Advertisement

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

, Volume 21, Issue 10, pp 1463–1472 | Cite as

Characterization model to assess ocean acidification within life cycle assessment

  • Vanessa Bach
  • Franziska Möller
  • Natalia Finogenova
  • Yasmine Emara
  • Matthias Finkbeiner
LCIA OF IMPACTS ON HUMAN HEALTH AND ECOSYSTEMS

Abstract

Purpose

Ocean acidification due to the absorption of increasing amounts of atmospheric carbon dioxide has become a severe problem in the recent years as more and more marine species are influenced by the decreasing pH value as well as by the reduced carbonate ion concentration. So far, no characterization model exists for ocean acidification. This paper aims to establish such a characterization model to allow for the necessary future inclusion of ocean acidification in life cycle assessment (LCA) case studies.

Methods

Based on a cause-effect chain for ocean acidification, the substances carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and methane were identified as relevant for this impact category. In a next step, the fate factor representing the substances’ share absorbed by the ocean due to conversion, distribution, and dissolution is determined. Then, the fate sensitivity factor is established reflecting the changes in the marine environment due to the amount of released hydrogen ions per gram of substance (category indicator). Finally, fate and fate sensitivity factors of each substance are multiplied and set in relation to the reference substance, carbon dioxide, thereby delivering the respective characterization factors (in kg CO2 eq) at midpoint level.

Results and discussion

Characterization factors are provided for carbon monoxide (0.87 kg CO2 eq), carbon dioxide (1 kg CO2 eq), and methane (0.84 kg CO2 eq), which allow conversion of inventory results of these substances into category indicator results for ocean acidification. Inventory data of these substances is available in common LCA databases and software. Hence, the developed method is directly applicable. In a subsequent contribution analysis, the relative contribution of the three selected substances, along with other known acidifying substances, to the ocean acidification potential of 100 different materials was studied. The contribution analysis confirmed carbon dioxide as the predominant substance responsible for more than 97 % of the total ocean acidification potential. However, the influence of other acidifying substances, e.g., sulfur dioxide, should not be neglected.

Conclusions

Evaluation of substances contributing to ocean acidification is of growing importance since the acidity of oceans has been increasing steadily over the last decades. The introduced approach can be applied to evaluate product system related impacts of ocean acidification and include those into current LCA practice.

Keywords

Acidifying substances CO2 Life cycle assessment Life cycle impact assessment Marine environment Ocean acidification 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors like to thank Dr. Lars Merkel of the Department of Chemistry (TU Berlin) who provided valuable assistance to the research presented here.

Supplementary material

11367_2016_1121_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

References

  1. Azevedo LB, De Schryver AM, Hendriks AJ, Huijbregts MAJ (2015) Calcifying species sensitivity distributions for ocean acidification. Environ Sci Technol 49:1495–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger M, Finkbeiner M (2011) Correlation analysis of life cycle impact assessment indicators measuring resource use. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brewer PG, Barry J (2008) Rising acidity in the ocean: the other CO2 problem—emissions are making the oceans more acidic, threatening sea life. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rising-acidity-in-the-ocean/. Accessed 1 Feb 2016
  4. Carew M (2010) UNEP emerging issues: environmental consequences of ocean acidification: a threat to food security. UNEPGoogle Scholar
  5. Dickson A (2010) The carbon dioxide system in seawater: equilibrium chemistry and measurements. Guide to best practices for ocean acidification research and data reporting. pp. 17–40Google Scholar
  6. Doney SC, Mahowald N, Lima I et al (2007) Impact of anthropogenic atmospheric nitrogen and sulfur deposition on ocean acidification and the inorganic carbon system. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:14580–14585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doney SC, Fabry VJ, Feely RA, Kleypas JA (2009) Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem. Ann Rev Mar Sci 1:169–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ducklow HW, Steinberg DK, Buesseler KO (2001) Upper ocean carbon export and the biological pump. Oceanography 4:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunford RW, Donoghue DNM, Burt TP (2012) Forest land cover continues to exacerbate freshwater acidification despite decline in sulphate emissions. Environ Pollut 167:58–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eakin CM, Kleypas J, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2008) Global climate change and coral reefs: rising temperatures, acidification and the need for resilient reefs. http://icriforum.org/sites/default/files/CLIM Acid and temps FINAL CH1 - Dec08_0.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2016
  11. Ecoinvent (2016) Ecoinvent databaseGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisler R (2011) Oceanic acidification: a comprehensive overview, 1st edn. CRC, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. European Union (2014) Agriculture and acidification. In: EUROSTAT. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/envir/report/en/acid_en/report.htm
  14. Fabry VJ, Seibel BA, Feely RA, Orr JC (2008) Impacts of ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem processes. ICES J Mar Sci 65:414–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feely R, Doney S, Cooley S (2009) Ocean acidification: present conditions and future changes in a high-CO2 world. Oceanography 22:36–47. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2009.95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gazeau F, Quiblier C, Jansen JM et al (2007) Impact of elevated CO2 on shellfish calcification. Geophys Res Lett. doi: 10.1029/2006GL028554 Google Scholar
  17. Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M et al. (2009) ReCiPe 2008: a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Report I: characterisationGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall-Spencer JM, Rodolfo-Metalpa R, Martin S et al (2008) Volcanic carbon dioxide vents show ecosystem effects of ocean acidification. Nature 454:96–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrould-Kolieb ER, Herr D (2012) Ocean acidification and climate change: synergies and challenges of addressing both under the UNFCCC. Clim Pol 12:378–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heijungs R, Guinée JB, Huppes G et al (1992) Environmental life cycle assessment of products—guide and backgrounds (part 2). CML, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  21. Holloway AM, Wayne RP (2010) Atmospheric chemistry. Royal Society of Chemistry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Hood M, Broadgate W, Urban E, Gaffney O (2011) Ocean acidification—a summary for policymakers from the second symposium on the ocean in a high-CO2 worldGoogle Scholar
  23. Hurst TP, Fernandez ER, Mathis JT (2013) Effects of ocean acidification on hatch size and larval growth of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma). ICES J Mar Sci 70:812–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) IPCC climate change fourth assessment report: climate change. In: IPCC Clim. Chang. Fourth Assess. Rep. Clim. Chang. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/assessments-reports.htm
  26. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014) IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 1132Google Scholar
  27. Isaksen ISA (2012) Tropospheric ozone: regional and global scale interactions. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Requirements and guidelines (EN ISO 14044:2006)Google Scholar
  29. Jolliet O, Bare J, Boulay A-M et al (2014) Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: findings of the scoping phase. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:962–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kirschke S, Bousquet P, Ciais P et al (2013) Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nat Geosci 6:813–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klöpffer W, Grahl B (2009) Ökobilanz (LCA): Ein Leitfaden für Ausbildung und Beruf. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kroeker KJ, Kordas RL, Crim RN, Singh GG (2010) Meta-analysis reveals negative yet variable effects of ocean acidification on marine organisms: biological responses to ocean acidification. Ecol Lett 13:1419–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindeijer EW, Müller-Wenk R, Steen B (2002) Life cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice. Chapter 2: impact assessment of resources and land use. SETAC, Pensacola, pp 11–62, ISBN 1-880611Google Scholar
  34. Margni M, Gloria T, Bare J et al. (2008) Guidance on how to move from current practice to recommended practice in life cycle impact assessment. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative PublicationGoogle Scholar
  35. Michaelidis B, Ouzounis C, Paleras A, Pörtner H (2005) Effects of long-term moderate hypercapnia on acid-base balance and growth rate in marine mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 293:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pörtner HO, Langenbuch M, Reipschläger A (2004) Biological impact of elevated ocean CO2 concentrations: lessons from animal physiology and earth history. J Oceanogr 60:705–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rhein M, Rintoul SR, Aoki S et al (2013) Observations: ocean. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 255–316Google Scholar
  38. Royal Society Great Britain (2005) Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Clyvedon Press Ltd, CardiffGoogle Scholar
  39. Schlesinger WH (2005) Biogeochemistry: treatise on geochemistry, volume 8, 1st edn. Elsevier Science, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  40. Schroeder T (2013) World ocean review. Vol. 2: the future of fish—the fisheries of the future. Maribus gGmbH, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  41. Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (2006) Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  42. Thinkstep (2016) GaBi product sustainability softwareGoogle Scholar
  43. Widdicombe S, Spicer JI (2008) Predicting the impact of ocean acidification on benthic biodiversity: what can animal physiology tell us? J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 366:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wuebbles DJ, Hayhoe K (2000) Atmospheric methane: trends and impacts. In: Non-CO2 greenhouse gases: scientific understanding, control and implementation. Springer, pp. 1–44Google Scholar
  45. Wuebbles DJ, Hayhoe K (2002) Atmospheric methane and global change. Earth Sci Rev 57:177–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zeebe RE, Wolf-Gladrow D (2001) CO2 in seawater: equilibrium, kinetics, isotopes. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vanessa Bach
    • 1
  • Franziska Möller
    • 1
  • Natalia Finogenova
    • 1
  • Yasmine Emara
    • 1
  • Matthias Finkbeiner
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Sustainable EngineeringTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations