Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Organizing life cycle management in practice: challenges of a multinational manufacturing corporation

  • ADVANCING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The environmental life cycle management (LCM) literature proposes many factors considered critical in order to successfully conduct LCM. This study contrasts these vague and general factors proposed as critical to LCM in existing literature, with detailed accounts of LCM in practice.

Methods

A literature review of three related research fields, i.e., LCM, life cycle thinking, and sustainable supply chain management, is contrasted with a study of how LCM is enacted in practice in a large multinational manufacturing company recognized for its LCM work. A qualitative study, with mainly a managerial focus, is conducted based on interviews, workshops, part-time observations, and document studies.

Results and discussion

The literature review demonstrates that the three related research fields provide different accounts of LCM: all apply a holistic environmental perspective, but with different emphases and using largely different research methods. The empirical study shows that integration was a common topic at the studied company and that solutions were often sought in tools and processes. Middle management support proved important, and challenging, in these integration efforts. Challenges identified also included further integrating LCM into departments such as purchasing and sales.

Conclusions

The constant focus on integration at the studied company implies that LCM work is an ongoing effort. Several integration paths are identified: (1) inclusion of sustainability aspects in tools and processes, (2) finding ways to work around certain organizational levels, and (3) using networks and social interaction to create commitment and integration. Although the concept of LCM implies a holistic approach, LCM in practice reveals a lack of a comprehensive overview of LCM-related initiatives and of involved sustainability practitioners within the studied organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Larger suppliers were also expected to have environmental management systems and to comply with Occupational Health and Safety (OHSAS) 18001 standards.

References

  • Balkau F, Sonnemann G (2010) Managing sustainability performance through the value-chain. Corp Gov 10(1):46–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H (2000) Introduction and organisation of LCA activities in industry: description and analysis of two LCA projects in Swedish companies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(6):363–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H, Tillman A-M (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA: an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocken N, Allwood J, Willey A, King J (2011) Development of an eco-ideation tool to identify stepwise greenhouse gas emissions reduction options for consumer goods. J Clean Prod 19(12):1279–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken N, Allwood J, Willey A, King J (2012) Development of a tool to rapidly assess implementation difficulty and emissions reduction benefits of innovations. Technovation 32(1):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden D (1994) The business of talk: organizations in action. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen F, Cousins P, Lamming R, Farukt A (2001) The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Prod Oper Manag 10(2):174–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A, Bell E (2007) Business research methods, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer J, Stevels A (1997) Strategic environmental product planning within Philips Sound & Vision. Environ Qual Manag 7(1):91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska B (1997) Narrating the organization: dramas of institutional identity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska B (2004) Narratives in social science research. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska B (2014) Social science research: from field to desk. SAGE Publications Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelund Holgaard J, Remmen A, Herreborg Jørgensen T (2007) LCM—intentional practices or a patchwork of practices? (Working Paper No. 20). Retrieved from Aalborg University website: http://www.plan.aau.dk/digitalAssets/5/5493_workingpaper202007.pdf

  • Fava J (1997) LCA: concept, methodology, or strategy? J Ind Ecol 1(2):8–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq 12(2):219–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Pub. Co., Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold S, Seuring S, Beske P (2010) Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 17(4):230–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth W, MacMillan I (1986) Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest. Strat Manag J 7(4):313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch MJ (2002) Organisationsteori. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen E (2000) Managers’ interpretations of LCA: enlightenment and responsibility or confusion and denial? Bus Strat Environ 9(4):239–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen E (2002) The institutional logic of life cycle thinking. J Clean Prod 10(5):427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunkeler D, Saur K, Rebitzer G, Finkbeiner M, Schmidth W-P, Jensen A, Stranddorf H, Christiansen K (2003) Life cycle management. SETAC Press

  • Jensen A (2009) LCM—a bridge to more sustainable products. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Lemnos Island, Greece, 8–10 September 2003. Full paper Vol. A, pp. 39–43, http://www.gnest.org/cest8/8cest_papers/abstracts_pdf_names/p22_Jensen.pdf

  • Linnanen L, Bostrom T, Miettinen P (1995) Life cycle management: integrated approach towards corporate environmental issues. Bus Strat Environ 4(3):117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren B (2012) The green engineer as an enabler of life-cycle management in manufacturing: models and practices. PhD dissertation. Chalmers University of Technology

  • Luttropp C, Lagerstedt J (2006) EcoDesign and the ten golden rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. J Clean Prod 14(15–16):1396–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol A (2003) The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini D, Gherardi S, Yanow D (eds) (2003) Knowing in organizations: a practice-based approach. M.E. Sharp, Inc., Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  • Poikkimäki S (2006) Look closer to see further—exploring environmental life cycle management, LCM. PhD dissertation. University of Jyväskylä

  • Power W (ed) (2009) Life cycle management: how business uses it to decrease footprint, create opportunities and make value chains more sustainable. United Nations Environment Programme & Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Europe

  • Reichertz J (2007) Abduction: the logic of discovery of grounded theory. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K (eds) The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. SAGE Publications Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmen A, Jensen A, Frydendal J (2007) Life cycle management: a business guide to sustainability. UNEP/SETAC, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Rex E (2008) Marketing for life cycle thinking. PhD dissertation. Chalmers University of Technology

  • Rex E, Baumann H (2008) Implications of an interpretive understanding of LCA practice. Bus Strat Environ 17(7):420–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J (2012) A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag 17(2):202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai K-H (2011) An organizational theoretical review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ 130(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S (2004) Industrial ecology, life cycles, supply chains: differences and interrelations. Bus Strat Environ 13(5):306–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16(15):1699–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah R, Ward PT (2007) Defining and developing measures of lean production. J Oper Manag 25(4):785–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman D (2011) Interpreting qualitative data: a guide to the principles of qualitative research, 4th edn. SAGE Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann G, de Leeuw B (2006) Life cycle management in developing countries: state of the art and outlook. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):123–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarr T, Fava J (2007) A capability model for life cycle management. In: LCM2007: Third International Conference on Life Cycle Management

  • Swarr T, Fava J, Jensen A, Valdivia S, Vigon B (2011) Life cycle management capability: an alternative approach to sustainability assessment. In: Finkbeiner M (ed) Towards life cycle sustainability management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 35–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen W, Seuring S (2009) Sustainability through the market—the impacts of sustainable supply chain management: introduction. Sustain Dev 17(5):269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford R (2003) Beyond systems: a vision for corporate environmental management for the future. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 2(2):162–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westkämper E, Alting L, Arndt G (2001) Life cycle management and assessment: approaches and visions towards sustainable manufacturing. Proc IMechE Part B: J Eng Manuf 215(5):599–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the studied organization that funded this research and made empirical data available for the study. The authors are also grateful for the useful comments presented by two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna Nilsson-Lindén.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Kirsten Schmidt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nilsson-Lindén, H., Baumann, H., Rosén, M. et al. Organizing life cycle management in practice: challenges of a multinational manufacturing corporation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 1368–1382 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0818-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0818-y

Keywords

Navigation