Skip to main content
Log in

Exploitation scenarios in industrial system LCA

  • UNCERTAINTIES IN LCA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This paper considers the variabilities that exist in the exploitation of a complex industrial system. Our scenario-based LCA model ensures the reliability of results in situations where the system life cycle is very uncertain, where there is substantial lack of data, and/or where time and resources available are limited. It is also an effective tool to generate exploitation recommendations for clients.

Methods

Existing quantitative uncertainty methods in LCA require a huge amount of accurate data. These data are rarely available in simplified and upstream LCA for complex industrial systems. A scenario-based approach is the best compromise between acceptable quality of results and resources required. However, such methods have not yet been proposed to improve the environmental knowledge of the system in the case of exploitation scenarios. The method proposed here considers a limited number of scenarios (three or four) that are defined using the Stanford Research Institute matrix. Using results from past projects, relevant parts of the system are listed, and expert knowledge and parameters are associated with these parts and quantified. A classical LCA process then provides the results for the different scenarios.

Results and discussion

The method was applied to an Alstom Grid AC/DC conversion substation for the primary aluminum industry. A previous study had limited scope, as the life cycle was poorly understood. Relevant parts were, thus, clearly identified as follows: spare parts program, transport failures, preventive and corrective maintenance, updates and revampings, lifetime modulation, and end-of-life. Four scenarios were considered as follows: best case, worst case, baseline (expected future), and a highly different alternative. Results show the pertinence of considering several exploitation scenarios when the life cycle is not predictable, as the environmental impacts may vary widely from one case to another. A sensitivity analysis also shows that some relevant parts such as updates and revampings will need to be carefully considered in futures studies.

Conclusions

The consideration of three exploitation scenarios (best case, baseline, and worst case) appears to be extremely pertinent when considering simplified LCA of industrial systems with high uncertainties and limited time and resources. This model is also very useful to generate good practice and recommendations towards clients, thus initiating a dialog centered on eco-design and continuous improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop P, Hines A, Collins T (2007) The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight 9:5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard BS, Fabrycky WJ (2011) Systems engineering and analysis, Fifth Edition. ed, Prentice Hall International series in industrial and systems engineering. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Börjeson L, Höjer M, Dreborg K-H, Ekvall T, Finnveden G (2006) Scenario types and techniques: towards a user’s guide. Futures 38:723–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciroth A (2003) Uncertainty Calculation for LCI Data: Reasons for, against, and an Efficient and Flexible Approach for Doing it, in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Quality of Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) Data. Karlsruhe, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Cluzel F, Yannou B, Leroy Y, Millet D (2012) Proposition for an adapted management process to evolve from an unsupervised life cycle assessment of complex industrial systems towards an eco-designing organization. Concurrent Eng-Res A 20:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewulf W (2003) A proactive approach to eco-design: framework and tools (PhD Thesis). Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • European Telecommunications Standards Institute (2011) ETSI TS 103 199 V1.1.1 (2011–11) - Environmental Engineering (EE); Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of ICT equipment, networks and services; General methodology and common requirements (ETSI Technical Specification). European Telecommunications Standards Institute, Sophia Antipolis, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden G, Ekvall T (1998) Life-cycle assessment as a decision-support tool—the case of recycling versus incineration of paper. Resour Conserv Recy 24:235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima Y, Hirao M (2002) A structured framework and language for scenario-based life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:317–329

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken P, Ogilvy JA, Schwartz P (1982) Seven Tomorrows. Bantam Dell Pub Group

  • Höjer M, Ahlroth S, Dreborg K-H, Ekvall T, Finnveden G, Hjelm O, Hochschorner E, Nilsson M, Palm V (2008) Scenarios in selected tools for environmental systems analysis. J Clean Prod 16:1958–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MAJ (1998) Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA - Part I: a general framework for the analysis of uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MAJ, Norris G, Bretz R, Ciroth A, Maurice B, Bahr B, Weidema B, Beaufort ASH (2001) Framework for modeling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hur T, Lee J, Ryu J, Kwon E (2005) Simplified LCA and matrix methods in identifying the environmental aspects of a product system. J Environ Manage 75:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (2011) ISO 14006:2011 - Environmental management systems - Guidelines for incorporating ecodesign (ISO Standard), Environmental management

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006a) ISO 14044:2006 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006b) ISO 14040:2006 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework

  • Lane J, Lant P (2012) Including N2O in ozone depletion models for LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:252–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy Y, Froelich D (2010) Qualitative and quantitative approaches dealing with uncertainty in life cycle assessment (LCA) of complex systems: towards a selective integration of uncertainty according to LCA objectives. Int J Design Eng 3:151–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Müller DB (2012) Addressing sustainability in the aluminum industry: a critical review of life cycle assessments. J Clean Prod 35:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd SM, Ries R (2007) Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment: a survey of quantitative approaches. J Ind Ecol 11:161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millet D, Bistagnino L, Lanzavecchia C, Camous R, Poldma T (2007) Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs? J Clean Prod 15:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostad-Ahmad-Ghorabi H, Collado-Ruiz D (2011) Tool for the environmental assessment of cranes based on parameterization. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:392–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesonen H-L, Ekvall T, Fleischer G, Huppes G, Jahn C, Klos ZS, Rebitzer G, Sonnemann GW, Tintinelli A, Weidema BP, Wenzel H (2000) Framework for scenario development in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008a) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment - Part 1: goal and scope and inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008b) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment - Part 2: impact assessment and interpretation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:374–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S, Evans D, Webber M (2002) How LCA studies deal with uncertainty. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt J, Thrane M (2009) Life cycle assessment of aluminum production in new Alcoa smelter in Greenland

  • Spielmann M, Scholz R, Tietje O, de Haan P (2004) Scenario modeling in prospective LCA of transport systems. Application of formative scenario analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:325–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tietje O (2005) Identification of a small reliable and efficient set of consistent scenarios. Eur J Oper Res 162:418–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wack P (1985) Scenarios: shooting the rapids. Harvard Bus Rev 63:139–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Weckenmann A, Schwan A (2001) Environmental life cycle assessment with support of fuzzy-sets. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:13–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP, Ekvall T, Pesonen H-L, Rebitzer G, Sonnemann GW, Spielmann M (2004) Scenarios in life cycle assessment. SETAC, Pensacola, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni A, Buttol P, Porta PL, Buonamici R, Masoni P, Guinée J, Ekvall T (2008) CALCAS WP5-D7: Critical review of current research needs and limitations related to ISO-LCA practice - Annex 2 - Reports of the topics and approaches analyzed (No. CALCAS WP5-D7 Annex 2), CALCAS (Co-ordination Action for innovation in Life-Cycle Analysis for Sustainability)

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Frankie Rico-Sanz for his contributions to the applicative steps of this work. We also gratefully thank Joël Devautour and François Puchar from Alstom Grid to their full support in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Cluzel.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Berlan Rodriguez Perez

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cluzel, F., Yannou, B., Millet, D. et al. Exploitation scenarios in industrial system LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19, 231–245 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0631-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0631-z

Keywords

Navigation