Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Life cycle inventory of energy production in ArcelorMittal steel power plant Poland S.A. in Krakow, Poland

  • LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this paper is to describe the life cycle inventory (LCI) approach of energy produced by ArcelorMittal Steel Power Plant Poland (AMSPPP) in Krakow, Poland. The present LCI is representative for the reference year 2005 by application of ISO 14040: 2006. The system boundaries were labeled as gate-to-gate (it covered full process chain for energy production). Background data of inputs and outputs from the steel power plant have been inventoried as follows: consumption of energy and fuels, including: power coal (domestic), natural gas, blast furnace gas and coke oven gas, emission of air pollutants, emissions of particulate, air emissions from stockpiles, wastes, internal transport, and land use.

Main feature

LCI energy generation was developed mainly on the basis of following sources: site-specific measured or calculated data, life cycle assessment (LCA) study carried out by Polish Academy of Science in Kraków, AMSPPP Environmental Impact Report, Company and literature information and expert consultations. The functional unit is represented by 977 MW of generated electric and heat energies, distributed to ArcelorMittal Steel Plant processes and to the Krakow’s grid. Time coverage is 2005. Operating parameters as well as air emissions associated with the power plant boilers were presented. The production data (steams: 9, 1.6, and 0.8 MPa, electric energy, degassing softening water, softening water heat, and blast furnace blow) were given. The emissions of SO2, NO x , CO, CH4, HCl, dust, heavy metals (Cr, Cd, Cu, Pb, Ni, and Mn), pollution factors (BOD5, COD) of waste water released from ash, slag, and sludge disposals were estimated. Finally, emission of CO2 was calculated. Continuous monitoring of air pollutant emissions conducted in two emitter units related to 977 MW energy produced in AMSPPP was discussed.

Results and discussion

Related to 977 MW of energy production distributed by AMSPPP, the consumption of blast furnace gas, coke oven gas, and natural gas were 1,279.7, 47,441, and 2,080 Mm3/year, respectively. Other fuel consumption, power coal (domestic), was 315,680 Mg/year. The production data of steams: 9, 1.6, and 0.8 MPa were estimated at 3,689,640; 227,642; and 335,010 Mg, respectively. The volume of heat was about 1,529,610 GJ. Degassing softening water and softening water represented 1,066,674 and 2,124,466 m3. Electric energy amount was on the order 441,188 MWh, and resulting value of the blast furnace blow was 3,076,606,000 m3. Nominal powers of the power plant boilers ranged from 149 to 177 MW. Direct dust, SO2, NO2, and CO emissions into the air from seven boilers (Nos. 1–7) were 33, 159.9, 134, and 8 kg/h, and from boiler No. 8 (coal-only) were 17.70, 222.6, 112, and 1.11 kg/h, respectively. Total CO2 emission was 1,802,902 Mg. Direct CO2 emissions from burning of power coal, blast furnace gas, coke oven gas, and finally natural gas were 674,317, 1,084,797, 39,802, and 3,986 Mg, respectively. The amounts of SO2, NO x (expressed as NO2 eq.) CO, CH4, HCl and dust emissions were 3,138.1, 2,648.5, 48.1, 575.08, 117.2, and 622.1 Mg, respectively. Contents of Mg, Cr, Cd, Cu, Pb, Ni, Mn in ash were on the order of 19.4, 1.8, 60, 50, 45, and 475 mg/kg, respectively (max. values, 28.4, 2.3, 75, 68, 59, 682, respectively). COD and BOD5 ranged 1.2 to 17 and 10.9 to 42.7 mg O2/dm3, respectively. Contribution of power coal stockpiles to heavy metal emissions was relatively small. The amounts of ash–sludge mixtures and carbon volatile ash during stock of power coal were 53,078.1 and 11,272 Mg, respectively. Data concerning pollutants into air from continuous monitoring were not included due to a limitation of the available data. The time coverage of the data collected from continuous monitoring is 2006.

Conclusions

This is the first tentative study to express energy generation in industry in Poland in terms of LCA/LCI for the energy power in steel industry. The results of the study suggest that reduction of the amount of power coal leads to saving of primary resources and reduction of SO2 emissions, decrease land occupation caused by power coal stockpiles, and increase recovery of the blast furnace gas, as well as, coke oven gas surplus. The results may help ArcelorMittal Steel Plant government make decisions in policy making. Presentation of the study in this paper is suitable for the energy production processes, as well as other industries.

Recommendations and outlook

The LCI offers environmental information consisting on the list of environmental loads. The impact assessment phase aims the results from the inventory analysis to be more understandable and life cycle impact assessment will be the direction for future research. Another issue to discuss is integration of LCA and risk assessment for industrial processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Air pollution control cost for coal-fired power stations (1995) IEA Coal Research. IEAPER/17

  • BAT (2005) Ministerstwo Środowiska: Najlepsze dostępne techniki (BAT) – Wytyczne dla produkcji żelaza i stali. Huty zintegrowane. Warszawa, luty 2005 (in Polish)

  • Coltro L, Garcia EEC, de Queiroz GC (2003) Life cycle inventory for electric energy system in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(5):290–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission Decision (2007) Establishing guidelines for the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document number C(2007) 3416)

  • Curran MA, Mann M, Norris G (2005) The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. J Clean Prod 13:853–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decyzja Urzędu Wojewódzkiego-ŚR.III.JD (.6610-16-1-05/06), 2006 (in Polish)

  • Di X, Nie Z, Yuan B, Zuo T (2007) Life cycle inventory for electricity generation in China. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(4):217–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dubreuil A (2001) Inventory for energy production in Canada. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6(5):281–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden G, Johansson J, Lind P, Moberg A (2005) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste-part 1: general methodology and results. J Clean Prod 13:213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent development in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manage 91(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journal of Laws (2005a) No 260, Item 2181 of 29.12.2005. http://lex.pl/serwis/du/2005/spis260.htm. Accessed 20 January 2010 (in Polish)

  • Journal of Laws (2005b) No 264, Item 2206 of 27.12.2005. http://msp.money.pl/akty_prawne/dzienniki_ustaw/rozporzadzenie;rady;ministrow;z;dnia,dziennik,ustaw,2005,264,2206.html. Accessed 20 January 2010 (in Polish)

  • Journal of Laws (2006) No 16, Item 124 of 12 January 2006. http://www.infor.pl/dziennik-ustaw,rok,2006,nr,16/poz,124.html. Accessed 20 January 2010 (in Polish)

  • Kulczycka J, Henclik A (2008) Ocena wpływu cyklu życia procesu wytwarzania energii na Wydziale Siłowni w Zakładzie Energetycznym Huty ArcelorMittal Steel Poland SA, Oddział w Krakowie. Polish Academy of Science, Kraków (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal Steel Poland (2003) Energetic department document. Krakow, Poland (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal Steel Poland (2007) Environmental Impact Report (in Polish)

  • Official Journal of the European Union. Commission Decision of 18 July 2007 (notified under document number C(2007) 3416), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:229:0001:0085:EN:PDF. Accessed 25 March 2010

  • Peiu N (2007) Life cycle inventory study of electrical energy production in Romania. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(4):225–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sate S, Seizo K, Naoki M, Akira N, Tanongkiat K, Anugerah W (2005) LCA-NETS Evaluation for GHGs of Power Generation Plants in Thailand. http://www.etseq.urv.es/aga/lcm2005/99_pdf/Documentos/AE12-4.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2009

  • Uliasz-Bochenczyk A, Mokrzycki E (2007) Emissions from Polish Power industry. Energy 32:2370–2375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP, Frees N, Nielsen A-M (1999) Marginal production technologies for life-cycle inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zych A. (2008) Poland - a European coal potentate. http://www.old.nettg.pl/Artykuly/Gornictwo-fakty-liczby-struktura/Poland---a-European-coal-potentate--,23954. Accessed 1 April 2010 (Polish)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank: Mr. Jacek Wolinski, Mr. Wojciech Motyka and Mr. Tomasz Marcowski from the ArcelorMittal Steel Poland SA, Krakow for discussion and materials support related to the presented topic, Mrs Joanna Kulczycka and Mrs Anna Henclik from Polish Academy of Science for the support during LCA study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boguslaw Bieda.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Niels Jungbluth

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bieda, B. Life cycle inventory of energy production in ArcelorMittal steel power plant Poland S.A. in Krakow, Poland. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16, 503–511 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0292-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0292-8

Keywords

Navigation