Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany
- 769 Downloads
With many policies in Germany steering towards a bioeconomy, there is a need for analytical tools that assess not only the environmental and economic implications but also the social implications of a transition to a bioeconomy. Wood is expected to become a major biomass resource in bioeconomy regions. Therefore, this paper develops a social life cycle assessment (sLCA) framework that can be applied specifically to a wood-based production system in one of Germany’s bioeconomy regions.
This paper reviews and analyses existing sLCA approaches, in terms of how applicable they are for assessing a wood-based production system in a German bioeconomy regional context. The analysis is structured according to the standard phases of environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). However, we use the term social effects rather than social impacts, to acknowledge the unknown cause–effect relationship between an organisation’s activities and its social impacts. We also consider the establishment of regional system boundaries, as well as the relationship between the social effects and the product being assessed. Additionally, an approach for the development and selection of social indicators and indices is outlined. Furthermore, we discuss data requirements and present an approach for a social life cycle impact assessment method.
Results and discussion
A new conceptual framework for a context-specific sLCA to assess wood-based products manufactured in a bioeconomy region was developed. It enables sLCA practitioners to identify “social hotspots” and “social opportunities” from a regional perspective. The location and characteristics of these social hotspots and opportunities can be analysed, in particular, for major production activities in a bioeconomy region in Germany. Therefore, according to this framework, the development of social indices and indicators, the collection of data and the approach used for characterising social effects need to relate to the geographical context of the product being assessed. The proposed framework can, thus, help to identify, monitor and evaluate the social sustainability of wood-based bioeconomy chains in a regional context.
This framework requires a high level of detail in the social inventory and impact assessment phase, in order to assess the regional foreground activities in a German wood-based bioeconomy region. It enables sLCA studies to identify which social hotspots and social opportunities occur and where they are located in the wood-based production system of a regional bioeconomy.
KeywordsBioeconomy region Framework sLCA site-specific Social life cycle assessment Wood-based products
The authors gratefully thank the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research for their financial support.
- (BMBF) Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2011) National research strategy BioEconomy 2030. http://www.bmbf.de/pub/Natinal_Research_Strategy_BioEconomy_2030.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2015
- (BMELV) Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (2013) Politikstrategie Bioökonomie: Nachwachsende Ressourcen und biotechnologische Verfahren als Basis für Ernährung, Industrie und Energie. http://www.bmbf.de/pubRD/Politikstrategie_Biooekonomie_barrierefrei.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2014
- (EC) European Commission (2012) Innovating for sustainable growth. A bioeconomy for Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/201202_innovating_sustainable_growth_en.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2015
- (GRI) Global Reporting Initiative (2011) Sustainability reporting guidelinesGoogle Scholar
- (SAI) SAI SA8000 (2008) Social accountability 8000Google Scholar
- (SMUL) Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft (2013) Sachsen hat Zukunft: Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie für den Freistaat Sachsen. https://www.smul.sachsen.de/smul/download/. Accessed 10 December 2014Google Scholar
- Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolabeled notebook: consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. GreenDeltaTC GmbH, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- DIN ISO 26000 (2010) Guidance on social responsibilityGoogle Scholar
- Feschet P, Garrabé M (2013) Social LCA and sustainable development. In: Macombe C (ed) Social LCAs: socio-economic effects in value chains. FruiTrop, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
- Fuchs M, Rauscher C, Weyh A (2014) Die regionalen Unterschiede in Deutschland sind groß. IAB-KurzberichtGoogle Scholar
- Kies U, Klein D, Schulte A (2010) Germany's forest cluster: exploratory spatial data analysis of regional agglomerations and structural change in wood-based employment- primary wood processing. Forstarchiv 81(6):233–272Google Scholar
- Macombe C (ed) (2013) Social LCAs: socio-economic effects in value chains. FruiTrop, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
- Paragahawewa U, Blackett P, Bruce S (2009) Social life cycle analysis (S-LCA). Some methodological issues and potential application to cheese production in New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- Petti L, Lie Ugaya CM, Di Cesare S (2014) Systematic review of social-life cycle assessment (S-LCA) case studies. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Social LCA in progress. FruiTrop, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
- Raschka A, Carus M (2012) Stoffliche Nutzung von Biomasse: Basisdaten für Deutschland. Europa und die Welt, HürthGoogle Scholar
- Reitinger C, Dumke M, Barosevcic M, Hillerbrand R (2011) A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):380–388Google Scholar
- Revéret J, Couture J, Parent J (2015) Socioeconomic LCA of milk production in Canada. In: Muthu SS (ed) Social life cycle assessment: an insight. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt I, Meurer M, Saling P, Kicherer A, Reuter W, Gensch C (2004) SEEbalance - managing sustainability of products and processes with the socio-eco-efficiency analysis by BASF, 45th ednGoogle Scholar
- Statistisches Bundesamt (2014) Nachhaltige Entwicklung in Deutschland Indikatorenbericht 2014. http://www.nachhaltigkeitsrat.de/uploads/media/Indikatorenbericht2014.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2015
- UNEP-SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme, ParisGoogle Scholar