Abstract
Purpose
For compliance with the ISO standard 14044, comparative life cycle assessments are required to address data quality for time-related coverage, geographic coverage, technology coverage, precision, completeness, representativeness, consistency, reproducibility, sources of the data and uncertainty of the information. As the community of practitioners and data developers grows, the purpose of this commentary is to initiate discussion of current issues and opportunities for improvement in data quality analysis.
Methods
Commonly applied data quality analysis methods are described as ranging from the collection of only qualitative information to the assignment of numeric scores. Common interpretations of data quality information are described as ranging from comparison in raw form to contribution and sensitivity analysis results, combination into an aggregate/multiaspect score, or use to infer data uncertainty. Method strengths and issues are described.
Results
The strengths of current data quality analysis methods lie in the consideration of the data quality aspects specified by the ISO standards and in the differentiation of low and high data quality. Weaknesses, however, lie in unrepeatable scoring criteria, aggregation of data quality information in a way that is difficult to interpret or misinterpreted and the use of data quality information in the estimation of uncertainty with no basis for accuracy.
Conclusion
It is found that among commonly applied methods there exists a need for improved repeatability and interpretability. When combined with emerging efforts to provide reliable uncertainty data to support the use of data quality information with contribution and sensitivity analysis results and efforts that have improved consideration of completeness, the future of data quality analysis promises substantial contribution to the field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
The standard defines consistency check as the “process of verifying that assumptions, methods and data are consistently applied throughout the study and are in accordance with the goal and scope definition performed before conclusions are reached” with the objective of determining whether the assumptions, methods and data are consistent with the goal and scope.
Available at http://lca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/lcainfohub/datasetArea.vm.
Available at http://www.ecoinvent.ch/.
References
Athena™ Sustainable Materials Institute (2004) US LCI Database Project Development Guidelines. US Department of Energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Retrieved from www.nrel.gov/lci/docs/dataguidelinesfinalrpt1-13-04.doc
European Commission–Joint Research Centre–Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook—general guide for life cycle assessment—detailed guidance. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Doka G, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R et al (2007) Overview and methodology. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland
International Standards Organization (ISO) (2006) Life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines
United Nations Environment Programme (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases. A basis for greener processes and products, available at http://www.unep.org/pdf/Global-Guidance-Principles-for-LCA.pdf
Lloyd SM, Ries R (2007) Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment: a survey of quantitative approaches. J Indust Ecol 11(1):161–179
Weidema BP (1998) Multi-user test of the data quality matrix for product life cycle inventory data. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3(5):259–265
Weidema BP, Wesnæs MS (1996) Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators. J Clean Prod 4(3–4):167–174
Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G (2011) Overview and methodology: data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 (final draft_revision 1) ecoinvent report No. 1(v3), http://www.ecoinvent.org/fileadmin/documents/en/ecoinvent_v3_elements/01_DataQualityGuideline_FinalDraft_rev1.pdf
Acknowledgement
This research was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Agricultural Library (agreement number 58-8201-0-149) and is part of the development of the LCA Digital Commons.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Ralph K. Rosenbaum
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooper, J.S., Kahn, E. Commentary on issues in data quality analysis in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17, 499–503 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0371-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0371-x