A method for allocation according to the economic behaviour in the EU-ETS for by-products used in cement industry
- 603 Downloads
The most efficient way to reduce the environmental impact of cement production is to replace Portland cement with alternative cementitious materials. These are most often industrial waste such as blast-furnace slags (GBFS) and coal combustion fly ashes (FA). However, a recent European directive no longer considers these products as waste but as by-products. Therefore, the impact of their production has to be considered. Within this new framework, this study develops an evaluation method of their environmental impacts.
This paper presents pre-existing methods and underlines their limits. Through our evaluation of these methods, it has become clear that the allocation procedure is necessary; however, results depend highly on the chosen allocation procedure. This study presents a new allocation method, based on the fact that both cement and the alternative materials, GBFS and FA, are produced by energy-intensive industries (cement iron and coal) which are all subjected to the European Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading System. In this carbon trading system, it is economically beneficial for industries to reduce their environmental impact, like for when, by example, by-products from one industry are used as alternative ‘green’ material by another industry. Our allocation coefficient is calculated so that the economic gains and losses are the same for all of the industries involved in these exchanges and provides the overall environmental benefit of the exchanges.
Results and discussion
The discussion shows that whilst this method has much in common with other allocation methods, it is more accurate as it allocates the environmental costs fairly over the industries involved and is more robust because of its constant value. One of its limits is that it cannot be used for life cycle inventories; however, we test the possibility of choosing a coefficient from one impact category and applying it to all the others.
Lastly, the technical term of the equation this paper presents could be employed for consequential life cycle assessment, to calculate the most environmental uses by-products could be put to.
KeywordsAllocation By-products Cement EU-ETS LCA Mineral additions
- AFNOR, French Normalisation Organisation (2004) NF EN 206-1 Concrete—part I: specification, performance, production and conformity. Department of Standards Malaysia, SelangorGoogle Scholar
- Ayer NW, Tyedmers PH, Pelletier NL, Sonesson U, Scholz A (2007) Co-product allocation in life cycle assessments of seafood production systems: review of problems and strategies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:480–487Google Scholar
- Chen A, Lin W-T, Huang R (2011) Application of rock wool waste in cement-based composites. Mater Design 32:635–642Google Scholar
- ECRA, European Cement Research Academy, [on-line], Carbon Capture Technology: ECRA's approach towards CCS; Communication Bulletin, 2009. Available from http://www.ecra-online.org/fileadmin/redaktion/files/pdf/ECRA_CCS_Communication_Bulletin.pdf. Accessed 18 March 2011
- European Union (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council on waste and repealing certain directives. Official journal of the European Union, 22.11.2008, L312: 3–30Google Scholar
- European Union (2009) Directive 2009/29/EC of the European parliament and of the council amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community. Official Journal of the European Union, 23.04.2009, L 140: 63–87Google Scholar
- Flower DJM, Sanjayan JG (2007) Greenhouse gas emissions due to concrete manufacture. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:282–288Google Scholar
- Goedkoop M, Oele M (2004) Simapro database manual. Methods library. Pre consultants BV, AmersfoortGoogle Scholar
- Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn H, vanDuin R, Huijbregts MAJ (2002) Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- ISO (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework; ISO 14040. International Standardisation OrganisationGoogle Scholar
- Kellenberger D, Althaus H-J (2003) Life cycle inventories of building products. Final report Ecoinvent, EMPA Dübendorf, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle InventoriesGoogle Scholar
- Lundie S, Ciroth A, Huppes G (2007) Inventory methods in LCA: towards consistency and improvement. Final report. UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle InitiativeGoogle Scholar
- Parrott L (2002) Cement, Concrete and Sustainability. A report on the progress of the UK cement and concrete industry towards sustainability. Technical report, British Cement AssociationGoogle Scholar
- Teller P, Denis S, Renzoni R, Germain A, Delaisse P, d'Inverno H (2000) Use of LCI for the decision-making of a Belgian cement producer: a common methodology for accounting CO2 emissions related to the cement life cycle. 8th LCA Case Studies Symposium SETAC-EuropeGoogle Scholar
- UNSTATS (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions by sector (absolute values). United Nation Statistical Division, New YorkGoogle Scholar