Just eating healthier is not enough: studying the environmental impact of different diet scenarios for Dutch women (31–50 years old) by linear programming
- 973 Downloads
Eating healthier or vegetarian and vegan diets are suggested options to reduce the environmental impact of the current diet. In this paper, we demonstrate a method that is able to identify diets with reduced environmental impact and are more similar to the current diet than predetermined scenarios. All diets were adequate and consisted of commonly available foods.
We used linear programming to find solutions that are as close as possible to the current diet of an average woman with age 31–50, first without any food groups’ constraints and later by imposing constraints on meat, fish, dairy, and eggs. Finally, we use a similar technique to search for the closest diet that achieves the same environmental reduction as the most restricted option (no meat, fish, dairy, or eggs), without restrictions on products. In the optimization algorithm, we incorporate popularity of food products in order to design menus which are feasible for the Dutch population.
Results and discussion
The results show that simply eating according to guidelines does not guarantee a diet with an improved environmental profile. Removing meat and fish from the diet reduces the environmental impact by about 21 %. A healthy vegan diet reaches 30 % environmental impact reduction, but leads to a diet with many changes in comparison to a typical Dutch diet and without meeting one of the health constraints (EPA + DHA—Eicosapentaenoic acid + Docosahexaenoic acid). We show that it is possible to find less restrictive solutions than vegetarian or vegan diets that still satisfy all nutritional requirements and have less environmental impact than the current one.
Just eating healthier is not enough in order to reduce environmental impact. However, designing a diet that meets dietary requirements must be a prerequisite for sustainable diets. Simply removing products from a diet can have as consequence that other products have to be added to compensate for the nutritional imbalances. We show, by using linear programming, that it is possible to reach 30 % reduction in the environmental impact with a diet which is relatively similar to the current one and could be more likely to be accepted.
KeywordsEating patterns Environmental impact Environmental impact of food Food policy and nutrition Greenhouse gas emissions Healthy food Linear programming
- Catherine A. Forestell, Andrea M. Spaeth, Stephanie A. Kane, (2012) To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females, Appetite, 58;(1);319-325, ISSN 0195-6663, 10.1016/j.appet.2011.10.015.
- FAO (2010) Sustainable diets and biodiversity. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
- FAO (2011) The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture - managing systems at risk. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
- Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B et al (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock – A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
- Gezondheidsraad (2001) Health Council of the Netherlands. Dietary reference intakes: energy, proteins, fats, and digestible carbohydrates; publication no. 2001/19R; The Hague, The Netherlands. pp 1–174Google Scholar
- Gezondheidsraad (2006) Health Council of the Netherlands. Guidelines for a healthy diet 2006/Richtlijnen Goede Voeding 2006; publication no. 2006/21. The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M et al (2013) ReCiPe 2008, A LCA method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level; Report 1 CharacterisationGoogle Scholar
- Kramer GFH, Broekema R, Tyszler M et al (2013) Comparative LCA of Dutch dairy products and plant- based alternatives. Gouda, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
- RIVM (2011) NEVO-online version 2011/3.0. http://nevo-online.rivm.nl/. Accessed 31 Jan 2013
- RIVM (2012) consumption_food_nut.dat Version 20111125, part of the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2007-2010Google Scholar
- Searchinger T et al (2013) Creating a Sustainable Food Future - World Resources Report 2013–14: Interim Findings. 1–144Google Scholar
- Sevenster M, Blonk H, Van der Flier S (2010) Environmental analyses of food and food waste/Milieuanalyses voedsel en voedselverliezen. pp 1–76Google Scholar
- Temme EH, van der Voet H, Thissen JT et al. (2013) Replacement of meat and dairy by plant-derived foods: estimated effects on land use, iron and SFA intakes in young Dutch adult females. Public Health Nutr 1–8.Google Scholar
- Tubiello FN, Salvatore M, Cóndor Golec RD et al. (2014) Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks - 1990-2011 Analysis. 1–76Google Scholar
- Tukker A, Bausch-Goldbohm S, Verheijden M et al. (2009) Environmental impacts of diet changes in the EU. 1–96. doi: 10.2791/88996
- USDA (2012) Release 25 of the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=22771
- Van Rossum CTM, Fransen HP, Verkaik-Kloosterman J et al (2011) Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2007-2010, pp 1–148Google Scholar
- Van Westerhoven S, Steenhuizen F (2010) Bepaling voedselverliezen bij huishoudens en bedrijfscatering in Nederland. pp 1–65Google Scholar
- Vieux F, Darmon N, Touazi D, Soler LG (2011) Food Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Changing Food Consumption Patterns or Consuming less? Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 58 (Suppl. 3) Presented at 11. European Nutrition Conference (FENS), Madrid, ESP (2011-10-26 - 2011-10-29). Basel,CHE: Karger. http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/209894
- Voedingscentrum (2011) Richtlijnen voedselkeuze 2011.Google Scholar
- Voedingscentrum (2013) Eettabel. 1–207Google Scholar
- Voedingscentrum (2014) Aanbevelingen voor vitamines , mineralen en spoorelementen/Recommendations for vitamins, minerals and trace elementsGoogle Scholar
- Westenbrink S, Jansen-van der Vliet M (2013) NEVO-online 2013: background information (in Dutch). pp 1–24Google Scholar
- Westhoek H, Rood T, Berg M van den et al (2011) The protein puzzle. pp 1–221Google Scholar
- WHO, FAO, UNU (2007) Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition - Report of a join FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation (WHO Technical Report Series 935). 284 ppGoogle Scholar