Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A review of life cycle assessments on wind energy systems

  • LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Several life cycle assessments (LCAs) of wind energy published in recent years are reviewed to identify methodological differences and underlying assumptions.

Methods

A full comparative analysis of 12 studies were undertaken (ten peer-reviewed papers, one conference paper, and one industry report) regarding six fundamental factors (methods used, energy use accounting, quantification of energy production, energy performance and primary energy, natural resources, and recycling). Each factor is discussed in detail to highlight strengths and shortcomings of various approaches.

Results

Several potential issues are found concerning the way LCA methods are used for assessing energy performance and environmental impact of wind energy, as well as dealing with natural resource use and depletion. The potential to evaluate natural resource use and depletion impacts from wind energy appears to be poorly exploited or elaborated on in the reviewed studies. Estimations of energy performance and environmental impacts are critically analyzed and found to differ significantly.

Conclusions and recommendations

A continued discussion and development of LCA methodology for wind energy and other energy resources are encouraged. Efforts should be made to standardize methods and calculations. Inconsistent use of terminology and concepts among the analyzed studies are found and should be remedied. Different methods are generally used and the results are presented in diverse ways, making it difficult to compare studies with each other, but also with other renewable energy sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Abbreviations

EPBT:

Energy payback time

EROI:

Energy return on (energy) investment

I/O:

Input–output

LCA:

Life cycle assessment

LCI:

Life cycle inventory

LCIA:

Life cycle impact assessment

LCSA:

Life cycle sustainability analysis

PCA:

Process chain analysis

PEROI:

Primary energy return on (energy) investment

PEPBT:

Primary energy payback time

REE:

Rare earth elements

References

  • Ardente F et al (2008) Energy performances and life cycle assessment of an Italian wind farm. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12(1):200–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atherton J (2006) Declaration by the metals industry on recycling principles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(1):59–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H, Tillman AM (2004) The Hitch Hiker’s guide to LCA. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs S (2011) Rare earths leave toxic trail to Toyota Prius, Vestas turbines. Bloomberg. Web article. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-05/china-rare-earths-leave-toxic-trail-to-toyota-prius-vestas-wind-turbines.html. Accessed 18 May 2011

  • Blanco MI (2009) The economics of wind energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(6–7):1372–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Geological Survey (2010) Rare earth elements—mineral profile. June 2010. See also: http://www.mineralsUK.com

  • Castor SB (2008) Rare earth deposits of North America. Resour Geol 58(4):337–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z (2011) Global rare earth resources and scenarios of future rare earth industry. J Rare Earth 29(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford RH (2009) Life cycle energy and greenhouse emissions analysis of wind turbines and the effect of size on energy yield. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(9):2653–2660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T, Weidema BP (2004) System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(3):161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESTP (2009) Steel – a key partner in the European low‐carbon economy of tomorrow. European Steel Technology Platform (ESTP)

  • Finnveden G (2005) The resource debate needs to continue. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(5):372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden G et al (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guezuraga B, Zauner R, Pölz W (2012) Life cycle assessment of two different 2 MW class wind turbines. Renew Energy 37(1):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB (2001) Life cycle assessment—an operational guide to the ISO-standards. Center of Environmental Science—Leiden University (CML)

  • Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Zaagmo A, Masoni P, Buonamici R, Ekvall T, Rydberg T (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haxel GB, Hedrick JB, Orris GJ (2002) Rare earth elements—critical resources for high technology. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 087-02. See also: http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs087-02

  • Hendrickson C et al (1997) Comparing two life cycle assessment approaches: a process model- vs. economic input–output-based approach. IEEE Int Symp Electron Environ, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Höök M, Li J, Johansson K, Snowden S (2012) Growth rates of global energy systems and future outlooks. Nat Resour Res. doi:10.1007/s11053-011-9162-0

  • IPCC (2011) Full report. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S, Zwickel T, Eickemeier P, Hansen G, Schlömer S, von Stechow C (eds) IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson MZ, Delucchi MA (2011) Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, part I: technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials. Energ Pol 39:1164–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser MJ, Snyder B (2012) Offshore wind decommissioning regulations and workflows in the Outer Continental Shelf United States. Mar Policy 36(1):113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanawaza Y, Kamitani M (2006) Rare earth minerals and resources in the world. J Alloy Comp 408–412:1339–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn R, van der Voet E (2010) Resource constraints in a hydrogen economy based on renewable energy sources: an exploration. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:2784–2795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubiszewski I et al (2010) Meta-analysis of net energy return for wind power systems. Renew Energy 35(1):218–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YM, Tzeng YE (2008) Development and life-cycle inventory analysis of wind energy in Taiwan. J Energ Eng 134(2):53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YM, Tzeng, YE, Su CL (2006) Life cycle assessment of wind power utilization in Taiwan. The 7th International Conference on Eco Balance, November 14–16, 2006, Tsukuba, Japan

