Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of maintenance on life cycle impact and cost assessment for residential flooring options

  • BUILDING COMPONENTS AND BUILDINGS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Most life cycle assessment (LCA) studies for flooring exclude the environmental and economic impacts incurred from the maintenance required due to uncertainty in average cleaning procedures, although some studies indicate that it may be the most significant component of the life cycle. This study investigates the impacts of maintenance on types of flooring and develops a single scoring system to compare floors based on both environmental and economic impacts.

Methods

The focus of this study was on the impact of maintenance on the life cycle of flooring choices. Maintenance data was collected from trade association studies and manufacturer’s recommendations. This data was compiled, along with data from previous flooring studies, to create a comprehensive life cycle inventory which was analyzed with the LCA software, SimaPro. A number of maintenance techniques and frequencies were tested in order to do a sensitivity analysis. An uncertainty analysis was completed using Monte Carlo simulations. A life cycle costing (LCC) analysis was used to evaluate the total present value cost of flooring including maintenance. Environmental and economic impacts were normalized to create a single score in order to compare the overall performance of flooring choices.

Results and discussion

Maintenance procedures may account for a significant portion of environmental and economic impacts of floorings. In the case of environmental scores, adding high maintenance to the life cycle can increase scores by anywhere from 31 % (hardwood) to 114 % (carpet). A sensitivity analysis of these scores shows that most of the score increase can be attributed to vacuuming. Maintenance costs considerably increase the total cost, accounting for 49 % of hardwood’s total cost and about 30 % of costs for linoleum, vinyl, and carpet. The expected service life of the home greatly influences which flooring is best, as costs and environmental scores change dynamically over time. For the expected service life of a home of 61 years, carpet has the worst and linoleum has the best overall performance.

Conclusions

Although averages for maintenance techniques are not currently known, ignoring maintenance as a part of the use phase presents a significant error in the comparison of flooring options environmentally and economically. Due in part to yearly maintenance effects, the flooring choice with the best overall performance changes dynamically depending on the expected service life remaining for the home.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aktas CB, Bilec MM (2012) Impact of lifetime on US residential building LCA results. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(3):337–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong (2012) Maintenance recommendations & procedures for commercial resilient, hardwood & laminate flooring. Armstrong Commercial Flooring, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Baitz M, Kreißig J, Byrne E, Makishi C, Kupfer T, Frees N, Bey N, Hansen MS, Hansen A, Bosch T, Borghi V, Watson J, Miranda M (2004) Life cycle assessment of PVC and of principal competing materials. European Commission, Leinfelden-Echterdingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpet and Rug Institute (2014a) About CRI. http://www.carpet-rug.org/about-cri/what-is-cri/. Accessed 20 Feb 2014

  • Carpet and Rug Institute (2014b) Residential vacuuming. http://www.carpet-rug.org/residential-customers/cleaning-and-maintenance/basic-cleaning/vacuuming.cfm. Accessed 25 Feb 2014

  • Carpet and Rug Institute (2014c) Residential deep cleaning and selecting a carpet cleaning professional. http://www.carpet-rug.org/residential-customers/cleaning-and-maintenance/deep-cleaning-and-selecting-a-carpet-cleaning-professional.cfm. Accessed 28 Feb 2014

  • Cetiner I, Edis E (2014) An environmental and economic sustainability assessment method for the retrofitting of residential buildings. Energy Build 74:132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ChemDry (2014) http://www.chemdry.com/residential. Accessed 12 Dec 2013

  • D&R International (2012) 2011 Buildings energy data book. US Department of Energy: Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, pp 1–6

  • Energy Information Administration (2011) Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States 2009. US Department of Energy, p 22

  • Energy Information Administration (2014) Electric power monthly: average retail price of electricity to ultimate customers by end-use sector. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_5_6_a. Accessed 23 Jan 2014

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2002) Solid waste management and greenhouse gases: a life-cycle assessment of emissions and sinks

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Water on tap: what you need to know

  • Forbo (2008) Cleaning & maintenance of marmoleum floors. http://www.forbo-flooring.com/Residential-flooring/Installation-floorcare/Floorcare/. Accessed 28 Feb 2014

  • Franke DL, Cole EC, Leese KE, Foarde KK, Berry MA (1997) Cleaning for improved indoor air quality: an initial assessment of effectiveness. Indoor Air 7(1):41–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G, Spielmann M (2005) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(1):3–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller S, Peterson S (1996) Life-cycle costing manual for the federal energy management program. NIST Handbook 135. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA

  • Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huibregts M, Schryver AD, Stuijs J, van Zelm R (2012) ReCiPe 2008: a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level

  • Günther A, Langowski H-C (1997) Life cycle assessment study on resilient floor coverings. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2(2):73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R, Settanni E, Guinée J (2013) Toward a computational structure for life cycle sustainability analysis: unifying LCA and LCC. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1722–1733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter P (1998) Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment: a structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere and valuesphere. Kluwer Academic, Zurich

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Homewyse (2014) Home service costs. www.homewyse.com. Accessed 12 Dec 2013

  • Hoogmartens R, Van Passel S, Van Acker K, Dubois M (2014) Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools. Environ Impact Assess 48:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunkeler D, Lichtenvort K, Rebitzer G, Ciroth A (2008) Environmental life cycle costing. Hunkeler D, Lichtenvort K, Rebitzer G (eds); lead authors, Ciroth A et al. Pensacola, Florida, SETAC; Boca Raton, CRC

  • Jönsson Å (1999) Including the use phase in LCA of floor coverings. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4(6):321–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson A, Tillman A-M, Svensson T (1997) Life cycle assessment of flooring materials: case study. Build Environ 32(3):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen A, Herrmann I, Bjørn A (2013) Analysis of the link between a definition of sustainability and the life cycle methodologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(8):1440–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–94 (with Comments by Helias A. Udo de Haes, p. 95)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepffer W, Ciroth A (2011) Is LCC relevant in a sustainability assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(2):99–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippiatt B, Greig AL, Lavappa P (2010) Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability (BEES). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowes (2014) Clean hardwood floors. http://www.lowes.com/cd_how+to+clean+hardwood+floors_1314379252_. Accessed 28 Feb 2014

  • Matos GR (2009) Use of minerals and materials in the United States from 1900 through 2006. US Geological Survey

  • National Center for Healthy Housing (2008) Carpets and healthy homes. http://www.nchh.org/Portals/0/Contents/CarpetsHealthyHomes.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2013

  • National Wood Flooring Association (2014) Frequently asked questions: care & maintenance. http://woodfloors.org/care-maitenance.aspx. Accessed 28 Feb 2014

  • Nebel B, Zimmer B, Wegener G (2006) Life cycle assessment of wood floor coverings—a representative study for the German flooring industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(3):172–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson AC (2004) Toward a new metropolis: the opportunity to rebuild america. The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program

  • Office of Management and Budget (2013) Circular A-94 appendix C. White House (December 2013)

  • Paulsen J (2001) Life cycle assessment for building products: the significance of the usage phase. Dissertation, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm

  • Paulsen J (2003) The maintenance of linoleum and PVC floor coverings in Sweden the significance of the usage phase in an LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(6):357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potting J, Blok K (1995) Life-cycle assessment of four types of floor covering. J Clean Prod 3(4):201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushing AS, Kneifel JD, Lippiatt BC (2013) Energy price indices and discount factors for life-cycle cost analysis 2013. Annual supplement to NIST handbook 135 and NBS special publication 709, vol NISTIR 85-3273-28. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanz C (2012) Working with linoleum flooring. This Old House

  • Soratana K, Marriott J (2010) Increasing innovation in home energy efficiency: Monte Carlo simulation of potential improvements. Energy Build 42(6):828–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swarr TE, Hunkeler D, Klöpffer W, Pesonen HL, Ciroth A, Brent AC, Pagan R (2011) Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(5):389–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau (2007) Ceramic wall and floor tile manufacturing (NAICS 327122). http://thedataweb.rm.census.gov/TheDataWeb_HotReport2/econsnapshot/snapshot.hrml?NAICS=327122&IND= %3DCOMP %28 %28C4*C4 %29 %2FC4 %29&STATE=ALL&COUNTY=ALL. Accessed 20 Feb 2014

  • Woller J (1996) The basics of Monte Carlo simulations. http://www.chem.unl.edu/zeng/joy/mclab/mcintro.html. Accessed 18 Feb 2014

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems, Hightower Chair, and the Georgia Research Alliance at the Georgia Institute of Technology. The views and ideas expressed herein are solely of the authors and do not represent the ideas of the funding agencies in any form.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Minne.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hanna-Leena Pesonen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Minne, E., Crittenden, J.C. Impact of maintenance on life cycle impact and cost assessment for residential flooring options. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 36–45 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0809-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0809-z

Keywords

Navigation