Abstract
Purpose
The environmental life cycle management (LCM) literature proposes many factors considered critical in order to successfully conduct LCM. This study contrasts these vague and general factors proposed as critical to LCM in existing literature, with detailed accounts of LCM in practice.
Methods
A literature review of three related research fields, i.e., LCM, life cycle thinking, and sustainable supply chain management, is contrasted with a study of how LCM is enacted in practice in a large multinational manufacturing company recognized for its LCM work. A qualitative study, with mainly a managerial focus, is conducted based on interviews, workshops, part-time observations, and document studies.
Results and discussion
The literature review demonstrates that the three related research fields provide different accounts of LCM: all apply a holistic environmental perspective, but with different emphases and using largely different research methods. The empirical study shows that integration was a common topic at the studied company and that solutions were often sought in tools and processes. Middle management support proved important, and challenging, in these integration efforts. Challenges identified also included further integrating LCM into departments such as purchasing and sales.
Conclusions
The constant focus on integration at the studied company implies that LCM work is an ongoing effort. Several integration paths are identified: (1) inclusion of sustainability aspects in tools and processes, (2) finding ways to work around certain organizational levels, and (3) using networks and social interaction to create commitment and integration. Although the concept of LCM implies a holistic approach, LCM in practice reveals a lack of a comprehensive overview of LCM-related initiatives and of involved sustainability practitioners within the studied organization.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Larger suppliers were also expected to have environmental management systems and to comply with Occupational Health and Safety (OHSAS) 18001 standards.
References
Balkau F, Sonnemann G (2010) Managing sustainability performance through the value-chain. Corp Gov 10(1):46–58
Baumann H (2000) Introduction and organisation of LCA activities in industry: description and analysis of two LCA projects in Swedish companies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(6):363–368
Baumann H, Tillman A-M (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA: an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Studentlitteratur, Lund
Bocken N, Allwood J, Willey A, King J (2011) Development of an eco-ideation tool to identify stepwise greenhouse gas emissions reduction options for consumer goods. J Clean Prod 19(12):1279–1287
Bocken N, Allwood J, Willey A, King J (2012) Development of a tool to rapidly assess implementation difficulty and emissions reduction benefits of innovations. Technovation 32(1):19–31
Boden D (1994) The business of talk: organizations in action. Polity Press, Cambridge
Bowen F, Cousins P, Lamming R, Farukt A (2001) The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Prod Oper Manag 10(2):174–189
Bryman A, Bell E (2007) Business research methods, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cramer J, Stevels A (1997) Strategic environmental product planning within Philips Sound & Vision. Environ Qual Manag 7(1):91–102
Czarniawska B (1997) Narrating the organization: dramas of institutional identity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London
Czarniawska B (2004) Narratives in social science research. Sage, London
Czarniawska B (2014) Social science research: from field to desk. SAGE Publications Ltd., London
Egelund Holgaard J, Remmen A, Herreborg Jørgensen T (2007) LCM—intentional practices or a patchwork of practices? (Working Paper No. 20). Retrieved from Aalborg University website: http://www.plan.aau.dk/digitalAssets/5/5493_workingpaper202007.pdf
Fava J (1997) LCA: concept, methodology, or strategy? J Ind Ecol 1(2):8–10
Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq 12(2):219–245
Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Pub. Co., Chicago
Gold S, Seuring S, Beske P (2010) Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 17(4):230–245
Guth W, MacMillan I (1986) Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest. Strat Manag J 7(4):313–327
Hatch MJ (2002) Organisationsteori. Studentlitteratur, Lund
Heiskanen E (2000) Managers’ interpretations of LCA: enlightenment and responsibility or confusion and denial? Bus Strat Environ 9(4):239–254
Heiskanen E (2002) The institutional logic of life cycle thinking. J Clean Prod 10(5):427–437
Hunkeler D, Saur K, Rebitzer G, Finkbeiner M, Schmidth W-P, Jensen A, Stranddorf H, Christiansen K (2003) Life cycle management. SETAC Press
Jensen A (2009) LCM—a bridge to more sustainable products. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Lemnos Island, Greece, 8–10 September 2003. Full paper Vol. A, pp. 39–43, http://www.gnest.org/cest8/8cest_papers/abstracts_pdf_names/p22_Jensen.pdf
Linnanen L, Bostrom T, Miettinen P (1995) Life cycle management: integrated approach towards corporate environmental issues. Bus Strat Environ 4(3):117–127
Löfgren B (2012) The green engineer as an enabler of life-cycle management in manufacturing: models and practices. PhD dissertation. Chalmers University of Technology
Luttropp C, Lagerstedt J (2006) EcoDesign and the ten golden rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. J Clean Prod 14(15–16):1396–1408
Mol A (2003) The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press, Durham
Nicolini D, Gherardi S, Yanow D (eds) (2003) Knowing in organizations: a practice-based approach. M.E. Sharp, Inc., Armonk
Poikkimäki S (2006) Look closer to see further—exploring environmental life cycle management, LCM. PhD dissertation. University of Jyväskylä
Power W (ed) (2009) Life cycle management: how business uses it to decrease footprint, create opportunities and make value chains more sustainable. United Nations Environment Programme & Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Europe
Reichertz J (2007) Abduction: the logic of discovery of grounded theory. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K (eds) The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. SAGE Publications Ltd., London
Remmen A, Jensen A, Frydendal J (2007) Life cycle management: a business guide to sustainability. UNEP/SETAC, Nairobi
Rex E (2008) Marketing for life cycle thinking. PhD dissertation. Chalmers University of Technology
Rex E, Baumann H (2008) Implications of an interpretive understanding of LCA practice. Bus Strat Environ 17(7):420–430
Sarkis J (2012) A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag 17(2):202–216
Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai K-H (2011) An organizational theoretical review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ 130(1):1–15
Seuring S (2004) Industrial ecology, life cycles, supply chains: differences and interrelations. Bus Strat Environ 13(5):306–319
Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16(15):1699–1710
Shah R, Ward PT (2007) Defining and developing measures of lean production. J Oper Manag 25(4):785–805
Silverman D (2011) Interpreting qualitative data: a guide to the principles of qualitative research, 4th edn. SAGE Publications Ltd, London
Sonnemann G, de Leeuw B (2006) Life cycle management in developing countries: state of the art and outlook. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):123–126
Swarr T, Fava J (2007) A capability model for life cycle management. In: LCM2007: Third International Conference on Life Cycle Management
Swarr T, Fava J, Jensen A, Valdivia S, Vigon B (2011) Life cycle management capability: an alternative approach to sustainability assessment. In: Finkbeiner M (ed) Towards life cycle sustainability management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 35–42
Vermeulen W, Seuring S (2009) Sustainability through the market—the impacts of sustainable supply chain management: introduction. Sustain Dev 17(5):269–273
Welford R (2003) Beyond systems: a vision for corporate environmental management for the future. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 2(2):162–173
Westkämper E, Alting L, Arndt G (2001) Life cycle management and assessment: approaches and visions towards sustainable manufacturing. Proc IMechE Part B: J Eng Manuf 215(5):599–626
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the studied organization that funded this research and made empirical data available for the study. The authors are also grateful for the useful comments presented by two anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Kirsten Schmidt
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nilsson-Lindén, H., Baumann, H., Rosén, M. et al. Organizing life cycle management in practice: challenges of a multinational manufacturing corporation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 1368–1382 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0818-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0818-y