This study aims to contribute to an improved understanding of the environmental implications of offshore power grid and wind power development pathways. To achieve this aim, we present two assessments. First, we investigate the impacts of a North Sea power grid enabling enhanced trade and integration of offshore wind power. Second, we assess the benefit of the North Sea grid and wind power through a comparison of scenarios for power generation in affected countries.
The grid scenario explored in the first assessment is the most ambitious scenario of the Windspeed project and is the result of cost minimization analysis using a transmission-expansion-planning model. We develop a hybrid life cycle inventory for array cables; high voltage, direct current (HVDC) links; and substations. The functional unit is 1 kWh of electricity transmitted. The second assessment compares two different energy scenarios of Windspeed for the North Sea and surrounding countries. Here, we utilize a life cycle inventory for offshore grid components together with an inventory for a catalog of power generation technologies from Ecoinvent and couple these inventories with grid configurations and electricity mixes determined by the optimization procedure in Windspeed.
Results and discussion
Developing, operating, and dismantling the grid cause emissions of 2.5 g CO2-Eq per kWh electricity transmission or 36 Mt CO2-Eq in total. HVDC cables are the major cause of environmental damage, causing, for example, half of total climate change effects. The next most important contributors are substations and array cabling used in offshore wind parks. Toxicity and eutrophication effects stem largely from leakages from disposed copper and iron mine tailings and overburden. Results from the comparison of two scenarios demonstrate a substantial environmental benefit from the North Sea grid extension and the associated wind power development compared with an alternative generation of electricity from fossil fuels. Offshore grid and wind power, however, entail an increased use of metals and, hence, a higher metal depletion indicator.
We present the first life cycle assessment of a large offshore power grid, using the results of an energy planning model as input. HVDC links are the major cause of environmental damage. There are differences across impact categories with respect to which components or types of activities that are responsible for damage. The North Sea grid and wind power are environmentally beneficial by an array of criteria if displacing fossil fuels, but cause substantial metal use.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Wind turbines have been studied extensively before (Arvesen and Hertwich 2012).
See Cameron et al. (2011) for details on how learning is modeled in Windspeed.
While 600 MW wind farm capacity is assumed here for the purpose of determining typical array-cabling requirements, the wind farm cluster capacities in Fig. 1 are not divisible into 600 MW units.
Scaling is performed because the sum of estimated cable layer weights does not exactly match the known, total weight. Without the scaling, estimated totals amount to 80–90 % of real totals.
Tilton and Lagos (2007) present a contrasting view.
See Cameron et al. (2011) for details on the scenarios considered in Windspeed.
4C Offshore (2013) 4C Global offshore wind farms database. http://www.4coffshore.com/offshorewind. Accessed 19 Apr 2013
ABB (2008) Miljörapport för år: 2007 [in Swedish). ABB high voltage cables, Sweden
ABB (2010) XLPE submarine cable systems. Attachment to XLPE land cable systems. User’s guide. www.abb.com. Accessed 26 Apr 2011
ABB (2012a) Environmental product declaration. Power transformer TrafoStar 500 MVA. www.abb.com. Accessed 5 May 2012
ABB (2012b) Environmental product declaration. GIS type ELK-3 for 420 kV. www.abb.com Accessed 15 Nov 2012
ABB (2013) The NorNed HVDC connection, Norway–Netherlands. ABB High voltage cables. www.abb.com. Accessed 17 Apr 2013
Arvesen A (2013) Understanding the environmental implications of energy transitions: a case study for wind power. Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Arvesen A, Hertwich EG (2011) Environmental implications of large-scale adoption of wind power: a scenario-based life cycle assessment. Environ Res Lett 6(4):045102
Arvesen A, Hertwich EG (2012) Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of wind power: a review of present knowledge and research needs. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(8):5994–6006
Arvesen A, Bright RM, Hertwich EG (2011) Considering only first-order effects? How simplifications lead to unrealistic technology optimism in climate change mitigation. Energy Policy 39(11):7448–7454
Arvesen A, Birkeland C, Hertwich EG (2013) The importance of ships and spare parts in LCAs of offshore wind power. Environ Sci Technol 47(6):2948–2956
