Attributional life cycle assessment: is a land-use baseline necessary?
- 1.1k Downloads
This paper aims to clarify the application of a land-use baseline in attributional life cycle assessment (ALCA) for product systems involving land use, through consideration of the fundamental purpose of ALCA. Currently, there is no clear view in the literature whether a baseline should be used when accounting for environmentally relevant physical flows related to land use.
An extensive search of literature was carried out using the key terms ‘attributional life cycle assessment’ and ‘attributional LCA’ in the Google Scholar web search engine. Approximately 700 publications were reviewed and summarised according to their type and scope, relevance of land use, key statements and references given for ALCA, and arguments for and against using a baseline in ALCA. Based on the literature review and supplementary literature references, a critical discussion on the use of a baseline and determination of the most appropriate land-use baseline in ALCA is provided.
Results and discussion
A few studies clearly argued that only absolute (observable) flows without a baseline are to be inventoried in ALCA, while the majority of the studies did not make any clear statement for or against. On the other hand, a land-use baseline was explicitly applied or proposed in a minority of the studies only, despite the fact that we classified land use as highly relevant for the majority of the studies reviewed. Furthermore, the LCA guidelines reviewed give contradictory recommendations. The most cited studies for the definition of ALCA provide general rules for selecting processes based on observable flows but do not argue that observable flows necessarily describe the environmentally relevant physical flows.
We conclude that a baseline is required to separate the studied parts of the technosphere from natural processes and to describe the impact of land use on ecosystem quality, such as carbon sequestration and biodiversity. The most coherent baseline for human-induced land-use in ALCA is natural regeneration. As the natural-regeneration baseline has typically been excluded, may vary bio-geographically and temporally, and is subject to uncertainties, case studies applying it should be performed so that implications can be studied and evaluated. This is particularly important for agricultural and forestry systems, such as food, feed, fibre, timber and biofuels.
KeywordsAbsolute emission Attributional LCA Baseline Environmentally relevant physical flow Land use Natural regeneration
The authors are grateful for the three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript. Sampo Soimakallio would like to thank Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation for financing.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Arm M, Wik O, Engelse CJ, Erlandsson M, Sundqvist J, Oberender A, Hjelmar O, Wahlström M (2014) ENCORT-CDW : evaluation of the European recovery target for construction and demolition waste. Nordic Working Papers, 2014:916Google Scholar
- Baumann H, Tillman A (2004) The Hitch Hiker's guide to LCA: an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and applications. Studentlitteratur, LundGoogle Scholar
- Brandão M (2012) Food, feed, fuel, timber or carbon sink? towards sustainable land use: a consequential life cycle approach. PhD thesis. Centre for Environmental Strategy (Division of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering), Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, UK. 246 pp. Appendices 541 ppGoogle Scholar
- Brander M, Wylie C (2011) The use of substitution in attributional life cycle assessment. GGMM:1–6. doi: 10.1080/20430779.2011.637670
- Brander M, Tipper R, Hutchinson C, Davis G (2009) Consequential and attributional approaches to LCA: a guide to policy makers with specific reference to greenhouse gas LCA of biofuels. http://ecometrica.com/white-papers/consequential-and-attributional-approaches-to-lca-a-guide-to-policy-makers-with-specific-reference-to-greenhouse-gas-lca-of-biofuels/. Accessed 24 May 2014
- Brander M, Wylie C, Gillenwater M (2012) Substitution: a problem with current life cycle assessment standards (p. 3). http://ecometrica.com/white-papers/substitution-a-problem-with-current-life-cycle-assessment-standards/. Accessed 12 June 2014
- BSI (2011) PAS 2050:2011 - Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. http://shop.bsigroup.com/en/forms/PASs/PAS-2050/. Accessed 4 June 2014
- Cellura M, Longo S, Marsala G, Mistretta M, Pucci M (2013) The use of genetic algorithms to solve the allocation problems in the life cycle inventory. In: Assessment and simulation tools for sustainable energy systems. Springer, pp 267–284Google Scholar
- Cherubini F, Jungmeier G, Bird DN (2012) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) and energy analysis of a bioethanol oriented biorefinery based on wood. In: IEA Bioenergy Task (Vol. 38). task38.org/Bioref_Case_Study_T38_Long_v4_clean.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2014Google Scholar
- Curran MA, Mann M, Norris G (2002) Report on the international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. EPA/600/R-02/041. Cincinnati, OH: US EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory. March. nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P1001NRO.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2014Google Scholar
- EC-JRC-IES (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance. First edition. http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/?page_id=86. Accessed 15 May 2014
- Elshout P, van Zelm R, Balkovic J, Obersteiner M, Schmid E, Skalsky R, van der Velde M, Huijbregts MAJ (2015) Greenhouse-gas payback times for crop-based biofuels. Nature Clim Change 5:604--610Google Scholar
- Erlandsson M, Almemark M (2009) Background data and assumptions made for an LCA on creosote poles, working report. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd. 16 October 2009. http://www.ivl.se/download/18.7df4c4e812d2da6a416800072055/B1865.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2014
- EU (2009) Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. 2009/28/EC. The Official Journal of the European Union 05/06/2009Google Scholar
- Goel P (2013) Land use in LCA: a critical analysis. Master's thesis, Leiden UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Guinée J, Kleijn R, Henriksson P (2010) Environmental life cycle assessment of South-East Asian aquaculture systems for tilapia, pangasius, catfish, penaeid shrimp and macrobrachium prawns. Goal & Scope Definition Report-Final version.Sustaining Ethical Aquaculture Trade (SEAT) Deliverable Ref: D 2Google Scholar
- Heijungs R, Guinée JB (2014) Life cycle impact assessment. Life Cycle Assess (LCA):90Google Scholar
- Heijungs R, Guinée JB, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R, de Goede HP (1992) Environmental life cycle assessment of products. Guide and backgrounds. NOH reports 9266 & 9267 Leiden: CML 96pp + 130pp Guide: ISBN: 90-5191-064-9Backgrounds: ISBN: 90-5191-064-9Google Scholar
- Helin T, Salminen H, Hynynen J, Soimakallio S, Huuskonen S, Pingoud K (2015) Global warming potentials of stemwood used for energy and materials in Southern Finland: differentiation of impacts based on type of harvest and product lifetime. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12244 Google Scholar
- Hofstetter P (1998) Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment - A structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere and valuesphere. PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Dissertation or ThesisGoogle Scholar
- ISO (2006) 14040:2006. Environmental management -- Life cycle assessment -- Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 20 pGoogle Scholar
- Koellner T (2013) Ecosystem services and global trade of natural resources: ecology, economics and policies. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
- Kuczenski B, Geyer R (2011) Life cycle assessment of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) beverage bottles consumed in the State of California. Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management UC Santa Barbara. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Publications/Documents/1487/20141487.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2014
- Leinonen I, Williams AG, Kyriazakis I (2014) Evaluating methods to account for the greenhouse gas emissions from land use changes in agricultural LCA. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector. LCA Food 2014, pp 8–10Google Scholar
- Lindeijer E, Müller-Wenk R, Steen B (eds) (2002) Impact assessment of resources and land use. In: Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich EG, Hofstetter P, Jolliet O, Klöpffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer EW, Müller-Wenk R, Olsen SI, Pennington DW, Potting J, Steen B (eds) (2002), Life cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice. SETAC, Pensacola, USA, pp 11–64Google Scholar
- Lindholm E (2010) Energy use and environmental impact of roundwood and forest fuel production in Sweden. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesGoogle Scholar
- Mattila T, Helin T, Antikainen R, Soimakallio S, Pingoud K, Wessman H (2011) Land use in life cycle assessment. The Finnish Environment 24. Finnish Environment InstituteGoogle Scholar
- Michelsen O (2006) Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains–methodological development with regulatory and organizational implications. Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Dissertation or Thesis, Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap og teknologiledelseGoogle Scholar
- Milà i Canals L, Clift R, Basson L, Hansen Y, Brandão M (2006) Expert workshop on land use impacts in life cycle assessment. 12–13 June 2006 Guildford, Surrey (UK). Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:363–368Google Scholar
- Muys B (2002) Reference system. In: Schweinle J (ed) The assessment of environmental impacts caused by land use in the life cycle assessment of forestry and forest products. Final report. Working group 2, land use of COST action E9. Nr. 209. BFH, Hamburg, pp 56Google Scholar
- National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI) (2013) A review of biomass carbon accounting methods and implications. Technical Bulletin No. 1015. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina Google Scholar
- Nuss P, Bringezu S, Gardner KH (2012) Waste-to-materials: the longterm option. In: Waste to energy. Springer, pp 1–26Google Scholar
- Oyewole A (2010) Implementation of land use and land use change and its effects on biodiversity in life cycle assessment. Master thesis, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- Rödl A (2012) IEA bioenergy task 38 - case study environmental assessment of liquid biofuel from woody biomass. Work Report of the Institute of Forest Based Sector Economics 2012/01. HamburgGoogle Scholar
- Rutland CT (2011) Life cycle assessment applied to 95 representative US Farms. Master thesis, Texas A&M UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt JH (2007) Life assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Ph. D. thesis, Part 3: life cycle inventory of rapeseed oil. Dissertation, Aalborg UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Scown CD (2010) Life-cycle water impacts of US transportation fuels. Dissertation, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Socolow R (1997) Industrial ecology and global change. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Sonnemann G, Vigon B (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases. A basis for greener processes and products.UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), ParisGoogle Scholar
- Vellinga TV, Blonk H, Marinussen M, van Zeist W, de Boer I, Starmans D (2009) Methodology used in FeedPrint: a tool quantifying greenhouse gas emissions of feed production and utilization. Lelystad, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Weidema B (2003) Market information in life cycle assessment (Vol. 863, p. 365). MiljøstyrelsenGoogle Scholar
- WRI, WBCSD (2011) Product life cycle reporting and standard. WRI, WashingtonGoogle Scholar