Skip to main content
Log in

CO2 reduction potentials by utilizing waste plastics in steel works

  • CASE STUDY
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

Feedstock recycling has received attention as an effective method to recycle waste plastics. However, estimating the reduction potential by life cycle assessment using coke oven and blast furnace in steel works has been a challenging task due to the complex structure of energy flow in steel works. Municipal waste plastics consist of several plastic resins. Previous studies have generally disregarded the composition of waste plastics, which varies significantly depending on the geographical area. If the reduction potentials by using each plastic resin in steel works can be quantified, the potential of municipal waste plastics (mixtures of plastic resins) can be estimated by summing up the potential of each resin multiplied by the composition of each resin in municipal waste plastics. Therefore, the goal of this study is to investigate the reduction potentials of CO2 emissions by using individual plastic resins (polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), polyethylene terephthalate (PET)) and those for municipal waste plastics in the coke oven and blast furnace.

Materials and methods

A model was developed to clarify the energy flow in steel works. In order to estimate the changes in energy and material balance in coke ovens when waste plastics are charged, the equations to calculate the coke product yield, gas product yield, and oil product yields of each plastic resin were derived from previous studies. The Rist model was adopted to quantify the changes in the inputs and outputs when plastics were fed into a blast furnace. Then, a matrix calculation method was used to calculate the change in energy balance before and after plastics are fed into a coke oven.

Results

It was confirmed that product yields of municipal waste plastics (mixtures of plastic resins) could be estimated by summing up the product yield of each plastic resin multiplied by the composition of each resin in municipal waste plastics. In both cases of coke oven and blast furnace feedstock recycling, the reduction potential of CO2 emissions varies significantly depending on the plastic resins. For example, in the case of coke oven chemical feedstock recycling, the reduction potential of PS and PP is larger than that of PE. On the other hand, in the case of blast furnace feedstock recycling, PE has the largest CO2 emissions reduction potential, whereas the CO2 emission reduction potential of PP is smaller than those of PE and PS. In both cases, PET has negative CO2 emission reduction potentials, i.e., there is an increase of CO2 emissions. In addition, the reduction potentials of CO2 emissions are slightly different in each city.

Discussions

The differences in the reduction potentials of CO2 emissions by coke oven chemical feedstock recycling of each plastic resin is attributable to the differences in calorific values and coke product yields of each plastic resin. On the other hand, the difference in the CO2 emission reduction potential for each plastic resin in blast furnace feedstock recycling is attributable to the difference in calorific values and the carbon and hydrogen content of each plastic resin, which leads to a difference in the coke substitution effect by each plastic resin. In both cases, the difference in those of municipal waste plastics is mostly attributable to the amount of impurities (e.g., ash, water) in the municipal waste plastics.

Conclusions

It was found that the reduction potential of CO2 emissions by coke oven and blast furnace feedstock recycling of municipal waste plastics (mixtures of plastic resins) could be estimated by summing up the potential of each resin multiplied by the composition of each resin in municipal waste plastics. It was also clarified that feedstock recycling of waste plastic in steel works is effective for avoiding the increase in CO2 emissions by incinerating waste plastics, such as those from household mixtures of different resins.

Recommendations and perspectives

With the results obtained in this study, reduction potentials of CO2 emissions can be calculated for any waste plastics because differences in composition are taken into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arena U, Mastellone ML, Perugini F (2003) Life cycle assessment of a plastic packaging recycling system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(2):92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asanuma M, Ariyama T (2004) Recycling of waste plastics in blast furnace. J I Energy 83:252–256

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Avila AF, Duarte MV (2003) A mechanical analysis on recycled PET/HDPE composites. Polymer Degrad Stabil 80(2):373–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bor YJ, Chien Y, Hsu E (2004) The market-incentive recycling system for waste packaging containers in Taiwan. Environ Sci Pol 7(6):509–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunegg G, Bona R, Schellauf F, Wallner E (2004) Solid Waste Management and Plastic Recycling in Austria and Europe. Polymer–Plast Technol Eng 43(6):1755–1767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden G, Johansson J, Lind P, Moberg G (2005) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results. J Cleaner Prod 13(3):213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortelny I, Michalkova D, Krulis Z (2004) An efficient method of material recycling of municipal plastic waste. Polymer Degrad Stabil 85(3):975–979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garfort AA, Ali S, Hernandez-Martınez J, Akah A (2004) Feedstock recycling of polymer wastes. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sc 8(6):419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R (1994) A generic method for the identification of options for cleaner products. Ecol Econ 10(1):69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R (2000) Chain Management by Life Cycle Assessment (CMLCA). CML, Leiden University, The Netherlands, http://www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/ssp/cmlca.html, accessed 20.3.2008

  • Holmgren K, Henning D (2004) Comparison between material and energy recovery of municipal waste from an energy perspective: a study of two Swedish municipalities. Resour Conserv Recycl 43(1):51–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu X, Calo JM (2006) Plastic particle separation via liquid-fluidized bed classification. Am Inst Chem Eng 52(4):1333–1342

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inaba R, Hashimoto S, Moriguchi Y (2005) Life cycle assessment of recycling in the steel industry for plastics containers and packaging. J Japan Soc Waste Manage 16(6):467–480 in Japanese

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • JCPRA (The Japan Containers and Packaging Recycling Association) (2007) Investigations on environmental impacts of recycling methods for plastics containers and packaging (in Japanese)

  • JEMAI (Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry) (2001) LCA-software ‘JEMAI-LCA’

  • Kaminsky W, Predel M, Sadiki A (2004) Feedstock recycling of polymers by pyrolysis in a fluidised bed. Polymer Degrad Stabil 85(3):1045–1050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kato K, Nomura S, Fukuda K, Uematsu H, Takamatsu N, Kondo H (2002a) Effect of waste plastics recycling technology using coke ovens on energy consumption. J Iron Steel Inst Jap 15(4):756

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato K, Nomura S, Uematsu H (2002b) Development of waste plastics recycling process using coke oven. ISIJ Int 42(Suppl):S10–S13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kato K, Nomura S, Uematsu H (2003) Waste plastics recycling process using coke ovens. J Mater Cycle Waste Manage 5(2):98–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Shin S, Sohn S, Choi J, Ban B (2002) Waste plastics as supplemental fuel in the blast furnace process: improving combustion efficiencies. J Hazard Mater 94(3):213–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koo J, Kim S, Seo Y (1991) Characterization of aromatic hydrocarbon formation from pyrolysis of polyethylene polystyrene mixtures. Resour Conserv Recycl 5(4):365–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuno Y, Betz M (2000) Development of life cycle inventories for electricity grid mixes in Japan. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(5):295–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • METI (Research and Statistics Department, Economic and Industrial Policy Bureau, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) (2001) 2001 Yearbook of Iron and Steel Statistics (in Japanese)

  • METI (Research and Statistics Department, Economic and Industrial Policy Bureau, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) (2004) Report on recyclability of containers and packaging, plastic bale (in Japanese)

  • Ministry of the Environment (2003) Report on a method to calculate amount of emission of greenhouse effect gas (in Japanese)

  • Molgaard C (1995) Environmental impacts by disposal of plastic from municipal solid waste. Resour Conserv Recycl 15(1):51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutha NH, Patel M, Premnath V (2006) Plastics materials flow analysis for India. Resour Conserv Recycl 47(3):222–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narita N, Sagisaka M, Inaba A (2001) Reduction effects of CO2 emission from steel products by reduction agent injection into blast furnace. J Japan Inst Metals 65(7):589–595 (in Japanese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishioka K, Yoshida S (1984) Investigation of bonding pattern of coal particles and factors for determination of coke properties during carbonization. Tetsu to hagane 70(3):351–357

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishioka K, Yoshida S, Hariki M (1984) Development of the carbonization simulation model with consideration of coking mechanism. Tetsu to hagane 70(3):358–365

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nisioka K (1990) Sun fossil: Coal (in Japanese). Agne Gijutsu Center, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Noda R, Komatsu M, Sumi E, Kasakura T (2001) Evaluation of material recycling for plastics: environmental aspects. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 3(2):118–125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okuwaki A (2004) Feedstock recycling of plastics in Japan. Polymer Degrad Stabil 85(3):981–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel M, von Thienen N, Jochem E, Worrell E (2000) Recycling of plastics in Germany. Resour Conserv Recycl 29(1–2):65–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perugini F, Mastellone ML, Arena U (2005) A life cycle assessment of mechanical and feedstock recycling options for management of plastic packaging wastes. Environ Prog 24(2):137–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plastic Waste Management Institute (2005a) An Introduction to Plastic Recycling in Japan 2004, 4 Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental and resource impact assessment of recycling methods by LCA. http://www.pwmi.or.jp/ei/ei_pk.htm, accessed 16.10.2008

  • Rist A, Meysson N (1967) A dual graphic representation of blast-furnace mass and heat balances. J Metals 9(4):50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross S, Evans D (2003) The environmental effect of reusing and recycling a plastic-based packaging system. J Cleaner Prod 11(5):561–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto K (1986) Development of carbonization in coke ovens: estimation of gas evolution patterns. Tetsu to Hagane 72(12):S840

    Google Scholar 

  • Shent H, Pugh RJ, Forssberg E (1999) A review of plastics waste recycling and the flotation of plastics. Resour Conserv Recycl 25(2):85–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song H, Moon K, Hyun JC (1999) A life-cycle assessment (LCA) study on the various recycle routes of PET bottles. Korean Chem Eng 16(2):202–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian PM (2000) Plastics recycling and waste management in the US. Resour Conserv Recycl 28(3–4):253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh S, Huppes G (2005) Methods for life cycle inventory of a product. J Cleaner Prod 13(7):687–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan (2006) Iron and steel handbook

  • Vinyl Environmental Council (2001) Report on LCI for recycling and waste management of PVC products

  • Williams PT, Williams EA (1999) Interaction of plastics in mixed-plastics Pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 13(1):188–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao R, Jin B, Zhou H, Zhong Z, Zhang M (2007) Air gasification of polypropylene plastic waste in fluidized bed gasifier. Energ Convers Manage 48(3):778–786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamakita R, Miura K, Ishino Y, Ohiwa N (2005) An investigation on thermal recycling of recycled plastics resin. JSME Int J 48(1):83–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G-H, Zhua J-F, Okuwaki A (2007) Prospect and current status of recycling waste plastics and technology for converting them into oil in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 50(3):231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziebik A, Stanek W (2001) Forecasting of the energy effects of injecting waste plastics into the blast furnace in comparison with other auxiliary fuels. Energy 26(12):1159–1173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasunari Matsuno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sekine, Y., Fukuda, K., Kato, K. et al. CO2 reduction potentials by utilizing waste plastics in steel works. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14, 122–136 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0055-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0055-3

Keywords

Navigation