Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A framework for modelling the transport and deposition of eroded particles towards water systems in a life cycle inventory

  • LAND USE IN LCA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Topsoil erosion due to land use has been characterised as one of the most damaging problems from the perspective of soil-resource depletion, changes in soil fertility and net soil productivity and damage to aquatic ecosystems. On-site environmental damage to topsoil by water erosion has begun to be considered in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) within the context of ecosystem services. However, a framework for modelling soil erosion by water, addressing off-site deposition in surface water systems, to support life cycle inventory (LCI) modelling is still lacking. The objectives of this paper are to conduct an overview of existing methods addressing topsoil erosion issues in LCA and to develop a framework to support LCI modelling of topsoil erosion, transport and deposition in surface water systems, to establish a procedure for assessing the environmental damage from topsoil erosion on water ecosystems.

Methods

The main features of existing methods addressing topsoil erosion issues in LCA are analysed, particularly with respect to LCI and Life Cycle Impact Assessment methodologies. An overview of nine topsoil erosion models is performed to estimate topsoil erosion by water, soil particle transport through the landscape and its in-stream deposition. The type of erosion evaluated by each of the models, as well as their applicable spatial scale, level of input data requirements and operational complexity issues are considered. The WATEM-SEDEM model is proposed as the most adequate to perform LCI erosion analysis.

Results and discussion

The definition of land use type, the area of assessment, spatial location and system boundaries are the main elements discussed. Depending on the defined system boundaries and the inherent routing network of the detached soil particles to the water systems, the solving of the multifunctionality of the system assumes particular relevance. Simplifications related to the spatial variability of the input data parameters are recommended. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is recommended to evaluate the effects of the transport capacity coefficient in the LCI results.

Conclusions

The published LCA methods focus only on the changes of soil properties due to topsoil erosion by water. This study provides a simplified framework to perform an LCI of topsoil erosion by considering off-site deposition of eroded particles in surface water systems. The widespread use of the proposed framework would require the development of LCI erosion databases. The issues of topsoil erosion impact on aquatic biodiversity, including the development of characterisation factors, are now the subject of on-going research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatorre LC, Beguería S, García-Ruiz JM (2010) Regional scale modelling of hillslope soil particle delivery: a case study in the Barasona Reservoir watershed (Spain) using WATEM/SEDEM. J Hydrol 391:109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almorox J, De Antonio R, Saa A, Cruz Díaz M, Gasco JM (1994) Methods for estimating water erosion. Ed. Agrícola Española (in Spanish)

  • Arnoldus HMJ (1977) Methodology used to determine the maximum potential average annual soil loss due to sheet and rill erosion in Morocco. FAO Soil Bull 34:39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley DB, Huggins LF, Monke EJ (1980) ANSWERS: a model for watershed planning. T ASAE 23:938–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett HH, Chapline WR (1928) Soil erosion: a national menace United States Department of Agriculture, Circular 033

  • Borselli L, Cassi P, Sanchis P (2009) Soil erodibility assessment for applications at watershed scale. In Constantini, EAC (ed) Manual of methods for soil and land evaluation, Science Publisher, Chapter 5, pp 98–117

  • Borselli L, Torri L (2010) EUROSEM 2010: European Soil Erosion Model. http://www.lorenzo-borselli.eu/eurosem/. Accessed December 2012

  • CEC (2006) Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC. European Council and the European Commission Brussels, 22.9.2006, COM(2006) 232 final, 2006/0086

  • Cowell SJ, Clift R (2000) A methodology for assessing soil quantity and quality in life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 8(4):321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet PJJ, Govers G (1995) GIS-based simulation of erosion and deposition patterns in an agricultural landscape: a comparison of model results with soil map information. Catena 25:389–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillaha TA, Wolfe ML, Shirmohammadi A, Byne FW (2001) ANSWERS-2000. In: Parsons JE, Thomas DL, Huffman RL (eds) Non-point source water quality models: their use and application. Final report of USDA-CSREES southern region research project S-273, Development and Application of Comprehensive Agricultural Ecosystems Models

  • EC JRC (European Commission, Joint Research Centre). International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) (2010) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment—detailed guidance. European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability, first ed. EUR 24708 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

  • Engelhund F, Hansen E (1968) A monograph on soil particle transport in alluvial streams. Teknish Forlag, Technical Press, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2005) New LocClim, Local Climate Estimator CD-ROM, Food and Agriculture Organization. Rome, Italy. www.fao.org/nr/climpag/pub/en3_051002_en.asp. Acessed November 2012

  • Foster GR, Meyer LD (1972) Transport of soil particles by shallow flow. Trans ASAE 15(1):99–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrigues E, Corson MS, Walter C, Angers DA, van der Werf H (2012) Soil-quality indicators in LCA: method presentation with a case study. 8th Int Conference on LCA in the Agri-food sector, 1–4 October, Saint-Maio, France

  • Gerontidis S, Kosmas C, Detsis B, Marathianou M, Zafirou T, Tsara M (2001) The effect of mouldboard plough on tillage erosion along a hillslope. J Soil Water Conserv 56:147–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JA, Battany M, Renschler CS, Fereres E (2003) Evaluating the impact of soil management on soil loss in olive orchards. Soil Use Manag 19:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govers G, Vandaele K, Desmet P, Poesen J, Bunte K (1994) The role of tillage in soil redistribution on hillslopes. Eur J Soil Sci 45:469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm M, Jones R, Montanarella L (2002) Soil erosion risk in Europe. European Soil Bureau. Institute for Environment and Sustainability. EUR 19939 EN

  • Guinée J, Van Oers L, de Koning A, Tamis W (2006) Life cycle approaches for conservation agriculture. CML report 171. Department of Industrial Ecology and Department of Environmental Biology, Leiden, the Netherlands

  • Gutteridge Haskins and Davey (1991) Integrated quantity/quality modelling—stage 3. Gutteridge Haskins & Davey for Department of Water Resources. Sydney

  • Hairsine P, Rose C (1992) Modelling water erosion due to overland flow using physical principles: 1. Sheet flow. Water Resour Res 28(1):237–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Faichney R, Munro A, Shortle JS (1998) Economic and environmental modelling for pollution control in an estuary. J Environ Manag 52:211–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvem A, Topaloglu F, Uygur V (2007) Estimating spatial distribution of soil loss over Seyhan River Basin in Turkey. J Hydrol 336(1–2):30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson RC, Imhoff JC, Davis HH (1980) User’s manual for the Hydrologic Simulation Program–Fortran (HSPF), version 5.0, EPA-600/9-80-105. US EPA Environmental Research laboratory, Athens, Greece

  • Jones A, Panagos P, Barcelo S, Bouraoui F, Bosco C, Dewitte O, Gardi C, Erhard M, Hervás J, Hiederer R, Jeffery S, Lukewillw L, Marmo L, Montanarella L, Olazábal C, Petersen J-E, Penizek V, Strassburger T, Tóth G, Van Den Eechaut M, Van Liedekerke N, Verheijen F, Viestova E, Yigini Y (2012a) The state of soil in Europe. JRC reference reports, European Commission. Office for official publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones A, Bosco C, Yigini P, Montanrella L (2012b) Soil erosion by water: 2011 update of IRENE agri-environmental indicator 21. JRC Scientific Report JRC 68729

  • Jones DS, Kowalski DG, Shaw RB (1996) Calculating Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) estimates on Department of Defense Lands: a review of RUSLE factors and U.S. Army Land Condition-Trend Analysis (LCTA) data gaps. CEMML Publications, TPS 96:8

  • Keesstra SD, van Dam O, Verstraeten G, van Huissteden J (2009) Changing soil particle dynamics due to natural reforestation in the Dragonja catchment, SW Slovenia. Catena 78(1):60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby MJ, Jones RJA, Irvine B, Gobin A, Govers G, Cerdan O, Van Rompaey AJJ, Le Bissonnais Y, Daroussin J, King D, Montanarella L, Grimm M, Vieillefont V, Puigdefabregas J, Boer M, Losmas C, Yassoglou N, Tsara M, Mantel S, Van Lynden G (2004) Pan-European Soil Erosion Risk Assessment: the PESERA map, version 1 October 2003. Explanation of special publication nº 73. European Soil Bureau research report nº16. Office for official publication of the European Communities, Luxemburg

  • Knisel WG (1980) CREAMS: a field scale model for chemicals, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems. United Stated Department of Agriculture

  • Laflen LJ, Renard KG, Foster GR (1991) WEPP: a new generation of erosion prediction technology. J Soil Water Conserv 46:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee GS, Lee HS (2006) Scaling effect for estimating soil loss in the RUSLE model using remotely sensed geospatial data in Korea. Hydro Earth Syst Sci Discuss 3:135–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson B, Cederberg C, Blix L (2000) Agricultural land use in life cycle assessment (LCA): case studies of three vegetable oil crops. J Clean Prod 8:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrit WS, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2003) A review of erosion and soil particle transport models. Environ Model Softw 18:761–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR (2007) Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. PNAS 104:13268–13272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Smith RE, Govers G, Poesen JWA, Auerswald K, Chisci G, Torri D, Styczen ME (1998) The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting soil particle transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surf Proc Land 23:527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muys B, Garcia Quijano J (2002) A new method for Land Use Impact Assessment in LCA based on ecosystem exergy concept, Internal report. Laboratory for Forest, Nature and Landscape Research, Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models—part 1: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núnez M, Civit B, Munoz P, Arena AP, Rieradevall J, Antón A (2010) Assessing potential desertification environmental impact in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núnez M, Antón A, Munoz P, Rieradevall J (2013) Inclusion of soil erosion impacts in life cycle assessment on a global scale: application to energy crops in Spain. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:755–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagos P, Meusburger K, Alewell C, Montanarella L (2012) Soil erodibility estimation using LUCAS point survey data of Europe. Environ Model Softw 30:143–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Oh C, Jeon S, Jung H, Choi C (2011) Soil erosion risk in Korean watersheds, assessed using the revised universal soil loss equation. J Hydrol 399(3–4):263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimenta MT (2003) Guidelines for the application of equation universal soil loss in GIS: the culture factor C and soil erodibility factor K. INAG/DSRH. Sistema Nacional de Informação de Recursos Hídricos/Direcção de Seviços dos Recursos Hídricoa-DSRH (in Portuguese)

  • Renard KG, Freimund JR (1994) Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R-factor in the revised USLE. J Hydrol 157:287–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Mc Cool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Agricultural Handbook no. 703, United States Department of Agriculture

  • Rose CW (1993) Erosion and soil particleation. In: Bonell M, Hufschmidt MM, Gladwell JS (eds.) Hydrology and water management in the humid tropics: hydrological research issues and strategies for water management. Cambridge University Press, pp 301–343

  • Rose CW, Coughlan KJ, Ciesiolka LAA, Fentie B (1997) Program GUEST (Griffith University erosion system template), a new soil conservation methodology and application to cropping systems in tropical steeplands. ACIAR technical reports

  • Sanchis MPS, Torri D, Borselli L, Poesen J (2008) Climate effects on soil erodibility. Earth Surf Proc Land 33:1082–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab GO, Fangmeier DD, Elliot WJ (1993) Soil and water management systems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Knijff R, Jones R, Montanarella L (2000) Soil erosion risk, assessment in Europe. Join Research Centre. European Soil Bureau

  • Van Muysen W, Govers G, Van Oost K, Van Rompaey A (2000) The effect of tillage depth, tillage speed and soil condition on chisel tillage erosivity. J Soil Water Conserv 55:354–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Muysen W, Govers G, Van Oost K (2002) Identification of important factors in the process of tillage erosion: the case of moulboard tillage. Soil Tillage Res 65:77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oost K, Govers G, Desmet PJJ (2000) Evaluating the effects of changes in landscape structure on soil erosion by water and tillage. Landsc Ecol 15:577–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rompaey A, Verstraeten G, Van Oost K, Govers G, Poesen J (2001a) Modelling mean annual soil particle yield using a distributed approach. Earth Surf Proc Land 26:1221–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rompaey A, Verstraeten G, Van Oost K, Rozanov A, Govers G, Poesen J (2001b) Modelling soil particle transport in the Jonkershoek catchment. Part 1: model calibration and validation. In: Cartographic Modelling of Land Degradation, Proceedings of the Workshop held in Ghent (September 2001) in the Framework of the Bilateral Cooperation between Flanders and South-Africa

  • Van Rompaye A, Krasa J, Dostal T, Govers G (2003) Modelling sediment supply to rivers and reservoirs in Eastern Europe during and after the collectivisation period. Hydrobiologia 494(1–3):169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rompaey A, Bazzoffi P, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (2005) Modelling sediment yields in Italian catchments. Geomorphology 65:157–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstraeten G (2006) Regional scale modelling of hillslope soil particle delivery with SRTM elevation data. Geomorphology 81:128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraeten G, Poesen J, Gillijns K, Govers G (2006) The use of riparian vegetated filter strips to reduce river soil particle loads: an overestimated control measures? Hydrol Process 20:4259–4267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraeten G, Prosser IP, Fogarty P (2007) Predicting the spatial patterns of hillslope soil particle delivery to river channels in the Murrumbidgee catchment, Australia. J Hydrol 334:440–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraeten G, Van Rompaey A, Van Oost K, Rozanov A, Poesen J, Govers G (2001) Modelling soil particle transport in the Jonkershoek catchment. Part 2: evaluating the impact of possible land use changes on soil particle delivery to the Eerste Rivier and the Jonkershoek reservoir. In: Cartographic Modelling of Land Degradation, Proceedings of the Workshop held in Ghent (September 2001) in the Framework of the Bilateral Cooperation between Flanders and South-Africa

  • Wilkinson BH (2005) Humans as geologic agents: a deep-time perspective. Geology 33:161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting soil erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning. USDA Agricultural Handbook, nº537

  • Yalin MS (1963) An expression for bed load transportation. J Hydraul Division American Society of Civil Engineers 98 (HY3), 221–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Kanae S, Oki T, Koike T, Musiake K (2003) Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes. Hydrol Process 17:2913–2928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu B (2005) Process-based erosion modelling: promises and progress. In: Bruijnzell LA, Bonell M (eds) Forests, water and people in the humid tropics: past, present and future, Hydrological research for integrated land and water management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 0511109415

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu B, Rose CW, Ciesiolka CAA, Coughlan KJ, Fentie B (1997) Towards a framework for runoff and soil loss prediction using GUEST technology. Aust J Soil Res 51191–1212

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge FCT (Science and Technology Foundation-Portugal) for scholarships granted to Paula Quinteiro (SFRH/BD/78690/2011) and Ana Cláudia Dias (SFRH/BPD/75788/2011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal

    Paula Quinteiro, Ana Cláudia Dias & Luís Arroja

  2. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Sustainable Agriculture National Research Flagship, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Victoria, 3169, Australia

    Bradley G. Ridoutt

Authors
  1. Paula Quinteiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ana Cláudia Dias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bradley G. Ridoutt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luís Arroja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Quinteiro.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Jörg Schweinle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quinteiro, P., Dias, A.C., Ridoutt, B.G. et al. A framework for modelling the transport and deposition of eroded particles towards water systems in a life cycle inventory. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19, 1200–1213 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0730-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0730-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation