Systematic literature review in social life cycle assessment
- 687 Downloads
The main purpose of this review is to investigate the methodology of social life cycle assessment (SLCA) through its application to case studies. In addition, the following research aims to define the trends related to the SLCA by researchers and consultants. This study will help to map the current situation and to highlight the hot spots and weaknesses of the application of the SLCA theory.
The SLCA could be considered as a useful methodology to provide decision support in order to compare products and/or improve the social effects of the life cycle of a product. Furthermore, the results of the case studies analyzed may influence decision makers significantly. For this reason, a systematic literature review of case studies was carried out in which SLCA was applied in order to analyze closely the application of the stages of this methodology. In this study, the major phases of the technical framework for a SLCA were analyzed. Specific attention was paid to detect the positive impacts that emerged in the case studies, which were also studied by administering a questionnaire to the authors of the analyzed case studies and to a number of experts in the field of SLCA.
Results and discussion
The 35 case studies examined in this paper, even though they do not deviate from the 40 identified by the previous processing, are still significantly different in terms of outcome produced. It is important to clarify that the authors who developed the case studies considered the steps defined in the SETAC/SETAC guidelines, borrowed from the ISO 14044 standard.
The data resulting from this analysis could help both practitioners and researchers to understand what the issues are, on which it is still necessary to investigate and work, in order to solidify the SLCA methodology and define its role in the context of life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA).
KeywordsCase studies SLCA Social life cycle assessment Systematic literature review
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Benoît-Norris C, Traverso M, Valdivia S et al (2013) The methodological sheets for sub-categories in social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). http://bit.ly/1Ma98vt. Accessed. 28 May 2015
- Bouzid A, Padilla M (2014) Analysis of social performance of the industrial tomatoes food chain in Algeria. New Medit 1:60–65Google Scholar
- Busset G, Belaud J-P, Montréjaud-Vignoles M et al (2014) Integration of social LCA with sustainability LCA: a case study on virgin olive oil production. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Pre-proceedings of the 4th International Seminar in Social LCA. FruiTrop Thema, pp 73–80Google Scholar
- Chang Y-J, Sproesser G, Neugebauer S et al (2015) Environmental and social life cycle assessment of welding technologies. Procedia CIRP 293–298Google Scholar
- Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolabeled notebook. http://bit.ly/1M3mA3w. 25 May 2015
- Clift R (2014) Social life cycle assessment: what are we trying to do. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (2014) Pre-proceedings of the 4th international seminar in social LCA. 19th-21st November. FruitropThema, Montpellier, France, pp 11–16Google Scholar
- Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (2013) Guidelines for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management. Version 4.2. http://bit.ly/1Hup87n. Accessed 13 April 2015
- De Luca AI, Iofrida N, Strano A et al (2015) Social life cycle assessment and participatory approaches: a methodological proposal applied to citrus farming in Southern Italy. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9999:1–14Google Scholar
- Di Cesare S, Silveri F, Petti L (2014) The role of indicators in social life cycle assessment : results from a literature review. http://bit.ly/1O9gf5F. Accessed 30 May 2015
- Di Cesare S, Silveri F, Sala S et al. (2016) Positive impacts in social life cycle assessment: state of the art and the way forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess (this issue–under review)Google Scholar
- Ekener-Petersen E (2013) Tracking down social impacts of products with social life cycle assessment. Dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- Farace DJ, Frantzen J (2005) Sixth international conference on grey literature: work on grey in progress, GL 2004 Conference Proceedings, New York, 6–7 December 2004, TextRelease, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Labuschagne C, Brent AC (2006) Social sustainability social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:3–15Google Scholar
- Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339. doi: b2700. 10.1136/bmj.b2700
- Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) (2014) Pre-proceedings of the 4th International Seminar in Social LCA. FruiTrop Thema, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
- Macombe C, Feschet P, Garrabé M, Loeillet D (2011) 2nd International Seminar in Social Life Cycle Assessment—recent developments in assessing the social impacts of product life cycles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:940–943. doi: 10.1007/s11367-011-0331-5
- Manhart A, Grießhammer R (2006) Social impacts of the production of notebook PCs. http://bit.ly/1jhqh9a. Accessed 4 June 2015
- Muthu SS (ed) (2015) Social life cycle assessment—an insight. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- Nemarumane T, Mbohwa C (2015) Social impact assessment of sugar production operations in South Africa: a social life cycle assessment perspective. In: Muthu SS (ed) Social life cycle assessment—an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp 71–113Google Scholar
- Norris GA (2013) The new requirement for social leadership: healing. In: Groschl S (ed) Uncertainty, diversity and the common good: changing norms and new leadership paradigms. Gower Publ, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Petti L, Ugaya CML, Di Cesare S (2014) Systematic review of social-life cycle assessment (S-LCA) case studies impact assessment method. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Pre-proceedings of the 4th International Seminar in Social LCA. FruiTrop Thema, pp 34–41Google Scholar
- Revéret J-P, Couture J-M, Parent J (2015) Socioeconomic LCA of milk production in Canada. In: Muthu SS (ed) Social life cycle assessment—an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp 25–69Google Scholar
- Robson W (1997) Strategic management and information systems: an integrated approach. Pitman Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Rugani B, Benetto E, Igos E et al (2014) Towards prospective life cycle sustainability analysis: exploring complementarities between social and environmental life cycle assessments for the case of Luxembourg’s energy system. Matériaux & Techniques, p 102Google Scholar
- UN (2014) World economic situation and prospects 2014. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wesp2014_en.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2016
- UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. http://bit.ly/1L54IpB. Accessed 18 January 2015
- UNEP/SETAC (2013) The Methodological Sheets For Subcategories In Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/S-LCA_methodological_sheets_11.11.13.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2015