Advertisement

Product social impact assessment

  • João Fontes
  • Peter Tarne
  • Marzia Traverso
  • Paula Bernstein
SOCIAL LCA IN PROGRESS

Abstract

Purpose

Whereas the business evolution of environmental sustainability metrics has advanced significantly over the past decade, social sustainability at product level is still relatively immature. Research continues to support the front runners on organisational sustainability, while workable solutions at product level have not yet been addressed sufficiently. Triggered by this imbalance, a group of experts from large companies decided to join forces, initiating the Roundtable for Product Social Metrics.

Methods

Starting in early 2013, this group of companies aimed to (i) consolidate principles for product social sustainability assessment and harmonise approaches, (ii) align with other global initiatives and share with other companies and (iii) develop solutions for cross-cutting implementation issues. In order to be able to produce a comprehensive method for social impact assessment that provides enough flexibility for individual requirements, the Roundtable developed a method based on the approaches of the participant companies and external references such as the UNEP/SETAC Guidelines for Social Life-Cycle Assessment of Products and corporate level standards. Guiding principles were defined for the development of the method.

Results and discussion

The results of the first two phases of the Roundtable for Product Social Metrics are documented in a handbook, which proposes a practical method for organisations to assess the social impacts of a product or a service along its life cycle. The handbook outlines an aligned method for social impact assessment at a product level offering two approaches: quantitative and scale based. The method was developed to allow reasoned assessment of overall performance by including social topics and performance indicators that reflect positive and negative impacts of the product on three stakeholder groups: workers, consumers and local communities. Nineteen social topics are proposed, together with their individual performance indicators, including detailed definitions. Application examples and recommendations for the communication of results are also included in the handbook.

Conclusions

The method can be applied in numerous scenarios, from understanding improvement opportunities and steering product development in different stages, to providing support for decision making and external communications. However, the method still has further potential for improvement, inter alia that the proposed indicators are not fully applicable to small farmers, SMEs and the self-employed, as well as that the indicators are mainly at inventory level. Furthermore, the proposed method is strongly dependent on the availability of data.

Keywords

Impact assessment method Performance indicators Roundtable for product social metrics Social impact assessment Social life-cycle assessment Social topics Stakeholder groups Sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the external stakeholders that contributed during the development of the handbook for their feedback and invaluable contribution. In addition, we would like to thank the other participants of the Roundtable for Product Social Metrics who co-authored the Handbook for Product Social Impact Assessment version 3.0: Andrea Bolhuis and Karin Bogaers (Ahold), Peter Saling and Richard van Gelder (BASF), Jacobine Das Gupta and Dave Morris (DSM), Dave Woodyard, Lynn Bell and René van der Merwe (Goodyear), Nicola Kimm, Caroline Santamaria Markus Laubscher, Marcel Jacobs(Philips), Dave Challis (RB), Carmen Alvarado (AkzoNobel), Charles Duclaux and Yasmine Slaoui (L’Oréal), Hazel Culley (Marks & Spencer), Sébastien Zinck, Raphael Stermann and Edouard Carteron (Steelcase), Ambalika Gupta (Mahindra Sanyo), Sara Nilsson (Vattenfall), Anne Gaasbeek, Mark Goedkoop and Simon Evitts (PRé Sustainability).

References

  1. Benoît-Norris C, Aulisio D, Norris G (2012) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4:1946–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolabeled notebook—consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. http://www.greendelta.com/uploads/media/LCA_laptop_final.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2015
  3. Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fontes J, Bolhuis A, Bogaers K, Saling P, van Gelder R, Traverso M, Tarne P, Das Gupta J, Morris D, Woodyard D, Bell L, van der Merwe R, Kimm N, Santamaria C, Laubscher M, Jacobs M, Challis D, Alvarado C, Duclaux C, Slaoui Y, Culley H, Zinck S, Stermann R, Carteron E, Gupta A, Nilsson S, Gaasbeek A, Goedkoop M, Evitts S (2016) Handbook for product social impact assessment version 3.0. http://product-social-impact-assessment.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Handbook-for-Product-Social-Impact-Assessment.pdf. Accessed 01 Jan 2016
  5. GRI (2013) G4 sustainability reporting guidelines implementation manual. https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/how-to-use-guidelines/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 01 Dec 2013
  6. ISO (2010) ISO 26000 guidance on social responsibility. First editionGoogle Scholar
  7. Jørgensen A, Dreyer L, Arne Wangel A (2012) Addressing the effect of social life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(6):828–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social LCA of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Norris G (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen A, Schneider L (2012) Life cycle sustainability dashboard. J Ind Ecol 16:680–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1164xPA-guidelines_sLCA.pdf. Accessed 01 Feb 2013
  12. UNGC (2004) The UN Global Compact’s ten principles. http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/index.html. Accessed 01 Feb 2013

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • João Fontes
    • 1
  • Peter Tarne
    • 2
  • Marzia Traverso
    • 2
  • Paula Bernstein
    • 1
  1. 1.PRé SustainabilityAmersfoortThe Netherlands
  2. 2.BMW GroupMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations