Development of a Climate Choice meal concept for restaurants based on carbon footprinting
- 1.2k Downloads
Significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from food production and consumption can be made at the level of individual diet. Together with the food and beverage sector, consumers could play a significant role by making informed choices that benefit the environment and their own health. Communicating information on carbon footprints to consumers is challenging and should be made very simple, yet reliable. This sector is showing interest in using eco-design tools to decrease climate change impacts of their meals.
A long-term concept for communicating information on carbon footprints associated with meals was developed in Finland. The criteria for a Climate Choice meal were created through stakeholder dialogue, and three restaurant operators piloted the concept in 25 restaurants. In addition to climate change impacts, possibilities to include other sustainability criteria were reviewed. The concept was based on simplified carbon footprinting of raw material production and processing of ingredients for 105 commonly selected lunches. The carbon footprint calculations allowed the development of the Climate Choice meal concept, its criteria, and piloting the concept. Based on experiences from restaurants and consumers from the pilot phase, final criteria were developed.
Results and discussion
The Climate Choice meal concept was created using two alternative climate criteria: one for immediate implementation and another for future implementation, in cases where carbon footprinting is feasible for restaurants. The criteria for immediate implementation include a list of mainly plant-based ingredients with low carbon footprint. Regarding future criteria, it should be made easy enough for restaurants to estimate the carbon footprints of their meals, allowing labeling of meals when their carbon footprints are at least 25 % smaller than for an average meal. In addition to the two climate criteria, Climate Choice meals need to follow Finnish public catering nutritional recommendations, taking into account that fish species on the Red List of WWF’s Finnish seafood guide are prohibited.
To promote climate-friendly eating, a long-term concept rather than a short-term campaign is needed. There is interest among consumers and restaurants for information on food carbon footprints and sustainability. Lunch is regarded as a good opportunity for consumers to learn about climate-friendly eating. The main challenges are to produce sufficiently reliable background data and to raise consumer and the food and beverage sector interest and understanding of carbon footprints associated with food.
KeywordsCarbon footprint Climate change impact Communication Consumer Eco-design Food Food and beverage sector Stakeholder dialogue
The authors would like to thank the Finnish Ministry of the Environment, WWF Finland, Restaurant Perho, HYY Restaurants, and Fazer Food Services for funding the Climate Lunch project.
- AFNOR (2014) Affichage Environnemental des produits de grande consummation. http://affichage-environnemental.afnor.org. Accessed 15 Dec 2014
- Barilla (2014) Si mediterraneo. Barilla. http://www.barillagroup.com/corporate/en/home/nutrition/commitment/simediterraneo.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2014
- Beattie G, Sale L (2009) Explicit and implicit attitudes to low and high carbon footprint products. Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain 5:191–206Google Scholar
- Berry T, Crossley D, Jewell J (2008) Check out carbon: the role of carbon labelling in delivering a low-carbon shopping basket. Forum for the Future, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Copenhagen City Council (2014) Climate+ restaurants. City of Copenhagen. http://subsite.kk.dk/sitecore/content/Subsites/CityOfCopenhagen/SubsiteFrontpage/Business/EnterprisesForClimateChange/CLIMATEplusRestaurants.aspx. Accessed 15 Dec 2014
- Dalgaard T, Olesen JE, Petersen SO, Petersen BM, Jørgensen U, Kristensen T, Hutchings NJ, Gyldenkærne S, Hermansen JE (2011) Developments in greenhouse gas emissions and net energy use in Danish agriculture - how to achieve substantial CO(2) reductions? Environ Pollut 159(11):3193–3203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- European Commission (2009) Europeans’ attitudes towards the issue of sustainable consumption and production, analytical report, Flash EB Series 256. European Commission, LuxemborgGoogle Scholar
- Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockström J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Tilman D, Zaks DPM (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jungbluth N, Keller R, König A, Doublet G (2014) “”ONE TWO WE–life cycle management in canteens together with suppliers, customers and guests. In: Schenck R, Huizenga D (eds) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2014), 8-10 October 2014, San Francisco, USA. ACLCA, Vashon, pp 611–618Google Scholar
- Meatless Monday (2014) Meatless Monday. The Monday Campaigns. http://www.meatlessmonday.com. Accessed 15 Dec 2014
- Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (2010) Joukkoruokailun kehittäminen Suomessa. Joukkoruokailun seuranta- ja kehittämistyöryhmän toimenpidesuositus (Developing mass catering services. Guidelines by the working group to monitor and develop mass catering services). Report of Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 2010:11. Available in Finnish (summaries in Swedish and English)Google Scholar
- Peano L, Bengoa X, Humbert S, Loerincik Y, Lansche J, Gaillard G, Nemecek T (2014) The World Food LCA Database project: towards more accurate food datasets. In: Schenck R, Huizenga D (eds) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2014), 8-10 October 2014, San Francisco, USA. ACLCA, Vashon, pp 964–966Google Scholar
- Rockstrom J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber H, Nykvist B, De Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sorlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 2:32Google Scholar
- Spaargaren G, van Koppen CSA, Janssen AM, Hendriksen A, Kolfschoten CJ (2013) Consumer responses to the carbon labelling of food: a real life experiment in a canteen practice. Sociol Rural 53(4):432–453Google Scholar
- White P, Sharp V, Darnton A, Downing P, Inman A, Strange K, Garnett T (2009) Food synthesis review: a report to the department for environment, food and rural affairs. The Social Marketing Practice et al. Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar