Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scope-dependent modelling of electricity supply in life cycle assessments

  • LCA MODELLING
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim and scope

Electricity use or substitution is one of the key parameters with regard to life cycle assessment (LCA) results. At the same time, it is often used as an illustrative example to highlight the modelling differences between decision-oriented and descriptive LCA. Three basically different models exist in life cycle inventory analysis: the attributional, the consequential and the decisional model. This paper proposes criteria that help to classify typical LCA questions regarding real business cases and find the most appropriate life cycle inventory (LCI) model. The framework is applied to a case study of an LCA of electricity use and supply within the international operations of an environmental service company with headquarters in France.

Main features

Individual decision with comparatively small consequences can be modelled under ceteris paribus (other things being equal) conditions. Decision situations with medium to large potential consequences should be modelled under the conditions of mutatis mutandis (the necessary changes being made). The key question is how to distinguish between small, medium and large consequences. We recommend using the relative economic size to classify objects of investigation and the LCA goals related to them into three groups to which the most appropriate LCI models are assigned.

Results and discussion

The attributional approach is sensible for environmental reporting and product labelling and declaration where the relative economic size of the object of investigation is small. The decisional approach is sensible for LCAs of product and process development, as well as site and supplier evaluation carried out by private companies in case the relative economic size of the object of investigation is medium. The consequential approach is of relevance for policy support of governments and international organisations as well as for strategic decisions of companies, where the relative economic size of the object of investigation is large. The consequential approach is also sensible in product or service comparisons by companies, if they offer products or services that are in line or help to comply with large-scale government policy measures (like for instance promoting renewable fuels). The French attributional and decisional electricity supply mix causes greenhouse gas emissions of 98 and 225 g CO2-eq./kWh, respectively, whereas the European attributional and decisional electricity supply mix causes greenhouse gas emissions of 554 and 473 g CO2-eq./kWh, respectively. The volumes of high radioactive waste generated with the French and EU-27 electricity mixes amount to 11 and 3.5 mm3/kWh for the attributional mixes as well as 3.8 and 0.034 mm3/kWh for the decisional mixes.

Conclusions

The criterion “relative economic size” helps to better decide on the appropriate LCI model to be applied in specific LCA case studies supporting any kind of decisions. Being quantitative, the “relative economic size” criterion is comparable to the criteria used to delimitate the product system (cut-off criteria mass, energy and environmental impact). The delimitation values proposed are still preliminary and still show a certain degree of ambiguity. Nevertheless, it proves to be both a practical and potentially relevant criterion. The case study of the French and European electricity mixes shows that a distinction of different decision contexts is required and feasible. Using official statistical information and published forecasts issued by the relevant industrial associations or governmental bodies significantly reduces the potential bias related to the determination of possible change-oriented electricity mixes.

Recommendations and perspectives

The relative economic size of the object of investigation is a quantified criterion to decide on the most appropriate modelling approach in life cycle inventory. It is recommended to apply the criterion in the goal and scope phase of any LCA and to apply it on the production volume on the one hand and on purchase volumes on the other. Production and purchase volumes can be expressed in either economic or physical quantities and be related to the totals of economic sectors or political entities such as nations or international organisations. The current paper deals with the appropriate modelling approach illustrated with the electricity mix. The electricity sector is only one of many sectors where the choice of the modelling approach may reveal important differences in the overall environmental impacts. Thus, it is worthwhile to extend the concept presented in this paper to other economic sectors such as agriculture, mining or paper and pulp. This would help to better substantiate or to adjust the delimitation values and to gain more experience with the threshold criteria proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://iea.org/, information retrieved on June 23, 2009

  2. In an attributional LCA, it contributes to the average electricity mix, while it might be the marginal power plant in a decisional or consequential LCA.

  3. http://www.ucte.org (accessed in February 2009), http://www.entsoe.eu/index.php?id=52 (accessed in May 2010)

  4. http://www.nordel.org (accessed in February 2009), http://www.entsoe.eu/index.php?id=61 (accessed in May 2010)

  5. http://www.baltso.eu (accessed in February 2009), http://www.entsoe.eu/index.php?id=51 (accessed in May 2010)

  6. http://www.berr.gov.uk/energy/statistics/source/electricity/page18527.html (accessed in February 2009)

  7. http://www.iea.org/ (accessed in February 2009)

  8. The long-term decisional electricity mix does not correspond to the long-term average electricity mix. Furthermore, the emissions are based on a life cycle approach. That is why the climate change intensity of the long-term decisional electricity mix may not comply with the EU target of a greenhouse gas emission reduction of 20% between 1990 and 2020.

References

  • BFE (2008) Schweizerische Elektrizitätsstatistik 2007. Bundesamt für Energie, Bern, CH

    Google Scholar 

  • BGZ (2009) Wohnsiedlung und Gewerbezentrum Sihlbogen: Zahlen und Fakten. Baugenossenschaft Zurlinden, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger R, Bauer C (2007) Wasserkraft. In: Dones R (ed) Sachbilanzen von Energiesystemen: Grundlagen für den ökologischen Vergleich von Energiesystemen und den Einbezug von Energiesystemen in Ökobilanzen für die Schweiz. Paul Scherrer Institut Villigen, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, CH

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2008) Europe’s current and future energy position. Demand—resources—investments. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Credit Suisse Group (2008) VfU Kennzahlen zur Betriebsökologie 2007 (VfU indicators of business ecology 2007). Credit Suisse Group, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran MA, Mann MK, Norris G (2002) Report on the international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. In: US-EPA N (Hrsg.), electricity data for life cycle inventories. US-EPA, held at the Breidenbach Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, October 23–25, 2001

  • ecoinvent Centre (2007) edata v2.01, ecoinvent reports no. 1–25, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. ecoinvent Centre, Duebendorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T (2002) Limitations of consequential LCA, InLCA/LCM 2002 E-conference

  • Ekvall T, Weidema B (2004) System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T, Ciroth A, Hofstetter P, Norris G (2004) Evaluation of attributional and consequential life cycle assessment. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdgas Zürich (2009) Geschäftbericht 2008. Erdgas Zürich, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • ERZ (2006) Klärwerk Werdhölzli (Wastewater treatment plant Werdhölzli). ERZ, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • EURELECTRIC (2006) Statistics and prospects for the European electricity sector (1980–1990, 2000–2030) (Europrog 2006). Union of the Electricity Industry—EURELECTRIC, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable resources (Renewable Energy Directive-RED). Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, BE

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010) ILCD Handbook (International Reference Life Cycle Data System), Specific guide for generic Life Cycle Inventory data sets, European Commission, DG-JRC

  • EUROSTAT (2009) Energy, transport and environment indicators. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • ewz (2008) Geschäftsbericht 2007. Marktöffnung in Sicht, Elektrizitätswerke der Stadt Zürich, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R (1997) Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. In: Nicoline Wrisberg, Udo de Haes Helias A (eds) Life cycle assessment: state-of-the-art and research priorities. LCA documents. Ecomed, Bayreuth, pp 59–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R (1998) Life cycle inventory analysis for decision-making: scope-dependent inventory system models and context-specific joint product allocation, 3-9520661-3-3. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R (2002) An introduction to attributional and consequential LCI models—properties and differences, 17. Diskussionsforum Ökobilanzen, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R (2006) Notions on the design and use of an ideal regional or global LCA database. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R (2007) Modelling of product systems in life cycle inventory analysis: synopsis of attributional and consequential lci models—properties and differences, Hrsg. Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Systemanalyse, Zentralabteilung technikbedingte Stoffströme, Uster, Karlsruhe

  • Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N (2003) Allocation applied on co-production processes in large LCI process network databases. In: Bauer C (Hrsg.), International Workshop on Quality of LCI Data, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, DE, pp. 5ff

  • FWS (2008) Statistiken 2008. Fördergemeinschaft Wärmepumpen Schweiz, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R (1997) Economic drama and the environmental stage; formal derivation of algorithmic tools for environmental analysis and decision-support from a unified epistemological principle, centre for environmental sciences. Leiden University, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R, Suh S (2002) The computational structure of life cycle assessment. Eco-efficiency in industry and science, vol 11. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO 14040:2006, 2nd edn 2006-06, Geneva

  • Lundie S, Ciroth A, Huppes G (2007) Inventory methods in LCA: towards consistency and improvement. UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathani C, van Nieuwkoop R, Wickart M (2008) Revision der IOT 2001 und Schätzung einer IOT 2005 für die Schweiz. Rütter & Partner, Ecoplan, Cepe, Rüschlikon/Bern/Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • SIA (2009) Graue Energie von Gebäuden; Merkblatt 2032; Entwurf für Einspracheverfahren. SIA, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidema B (2001) Avoiding co-product allocation in life-cycle assessment. In: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(3), pp. 11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank the Veolia Environnement Research and Innovation for input, feedback and comments throughout the study and for financing the study performed in 2009. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which helped to increase the substantiation of the approach and the clarity of its presentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf Frischknecht.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Andreas Ciroth

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frischknecht, R., Stucki, M. Scope-dependent modelling of electricity supply in life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15, 806–816 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0200-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0200-7

Keywords

Navigation