Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the use and impact of LCA-based information in corporate communications

  • METHODOLOGY
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

The effective communication of corporate environmental messages has a history of mixed results and concerns remain around the quality and accurateness of these messages. Life cycle assessment (LCA) information is often presented as a promising informational tool, by which improved communication effectiveness of environmental/sustainable claims may materialize; however, the possibility of information overload has limited its application in marketing communication settings. The overall purpose of this research is to better understand how LCA-based environmental performance information might be effectively communicated in an advertising setting, the impact of such messages on individuals’ attitudes and behavioral intentions, and the mediating roles of informational complexity and credibility.

Methods

Fictitious, but realistic, advertisements employing LCA-based information were created and tested empirically in two experimental settings. The first, in a business-to-consumer (B2C) setting, examines the influence of several environmental information contents, formats, and disclosures on attitudinal factors toward the ad, brand, and company, as well as behavioral intentions. Using hair shampoo as the product category, and the biodegradability capacity of its bottle as the environmental attribute, regression analyses were developed based on a sample of 3,292 subjects evaluating one of 12 different advertisements. The second experiment presented in this paper expands upon these ideas by focusing on a business-to-business (B2B) environment where the need for cognition, and thus the complexity threshold, is thought to be quite high and where environmental performance is expected to be of importance to the purchaser. This experimental setting includes responses from 1,062 architects and engineers—all of whom are members of the U.S. Green Building Council who evaluated one of eight different advertisements. In this experimental setting, the volume of LCA-based information is varied, while exploring the role of this information in conjunction with functional product performance messages.

Results

Results indicate that LCA-based information can be effective within an advertising medium in enhancing message credibility, attitudes toward the brand and company, and positively influencing behavioral intentions toward purchasing, even though this information is viewed as complex and detrimental to attitudes toward the advertisement itself. More specifically, results from the first empirical experiment indicate that LCA-based communications make for more poorly reviewed advertising, but the credibility gained through explicit LCA-based environmental disclosures favorably influences the perceptions toward the company and the brand. These results are confirmed in the business-to-business experiment. Evidence from this study suggests that, within environmentally aware and sensitive recipients, advertisements with environmental messages are more effective than those presenting functional product benefits alone, but only when the messages are substantiated with elaborated LCA-based information.

Discussion

Within the B2C respondents, we found that the perceived complexity of the ad in fact generated a significantly positive attitudinal response concerning the company under evaluation, which was not evident in the B2B study. The results suggest that the end-use consumers in the first experiment more often processed the ad through the peripheral route of persuasion, where the downside risk of presenting complex and detailed environmental information is significant (i.e. people won’t pay attention to the ad), but can be balanced (or even surpassed) by positive associations with presenting additional information (i.e. the company must be strong if it is willing to fully disclose all of this information).

Conclusions

The influence of perceived complexity of LCA-based advertisements does not appear to negatively influence most measures typically used to assess advertising effectiveness; however, the appeal of the advertisement itself is significantly negatively impacted by increases in complexity. The credibility gained through more elaborated LCA-based environmental messages, to a high extent, compensates the effect of complexity on the attitude toward the appeal of the ad itself. In fact, this credibility strongly influences in a positive manner the attitudes buyers have toward the ad, the brand, the company, and their intention to purchase the product under evaluation.

Recommendations and perspectives

Practitioners are to reconsider the position that simple and appealing advertisements are most effective to an overall marketing communication strategy addressing environmental performance. Simple messages are often required to gain market awareness and break through the noisy hypermedia marketplace; however, our results suggest that a firm’s ability to gain credibility in its message can compensate for many of the negative effects of highly complex messages. Researchers and LCA professionals influencing methodologies and implementation of LCA at the product level should recognize the potential use of selected and incomplete LCA-based information by firms in marketing communications. While strategic differentiation benefits associated with effective communication of environmental performance may lead to increased use of LCA techniques by firms, appropriate development of standards and certifications may be required to preserve perceptions of objectivity and transparency associated with LCA methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The original response rate was 43% resulting in a total of 4,153 responses. Participants expended in average 10.29 min (median = 10) to complete the assessment, and only those within a 95% confidence interval were included in the analysis. In addition, respondents who only partially completed the questionnaire and respondents for which English is the second language were excluded. The final sample includes 42.8% males and the remaining 57.2% were females.

  2. The original response rate was 21.5% resulting in a total of 1,346 responses (21.5% response rate). Participants expended in average 12.22 min (median = 10) to complete the assessment, and only those within a 95% confidence interval were included in the analysis. In addition, respondents who only partially completed the questionnaire and respondents for which English is the second language were excluded. The final sample includes 64.3% males and the remaining 35.7% were females.

References

  • Anderson R, Jolson M (1980) Technical wording in advertising: implication for marketing segmentation. J Market 44(1):57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong J, Overton T (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Market Res 14(3):396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra R, Ray M (1986) Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising. J Consum Res 13(2):234–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks M, Highhouse S (2006) Familiarity breeds ambivalence. Corp Reput Rev 9(2):105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder BJ, Philips LW, Tybout AM (1981) Designing research for application. J Consum Res 8(2):197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson L, Stephen G, Kangun N (1993) A content analysis of environmental advertising claims: a matrix approach. J Advertising 22(3):27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson L, Grove S, Laczniak R, Kangun N (1996) Does environmental advertising reflect integrated marketing communications? An empirical investigation. J Bus Res 37(3):225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan R (2000) The effectiveness of environmental advertising: the role of claim type and the source country green image. Int J Advertising 19(3):349–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J (1993) Strategies for environmental advertisement. J Consum Market 10(2):19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis J (1994) The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. J Mass Commun Quart 72(2):285–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Borghi A, Binaghi L, Del Borghi M, Gallo M (2007) The application of the environmental product declaration to waste disposal in a sanitary landfill. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(1):40–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman D (2000) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, p 464

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterling D, Kenworthy A, Nemzoff R (1996) The greening of advertising: a twenty-five year look at environmental advertising. J Market Theo Pract 4(1):20–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young/SPRU for the European Commission (1998) Integrated Product Policy. The executive summary can be downloaded at http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ipp/home.htm

  • Fet A, Starr C (2006) Eco-labeling, product category rules and certification procedures based on ISO 14025 requirements. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankl P, Rubik F (1999) Life cycle assessment (LCA) in business: an overview on drivers, issues, applications and future perspectives. Global Nest: Int J 1(3):185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl P, Fullana P, Kreissig J (2007) Communication of Life Cycle Assessment in the Building and Energy Sectors. Report on the International Expert Workshop: Sector-Specific Approaches for Communication of Life Cycle Information to different Stakeholders, Barcelona, September 8th, 2005

  • Frooman J (1999) Stakeholder influence strategies. Acad Manage Rev 24(2):191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J, St. John C (1996) Managing and partnering with external stakeholders. Acad Manage Exec 10(2):46–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickle G (2007) Promoting product stewardship with eco-labels, certification programs, and product standards. Environ Qual Manage 16(3):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovland C, Weiss W (1951) The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opin Quart 15(4):635–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangun N, Carlson L, Grove S (1991) Environmental advertisement claims: a preliminary investigation. J Pub Pol Market 10(2):47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Karna J, Juslin H, Ahonen V, Hansen E (2001) Green advertising. Greener Manage Int 33:59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller K (1993) Conceptualizing, measuring, managing customer-based brand equity. J Market 57(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodish L, Abraham M, Kalmensen S, Livelsberger J, Lubetikin B, Rlghardson B, Stevens M (1995) How T.V. advertising works: a meta-analysis of 389 real world split cable T.V. advertising experiments. J Market Res 32(2):125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loerincik Y, Kaenzig J, Jolliet O (2005) Life cycle approaches for sustainable consumption: 24th LCA Swiss discussion forum. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(3):228–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrey T (1998) The effects of syntactic complexity on advertising persuasiveness. J Consum Psychol 7(2):187–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie S, Lutz R (1989) An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. J Market 53(2):48–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Murillo S, Smith T (2005) How much is too much? Exploring life cycle assessment information in environmental marketing communications. Buis Prof Ethics J 24(1–2):199–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Mungkung R, Udo de Haes H, Clift R (2006) Potentials and limitations of life cycle assessment in setting ecolabelling criteria: a case study of Thai shrimp aquaculture product. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohanian R (1990) Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. J Advert 19(3):39–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhuis F, Rubik F, Scholl G (1996) Product policy in Europe: new environmental perspectives (Environment & Policy). Kluwer Academic, Great Britain, p 320

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne L, Vlosky R (1997) Willingness to pay for environmentally certified wood products: the consumer perspective. Forest Prod J 47(6):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Park C, Jaworski B, Maclnnis D (1986) Strategic brand concept-image management. J Market 50(4):135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips B (1997) Thinking into it: consumer interpretations of complex advertising images. J Advertising 26(2):77–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky M, Bailey J, Baker H, Basche C, Jepson C, Neath L (1998) Communicating environmental information: are marketing claims on packaging misleading? J Bus Ethics 17(3):281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1985) Competitive advantage. The Free, New York, p 557

    Google Scholar 

  • Prothero A (1990) Green consumerism and the societal marketing concept: marketing strategies for the 1990s. J Market Manage 6(2):87–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujari D, Peattie K, Wright G (2004) Organizational antecedents of environmental responsiveness in industrial new product development. Ind Market Manag 33(5):381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schau E, Fet A (2008) LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(3):255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee R (1982) Product differentiation advantages of pioneering brands. Am Econ Rev 72(3):349–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimp T (1981) Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. J Advertising 10(2):9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuptrine K, McVicker D (1981) Readability levels of magazines ads. J Advertising Res 21(5):45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward D, Koslow S (1989) Executional factors and advertising effectiveness: a replication. J Advertising 18(3):21–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan J, Combs L (1976) Product performance and consumer satisfaction: a new concept. J Marketing 40(2):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teils M, Roe B (2005) Evaluating the factors that impact the effectiveness of eco-labeling programmes. In: Krarup S, Russell C (eds) Environment, information and consumer behaviour. Edward Elgar, UK pp 65–90

  • Tellis G (2005) Advertising's role in capitalist markets: what do we know and where do we go from here? J Advertising Res 45(2):162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truffer B, Markard J, Wüstenhagen R (2001) Eco-labeling of electricity-strategies and tradeoffs in the definition of environmental standards. Energ Policy 29(11):885–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn R (1980) How advertising works: a planning model. J Advertising Res 20(5):27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters L (1986) The effect of brand advertising on company image: implications for corporate advertising. J Advertising Res 26(2):54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods W (1960) Psychological dimensions of consumer decision. J Marketing 24(3):15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu B, Newell S (2003) The impact of noise on recall of advertisements. J Market Theo Pract 11(2):56–65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the financial and logistical support from the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association (NAIMA), the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), the Forest Products Management Development Institute (FPMDI), the AT&T Industrial Ecology Fellowship, and the AT&T Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio A. Molina-Murillo.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molina-Murillo, S.A., Smith, T.M. Exploring the use and impact of LCA-based information in corporate communications. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14, 184–194 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0042-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0042-8

Keywords

Navigation