Skip to main content
Log in

Combining risk assessment, life cycle assessment, and multi-criteria decision analysis to estimate environmental aspects in environmental management system

  • LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The rating of environmental aspects plays a central role in the ISO 14001 environmental management system (EMS) and EU Eco-Management and Audit Scheme because it is the basis for the identification of an organization's environmental targets. The existing methods for the assessment of environmental aspects are grouped into three categories: risk assessment-based (RA-based), life cycle assessment (LCA)-based, and criterion-based methods. The first category accurately determines abnormal, or accidental aspects, as well as the probabilistic causality of aspect–pathway–receptor–impact relationships, but when evaluating environmental impact, it cannot provide a sound theoretical basis. The second category provides a theoretical foundation for the assessment of environmental impact, due to LCA, but cannot adequately represent the probabilistic aspect–pathway–receptor–impact relationship. The third category puts emphasis on the significance criteria, but the scoring methods are too simple. To combine the benefits of these three categories of research, this study proposes an integrated framework, combining RA-, LCA-, and criterion-based methods.

Materials and methods

The integrated framework incorporates LCA techniques for the identification of the causal linkage for aspect–pathway–receptor–impact, uses fuzzy logic to assess aspects, considers fuzzy conditions, in likelihood assessment, and employs a new multi-criteria decision analysis method—multi-criteria and multi-connection comprehensive assessment (MMCA)—to estimate significant aspects in EMS.

Results and discussion

The proposed model is verified, using a real case study—a waste-recycling factory. The results show that this method successfully prioritizes the environmental aspects. Compared with criterion-based methods, the case study demonstrates that the proposed method provides a more solid theoretical basis.

Conclusions

This study integrates RA, LCA, and MMCA, to assess environmental aspects. The method identifies the probabilistic causality of aspect–pathway–receptor–impact relationships, enhances the theoretical foundations, and strengthens decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Burke S, Gaughran WF (2006) Intelligent environmental management for SMEs in manufacturing. Robot Comput Integrated Manuf 22:566–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XT (2009) A study on the operation and management of a treatment plant of green construction materials: an example of Si-Wei construction waste processing plant. A master thesis of National Central University, Taiwan

  • Cheng CH (1998) A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Set Syst 95:307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu TC, Tsao CT (2002) Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid point and original point. Comput Math Appl 43:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA (2002) Guidelines for environmental risk assessment and management. (http://www.defra.gov.uk/Environment/risk/eramguide/index.htm)

  • Dong W, Shah HC (1987) Vertex method for computing functions of fuzzy variables. Fuzzy Set Syst 24(1):65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edalat A (2008) Implementation of ISO 14001:2004 (environmental management system standard) for reverse osmosis desalination plants for the first time in Iran presented at the Conference on Desalination and the Environment. Desalination 220(1–3):57–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gangolells M, Casals M, Gassó S, Forcada N, Roca X, Fuertes A (2009) A methodology for predicting the severity of environmental impacts related to the construction process of residential buildings. Build Environ 44(3):558–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangolells M, Casals M, Gassó S, Forcada N, Roca X, Fuertes A (2011) Assessing concerns of interested parties when predicting the significance of environmental impacts related to the construction process of residential buildings. Build Environ 46(5):1023–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gernuks M, Buchgeister J, Schebek L (2007) Assessment of environmental aspects and determination of environmental targets within environmental management systems (EMS)—development of a procedure for Volkswagen. J Clean Prod 15(11–12):1063–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong L, Jin C (2009) Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for carrying capacity of regional water resources. Water Resour Manag 23(12):2505–2513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Choi SK, Goksel L (2011) Tolerance allocation of assemblies using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and decision support process. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 55(1–4):379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowska A (2011) Environmental life cycle assessment as a tool for identification and assessment of environmental aspects in environmental management systems (EMS) part 1: methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(2):178–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljubas D, Sabol G (2011) Possibilities of environmental aspects and impacts evaluation according to ISO 14001 standard on the example of an academic institution. Holistic Approach Environ 2(1):75–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Marazza D, Bandini V, Contin A (2010) Ranking environmental aspects in environmental management systems: a new method tested on local authorities. Environ Int 36(2):168–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monavari M, Fard SMB (2011) Application of network method as a tool for integrating biodiversity values in environmental impact assessment. Environ Monit Assess 172(1–4):145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraes CA, Kieling AG, Caetano MO, Gomes LP (2010) Life cycle analysis (LCA) for the incorporation of rice husk ash in mortar coating. Resour Conserv Recy 54(12):1170–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Põder T (2006) Evaluation of environmental aspects significance in ISO 14001. Environ Manag 37(5):732–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiffert MEB (2008) Environmental impact evaluation using a cooperative model for implementing EMS (ISO 14001) in small and medium-sized enterprises. J Clean Prod 16(14):1447–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4(3):167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zackrisson M (2005) Environmental aspects when manufacturing products mainly out of metals and/or polymers. J Clean Prod 13(1):43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inform Sciences 8(3):199–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as the basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Set Syst 1(1):3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1996) Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 4(1):103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel T, Almroth C, Bresky J, Burman JO (2002) Identification and assessment of environmental aspects in an EMS context: an approach to a new reproducible method based on LCA methodology. J Clean Prod 10(4):381–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorpas A (2010) Environmental management systems as sustainable tools in the way of life for the SMEs and VSMEs. Bioresource Technol 101(6):1544–1557 (review article)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China (Taiwan) for financially supporting this research under Contract NSC 99-2221-E-131-010-MY2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Fong-Rey Liu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hanna-Leena Pesonen

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 348 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, K.FR., Ko, CY., Fan, C. et al. Combining risk assessment, life cycle assessment, and multi-criteria decision analysis to estimate environmental aspects in environmental management system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17, 845–862 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0407-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0407-x

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Chihhao Fan