Skip to main content
Log in

The application of life cycle assessment to public policy development

  • POLICIES AND SUPPORT IN RELATION TO LCA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Despite the potential value it offers, integration of life cycle assessment (LCA) into the development of environmental public policy has been limited. This paper researches potential barriers that may be limiting the use of LCA in public policy development, and considers process opportunities to increase this application.

Methods

Research presented in this paper is primarily derived from reviews of existing literature and case studies, as well as interviews with key public policy officials with LCA experience. Direct experience of the author in LCA projects with public policy elements has also contributed to approaches and conclusions.

Results and discussion

LCAs have historically been applied within a rational framework, with experts conducting the analysis and presenting results to decision-makers for application to public policy development. This segmented approach has resulted in limited incorporation of LCA results or even a broader approach of life cycle thinking within the public policy development process. Barriers that limit the application of LCA within the public policy development process range from lack of technical knowledge and LCA understanding on the part of policy makers, to a lack of trust in LCA process and results. Many of the identified barriers suggest that the failure of LCAs to contribute positively to public policy development is due to the process within which the LCA is being incorporated, rather than technical problems in the LCA itself. Overcoming the barriers to effective use of LCAs in public policy development will require a more normative approach to the LCA process that incorporates a broad group of stakeholders at all stages of the assessment. Specifically, a set of recommendations have been developed to produce a more inclusive and effective process.

Conclusions

In an effort to effectively incorporate LCA within the overall public policy decision-making process, the decision-making process should incorporate a multi-disciplinary approach that includes a range of stakeholders and public policy decision-makers in a collaborative process. One of the most important aspects of incorporating LCA into public policy decisions is to encourage life cycle thinking among policy makers. Considering the life cycle implications will result in more informed and thoughtful decisions, even if a full LCA is not undertaken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen DT, Consoli FJ, Davis FJ, Davis GA, Fava JA, Warren JL (1995) Public Policy Applications of Life-Cycle Assessments – Proceedings from the Workshop on Application of Life-Cycle Assessment to Public Policy. In: David T. Allen, Frank J. Consoli, Gary A. Davis, James A. Fava and John L Warren (eds) SETAC Technical Publications Series. August, 1995. ISBN 1-880611-18-X assessment - Principles and framework. Second edition 2006-07-01

  • Baumann H, Tillman A-M (2004) The hitch Hiker’s guide to LCA—an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Published by Studentlitteratur AB, Lund, Sweden, ISBN 91-44-02364-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Bras-Klapwijk RM (1998) Are life cycle assessments a threat to sound public policy making? Delft University of Technology, Policy and Management, Department of Policy Analysis, The Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3(6):333–342. doi:10.1007/BF02979344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bras-Klapwijk RM (1999) Adjusting Life Cycle Assessment Methodology for Use in Public Policy Discourse. Doctoral dissertation - Delft University of Technology

  • CalRecycle (2014) Used oil recycling program statutes and regulations. Retrieved from http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/usedoil/policylaw/default.htm. Accessed 12 November 2014

  • Carlson R (2014a) Financial Assistance Division, California Department of Resource, Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). Personal communication, July 15, 2014

  • Carlson R (2014b) Financial Assistance Division, California Department of Resource, Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). Personal communication, November 20, 2014

  • CIELAP (2009) CIELAP Brief on Life Cycle Assessment. Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy. June 2009. Accessed at www.cielap.org on Feb. 19, 2011

  • Curran M (2014) Editor-in-chief - the international journal of life cycle assessment and former LCA research program manager at US EPA. Personal Communication

  • de Neufville R (1990) Applied Systems Analysis, Engineering Planning and Technology Management. McGraw-Hill, New York

  • Ekvall T, Assefa G, Bjorklund A, Eriksson O, Finnveden G (2007) What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. Science Direct – Waste Manage 27(2007):989–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU (2011) European Commission Environment. European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment. Accessed at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/lca.htm on Feb 21, 2011

  • EUROPEN (1999) Use of Life Cycle Asssessment (LCA) as a Policy Tool in the Field of Sustainable Packaging Waste Management. September, 1999

  • Hofstetter P (1998) Perspectives in Life Cycle Impact Assessment – A Structured Approach to Combine Models of the Technosphere, Ecosphere and Valusphere. Dissertation submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Zurich

  • ISO (2006) ISO 14040 International Standard. Environmental management - Life cycle

  • Lazarevic D, Buclet N, Brandt N (2012) The application of life cycle thinking in the context of European waste policy. J Clean Prod 29–30:199–207

  • LCI (2014) Life Cycle Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/about/about-lci/get-involved/be-a-part-of-a-work-area/. Accessed 7 June 2014

  • Leith A (2014) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Personal Communication

  • NRC (2014) Sustainability and the U.S. EPA, committee on incorporating sustainability in the U.S. environmental protection agency, science and technology for sustainability program, policy and global affairs division, national research council of the national academies. The National Academies Press. 2011

  • openLCA (2014) The openLCA project. Accessed at http://www.openlca.org/about-openlca. December 20, 2014

  • Reed D (2012) Life-cycle assessment in government policy in the United States. PhD diss., university of Tennessee, 2012. Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1394

  • USDA (2014) LCA Commons – Data and Community for Life Cycle Assessment. United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Library. Accessed at http://www.lcacommons.gov/. December 20, 2014

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Seidel.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Mary Ann Curran

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seidel, C. The application of life cycle assessment to public policy development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21, 337–348 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-1024-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-1024-2

Keywords

Navigation