State of the art in S-LCA: integrating literature review and automatic text analysis

  • Gabriella Arcese
  • Maria Claudia Lucchetti
  • Ilaria Massa
  • Clara Valente
SOCIAL LCA IN PROGRESS

Abstract

Purpose

Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) method lacks of standard and code of practice. The aim of the study is to classify the wide variety of contributions on S-LCA for tracking the development of different themes and for defining and classifying the main approaches in a systematic and reproducible way.

Methods

The research addressed to study a collection of 51 articles published between January 2006 and November 2014 using statistical criteria. We used automatic text analysis (ATA) tools related to lexicon analysis to identify keywords useful in tracing the main topics covered in articles published in different periods. We conducted principal component analysis (PCA) to classify the different approaches in the literature and to outline the orientations of the various research groups.

Results and discussion

The results from lexicon analysis showed a rapid succession of different topics covered in the analyzed period. This alternation is strongly affected by the introduction of UNEP/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) S-LCA guidelines and methodological sheets. PCA analysis enabled to synthesize the information related to the numerous approaches. Results did not show a clear division into groups which indicates the absence of a dominant position on the subject in the literature.

Conclusions

This study attempted to map the state of art in S-LCA integrating literature review with multivariate statistical techniques. The analysis showed a highly fragmented field. These results confirm the existence of a variety of approaches that in part have already been identified by literature reviews on S-LCA. Alignment with the results in the literature confirms ATA to be a suitable instrument for the realization of reviews. Moreover, being systematic and reproducible allows ATA to be applied repeatedly, expanding the number of articles and topics analyzed.

Keywords

Approaches synthesis Automatic text analysis (ATA) Literature review Principal component analysis (PCA) Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdi H, Willimas LJ (2010) Principal component analysis. WIREs Comput Stat 2(4):433–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013) Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1116–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arcese G, Lucchetti MC, Merli R (2013) Social life cycle assessment as a management tool: methodology for application in tourism. Sustainability 5(8):3275–3287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arushanyan Y, Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2014) Lessons learned—review of LCAs for ICT products and services. Comput Ind 65(2):211–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the production of an airbag injure more people than the airbag saves in traffic? J Ind Ecol 17(4):517–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benoit Norris C, Aulisio D, Norris GA (2012) Working with the social hotspots database—methodology and findings from 7 social scoping assessments. In: Dornfeld DA, Linke BS (eds) Leveraging technology for a sustainable world. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 581–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benoît-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:682–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benoît-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4(9):1946–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benoît-Norris C, Norris GA, Aulisio D (2014) Efficient assessment of social hotspots in the supply chains of 100 product categories using the social hotspots database. Sustainability 6:6973–6984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolasco S (2010) Analisi multidimensionale dei dati. Carocci Editori, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Bolasco S (2013) L’ analisi automatica dei testi. Fare ricerca con il text mining. Carocci Editori, RomeGoogle Scholar
  13. Bolasco S, Pavone P (2008) Multi-class categorization based on cluster analysis and TFIDF. 9th JADT (2008): 209–218. http://lexicometrica.univ-paris3.fr/jadt/jadt2008/pdf/bolasco-pavone.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2015
  14. Canzonetti A (2008) Information retrieval e analisi delle cooccorrenze per l’estrazione di informazione specifica da documentazione giuridica. 9th JADT(2008):277–284. http://lexicometrica.univ-paris3.fr/jadt/jadt2008/pdf/canzonetti.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2015
  15. De Luca AI, Iofrida N, Strano A, Falcone G, Gulisano G (2015) Social life cycle assessment and participatory approaches: a methodological proposal applied to citrus farming in southern Italy. Integr Environ Assess Manag 11(3):383–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2010a) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part 1: development of indicators for labour rights. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(3):247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2010b) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part 2: implementation in six company case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(4):385–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ekener-Petersen E, Moberg Å (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 2: reflections on a study of a complex product. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ekener-Petersen E, Höglund J, Finnveden G (2014) Screening potential social impacts of fossil fuels and biofuels for vehicles. Energ Policy 73:416–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feschet P, Loeillet D, Macombe C, Garrabé M (2010) Fruits and vegetables supply chains specificities and stakes as element of discussion on Social-LCA. In: 7th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (Vol. 2, pp 1–6). Aldo Moro University, BariGoogle Scholar
  23. Feschet P, Macombe C, Garrabé M, Loeillet D, Rolo Saez A, Benhmad F (2013) Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway: the case of banana industry in Cameroon. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:490–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2(10):3309–3322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):366–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giuliano L, La Rocca G (2008) L’analisi automatica e semi-automatica dei dati testuali—software e Istruzioni per l’uso. LED Edizioni Universitarie. ISBN 978-88-7916-382-8Google Scholar
  28. Grießhammer R, Benoît-Norris C, Dreyer LC, Flysjö A, Manhart A, Mazijn B, Méthot AL, Weidema B (2006) Feasibility study: integration of social aspects into LCA. Ghent University. https://biblio.ugent.be/input/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=512499&fileOId=633083. Accessed 26 Jan 2015
  29. Hauschild MZ, Dreyer LC, Jørgensen A (2008) Assessing social impacts in a life cycle perspective—lessons learned. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(3):620–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutchins MJ, Sutherland JW (2008) An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J Clean Prod 16:1688–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jørgensen A, Hauschild MZ, Jørgensen MS, Wangel A (2009) Relevance and feasibility of social life cycle assessment from a company perspective. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jørgensen A, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen MS, Hauschild MZ (2010a) Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(4):376–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jørgensen A, Lai LCH, Hauschild MZ (2010b) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jørgensen A, Dreyer LC, Wangel A (2012) Addressing the effect of social life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:828–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jørgensen A, Herrmann IT, Bjørn A (2013) Analysis of the link between a definition of sustainability and the life cycle methodologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1440–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kloepffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lagarde V, Macombe C (2013) Designing the social life cycle of products from the systematic competitive model. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):172–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, Finkbeiner M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3(4):562–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Schebek L (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(8):1581–1592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Macombe C, Leskinen P, Feschet P, Antikainen R (2013) Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs. J Clean Prod 52:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social life cycle assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mathe S (2014) Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1506–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Musaazi MK, Mechtenberg AR, Nakibuule J et al (2015) Quantification of social equity in life cycle assessment for increased sustainable production of sanitary products in Uganda. J Clean Prod 96:569–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Norris GA (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles: towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret JP (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret JP (2012) Revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in the transition towards sustainable production and consumption. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1642–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reitinger C, Dumke M, Barosevcic M, Hillerbrand R (2011) A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rouillier J, Bansard JY, Kerbaol M (2002) Application de l’analyse statistique de données textuelles à une revue bibliographic de la litérature médicale. In: Morin A, Sébillot P (ed) 6th JADT-2002. pp 665–676Google Scholar
  52. Sanchez Ramirez PK, Petti L (2011) Social life cycle assessment: methodological and implementation issues. In: Năstase C (ed) The USV annals of economics and public administration 11(1). Editura Universităţii Ştefan cel Mare, Suceava, pp 11–17. http://www.seap.usv.ro/annals/arhiva/ANNALS_vol.11,nr.1(13),2011_fulltext.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2015
  53. Sanchez Ramirez PK, Ugaya CML, Vicoli RV, Vaira S, Petti L (2012) A tomato case study using subcategory assessment method. SETAC 18th LCA Case Study Symposium http://lcacopenhagen.setac.eu/embed/Copenhagen/programme_abstracts_book_31102012_v2.pdf
  54. Sanchez Ramirez PK, Petti L, Haberland NT, Ugaya CML (2014) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 1: methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1515–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Seuring S, Gold S (2012) Supply chain management: an international journal emerald article: conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag 17(5):544–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith J, Barling D (2014) Social impacts and life cycle assessment: proposals for methodological development for SMEs in the European food and drink sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(4):944–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Traverso M, Asdrubali F, Francia A, Finkbeiner M (2012) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to photovoltaic modules. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:1068–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. UNEP/SETAC Life-Cycle Initiative (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nation Environment Programme, ParisGoogle Scholar
  59. Valdivia S, UgayaCML HJ, Traverso M, Mazijn B, Sonnemann G (2013) A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio+20. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1673–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu R, Yang D, Chen J (2014) Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability 6(7):4200–4226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriella Arcese
    • 1
  • Maria Claudia Lucchetti
    • 1
  • Ilaria Massa
    • 2
  • Clara Valente
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Business StudiesRoma Tre UniversityRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of ManagementSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  3. 3.Østfoldforskning ASKråkerøyNorway

Personalised recommendations