Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stuck Between the Great Powers: Secondary Countries’ Responses to Soft Power Competition Between the US and China During the COVID-19 Pandemic

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Chinese Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent and increasingly antagonistic relationship between the world’s two great powers, the United States and China, has caused collateral damage to many secondary countries as their interests might rely on amicable relationships with both the US and China. Employing soft power as the theoretical framework, this study is one of the first empirical investigations of how the divergent US and Chinese anti-virus approaches (i.e., mitigation strategies vs. zero COVID policy) may influence people’s policy preferences in secondary countries. A two-wave cross-national panel survey (n = 3,216) was conducted in four Asian societies: South Korea, Japan, Singapore, and Hong Kong. The results disclose an uneven game regarding the soft power competition between the US and China: Asian publics with greater confidence in the US anti-virus approach perceive domestic anti-virus measures as restrictive, and express less support for international trade; whereas, Asian publics trusting China’s anti-virus approach express no specific preferences for domestic anti-virus measures, but more support for international trade and immigration. These findings illustrate differential responses from Asian publics to the US’s and China’s soft power practices in different policy arenas. This study contributes to the emerging literature linking COVID-19 to soft power, public diplomacy, and international relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Perceived threat of COVID-19 was assessed by asking respondents to what extent they think the coronavirus pandemic threatens their job, full-time studies or business (1 = Very insignificant, 7 = Very significant). Authoritarianism was measured with three items on a seven-point scale (1 = Strongly disagree, 7 = Strongly agree): (1) “government should be led by a political strongman”; (2) “government led by elites is more effective in governance than a government led by public opinion”; (3) “A non-democratic system, where decisions are made by national leaders who are not chosen by the general public, is better at producing a strong economy.” News consumption on COVID-19 tapped the frequency of respondents consuming related news information from newspapers, television, online news outlets and social media (1 = Not at all, 7 = Very often).

References

  1. Abutaleb, Y., J. Dawsey, E. Nakashima, and G. Miller. 2020. “The US was beset by denial and dysfunction as the coronavirus raged”, Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2020/04/04/coronavirus-government-dysfunction/.

  2. Acharya, A. 2014. Global international relations (IR) and regional worlds: a new agenda for international studies. International Studies Quarterly 58 (4): 647–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Agence, France-Press. 2020. “Trump: Americans will develop ‘herd mentality’, coronavirus vaccine weeks away”, South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/3101743/trump-americans-will-develop-herd-mentality?module=perpetual_scroll_0andpgtype=articleandcampaign=3101743.

  4. Agencies. 2021. “Coronavirus: Singapore excludes China’s Sinovac jabs from national vaccination tally; South Korea cases surge”, South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/article/3140105/coronavirus-singapore-excludes-chinas-sinovac-jabs-national-vaccination.

  5. Ameyaw-Brobbey, T. 2021. A critical juncture? COVID-19 and the fate of the US–China Struggle for Supremacy. World Affairs 184 (3): 260–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, S. 2020. “A review of Trump immigration policy”, Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2020/08/26/fact-check-and-review-of-trump-immigration-policy/?sh=3bda080456c0.

  7. Antwi-Boasiako, I. 2022. Vaccine diplomacy game: The race for soft power. Available at SSRN 4092062.

  8. Badr, H., A. Oluyomi, L. Woodard, X. Zhang, S. A. Raza, M. Adel Fahmideh, O. El-Mubasher, and C. A. Amos. 2021. Sociodemographic and health belief model factors associated with nonadherence to COVID-19 mitigation strategies in the United States. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 55 (7): 677–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bastiaens, I., and E. Postnikov. 2020. Social standards in trade agreements and free trade preferences: an empirical investigation. The Review of International Organizations 15: 793–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. BBC News. 2020. “Coronavirus: New York has more cases than any country”. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52239261.

  11. Biskupic, J. 2020. “Civil liberties in the time of coronavirus”, CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/29/politics/civil-liberties-issues-coronavirus/index.html.

  12. Boylan, B., J. McBeath, and B. Wang. 2020. US–China Relations: Nationalism, the Trade War, and COVID-19. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 14 (1): 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bueno de Mesquita, B., A. Smith, R. M. Siverson, and J. D. Morrow. 2005. The logic of political survival. MIT press.

  14. Cha, V. D. 2020. Allied Decoupling in an era of US–China Strategic Competition. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 13 (4): 509–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang, Y.-Y. 2021. The post-pandemic world: between constitutionalized and authoritarian orders—China’s narrative-power play in the pandemic era. Journal of Chinese Political Science 26 (1): 27–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, W. A. 2021. COVID-19 and China’s changing soft power in Italy. Chinese Political Science Review 1–21.

  17. Choma, B. L., G. Hodson, D. Sumantry, Y. Hanoch, and M. Gummerum. 2021. Ideological and psychological predictors of COVID-19-related collective action, opinions, and health compliance across three nations. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 9 (1): 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen, J. 2020. “The Trump Administration goes all in on herd immunity”, Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshuacohen/2020/10/10/where-does-the-trump-administration-stand-on-herd-immunity/?sh=52738b8c72f5.

  19. Cook, R. J., M. Ohle, and Z. Han. 2022. The illusion of the China-US-Europe strategic triangle: reactions from Germany and the UK. Journal of Chinese Political Science 27 (3): 493–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cortez, M. F., and A. Thomson. 2021. “Isolated China Is the World’s Last Country Chasing Covid Zero”, Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-10-05/another-covid-zero-country-falls-making-china-the-last-holdout#xj4y7vzkg.

  21. Cull, N. J. 2022. From soft power to reputational security: rethinking public diplomacy and cultural diplomacy for a dangerous age. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 18 (1): 18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Datta, M. N. 2009. The decline of America’s soft power in the United Nations. International Studies Perspectives 10 (3): 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dunford, M., and B. Qi. 2020. Global reset: COVID-19, systemic rivalry and the global order. Research in Globalization 2: Article 100021.

  24. Fidler, D. P. 2013. “Health diplomacy”. In The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, eds. A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, and R. Thakur, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fontaine, R. 2020. “Globalization will look very different after the coronavirus pandemic”, Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/17/globalization-trade-war-after-coronavirus-pandemic/.

  26. Frey, C. B., C. Chen, and G. Presidente. 2020. Democracy, culture, and contagion: political regimes and countries responsiveness to Covid-19. Covid Economics 18: 222–238.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Galbraith, J. 2019. Trump administration announces withdrawal from four international agreements. American Journal of International Law 113 (1): 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Goldsmith, B. E., and Y. Horiuchi. 2012. In search of soft power: does foreign public opinion matter for US foreign policy? World Politics 64 (3): 555–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Goldsmith, B. E., and M. Linley. 2012. Engaged or not? Perceptions of australian influence among asian publics. Japanese Journal of Political Science 13 (4): 525–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gunia, A. 2020. “China’s draconian lockdown is getting credit for slowing coronavirus. Would it work anywhere else?”, Time. https://time.com/5796425/china-coronavirus-lockdown/.

  31. Hagström, L., and K. Gustafsson. 2021. The limitations of strategic narratives: the sino-american struggle over the meaning of COVID-19. Contemporary Security Policy 42 (4): 415–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hainmueller, J., and M. J. Hiscox. 2006. Learning to love globalization: education and individual attitudes toward international trade. International Organization 60 (2): 469–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hainmueller, J., and M. Hiscox. 2007. Educated Preferences: explaining attitudes toward Immigration in Europe. International Organization 61 (2): 399–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Holsti, O. R. 1996. Public opinion and american foreign policy. University of Michigan Press.

  35. Hossain, M. F. 2021. Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: pros and cons of China’s soft power projection. Asian Politics & Policy 13 (4): 597–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hu, B. 2021. Sino-US competition in the South China Sea: power, rules and legitimacy. Journal of Chinese Political Science 26 (3): 485–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang, H. 2015. International knowledge and domestic evaluations in a changing society: the case of China. American Political Science Review 109 (3): 613–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hurwitz, J., and M. Peffley. 1987. How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Political Science Review 81 (4): 1099–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hurwitz, J., and M. Peffley. 1990. Public images of the Soviet Union: the impact on foreign policy attitudes. The Journal of Politics 52 (1): 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hurwitz, J., M. Peffley, and M. A. Seligson. 1993. Foreign policy belief systems in comparative perspective: the United States and Costa Rica. International Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 245–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Isernia, P. 2007. “Anti-Americanism in Europe during the cold war”. In Anti-americanisms in world politics, eds. P. J. Katzenstein, and R. O. Keohane, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jae Moon, M., K. Suzuki, T. I. Park, and K. Sakuwa. 2021. A comparative study of COVID-19 responses in South Korea and Japan: political nexus triad and policy responses. International Review of Administrative Sciences 87 (3): 651–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jaworsky, B. N., and R. Qiaoan. 2021. The politics of blaming: the narrative battle between China and the US over COVID-19. Journal of Chinese Political Science 26: 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kirton, J. J., and A. X. Wang. 2021. China’s global leadership through G20 compliance. Chinese Political Science Review 1–41.

  45. Kleinberg, K. B., and B. O. Fordham. 2010. Trade and foreign policy attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 54 (5): 687–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kobierecka, A., and M. M. Kobierecki. 2021. Coronavirus diplomacy: chinese medical assistance and its diplomatic implications. International Politics 58 (6): 937–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kuik, C. C. 2008. The essence of hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s response to a rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 30 (2): 159–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kuik, C. C. 2020. “Hedging in post-pandemic Asia: what, how, and why?”, The ASAN Forum. https://theasanforum.org/hedging-in-post-pandemic-asia-what-how-and-why.

  49. Kuik, C. C. 2021. Getting hedging right: a small-state perspective. China International Strategy Review 3 (2): 300–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kupferschmidt, K., and J. Cohen. 2020. Can China’s COVID-19 strategy work elsewhere? Science 367 (6482): 1061–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lai, B. H., and N. F. Martini. 2021. Nationalism and its effects on attitudes about trade, cooperation, and immigration. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 14 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lee, H. L. 2020. The endangered asian century: America, China, and the perils of confrontation. Foreign Affairs 99 (4): 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lee, S., S. Yuen, N. H. K. Or, E. W. Cheng, and R. P. H. Yue. 2022. Pandemic vulnerability, policy feedback and support for immigration: evidence from Asia. British Journal of Social Psychology, February, 1–20.

  54. Li, C., and R. McElveen. 2020. “Mask diplomacy: How coronavirus upended generations of China-Japan antagonism”, Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/03/09/mask-diplomacy-how-coronavirus-upended-generations-of-china-japan-antagonism/.

  55. Lin, F., X. Chen, and E. W. Cheng. 2022. Contextualized impacts of an infodemic on vaccine hesitancy: the moderating role of socioeconomic and cultural factors. Information Processing and Management 59 (5): 103013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Lin, H. Y. 2021. COVID-19 and american attitudes toward US-China disputes. Journal of Chinese Political Science 26 (1): 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Linley, M., J. Reilly, and B. E. Goldsmith. 2012. Who’s afraid of the Dragon? Asian Mass Publics’ perceptions of China’s influence. Japanese Journal of Political Science 13 (4): 501–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Liu, K. 2022. The Global Times and the China threat narrative: an empirical analysis. Journal of Chinese Political Science 27 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Mandhana, N. 2022. “How China’s zero-covid policies are disrupting cross-border trade”, The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-zero-covid-policies-cause-a-traffic-jam-in-vietnam-as-farmers-suffer-11642503601.

  60. Mansfield, E., and D. Mutz. 2009. Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and out-group anxiety. International Organization 63 (3): 425–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mayda, A. M., and D. Rodrik. 2005. Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others? European Economic Review 49 (6): 1393–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. McDonagh, N. 2021. System rivalry during pandemic times: a political economy view of great power vaccine diplomacy. Available at SSRN 3873029.

  63. Meijer, H., and L. Simón. 2021. Covert balancing: great powers, secondary states and US balancing strategies against China. International Affairs 97 (2): 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Noesselt, N. 2022. Strategy adjustments of the United States and the European Union vis-à-vis China: democratic global power identities and fluid polygonal relations. Journal of Chinese Political Science 27 (3): 519–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Normile, D. 2020. “‘Suppress and lift’: Hong Kong and Singapore say they have a coronavirus strategy that works”, Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/suppress-and-lift-hong-kong-and-singapore-say-they-have-coronavirus-strategy-works.

  66. Normile, D. 2021. ‘Zero COVID’ is getting harder—but China is sticking with it. Science 374 (6570): 924–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Norrlöf, C. 2020. Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony. International Affairs 96 (5): 1281–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Nye, J. S. 2008. Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 94–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Owen, J. M. 2021. Two emerging international orders? China and the United States. International Affairs 97 (5): 1415–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Ozili, P. K., and T. Arun. 2023. Spillover of COVID-19: impact on the Global Economy. Available at SSRN 3562570.

  71. Papageorgiou, M., and D. D. S. N. de Melo. 2022. China as a responsible power amid the COVID-19 crisis: perceptions of partners and adversaries on twitter. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 15 (2): 159–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Pew Research Center. 2021. “Spring 2021 survey data”. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/dataset/spring-2021-survey-data/.

  73. Pew Research Center. 2022a. “U.S. receives more positive ratings than China in most countries”. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/06/29/across-19-countries-more-people-see-the-u-s-than-china-favorably-but-more-see-chinas-influence-growing/ft_2022-06-29_chinaus_01/.

  74. Pew Research Center. 2022. “Large majorities continue to hold unfavorable view of China”. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2022/06/29/negative-views-of-china-tied-to-critical-views-of-its-policies-on-human-rights/pg_2022-06-29_views-of-china_00-02/.

  75. Reich, S., and P. Dombrowski. 2020. The consequence of COVID-19: how the United States moved from security provider to security consumer. International Affairs 96 (5): 1253–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ross, R. S. 2006. Balance of power politics and the rise of China: accommodation and balancing in East Asia. Security Studies 15 (3): 355–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Rowse, M. 2021. “Unlike Singapore, Hong Kong might be stuck with ‘zero Covid’ even if it wants to open up”, South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3152489/unlike-singapore-hong-kong-might-be-stuck-zero-covid-even-if-it?module=perpetual_scroll_0andpgtype=articleandcampaign=3152489.

  78. Saltzman, I. Z. 2023. Diversionary words: Trump, China and the COVID-19 pandemic. Chinese Political Science Review 1–25.

  79. Silver, L., K. Devlin, and C. Huang. 2020. “Negative views of both U.S. and China abound across advanced economies amid COVID-19”, Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/10/06/negative-views-of-both-us-and-china-amid-covid-19/.

  80. Steinbock, D. 2018. US-China trade war and its global impacts. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 4 (04): 515–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Stevens, H., and S. Tan. 2020. “These quotes show how Trump’s response to the coronavirus has changed over time”, The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/politics/trump-coronavirus-statements/.

  82. Stokes, D., and M. Williamson. 2021. The United States, China and the WTO after Coronavirus. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 14 (1): 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. The Economic Times. 2021. “President Joe Biden orders US to rejoin WHO, UN chief welcomes re-engagement”. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/president-joe-biden-orders-us-to-rejoin-who-un-chief-welcomes-re-engagement/articleshow/80380853.cms?from=mdr.

  84. The Standard. 2022. “HK will engage with mainland to understand requirements to start quarantine-free travel”. https://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news/section/4/190000/HK-will-engage-with-mainland-to-understand-requirements-to-start-quarantine-free-travel.

  85. Trump, D. J. 2020. “Proclamation on declaring a national emergency concerning the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak”, Washington DC: The White House. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-declaring-national-emergency-concerning-novel-coronavirus-disease-covid-19-outbreak/.

  86. Tung, N. C. 2022. US-China COVID-19 vaccine diplomacy competition in Vietnam: where vaccines go, influence may follow. Australian Journal of International Affairs 1–19.

  87. Van Fleet, J. D. 2022. “Shanghai lockdown diary”, The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2022/04/shanghai-lockdown-diary/.

  88. Wang, O. 2021. “China’s zero-covid strategy risks isolating it from trade partners as US tensions rise, expert says”, South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3160140/chinas-zero-covid-strategy-risks-isolating-it-trade-partners.

  89. Wang, X., L. Shi, Y. Zhang, H. Chen, and G. Sun. 2021. Policy disparities in fighting COVID-19 among Japan, Italy, Singapore and China. International Journal for Equity in Health 20 (1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Wang, Z., and Z. Sun. 2021. From globalization to regionalization: the United States, China, and the post-covid-19 world economic order. Journal of Chinese Political Science 26 (1): 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Welsh, B., and A. Chang. 2015. Choosing China: public perceptions of ‘China as a model’. Journal of Contemporary China 24 (93): 442–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Wike, R., J. Poushter, L. Silver, J. Fetterolf, and M. Mordecai. 2021. “America’s image abroad rebounds with transition from Trump to Biden”. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/06/10/americas-image-abroad-rebounds-with-transition-from-trump-to-biden/.

  93. Wikipedia. 2022a. “COVID-19 vaccination in South Korea”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_vaccination_in_South_Korea.

  94. Wikipedia. 2022b. “COVID-19 vaccination in Japan”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_vaccination_in_Japan.

  95. Wu, N. 2022. Misattributed blame? Attitudes toward globalization in the age of automation. Political Science Research and Methods 10 (3): 470–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Xia, M. 2023. Sino-US competition: is liberal democracy an asset or liability? Journal of Chinese Political Science 28 (2): 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Yang, X. 2020. “How a message of encouragement from Japan made Chinese question their own appreciation to Mandarin”, CGTN. https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-02-15/Japanese-donations-spark-debate-about-aesthetics-of-Chinese-language-O5ZRyoR9rW/index.html.

  98. YouGov-Cambridge Globalism Project. 2019. “Globalism all markets”. https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/wyhdmyczxk/Globalism2019_immigration_softpower_general.PDF.

  99. Zaini, K., and T. H. Hoang. 2021. Understanding the selective hesitancy towards chinese vaccines in Southeast Asia. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.

  100. Zhao, S. 2021. Rhetoric and reality of China’s global leadership in the context of COVID-19: implications for the US-led world order and liberal globalization. Journal of Contemporary China 30 (128): 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Zhao, S. 2022. The US–China rivalry in the emerging bipolar world: hostility, alignment, and power balance. Journal of Contemporary China 31 (134): 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Zhu, Q., and M. M. Skoric. 2022. Political implications of disconnection on social media: a study of politically motivated unfriending. New Media & Society 24 (12): 2659–2679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This work was supported by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [grant no. CityU 11609219]. The funders had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; the writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Media and Communication, Run Run Shaw Creative Media Center, City University of Hong Kong, 18th Tat Hong Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong

    Fen Lin & Xiang Meng

Authors
  1. Fen Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiang Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Meng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, F., Meng, X. Stuck Between the Great Powers: Secondary Countries’ Responses to Soft Power Competition Between the US and China During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J OF CHIN POLIT SCI (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-023-09862-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-023-09862-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation