luigia Petti
SOCIAL LCA IN PROGRESS

Abstract

Purpose

Social life cycle assessment (SLCA) is a methodology under continuous development, which may be applied at different scales: from products to economic sectors up to systems at region (meso) and country (macro) scales. Traditionally, SLCA has been focusing on the assessment of negative social externalities, whereas also positive social impacts could be associated to human interventions. The purpose of the present study is to understand how positive impacts are defined in published literature and how they could be assessed through indicators. The aim is to clarify the concept among scholars and to support decision making in business and policy context.

Methods

The study uses a systematic review approach in order to analyse the types of indicators adopted. In the field of SLCA and according to Paragahawewa et al. (2009), “[I]ndicators are ‘pointers’ to the state of the impact categories (and/or subcategories) being evaluated by the SLCA”. Indicators can be quantitative, semi-quantitative or qualitative (UNEP/SETAC 2009). This review was carried out in order to identify and analyse positive impacts and indicators. After careful scrutiny, 47 papers containing theoretical frameworks were considered, as well as 46 papers presenting case studies.

Results and discussion

Compared to environmental life cycle assessment (E-LCA), where the presence of positive impacts is lower, evaluating benefits or positive impacts can still play a major role in SLCA (Benoît et al. 2010). A quarter of the analysed papers on theoretical frameworks take into account the topic of positive impacts and indicators. Results from case study analysis highlight as “workers”, was the most considered stakeholder (in 100 % of the analysed papers), and as the majority of positive indicators used in the case study analysed are recorded in relation to “other value chain actors”. Within the concept of “positive impacts”, no reference should be made merely to the utility of a product or service. In a broader sense, we could refer to solutions improving the conditions of one or various stakeholders involved. In other words, these are solutions that carry a positive contribution to one or more stakeholders without harming others.

Conclusions

So far, positive impacts are barely covered in literature. There is a clear need of streamlining definition and indicators, especially if they should be applied in a policy context complementing traditional—and often monetary-based, cost-benefit analysis (CBA).

