Environmental impact of traction electric motors for electric vehicles applications

  • Maria Hernandez
  • Maarten Messagie
  • Omar Hegazy
  • Luca Marengo
  • Oliver Winter
  • Joeri Van Mierlo
ASSESSING AND MANAGING LIFE CYCLES OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES

Abstract

Purpose

The expansion of the electric vehicle (EV) market will bring changes in the type of environmental impact generated by the transport sector. This will be partially associated to the introduction of new technologies for energy storage and powertrains, including electric motors technology, which can play a critical role for the EV. To assure its optimal performance, key components and innovative materials are integrated in current motor designs. Such is the case of permanent magnets (PM), commonly made of rare-earth elements, which have a history of ecological concerns related to its mining. The goal of the paper is to study novel traction e-motors and to assess the influence of its components, in the environmental performance of the motor and the electric vehicle.

Methods

In this study, a life cycle assessment (LCA) is performed, including the manufacturing, use, and end of life stages of a traction electric motor for EV applications. A comparison is presented, where the rare-earth magnets are replaced by ferrite magnets, under several efficiency scenarios. Average European conditions are considered for framing the modeling. A functional unit of 1 km driven by the vehicle is used.

Results and discussion

Twelve impact categories were selected to present the potential environmental impact of the motors. Energy consumption during the use stage was identified as a hotspot responsible for an important share of the impact. The amount of energy consumed is highly dependent on the efficiencies of the powertrain, which is why improving efficiency should be regarded as crucial for decreasing the environmental damage produced by the motor. The use of rare-earth magnets during manufacturing does not represent a significant share of the impact, as they only take 2 % of the total mass. Other components, including laminations, housing and windings were instead recognized as more significant than the mangets, mainly for climate change, toxicity of humans, soil and water bodies, as well as metal depletion. The use of alternative materials for rare-earth magnets can contribute in the reduction of the potential impact, as long as the overall efficiency of the motor remains the same or increases.

Conclusions

Based on the study results, it can be concluded that the environmental performance of traction motor is closely tight to its efficiency. Selection of materials during design should focus more on preserving or improving the efficiency of the motor, than on materials with low environmental impact during production.

Keywords

Efficiency E-motor Environmental performance EV LCA Powertrain 

Supplementary material

11367_2015_973_MOESM1_ESM.docx (98 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 98.1 kb)

References

  1. ABB (2002) Environmental product declarations. http://www.abb.com/cawp/abbzh258/3d76091aeb235c70c12569ee002b47f4.aspx. Accessed 15 Nov 2014
  2. Al-Alawi B, Bradley T (2013) Review of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle market modeling studies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 21:190–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binnemans K, Jones P, Blanpain B, Van Gerven T, Yang Y, Walton A, Buchert M (2013) Recycling of rare earths: a critical review. J Clean Prod 51:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brouwer A, Kuramochi T, Van den Broek M, Faaij A (2013) Fulfilling the electricity demand of electric vehicles in the long term future: an evaluation of centralized and decentralized power supply systems. Appl Energy 107:33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan CC (2007) The state of the art of electric, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles. Proc IEEE 95(4):704–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Croezen H, Bello O (2003) Environmental profiles of motors and transformers. CE, DelftGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuenca R, Gaines L, Vyas A (2009) Evaluation of electric vehicle production and operating costs. Center for Transportation Research, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, ArgonneGoogle Scholar
  8. Deprez W, Pardon L, De Keulenaer H, Herrmann C, Driesen J (2006) Ecodesign toolbox for electrical equipment. 13th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering. LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission (2010) ILCD Handbook: analysing of existing environmental impact assessment methodologies for use in life cycle assessment. First edition. JRC Reference Report, European Commission – Joint Research Centre. Publications office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2011) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - Recommendations for life cycle impact assessment in the European contextGoogle Scholar
  11. European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Institute for Energy and Transport. (2012) Driving and parking patterns of European car drivers - a mobility surveyGoogle Scholar
  12. European Commission - Research Directorate General. (2007) The Seventh Framework Program (FP7)Google Scholar
  13. Gerssen-Gondelach S, Faaij A (2012) Performance of batteries for electric vehicles on short and longer term. J Power Sources 212:111–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gieras J (2013) Permanent motor magnet technology: design and applications. In: Applications of permanent magnet motors, 3rd ed. CRC Press, New York, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  15. Hawkins T, Gausen O, Strømman A (2012a) Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:997–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hawkins TR, Singh B, Majeau-Bettez G, Stromman AH (2012b) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J Ind Ecol 17:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hegazy O, Van Mierlo J, Barrero R, Omar N, Lataire P (2013) PSO algorithm-based optimal power flow control of fuel cell/supercapacitor and fuel cell/battery hybrid electric vehicles. Int J Comput Math Electr Electron Eng 32(1):86–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hischier R, Classen M, Lehmann M, Scharnhorst W (2007) Life cycle inventories of electric and electronic equipment: production, use and disposal. Final report ecoinvent data v2.0 No. 18. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, DübendorfGoogle Scholar
  19. I. S. ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and frameworksGoogle Scholar
  20. I. S. ISO 14044 (2006) International standard assessment — Requirements and guidelinesGoogle Scholar
  21. International Energy Agency (2011) Energy-efficiency policy opportunities for electric motor-driven systems. 2011. http://www.iea.org/topics/energyefficiency/publications/ . Accessed 15 Dec 2014
  22. International Energy Agency (2012) European union −28: electricity and heat 2012. http://www.iea.org/statistics/statisticssearch/report/?country=EU28&product=electricityandheat&year=2012. Accessed 10 Nov 2014
  23. Jin Y, Aijun L, Xiao-Liang L, Yiding W, Wenbin Z, Zhanheng C (2013) China’s ion-adsorption rare earth resources, mining consequences and preservation. Environ Dev 8:131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu P, Liu H (2011) Application of Z-source inverter for permanent-magnet synchronous motor drive system for electric vehicles. Procedia Eng 15:309–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Messagie M, Lebeau K, Coosemans T, Macharis C, Van Mierlo J (2013) Environmental and financial evaluation of passenger vehicle technologies in Belgium. Sustainability 5(12):5020–5033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Messagie M, Boureima F, Coosemans T, Macharis C, Van Mierlo J (2014a) A range-based vehicle life cycle assessment incorporating variability in the environmental assessment of different vehicle technologies and fuels. Energies 7(3):1467–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Messagie M, Mertens J, Oliveira L, Rangaraju S, Sanfelix J, Coosemans T, Van Mierlo J, Macharis C (2014b) The hourly life cycle carbon footprint of electricity generation in Belgium, bringing a temporal resolution in life cycle assessment. Appl Energy 134:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nordelöf A, Messagie M, Tillman A, Ljunggren Söderman M, Van Mierlo J (2014) Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric vehicles—what can we learn from life cycle assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1866–1890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sprecher B, Xiao Y, Walton A, Speight J, Harris R, Kleijn R, Visser G, Kramer G (2014) Life cycle inventory of the production of rare earths and the subsequent production of NdFeB rare earth permanent magnets. Environ Sci Technol 48:3951–3958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Torrent M, Martínez E, Andrada P (2012) Life cycle analysis on the design of induction motors. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. U.S. Department of Energy (2011) Critical materials strategy – 2011 Report and summary. Http://energy.gov/epsa/initiatives/department-energy-s-critical-materials-strategy. Accessed 01 Dec 2014
  32. UNECE (2013) Regulation No. 101 Uniform provisions concerning the approval of passenger cars powered by an internal combustion engine only, or powered by a hybrid electric power train with regard to the measurement of the emission of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption and/or the measurement of electric energy consumption and electric range, and of categories M1 and N1 vehicles powered by an electric power train only with regard to the measurement of electric energy consumption and electric rangeGoogle Scholar
  33. Zeraoulia M, Benbouzid M, Diallo D (2006) Electric motor drive selection issues for HEV propulsion systems: a comparative study. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, Inst Electr Electron Eng (IEEE) 55(6):1756–1764Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Hernandez
    • 1
  • Maarten Messagie
    • 1
  • Omar Hegazy
    • 1
  • Luca Marengo
    • 2
  • Oliver Winter
    • 3
  • Joeri Van Mierlo
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering, Mobility and Automotive Technology Research Group (MOBI)Vrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.R&D Product DevelopmentCentro Richerche Fiat S.C.p.AOrbassanoItaly
  3. 3.Mobility Department Electric Drive TechnologiesAIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbHViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations