A comparison of the GHG emissions caused by manufacturing tissue paper from virgin pulp or recycled waste paper

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this work is to compare greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from producing tissue paper from virgin pulp (VP) or recycled waste paper (RWP). In doing so, the study aims to inform decision makers at both company and national levels which are the main causes of emissions and to suggest the actions required to reduce pollution.

Methods

An attributional life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed in order to estimate and compare the GHG emissions of the two processes. LCA allows us to assess how the choice of raw material for VP and RWP processes influences total GHG emissions of tissue paper production, what are the main drivers behind these emissions and how do the direct materials; energy requirements and transportation contribute to the generation of emissions. The cradle-to-gate approach is carried out.

Results and discussion

The results show that demands for both thermal energy and electricity are higher for the RWP than for the VP if only the manufacturing stages are considered. However, a different picture emerges when the analysis looks at the entire life cycle of the production. GHG from the VP are about 30 % higher than the RWP, over the life cycle emitting 568 kg CO2 eq more per kilogram of tissue paper. GHG emissions from the wood pulping alone were 559 g CO2 eq per kilogram of tissue paper, three times higher than waste paper collection and transportation.

Conclusions

In terms of GHG emissions from cradle to gate, the recycled process less intensive than the virgin one for two reasons. First, as shown in the results the total GHG emissions from RWP are lower than those from VP due to relatively lower energy and material requirements. Second is the non-recyclability nature of tissue paper. Because the tissue paper is the last use of fibre, using RWP as an input would be preferable over using VP. The environmental profile of the tissue products both from RWP and VP can be improved if the following conditions are considered by the company. First, the company should consider implementing a cogeneration unit to simultaneously generate both useful heat and electricity. Second, it may consider changing the VP mix, in order to avoid the emissions associated with long distance transpiration effort. Third, there is the option of using sludge as fuel, which would reduce the total fossil fuel requirement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    Recycling rate is defined as the ratio of the total consumption of recovered paper as a raw material by industries to the total consumption of paper and paper board.

  2. 2.

    Personal communications with the tissue-producing company (2011).

References

  1. Althaus HJ, Chudacoff M, Hischier R, Jungbluth N, Osses M, Primas A (2007) Life cycle inventories of chemicals. ecoinvent report No. 8, v2.0. EMPA. Dübendorf, Swiss Centre for life cycle inventories; Dübendorf, Switzerland. http://ecoinvent.org/. Accessed 19 September 2011

  2. Arena U, Mastellone ML, Perugini F, Clift R (2004) Environmental assessment of paper waste management options by means of LCA methodology. Ind Eng Chem Res 43(18):5702–5714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Asociación Española de Fabricantes de Pasta, Papel y Cartón (ASPAPEL) (2011) Sustainability report (in English). Madrid (Spain). http://www.aspapel.es. Accessed 21 December 2011

  4. Björklund A, Finnveden G (2005) Recycling revisited—life cycle comparisons of global warming impact and total energy use of waste management strategies. Resour Conserv Recycl 44(4):309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cederberg C, Mattsson B (2000) Life cycle assessment of milk production—a comparison of conventional and organic farming. J Cleaner Prod 8(1):49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cui Z, Hou Y, Hong J, Ismail Z (2011) Life cycle assessment of coated white board: a case study in China. J Cleaner Prod 19(13):1506–1512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Das TK, Houtman C (2004) Evaluating chemical-, mechanical-, and bio-pulping processes and their sustainability characterization using life-cycle assessment. Environ Prog 23(4):347–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dias A, Arroja L, Capela I (2007) Life cycle assessment of printing and writing paper produced in Portugal. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(7):521–528

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dones R, Bauer C, Bolliger R, Burger B, Faist Emmenegger M, Frischknecht R, Hech T, Jungbluth N, Röder A, Tuchschmid M (2007) Life cycle inventories of energy systems: Results from current systems in Switzerland and other UCTE countries. ecoinvent report no. 5. Paul Scherrer Institut Villigen, Swiss Centre for life cycle inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland

  10. Environmental Paper Network (EPN) (2007) The state of the paper industry: monitoring the indicators of environmental performance. EPN. www.environmentalpaper.org. Accessed 20 December 2011

  11. Environmental Paper Summit (2002) A common vision for transforming the paper industry: striving for environmental and social sustainability. Drafted by the alliance for environmental innovation, Center for a new american dream, Conservatree, Co-op America, Dogwood Alliance, ForestEthics, the Green Press Initiative, the Markets Initiative, Natural Resources Defense Council, the Recycled Products Purchasing Cooperative. Ratified at The Environmental Paper Summit, Sonoma Country, California

  12. Environmental Resources Management (ERM) (2007) Life cycle assessment of tissue products. report prepared for Kimberly-Clark. Environmental Resources Management

  13. European Commission (EC) (2000) Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC). Reference document on best available techniques in the pulp and paper industry. institute for prospective technological studies seville

  14. European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT) (1998) Efficient transport for Europe, Policies for Internalisation of External Costs. ECMT, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  15. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2010a) The European Environment: State and outlook 2010 – consumption and the environment. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/energy-efficiency-and-energy-consumption-3/assessment. Accessed 05 November 2011

  16. European Union (EU) (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. Official Journal of the European Union

  17. Finnveden G, Ekvall T (1998) Life-cycle assessment as a decision-support tool: the case of recycling versus incineration of paper. Resour Conserv Recycl 24:235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Finnveden G, Johansson J, Lind P, Moberg Å (2005) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—Part 1: General methodology and results. J Cleaner Prod 13(3):213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. González-García S, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Romero J, Feijoo G (2009) Environmental impact assessment of total chlorine free pulp from Eucalyptus globulus in Spain. J Cleaner Prod 17(11):1010–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guinée JB, Gorée M et al (2001) Handbook on life cycle assessment—operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hischier R (2007) Life cycle inventories of packaging and graphical papers. ecoinvent-Report No. 11, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland

  22. Hohenthal C, Behm K (2008) Carbon footprint of toilet tissue paper: comparison of toilet tissue using 100% fresh fibre pulp and 100% recovered fibre pulp. Oy Keskuslaboratorio-Centrallaboratorium Ab, KCL Science and Consulting

  23. Hong J, Li X (2012) Environmental assessment of recycled printing and writing paper: a case study in China. Waste Manage 32(2):264–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2007) Tracking industrial energy efficiency and CO2 emissions. IEA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  25. IPCC (2007) Summary for Policymakers. In: Solomon S, Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  26. ISO (2006a) ISO14040 International Standard. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  27. ISO (2006b) ISO14044 International Standard. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland

  28. Jawjit W, Kroeze C, Soontaranun W, Hordijk L (2006) An analysis of the environmental pressure exerted by the eucalyptus-based Kraft pulp industry in Thailand. Environ Dev Sustain 8:289–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jawjit W, Kroeze C, Soonaranun W, Hordijk L (2007) Options to reduce the environmental impact by eucalyptus-based kraft pulp industry in Thailand: model description. J Cleaner Prod 15(18):1827–1839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lopes E, Dias A, Arroja L, Capela I, Pereira F (2003) Application of life cycle assessment to the Portuguese pulp and paper industry. J Cleaner Prod 11:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Merrild H, Damgaard A, Christensen TH (2008) Life cycle assessment of waste paper management: the importance of technology data and system boundaries in assessing recycling and incineration. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:1391–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Merrild H, Damgaard A, Christensen TH (2009) Recycling of paper: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Manage Res 27(8):746–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2008) Environmental Outlook to 2030. OECD, Paris. http://www.oecd.org. Accessed June 2011

  34. Ross S, Evans D (2002) Use of life cycle assessment in environmental management. Environ Manage 29(1):132–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Szabó L, Soria A, Forsström J, Keränen JT, Hytönen E (2009) A world model of the pulp and paper industry: demand, energy consumption and emission scenarios to 2030. Environ Sci Policy 12:257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. United Nations (UN) (1992) Earth Summit, Agenda 21, UN Conference on Environmental Development, the United Nations programme of action from Rio de Janeiro. UN, Division for Sustainable Development

  37. United Nations (UN) (2002) United Nations General Assembly, World Summit on Sustainable Development: Plan of Implementation. UN, Division for Sustainable Development, New York

  38. Worrell E, Neelis M, Price L, Galitsky C, Zhou N (2008) World best practice energy intensity values for selected industrial sectors. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  39. WRI and WBSCD (2011) Greenhouse gas protocol (GHGP): product life cycle accounting and reporting standard. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by the Department of Chemical Engineering of Universitat Rovira i Virgili by providing a PhD scholarship to carry out this project. The main data is provided by Gomá-Camps, a tissue manufacturing company in Tarragona, Spain. The authors would like to acknowledge the company for their support. The work would not have been possible without their cooperation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eskinder Demisse Gemechu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Barbara Nebel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gemechu, E.D., Butnar, I., Gomà-Camps, J. et al. A comparison of the GHG emissions caused by manufacturing tissue paper from virgin pulp or recycled waste paper. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18, 1618–1628 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0597-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Greenhouse gas emissions
  • Recycled waste paper
  • Tissue paper
  • Virgin pulp