Keywords

Positive impacts Positive indicators Policy support SLCA Social life cycle assessment 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Albrecht S, Brandstetter P, Beck T, et al. (2013) An extended life cycle analysis of packaging systems for fruit and vegetable transport in Europe. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1549–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013a) Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1106–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013b) Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1116–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arcese G, Lucchetti M, Merli R (2013) Social life cycle assessment as a management tool: methodology for application in tourism. Sustainability 5:3275–3287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archer BH, Cooper C, Ruhanen L (2005) The positive and negative impacts of tourism. In: Theobald WF (ed) Glob. Tour. Elsevier Inc., p 79–102Google Scholar
  6. Atkinson AB, Cantillon B, Marlier E, Nolan B (2002) Social indicators: the EU and social inclusion. OUP, Oxford. doi: 10.1093/0199253498.001.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the production of an airbag injure more people than the airbag saves in traffic? Opting for an empirically based approach to social life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 17:517–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belfiore E, Bennett O (2007) Rethinking the social impacts of the arts. Int J Cult Policy 13:135–151. doi: 10.1080/10286630701342741
  9. Benoît C, Vickery-Niederman G (2011) Social sustainability assessment literature review. Sustain Consort White Pap, p 1–34Google Scholar
  10. Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, et al. (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benoît Norris C (2014) Data for social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:261–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benoît Norris C, Revéret J-P (2015) Partial organization and social LCA development: the creation and expansion of an epistemic community. In: Muthu SS (ed) Soc. life cycle assess. - an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp. 199–226Google Scholar
  13. Benoît-Norris C (2012) Social life cycle assessment: a technique providing a new wealth of information to inform sustainability-related decision making. In: Curran MA (ed) Life Cycle Assess. Handb A Guid. Environ. Sustain. Prod. Scrivener Publishing LLC, p 433–452Google Scholar
  14. Benoit-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4:1946–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benoît-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, et al. (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:682–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bienge K, von Geibler J, Lettenmeier M et al (2009) Sustainability hot spot analysis: a streamlined life cycle assessment towards sustainable food chains. 9th Eur. IFSA Symp. Vienna, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  17. Blom M, Solmar C (2009) How to Socially Assess Biofuels. Master’s thesis. Luleå University of Technology. http://epubl.luth.se/1402-1617/2009/077/LTU-EX-09077-SE.pdf. Accessed 21 Jul 2016
  18. Bocoum I, Macombe C, Revéret J-P (2015) Anticipating impacts on health based on changes in income inequality caused by life cycles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:405–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bond AJ, Dockerty T, Lovett A, Riche AB, Haughton AJ, Bohan DA, Sage RB, Shield IF, Finch JW, Turner MM, Karp A (2011) Learning how to deal with values, frames and governance in sustainability appraisal. Reg Stud 45(8):1157–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bossel H (1999) Indicators for sustainable development: theory, method, applications. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg. https://www.iisd.org/pdf/balatonreport.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2016
  21. Bouzid A, Padilla M (2014) Analysis of social performance of the industrial tomatoes food chain in Algeria. New Medit 1:60–65Google Scholar
  22. Brizius JA, Campbell MD (1991) Getting results: a guide for government accountability. Council of Governors Policy Advisors, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Brouwer R, Van Ek R (2004) Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 50:1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.020
  24. CEPS (2013) Assessing the costs and benefits of regulation. Study for the European Commission, Secretariat General. http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/commission_guidelines/docs/131210_cba_study_sg_final.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2016
  25. Chang Y-J, Sproesser G, Neugebauer S, et al. (2015) Environmental and social life cycle assessment of welding technologies. Procedia CIRP:293–298Google Scholar
  26. Chhipi-Shrestha GK, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2014) “Socializing” sustainability: a critical review on current development status of social life cycle impact assessment method. Clean Techn Environ Policy. doi: 10.1007/s10098-014-0841-5 Google Scholar
  27. Cinelli M, Coles SR, Jørgensen A, et al. (2013) Workshop on life cycle sustainability assessment: the state of the art and research needs—November 26, 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1421–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolabeled notebook. http://www.greendelta.com/uploads/media/LCA_laptop_final.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015
  29. De Luca AI, Iofrida N, Strano A, et al. (2015) Social life cycle assessment and participatory approaches: a methodological proposal applied to citrus farming in Southern Italy. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9999:1–14Google Scholar
  30. Di Cesare S, Silveri F, Petti L (2014) The Role of indicators in Social Life Cycle Assessment : results from a literature review. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268796670_The_Role_of_indicators_in_Social_Life_Cycle_Assessment_results_from_a_literature_review. Accessed 8 Feb 2016
  31. Drewnowski J (1972) Social indicators and welfare measurement: remarks on methodology. J Dev Stud 8(3):77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2010) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. EC (2015a) Beyond GDP initiative. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/beyond_gdp/index_en.html. Accessed 29 Nov 2015
  35. EC (2015b) Social situation of EU, Periodic reports available at http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=22. Accessed 29 Nov 2015
  36. EC (2015c) Europe 2020 targets. http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/europe-2020-in-a-nutshell/targets/index_en.htm. Accessed 29 Nov 2015
  37. EC (2015d) Better Regulation Guidelines COM(2015) 215 final and SWD(2015) 110 finalGoogle Scholar
  38. Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ekener-Petersen E, Moberg Å (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA–part 2: reflections on a study of a complex product. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ekener-Petersen E, Höglund J, Finnveden G (2013) Social and socioeconomic impacts from vehicle fuels. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:721761/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2015
  41. Ekvall T (2011) Nations in social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:1–2. doi: 10.1007/s11367-010-0235-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Feschet P, Macombe C, Garrabé M, et al. (2013) Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway: the case of banana industry in Cameroon. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:490–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2:3309–3322. doi: 10.3390/su2103309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fontes J (2014) Handbook for product social impact assessment. http://www.dsm.com/content/dam/dsm/cworld/en_US/documents/handbook-for-product-social-impact-assessment.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2015
  45. Foolmaun RK, Ramjeawon T (2013a) Life cycle sustainability assessments (LCSA) of four disposal scenarios for used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Environ Dev Sustain 15:783–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013b) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:366–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Goodwin N, Nelson JA, Ackerman F, Weisskopf T (2008) Consumption and the consumer society. http://www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/education_materials/modules/Consumption_and_the_Consumer_Society.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2016
  49. Grießhammer R, Benoît C, Dreyer LC et al (2006) Feasibility study : integration of social aspects into LCA. http://www.saiplatform.org/uploads/Library/UNEP-SETACLifeCycleInitiativeTFonSocialIssues-FeasibilityStudy.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2015
  50. Horsch K (1997) Indicators: definition and use in a results-based accountability system. http://www.hfrp.org/publications-resources/browse-our-publications/indicators-definition-and-use-in-a-results-based-accountability-system. Accessed 15 Nov 2015
  51. Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:620–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hsu C-W, Wang S-W, Hu AH (2013) Development of a new methodology for impact assessment of SLCA. In: Nee AYC, Song B, Ong S-K (eds) Proc. 20th CIRP Int. Conf. Life Cycle Eng. Springer, Singapore, pp. 469–473Google Scholar
  53. Hu M, Kleijn R, Bozhilova-Kisheva KP, Di Maio F (2013) An approach to LCSA: the case of concrete recycling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1793–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hutchins MJ, Sutherland JW (2008) An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J Clean Prod 16:1688–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles (1994) Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess 12(2):107–152Google Scholar
  56. ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and frameworkGoogle Scholar
  57. Jørgensen A (2010) Developing the Social Life Cycle Assessment:-addressing issues of validity and usability. http://orbit.dtu.dk/fedora/objects/orbit:82775/datastreams/file_5100400/content Accessed 4 Feb 2015
  58. Jørgensen A (2013) Social LCA—a way ahead? Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:296–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jørgensen A, Dreyer LC, Wangel A (2012) Addressing the effect of social life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:828–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jørgensen A, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen MS, Hauschild MZ (2010a) Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:376–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jørgensen A, Hauschild MZ, Jørgensen MS, Wangel A (2009) Relevance and feasibility of social life cycle assessment from a company perspective. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jørgensen A, Lai LCH, Hauschild MZ (2010b) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kloëpffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Labuschagne C, Brent AC (2006) Social sustainability social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:3–15Google Scholar
  66. Lähtinen K, Myllyviita T, Leskinen P, Pitkänen SK (2014) A systematic literature review on indicators to assess local sustainability of forest energy production. Renew Sust Energ Rev 40:1202–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, et al. (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3:562–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, et al. (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1581–1592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Luthe T, Kägi T, Reger J (2013) A systems approach to sustainable technical product design. J Ind Ecol 17:605–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Macombe C, Loeillet D (2013) Social life cycle assessment, for who and why? In: Macombe C (ed) Social LCAs socio-economic effects in value chains. FruiTrop Thema, p 35–52Google Scholar
  71. Macombe C, Feschet P, Garrabé M, Loeillet D (2011) 2nd International Seminar in Social Life Cycle Assessment—recent developments in assessing the social impacts of product life cycles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:940–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Macombe C, Leskinen P, Feschet P, Antikainen R (2013) Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs. J Clean Prod 52:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Manhart A, Grießhammer R (2006) Social impacts of the production of notebook PCs. http://www.prosa.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/notebooksurvey_final_engl.pdf. Accessed 4 Jun 2015
  74. Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1386–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, et al. (2014) Application challenges for the social life cycle assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mathe S (2014) Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1506–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Moberg Å, Picha M, Erlandsson-Segerström B et al (2009) Using a life-cycle perspective to assess potential social impacts of ICT services: a pre-study. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:355953/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2015
  78. Molteni M (2007) Gli stadi di sviluppo della CSR nella strategia aziendale. Impresa Progetto 2:1–25Google Scholar
  79. Moriizumi Y, Matsui N, Hondo H (2010) Simplified life cycle sustainability assessment of mangrove management: a case of plantation on wastelands in Thailand. J Clean Prod 18:1629–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nazarkina L, Le Bocq A (2006) Social aspects of Sustainability assessment: Feasibility of Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). EDF 2006, Moretsur-Loing, FranceGoogle Scholar
  81. Nemarumane T, Mbohwa C (2015) Social impact assessment of sugar production operations in South Africa: a social life cycle assessment perspective. In: Muthu SS (ed) Soc. life cycle assess. - an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp. 71–113Google Scholar
  82. Neugebauer S, Traverso M, Scheumann R, et al. (2014) Impact pathways to address social well-being and social justice in SLCA—fair wage and level of education. Sustainability 6:4839–4857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Norris G (2015) Doing more good than harm: footprints, handprints, and beneficience. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic979867.files/Basic%20Beneficience%20Primer.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2015
  84. Norris GA (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Norris GA (2013) The new requirement for social leadership: healing. Uncertainty, divers. Common Good Chang. Norms New Leadersh. ParadigGoogle Scholar
  86. Paragahawewa U, Blackett P, Small B (2009) Social Life Cycle Analysis (S-LCA): some methodological issues and potential application to cheese production in New Zealand. http://www.saiplatform.org/uploads/Library/SocialLCA-FinalReport_July2009.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
  87. Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2013) Revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in the transition towards sustainable production and consumption. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1642–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pelletier N, Ustaoglu E, Benoit C, Norris G (2013) Social Sustainability in trade and development policy contact information. doi: 10.2788/659
  90. Pelletier N, Ustaoglu E, Benoit C, Norris G, Rosenbaum E, Vasta A, Sala S (2016) Social sustainability in trade and development policy. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1059-z (this issue)Google Scholar
  91. Petti L, Campanella P (2009) The social LCA: the state of art of an evolving methodology. Ann “Stefan cel Mare” Univ Suceava Fascicle Fac Econ Public Adm 9:47–56Google Scholar
  92. Petti L, Ugaya CML, Di Cesare S (2014) Systematic review of Social- Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA ) case studies. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Pre-proceedings of the 4th International Seminar in Social LCA. Frui Trop Thema, p 34–41Google Scholar
  93. Pizzirani S, McLaren SJ, Seadon JK (2014) Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1316–1330. doi: 10.1007/s11367-014-0722-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Reitinger C, Dumke M, Barosevcic M, Hillerbrand R (2011) A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:380–388. doi: 10.1007/s11367-011-0265-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ren J, Manzardo A, Mazzi A, et al. (2015) Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:842–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Revéret J-P, Couture J-M, Parent J (2015) Socioeconomic LCA of milk production in Canada. In: Muthu SS (ed) Soc. life cycle assess. - an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp. 25–69Google Scholar
  97. Sala S, Farioli F, Zamagni A (2013) Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: part 1. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1653–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Samson R (2012) Environmental and socioeconomic life cycle assessment of Canadian milk. https://www.dairyresearch.ca/file.php?filename=/var/www/cdrplive/files/news/19/LCA-DFCExecSum_e.pdf. Accessed 21 Jul 2016
  99. Sanchez Ramirez PK, Petti L (2011) Social life cycle assessment: methodological and implementation issues. Ann “Ştefan cel Mare” Univ Suceava Fascicle Fac Econ Public Adm 11:11–17Google Scholar
  100. Sanchez Ramirez PK, Del Sordo M, Petti L (2013) La Social Life Cycle Assessment del Pomodoro Cuore di bue. DEc Working Paper Series. no. 27Google Scholar
  101. Sanchez Ramirez PK, Petti L, Brones F, Ugaya CML (2016) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 2: application in Natura’s cocoa soap. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:106–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sanchez Ramirez PK, Petti L, Haberland NT, Ugaya CML (2014) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 1: methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1515–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Schulenkorf N, Edwards D (2012) Maximizing positive social impacts: strategies for sustaining and leveraging the benefits of intercommunity sport events in divided societies. J Sport Manag 26:379–390Google Scholar
  104. Seager TP, Melton J, Eighmy TT (2004) Working towards sustainable science and engineering: introduction to the special issue on highway infrastructure. Resour Conserv Recycl 42(3):205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sheldon EB, Freeman HE (1970) Notes on social indicators: promises and potential. Policy Sci 1(1):97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Slootweg R, Vanclay F, van Schooten M (2001) Function evaluation as a framework for the integration of social and environmental impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 19:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Srinivasan S, O’Fallon LR, Dearry A (2003) Creating healthy communities, healthy homes, healthy people: initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health. Am J Public Health 93:1446–1450. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1446
  108. Swarr TE (2009) Societal life cycle assessment-could you repeat the question? Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:285–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Traverso M, Asdrubali F, Francia A, Finkbeiner M (2012a) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to photovoltaic modules. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:1068–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen A, Schneider L (2012b) Life cycle sustainability dashboard. J Ind Ecol 16:680–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Treccani (2012) Utilità. Dizionario di Economia e Finanza. http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/utilita_res-cc18589b-8cd0-11e2-b3e0-00271042e8d9_(Dizionario-di-Economia-e-Finanza)/. Accessed 25 July 2016
  112. Umair S, Björklund A, Ekener-Petersen E (2013) Social life cycle inventory and impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan. In: Hilty LM, Aebischer B, Andersson G, Lohmann W (eds) Proc. First Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. Sustain. Zurich, p 52–58Google Scholar
  113. Umair S, Björklund A, Petersen EE (2015) Social impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan using UNEP SETAC guidelines. Resour Conserv Recycl 95:46–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. UN (2015b) Sustainable development goals. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
  115. UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. http://www.cdo.ugent.be/publicaties/280.guidelines-sLCA.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2015
  116. UNEP/SETAC (2013) The Methodological Sheets For Subcategories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/S-LCA_methodological_sheets_11.11.13.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2015
  117. United Nations (UN) (2015a) Millennium development goals. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/
  118. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2014) Human development index. http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
  119. Valdivia S, Ugaya CML, Hildenbrand J, et al. (2012) A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio + 20. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1673–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Vanclay (2003a) International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 21:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Vanclay F (2002) Conceptualising social impacts. Environ Impact Assess Rev 22:183–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Vanclay F (2003b) Why have principles for social impact assessment? Int Assoc Impact Assess 2:1–8Google Scholar
  123. Vinyes E, Oliver-Solà J, Ugaya C, et al. (2013) Application of LCSA to used cooking oil waste management. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:445–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Wan H (2012) Assessing CSR and applying social life cycle assessment: a case study on biochemical oxygen demand online monitor. Master’s thesis. Uppsala University. http://www.greenbusinessregion.se/file/assesing-csr-and-applying-social-life-cycle-assesment.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2016
  125. Weldegiorgis FS, Franks DM (2014) Social dimensions of energy supply alternatives in steelmaking: comparison of biomass and coal production scenarios in Australia. J Clean Prod 84:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Wilhelm M, Hutchins M, Mars C, Benoit-Norris C (2015) An overview of social impacts and their corresponding improvement implications: a mobile phone case study. J Clean Prod 102:302–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Woolcock M, Narayan D (2000) Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Res Obs 15(2):225–249. doi: 10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
  128. World Bank (2012) Designing a results framework for achieving results: a how-to guide. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTEVACAPDEV/Resources/designing_results_framework.pdf
  129. Wu R, Yang D, Chen J (2014) Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability 6:4200–4226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Yu M, Halog A (2015) Solar photovoltaic development in Australia—a life cycle sustainability assessment study. Sustainability. doi: 10.3390/su7021213 Google Scholar
  131. Zamagni A, Amerighi O, Buttol P (2011) Strengths or bias in social LCA? Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:596–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Zamagni A, Pesonen H-L, Swarr T (2013) From LCA to life cycle sustainability assessment: concept, practice and future directions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1637–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economic StudiesUniversity «G. D’Annunzio»PescaraItaly
  2. 2.CIRAD, UPR GECOMontpellier Cedex 5France
  3. 3.IRSTEA, UMR ITAP – ELSAMontpellier Cedex 5France
  4. 4.European Commission-Joint Research CentreInstitute for Environment and Sustainability - Sustainability Assessment UnitIspraItaly

Personalised recommendations