Azau S (2011) Focusing on 2050. In: EWEA wind directions: the European wind industry magazine. European Wind Energy Associations (EWEA). www.ewea.org/annual2011/fileadmin/ewec2011_files/documents/Wind_Directions_March_2011.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2013
Bengtsson S, Andersson K, Fridell E (2011) A comparative life cycle assessment of marine fuels. J Eng Marit Environ 225(2):97–110
Beurskens LWM, Hekkenberg M, Vethman P (2011) Renewable energy projections as published in the National Renewable Energy Action Plans of the European member states. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands and the European Environment Agency. www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2010/e10069.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2012
Birkeland C (2011) Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of offshore wind power generation and power transmission in the North Sea. Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Blanco MI (2009) The economics of wind energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(6–7):1372–1382
Bumby S, Druzhinina E, Feraldi R, Werthmann D, Geyer R, Sahl J (2010) Life cycle assessment of overhead and underground primary power distribution. Environ Sci Technol 44(14):5587–5593
Callavik M, Blomberg A, Häfner J, Jacobsen B (2012) The hybrid HVDC breaker. An innovation breakthrough enabling reliable HVDC grids. ABB Grid Systems. http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot221.nsf/veritydisplay/c9d5ba256e7e9671c1257ab6004b1feb/$file/hybrid-hvdc-breaker---an-innovation-breakthrough-for-reliable-hvdc-gridsnov2012.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2013
Cameron L, van Stralen J, Veum K (2011) Scenarios for offshore wind including spatial interaction and grid issues. Windspeed. www.windspeed.eu/media/publications/WINDSPEED_D6.1_final.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2013
Carvalho MG (2012) EU energy and climate change strategy. Energy 40(1):19–22
Crawford RH (2009) Life cycle energy and greenhouse emissions analysis of wind turbines and the effect of size on energy yield. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(9):2653–2660
EC (2010a) Energy infrastructure priorities for 2020 and beyond—a blueprint for an integrated European energy network. COM (2010) 677 final. European Commission (EC), Brussels
EC (2010b) State of play in the EU energy policy. Accompanying document to COM (2010) 639. European Commission (EC). SEC (2010) 1346 final, Brussels
Ecoinvent. Life cycle inventory database v2.2 (2010). Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories
Erdmann L, Graedel TE (2011) Criticality of non-fuel minerals: a review of major approaches and analyses. Environ Sci Technol 45(18):7620–7630
EWEA (2009) Oceans of opportunity: harnessing Europe’s largest domestic energy resource. European Wind Energy Association (EWEA), Brussels
Fripp M (2012) Switch: a planning tool for power systems with large shares of intermittent renewable energy. Environ Sci Technol 46(11):6371–6378
Gordon RB, Bertram M, Graedel TE (2006) Metal stocks and sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(5):1209–1214
Harrison GP, Maclean EJ, Karamanlis S, Ochoa LF (2010) Life cycle assessment of the transmission network in Great Britain. Energy Policy 38(7):3622–3631
Hauschild M, Goedkoop M, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Margni M, Schryver A, Humbert S, Laurent A, Sala S, Pant R (2013) Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(3):683–697
Hegger S, Hischier R (2010) ReCiPe—Implementation. Assignment of characterisation factors to the Swiss LCI database ecoinvent (version v. 2.2). Midpoint method, hierarchist version. PRé Consultant and Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories
Huertas-Hernando D, Korpås M, van Dyken S (2011) Grid implications: optimal design of a subsea power grid in the North Sea. Windspeed. www.windspeed.eu/media/publications/WINDSPEED_D6.3%5B1%5D.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2012
IEA (2012) World energy outlook 2012. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris
ISO (2006) Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework (ISO 14040: 2006). International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva
Jacquemin J, Butterworth D, Garret C, Baldock N, Henderson A (2011) Inventory of location specific wind energy cost. Windspeed. www.windspeed.eu/media/publications/WINDSPEED_D2_2_revised_May_2011.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2013
Jones CI, McManus MC (2010) Life-cycle assessment of 11 kV electrical overhead lines and underground cables. J Clean Prod 18(14):1464–1477
Jorge RS, Hertwich EG (2013) Environmental evaluation of power transmission in Norway. Appl Energy 101:513–520
Jorge R, Hawkins T, Hertwich E (2012a) Life cycle assessment of electricity transmission and distribution—part 1: power lines and cables. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(1):9–15
Jorge R, Hawkins T, Hertwich E (2012b) Life cycle assessment of electricity transmission and distribution—part 2: transformers and substation equipment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:184–191
Kleijn R, van der Voet E (2010) Resource constraints in a hydrogen economy based on renewable energy sources: an exploration. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(9):2784–2795
Majeau-Bettez G, Strømman AH, Hertwich EG (2011) Evaluation of process- and input–output-based life cycle inventory data with regard to truncation and aggregation issues. Environ Sci Technol 45(23):10170–10177
Moe E (2010) Energy, industry and politics: energy, vested interests, and long-term economic growth and development. Energy 35(4):1730–1740
Mudd GM (2010) The environmental sustainability of mining in Australia: key mega-trends and looming constraints. Resour Policy 35(2):98–115
Nexans (2011) 60–500 kV High voltage underground cables. XLPE insulated cables. www.nexans.com. Accessed 26 Apr 2011
Pettersen J, Hertwich EG (2008) Critical review: life-cycle inventory procedures for long-term release of metals. Environ Sci Technol 42(13):4639–4647
Prior T, Giurco D, Mudd G, Mason L, Behrisch J (2012) Resource depletion, peak minerals and the implications for sustainable resource management. Global Environ Chang 22(3):577–587
Riahi K, Dentener F, Gielen D, Grubler A, Jewell J, Klimont Z, Krey V, McCollum D, Pachauri S, Rao S, van Ruijven B, van Vuuren DP, Wilson C (2012) Energy pathways for sustainable development. In: Global energy assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 1205–1306
Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Schuhmacher M, Van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox–the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(7):532–546
Steen B (2006) Abiotic resource depletion: different perceptions of the problem with mineral deposits. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):49–54. doi:10.1065/lca2006.04.011
Strømman AH, Solli C, Hertwich EG (2006) Hybrid life-cycle assessment of natural gas based fuel chains for transportation. Environ Sci Technol 40(8):2797–2804
Tilton JE, Lagos G (2007) Assessing the long-run availability of copper. Resour Policy 32(1–2):19–23
Tukker A, de Koning A, Wood R, Hawkins T, Lutter S, Acosta J, Rueda Cantuche JM, Bouwmeester M, Oosterhaven J, Drosdowski T, Kuenen J (2013) EXIOPOL—development and illustrative analyses of a detailed global MR EE SUT/IOT. Econ Syst Res 25(1):50–70
Unruh GC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12):817–830
Veum K, Cameron L, Hernando DH, Korpås M (2011) Roadmap to the deployment of offshore wind energy in the Central and Southern North Sea (2020–2030). Windspeed. www.windspeed.eu/media/publications/WINDSPEED_Roadmap_110719_final.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2012
Wagner H-J, Baack C, Eickelkamp T, Epe A, Lohmann J, Troy S (2011) Life cycle assessment of the offshore wind farm alpha ventus. Energy 36(5):2459–2464
Wiedmann TO, Suh S, Feng K, Lenzen M, Acquaye A, Scott K, Barrett JR (2011) Application of hybrid life cycle approaches to emerging energy technologies—the case of wind power in the UK. Environ Sci Technol 45(13):5900–5907
Windspeed (2014) Windspeed. Supporting decisions. Spatial deployment of offshore wind energy in Europe. http://www.windspeed.eu. Accessed 19 Mar 2013
York R (2012) Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels? Nat Clim Chang 2:441–443
Zhai P, Williams ED (2010) Dynamic hybrid life cycle assessment of energy and carbon of multicrystalline silicon photovoltaic systems. Environ Sci Technol 44(20):7950–7955. doi:10.1021/es1026695
The work was supported by the Research Council of Norway through the Centre for Sustainable Energy Studies (CenSES). Huertas-Hernando acknowledges financial support from FME NOWITECH. The analysis builds on the MSc thesis by Nes supervised by Hertwich and Arvesen, Arvesen’s wind power LCAs, and Huertas-Hernando’s work on Windspeed. We thank the anonymous reviewers for many helpful comments and suggestions.
Responsible editor: Matthias Finkbeiner
About this article
Cite this article
Arvesen, A., Nes, R.N., Huertas-Hernando, D. et al. Life cycle assessment of an offshore grid interconnecting wind farms and customers across the North Sea. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19, 826–837 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0709-2
- Carbon footprint
- Grid integration
- Hybrid LCA
- HVDC transmission
- Variable renewable energy