  • Lenzen M, Munksgaard J (2002) Energy and CO2 life cycle analyses of wind turbines—review and applications. Renew Energy 26(3):339–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long KR, Van Gosen BS, Foley NK, Cordier D (2010) The principal rare earth elements deposits of the United States—a summary of domestic deposits and a global perspective. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations, report 2010–5220, 96 p. See also: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5220/

  • Martinez E et al (2009a) Life cycle assessment of multi-megawatt wind turbine. Renew Energy 34(3):667–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez E et al (2009b) Life-cycle assessment of a 2-MW rated power wind turbine: CML method. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(1):52–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez E et al. (2010) Environmental impact of modern wind power under LCA methodology. In: Muyeen SM (ed) Wind power. ISBN: 978-953-7619-81-7, InTech. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/environmental-impact-of-modern-wind-power-under-lca-methodology

  • Mortimer ND (1991) Energy analysis of renewable energy sources. Energ Pol 19(4):374–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss RL, Tzimas E, Kara H, Willis P, Kooroshy J (2011) Critical metals in strategic energy technologies—assessing rare metals as supply-chain bottlenecks in low-carbon energy technologies. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission scientific and technical report. See also: http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/

  • Pasqualetti MJ, Gipe P, Righter RW (2002) Wind power in view: energy landscapes in a crowded world. Academic, New York, p 234

    Google Scholar 

  • Renewables International (2011) Neodymium a bone of contention in wind turbines. News article from 25 May 2011. See also: http://www.renewablesinternational.net/neodymium-a-bone-of-contention-in-wind-turbines/150/435/31015/

  • Schleisner L (2000) Life cycle assessment of a wind farm and related externalities. Renew Energy 20(3):279–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart B, Weidema B (2005) A consistent framework for assessing the impacts from resource use—a focus on resource functionality. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(4):240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremeac B, Meunier F (2009) Life cycle analysis of 4.5 MW and 250 W wind turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(8):2104–2110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tse PK (2011) China’s rare-earth industry. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011–1042, 11 p. See also: http://files.eesi.org/usgs_china_030011.pdf

  • US Department of Energy (2010) Critical materials strategy. Report the role of rare earth metals and other materials in the clean energy economy. December 2010, see also: http://energy.gov/

  • Valenzuela J, Wang J (2011) A probabilistic model for assessing the long-term economics of wind energy. Electr Power Syst Res 81(4):853–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vestas (2011) Life cycle assessment of electricity production from a Vestas V112 turbine wind plant, final report. PE North West Europe ApS. See also: http://www.vestas.com/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2fEN%2fSustainability%2fLCA%2fLCA_V112_Study_Report_2011.pdf

  • Wall G (2011) Life cycle exergy analysis of renewable energy systems. Open Renew Energy J 4(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP (2000) Increasing credibility of LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(2):63–64. doi:10.1007/BF02979718

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinzettel J et al (2009) Life cycle assessment of a floating offshore wind turbine. Renew Energy 34(3):742–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welch JB, Venkateswaran A (2009) The dual sustainability of wind energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(5):1121–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White SW (2006) Net energy payback and CO2 emissions from three Midwestern wind farms: an update. Nat Resour Res 15(4):271–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WWEA (2010) World wind energy report 2009. World Wind Energy Association, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. Ehri Gbegbaje-Das from PE International and Peter Garrett and Klaus Rønde from VESTAS have our gratitude for providing assistance and clarifications regarding the Vestas LCA study. This study has been supported by the STandUP for energy collaboration initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Global Energy Systems, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 535, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, 751 21, Uppsala, Sweden

    Simon Davidsson & Mikael Höök

  2. Global Energy Systems, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, 752 36, Uppsala, Sweden

    Simon Davidsson & Mikael Höök

  3. Solhemsgatan 46, 431 44, Mölndal, Sweden

    Göran Wall

Authors
  1. Simon Davidsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mikael Höök
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Göran Wall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikael Höök.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Christopher J. Koroneos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davidsson, S., Höök, M. & Wall, G. A review of life cycle assessments on wind energy systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17, 729–742 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0397-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0397-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation