A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands




There is a need to assess social impacts of products along the full life cycle, not only to be able to address the “social dimension” in sustainability, but also for potentially improving the circumstances of affected stakeholders. This paper presents a case study for a social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) based on the recently published “Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products” developed by the United Nations Environment Programme/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (UNEP/SETAC) working group. General aim is to “try out” the proposed method. The case study itself compares the impacts of rose production in Ecuador with the Netherlands. Furthermore, the objective is to identify differences and similarities in environmental and social life cycle modelling and both social and environmental hot spots in each of the life cycles.


The study considers the production of rose blossoms and the cutting and packaging process in two fictitious companies in Ecuador and the Netherlands. Both rose bouquets are delivered to the European market and auctioned in Aalsmeer, the Netherlands. The social assessment is based on the UNEP/SETAC guidelines for S-LCA. Data are mainly obtained from governmental and non-governmental organisations. For the calculation of the environmental burden, a screening-type LCA is conducted, including midpoint impact assessment.

Results and discussion

This paper asserts that rose production in Ecuador is associated with many negative social effects, e.g. child labour, unfair salary, or bad impairment to health. The rose production in the Netherlands has no obvious negative social impacts but rather ecological consequences. Responsible for this is the high-energy consumption of the greenhouses.


Application of the UNEP/SETAC guidelines in case studies can be encouraged based on results of this case study. The consideration of different stakeholder groups with corresponding, very diverse themes allows a comprehensive analysis of the actual conditions. However, finding suitable indicators to measure the status of the subcategories may be challenging. Moreover, the case study shows that results can be completely different for the environmental and for the social dimension, so that it often will be needed to perform both assessments if a complete picture is required.

Recommendations and perspectives

It will be interesting to apply the UNEP/SETAC approach of S-LCA to other products; products with a more complex life cycle will be a special challenge. As with any new method, getting experience on data collection and evaluation, building a data stock, integrating the method in software, and finding ways for effective communication of results are important steps until integrating S-LCA in routine, recognized decision support.


Ecuador E-LCA Rose production S-LCA Social impacts The Netherlands 


  1. Agri-info (2007). Available at: www.agri-info.eu. Accessed July 2009
  2. Aktiv gegen Kinderarbeit (2010). Available at: www.aktiv-gegen-kinderarbeit.de. Accessed October 2010
  3. Außenwirtschaft Österreich (2009) Exportbericht Niederlande, WienGoogle Scholar
  4. Amnesty International (2010) Amnesty Report 2009 Ecuador. Available at: www.amnesty.de/jahresbericht/2009/ecuador. Accessed October 2010
  5. Batallas M (2009) Blumenindustrie in Ecuador – Hintergründe. Die Wirklichkeit der Blumenindustrie in Ecuador. Available at: http://www.fian.de/fian/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=111&Itemid=146. Accessed July 2009
  6. Bauer W (2004) In: Focus, no. 20/2004. Available at: http://www.focus.de/panorama/reportage/reportage-wall-street-der-blumen_aid_201021.html. Accessed July 2009
  7. CIA (2010). Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/. Accessed October 2010
  8. Djevic M, Dimitrijevic A (2010) Greenhouse Energy Consumption and Energy Efficiency. Available at: www.ru.acad.bg/baer/BugGHRad.pdf. Accessed October 2010
  9. Dreßler H (2005) In: Magazin für Zierpflanzenbau. Available at: http://www.fairflowers.de/fileadmin/flp.de/Redaktion/Dokumente/Presse_Berichte/Gb20_2005_S22-24.pdf. Accessed October 2010
  10. Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eurostat (2010). Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/labour_market/earnings. Accessed October 2010
  12. Expoflores (2010). Available at: www.expoflores.com. Accessed October 2010
  13. FIAN-Deutschland e.V. (2006) Blühende Zukunft? Verletzung von Kinderrechten durch die Blumenindustrie, KölnGoogle Scholar
  14. FIAN-Deutschland e.V. (2009). Available at: www.fian.de. Accessed July 2009)
  15. Flower Label Program (2010). Available at: www.fairflowers.de. Accessed October 2010
  16. Germany Trade and Invest (2009). Available at: www.gtai.de. Accessed July 2009
  17. GTZ (2004) Kurzstudie zum Flower Label Programm. Available at: www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/de-kurzstudie-flp.pdf. Accessed October 2010
  18. GTZ (2008). Available at: www.gtz.de. Accessed July 2009
  19. Haupt M (2002) Der dornige Weg von Schnittblumen. Available at: www.inka-ev.de/deutsch/inhalte/inkainfo/pdf_Dateien/schnittblumen.pdf. Accessed October 2010
  20. Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research (2009) Conflict Barometer 2009, University of Heidelberg, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. IEA (2006) Electricity/Heat in Ecuador in 2006. Available at: www.iea.org/Textbase/stats/electricitydata.asp?COUNTRY_CODE=EC. Accessed July 2009
  23. ILO (2004) Girl Child Labour in Agriculture, Domestic Work and Sexual Exploitation. Rapid assessments on the cases of the Phillipines, Ghana and Ecuador, vol 1. ILO-IPEC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  24. ILO et al (2005) National Report on the Results of the Child Labour Survey in Ecuador, 1 edn. ILO-IPEC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  25. ILO (2010). Available at: www.ilo.org. Accessed October 2010
  26. Mc Gowan C. (2006) In: super floral retailing, vol. 19, no. 9. Available at: www.superfloralretailing.com/september2006/featurestory.html. Accessed October 2010
  27. Norris G (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles—towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. OSAC (2007) Ecuador 2007 Crime & Safety Report. Available at: www.osac.gov/Reports/report.cfm?contentID=64137. Accessed October 2010
  29. Plus minus (2009) Giftige Blumengrüße zum Valentinstag. Available at: www.daserste.de/plusminus/beitrag_dyn∼uid,kbgfyxjqozyytmdz∼cm.asp. Accessed July 2009
  30. PRTR (2009). Available at: www.prtr.net. Accessed July 2009
  31. Statistics Netherlands (2009). Available at: www.cbs.nl. Accessed July 2009
  32. Steinkirchner P, Busch A (2007) Vormacht von Holland im Rosen-Geschäft gerät ins Wanken. Available at: www.wiwo.de/unternehmer-maerkte/vormacht-von-holland-im-rosen-geschaeft-geraet-ins-wanken-230666/. Accessed October 2010
  33. Transparency International (2010) Annual Report 2009. Available at: www.transparency.org/publications/annual_report. Accessed October 2010
  34. UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Available at: www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1164xPA-guidelines_sLCA.pdf. Accessed October 2010
  35. Weidema B (2006) The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Welt (2008) Europäischer Vergleich—Das deutsche Sozialsystem ist nur Mittelmaß. Available at: www.welt.de/wirtschaft/article2026423/Das_deutsche_Sozialsystem_ist_nur_Mittelmass.html. Accessed October 2010
  37. Wetboek (2009) Wet mileurbehheer 1979. Available at: www.wetboek-online.nl. Accessed July 2009
  38. Wikipedia (2006) Arbeitslosenquote (Niederlande). Available at: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbeitslosenquote_(Niederlande). Accessed October 2010
  39. Williams A (2007) Comparative Study of Cut Roses for the British Market Produced in Kenya and the Netherlands. Cranfield University, CranfieldGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GreenDeltaTC GmbHBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations